Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft...ckDraft-100622

    Mock Draft, Version 6.0: Picks 1-30
    EmailPrintComments
    By Chad Ford
    ESPN.com
    Archive


    AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
    There's no question who's going No. 1. But after John Wall ... that's when things will get interesting.
    With the 2010 NBA draft two days away, it's time to take our first full look at both rounds of the draft. As teams continue to narrow their draft lists down, there are still plenty of things up in the air with tons of trade talk and last-minute workouts taking place.

    Here's our best stab, after talking to numerous NBA team sources, at how the draft will play out on June 24.


    Mock Draft 6.0
    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Washington


    John Wall

    Position: PG
    Height: 6-foot-4
    Weight: 196 pounds
    Age: 19
    School: Kentucky
    (Wall's previous position: No. 1 to Washington)

    Analysis: Wall as the No. 1 pick is still the only sure thing in the draft. He had his workout in Washington D.C. last week, and from all indications it went well.

    The task for the Wizards now turns to filling in the spaces around him -- getting a healthy and focused Gilbert Arenas, looking for bargains or perhaps Rudy Gay in free agency, and figuring out how to turn the Wizards into a powerhouse franchise. Adding Wall is a big, big step in the right direction, but only one of many the Wizards are going to have to take.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Philadelphia


    Evan Turner

    Position: SG
    Height: 6-7
    Weight: 214
    Age: 21
    School: Ohio State
    (Turner's previous position: No. 2 to Philadelphia)

    Analysis: We're keeping Turner at No. 2 even though we continue to hear from some sources that the team is after a big.

    Why? Because after the Sixers worked out Turner last week, and even after they swapped Samuel Dalembert for Andres Nocioni and Spencer Hawes, a well-placed source in Philly continues to insist that Turner is their guy.

    Still, I continue to hear that head coach Doug Collins prefers the team draft a big. He's been very high on Derrick Favors and, according to sources, was wowed by Cousins after he and Favors worked out in Philly. If Collins wants to win now, Cousins could be the catalyst.

    So what does it come down to in Philly? I think we'll find out Thursday who makes the decisions in Philly. If it's Turner, Ed Stefanski is the man in charge. If it's Favors or Cousins, Collins may be running the ship.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    New Jersey


    Derrick Favors

    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 245
    Age: 18
    School: Georgia Tech
    (Favors' previous position: No. 3 to New Jersey)

    Analysis: The latest news out of NJ is that there is a three-way scrum between Cousins, Favors and Wes Johnson. Cousins and Favors worked out against each other on Monday in New Jersey. And the team is also high on Johnson because of its need at the wing and his ability to step in and play from day one.

    Cousins, who has been awesome in recent workouts in Sacramento and Philly, was good again in Jersey, not only showing his dominant offensive moves in the paint, but shooting the lights out, too. Favors showed off his athleticism and upside, but in terms of NBA readiness, Cousins has the edge.

    That could make the Nets' decision pretty tough. Not only does new owner Mikhail Prokhorov want to win now, so does new head coach Avery Johnson. That could push Cousins or small forward Wes Johnson into the foreground.

    However, there are issues with Cousins if they take him at No. 3. The Nets are also targeting a number of veteran big men, including Chris Bosh, Amare Stoudemire and Carlos Boozer this summer. With Brook Lopez already in the middle, would the Nets have minutes for Cousins?



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Minnesota


    Wesley Johnson

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-8
    Weight: 206
    Age: 22
    School: Syracuse
    (Johnson's previous position: No. 4 to Minnesota)

    Analysis: The Wolves are one of the most active teams in the league right now. They have explored moving up in the draft to get Turner. They've also looked at packaging the 16th and 23rd picks in an effort to move up and get a second top-10 pick.

    If they keep the No. 4 pick, it continues to look like their target is Johnson, who we've had going to Minnesota in our mock draft since May. He was in Minnesota last week and wowed everyone in the organization. Not only is he a great basketball player, but he's a great young man and the type of locker-room guy that a young team wants to build with.

    However, it appears that all the uncertainty at the top of the draft could be swaying Minnesota. Over the past 24 hours the team has been seriously discussing taking Cousins, who has refused to work out for Minnesota. The team has had some interest in potential trades for Al Jefferson or Kevin Love and has been watching a lot of tape on Cousins to be sure they aren't missing the boat. While he isn't a great fit and there are concerns about his attitude, he's such a talent that the Wolves might be reluctant to pass.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Sacramento


    DeMarcus Cousins

    Position: C
    Height: 6-11
    Weight: 292
    Age: 19
    School: Kentucky
    (Cousins' previous position: No. 5 to Sacramento)

    Analysis: Last week, we put Cousins here after a terrific workout in Sacramento over Greg Monroe. What's happened since then? Well, Monroe returned to Sacramento for a second workout, and sources say he wowed them again. In addition, the Kings swapped Nocioni and Hawes for Dalembert, giving them a much-needed shot-blocker and rebounder in the middle.

    So where does that leave Sacramento? I hear Cousins might have a slight lead over Monroe, but it's very close. However, more and more, a third option is emerging: Trading the pick. GM Geoff Petrie has zero history of trading down in the draft, but the Kings are actively exploring their options with so many teams pining to get their hands on Cousins -- everyone from Detroit to Boston has been looking at moving up.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Golden State


    Greg Monroe

    Position: PF
    Height: 6-11
    Weight: 247
    Age: 19
    School: Georgetown
    (Monroe's previous position: No. 6 to Golden State)

    Analysis: The Warriors are among the most difficult teams in the draft to predict right now. Over the course of the past week, I've heard a number of players were atop their list, including Cousins, Monroe, Al-Farouq Aminu, Xavier Henry, Ekpe Udoh, Patrick Patterson ... I could go on.

    To me, this is where the gamesmanship really starts. The Warriors could go in almost any direction. The team itself is a bit of a mess. We're not sure who's going to own the team in a month, the coaching situation is up in the air, players are on the trading block and agents who have had their players work out for Golden State don't particularly want their guys to end up there.

    For weeks, the word I've been getting is that Cousins is the guy. If he's off the board, the next closest consensus among sources (and I use the word "consensus" loosely) is Monroe. He reportedly had a bad workout in Golden State, but it might not matter. The Warriors need more size, and Monroe's high basketball IQ and skill level should be a nice fit in Golden State.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Detroit


    Ed Davis

    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 227
    Age: 20
    School: North Carolina
    (Davis' previous position: No. 10 to Indiana)

    Analysis: Pistons president Joe Dumars has said he wants his team to regain the grit and toughness of past Pistons teams. But picking at No. 7 makes that a bit of a challenge. Detroit is really high on both Cousins and Favors, but most likely it will have to move up in the draft to get one of them.

    Monroe is also high on its board, but in our latest scenario, he's gone too. Regardless, the team needs a big man.

    For weeks I've had Aminu going to Detroit, but after Aminu canceled his workouts in Detroit, the Pistons have begun looking in other directions.

    At this point it looks like it's down to Davis, Udoh or Cole Aldrich. Aldrich is the most NBA-ready center and Udoh is the best shot-blocker of the group. But of the players left on the board, Davis has the most upside. He may be raw, but he's an athletic 6-foot-10 big man with bounce and the ability to crash the boards. The Pistons need to swing for the fences.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    L.A. Clippers


    Al-Farouq Aminu

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-9
    Weight: 215
    Age: 19
    School: Wake Forest
    (Aminu's previous position: No. 7 to Detroit)

    Analysis: The Clippers could go in a lot of different directions with this pick, and I keep getting mixed signals.

    The latest word has them narrowing the field down to Aminu, Davis, Udoh, Gordon Hayward and Luke Babbitt.

    Of those five names, Aminu would be the winner if he was still there at No. 8. The Clippers have a big hole at the 3 and feel he's a top-five talent in the draft. If he's gone, the Clippers' decision is whether to go big or wing. If they go big, I think Davis has the slight edge. If they go with a wing (their biggest need at the moment), it appears that Hayward and Babbitt are neck-and-neck. So which direction will they go?

    In that scenario, I think Hayward wins out for two reasons. One, he's got more upside, and two, he's a better defender right now.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Utah


    Luke Babbitt

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-9
    Weight: 214
    Age: 20
    School: Nevada
    (Babbitt's previous position: No. 9 to Utah)

    Analysis: The Jazz are crossing their fingers that Monroe slips to them. If he doesn't, as we've projected here, they have a tough choice. Davis has been moving strongly up their board, but in this mock he's going at No. 7 to Detroit.

    The Jazz could still address their need for a big with Udoh, or they can address a big need at the wing. Babbitt, Henry and Hayward are all options the team would be comfortable with.

    Which way are they leaning? GM Kevin O'Connor is keeping his cards close to the vest. I think Babbitt has a slight lead over Henry, Hayward and Udoh at the moment. But this one could come down to draft night.

    I'll say this: The Jazz have been consistently high on Babbitt all year. They have had success with sweet-shooting small forwards like him, and he can come in and contribute from day one. All that should give him the edge.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Indiana


    Ekpe Udoh

    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 237
    Age: 22
    School: Baylor
    (Udoh's previous position: No. 14 to Houston)

    Analysis: The Pacers continue to talk to a number of teams about moving up, down or all the way out of the draft. It's no secret the team needs a point guard, and it's no secret that at No. 10, there probably isn't a point guard worth taking.

    So the team now has a tough choice if Davis and Monroe are both off the board: Udoh or Paul George? Udoh gives them something they have lacked for years: a legitimate shot-blocker. George has that silky-smooth shooting touch and upside that Brandon Rush hasn't really displayed in Indiana. Of the two, I think Udoh's leading the charge, but as the Pacers continue to talk trade, someone else could be making this pick.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    New Orleans



    Gordon Hayward

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-8
    Weight: 211
    Age: 20
    School: Butler
    (Hayward's previous position: No. 8 to L.A. Clippers)

    Analysis: The Hornets have a new head coach, and job No. 1 is filling a pretty large hole in their frontcourt. The Hornets have Emeka Okafor and David West and not much else.

    However, the choices of Aldrich and Patterson haven't blown the team away. Both players do not have the sexy upside of other players in the draft.

    That could lead the Hornets to the wing, where they eventually have to replace Peja Stojakovic. Hayward has the raw abilities to be a terrific 3 someday. While he struggled with his shot last season, teams think he will adapt well at the next level and has a chance to be a star.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Memphis


    Paul George

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-9
    Weight: 214
    Age: 20
    School: Fresno State
    (George's previous position: No. 16 to Minnesota)

    Analysis: It's tough to know which way the Grizzlies are leaning. Over the course of the past few weeks, the three names that have gotten the most buzz have been George, Babbitt and Patterson.

    After making a huge reach for Hasheem Thabeet at No. 2 last season, you'd think the Grizzlies would go conservative and take either Babbitt or Patterson. While neither player has enormous upside, both are NBA-ready and can provide instant offense.

    However, as the process moves on, it appears that George is slowly moving to the front of the pack. How do we know? Because George is in for a second workout in Memphis on Tuesday -- this time in front of owner Michael Heisley. If you read the Memphis Commercial Appeal on Sunday, it's Heisley who makes the final decision in Memphis, not GM Chris Wallace. While George is clearly the biggest risk of the group, he's also the player with the most upside. If he develops his many talents, he could be a superstar.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Toronto


    Patrick Patterson

    Position: PF
    Height: 6-8
    Weight: 245
    Age: 21
    School: Kentucky
    (Patterson's previous position: No. 12 to Memphis)

    Analysis: The Raptors could go in a number of different directions here. With Bosh likely out the door, Hedo Turkoglu pining for a trade and the team shopping Jose Calderon, you can expect the team to look radically different next season.

    Finding a center is atop GM Bryan Colangelo's list. If Bosh leaves, he'd like to move Andrea Bargnani to the 4. But of the top big men left on the board -- Orton, Whiteside and Solomon Alabi -- none of them is close to being ready.

    The Raptors have been looking closely at Avery Bradley, but their inability to find a trade for either Calderon or Jarrett Jack makes taking Bradley a risk. So look for them to focus on the best big man left on the board: Patterson. He may not be a flashy player or filled with upside, but he is tough, plays hard and will be solid at the next level. At pick No. 13, that's all you can ask for. Think of him as this year's Tyler Hansbrough.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Houston


    Cole Aldrich

    Position: C
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 236
    Age: 21
    School: Kansas
    (Aldrich's previous position: No. 11 to New Orleans)

    Analysis: The Rockets have been another team trying to move up a few spots in the draft. At No. 14, it looks like virtually every player they covet will be off the board. If they can't move up, that should put them in the mode of taking the best player available.

    That would be Aldrich, who is a big with the ability to block shots and rebound. He also has a decent face-the-basket game. With Yao Ming's long-term status really up in the air, Aldrich gives them a backup big that should be able to step in and play right away.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Milwaukee
    (via Chicago)


    Xavier Henry

    Position: SG
    Height: 6-7
    Weight: 210
    Age: 19
    School: Kansas
    (Henry's previous position: No. 15 to Milwaukee)

    Analysis: The Bucks have a big need at the wing position with Michael Redd coming back from injury and John Salmons looking to opt out of his contract. Of the players left on the board, Henry looks to be, by far, the best value. He can play either the 2 or 3, and can shoot the lights out.

    Speaking of upside, we probably should add one more name to the list. It's a long shot, but Cincinnati's Lance Stephenson has impressed in workouts, and the Bucks have had their eye on him for a while. It seems like he's a bit of a reach at 15, but John Hammond rolled the dice on a former high school phenom with a bad rep last year and it paid off. Will he do it again this year?


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Minnesota
    (via Charlotte)


    James Anderson

    Position: SG
    Height: 6-6
    Weight: 210
    Age: 21
    School: Oklahoma State
    (Anderson's previous position: No. 17 to Chicago)

    Analysis: The Wolves have been actively trying to package Nos. 16 and 23 to move up a few spots in the draft to get their hands on George. But if George is gone, there aren't a lot of prospects they're in love with here.

    I think the Wolves would be more aggressive in trying to trade at this point. If they keep the pick, they might go ahead and take Anderson, who doesn't have the upside of some of the other wing guys like George or Hayward, but was one of the best scorers in college basketball last year. He would give the Wolves more shooting on the perimeter.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Chicago
    (via Milwaukee)


    Avery Bradley

    Position: SG
    Height: 6-3
    Weight: 180
    Age: 19
    School: Texas
    (Bradley's previous position: No. 13 to Toronto)

    Analysis: I've had Anderson here for every mock draft; the Bulls need a 2-guard who can shoot the basketball, and Anderson was the most NBA-ready prospect left on the board. But in this mock, Anderson's already off the board. While I still think Anderson is in the mix here -- along with Dominique Jones and Jordan Crawford -- a name I'm hearing more and more at 17 is Bradley.

    With Kirk Hinrich on the trading block, Bradley's ability to swing between the 1 and the 2 is important to a team like the Bulls, who envision him more in a Monta Ellis-type role.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Miami


    Eric Bledsoe

    Position: PG
    Height: 6-2
    Weight: 192
    Age: 20
    School: Kentucky
    (Bledsoe's previous position: No. 18 to Miami)

    Analysis: Bledsoe has been in this spot since our first mock draft. While teams as high as Indiana (10), Toronto (13) and Houston (14) are in the mix for him, Miami looks like the perfect resting spot for Bledsoe. He's a tough, Pat Riley-type of player and could be a long-term upgrade from the Mario Chalmers-Carlos Arroyo duo at point guard.

    Bledsoe was one of the players who really helped himself at the draft combine. Playing outside of Wall's shadow, he often looked like the best guard on the floor. Physically, he's ready for the NBA right now. But he still needs more experience running the point. In the long term, Bledsoe could pay off.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Boston


    Damion James

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-8
    Weight: 227
    Age: 22
    School: Texas
    (James' previous position: No. 20 to San Antonio)

    Analysis: I've had Alabi going to Boston for weeks. But after finding out Monday that the team hasn't been able to get him in for a workout, I'm hedging.

    I still believe the Celtics like Alabi a lot, however, the name I'm hearing more and more out of Boston is James. He makes a lot of sense for the Celtics. He's a tough, physical player who can play both the 3 and the 4 for them. He's one of the few guys left in the draft that can come in and play on a veteran team like the Celtics right away.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    San Antonio


    Craig Brackins

    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 229
    Age: 22
    School: Iowa State
    (Brackins' previous position: No. 26 to Oklahoma City)

    Analysis: The Spurs need size, and this pick will likely come down to either Brackins or Alabi. While Alabi has the size and upside, with Tiago Splitter possibly coming to San Antonio this fall, the Spurs may be set at the 5.

    Brackins' ability to spread the floor and play inside and outside is coveted in San Antonio. A number of GMs have told me he could end up being the sleeper of the draft.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Oklahoma City


    Solomon Alabi

    Position: C
    Height: 7-1
    Weight: 237
    Age: 22
    School: Florida State
    (Alabi's previous position: No. 19 to Boston)

    Analysis: The Thunder will have a tough call to make here between Alabi, Daniel Orton and Kevin Seraphin. The Thunder have been high on Orton all year, but a so-so workout in OKC, along with concerns about his knees, have given them and everyone else in the league pause.

    The Thunder, meanwhile, have been high on Alabi for a while. He may seem like a bit of a reach to some, but he appears to be one of the hotter names in the draft at the moment. The Raptors, Celtics, Spurs, Thunder, Heat and Blazers are all showing interest. Those are all teams with historically good draft track records, so watch carefully.

    Alabi measured as one of the tallest and longest players in the draft, and he showed a nice skill game and a terrific motor in the drills. Some scouts are comparing him to Dikembe Mutombo. I don't think Alabi has the same sort of rebounding and shot-blocking ability, but he does have a similar demeanor and presence on the court.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Portland


    Kevin Seraphin

    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 258
    Age: 20
    Country: France
    (Seraphin's previous position: No. 23 to Minnesota)

    Analysis: Kevin Pritchard hit a home run with the 25th pick in 2008 when he drafted French swingman Nicolas Batum. How good is Batum? The Blazers rejected the Wolves' offer of the No. 4 pick for Batum a couple of week ago.

    Now they have their eyes set on Seraphin, a French big man with great athleticism and excellent defensive instincts. The Blazers would also love Alabi, but in this case he isn't on the board. Hassan Whiteside and Orton are also possibilities here.




    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Minnesota
    (via Utah)


    Larry Sanders

    Position: PF
    Height: 6-11
    Weight: 222
    Age: 21
    School: Va. Commonwealth
    (Sanders' previous position: No. 28 to Memphis)

    Analysis: With the Wolves going with wings with their first two picks, look for them to take a swing at a player with huge upside at No. 23. Sanders has a freakishly long wingspan and can really run the floor. He also gives the Wolves something that they've been in short supply of -- shot-blocking.

    Whiteside and Orton are both possibilities here as well. But it sounds as if the Wolves are a little turned off by the immaturity of both players and might not need a center anyway -- they will pursue Darko Milicic in free agency and sign former second-round pick Nikola Pekovic this summer.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Atlanta


    Hassan Whiteside

    Position: C
    Height: 7-0
    Weight: 227
    Age: 20
    School: Marshall
    (Whiteside's previous position: No. 22 to Portland)

    Analysis: The Hawks could go in a lot of directions here. They might end up having to replace Joe Johnson in free agency. But at this point in the draft, Whiteside's upside might be too much to pass on.

    Whiteside is the best shot-blocker in the draft and, when he's playing well, reminds some of a young Marcus Camby. He's immature and needs a lot of work, but at No. 24, there isn't a player left on the board with more upside.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Memphis
    (via Denver)


    Jordan Crawford

    Position: SG
    Height: 6-4
    Weight: 198
    Age: 21
    School: Xavier
    (Crawford's previous position: 27)

    Analysis: Crawford's stock has been slowly rising, and now he's in the mix with the Bulls at 17, the Celtics at 19, the Spurs at 20, the Blazers at 22 and the Wolves at 23. But it looks like he won't slide past the Grizzlies here. The addition of Crawford and George would give the Grizzlies a ton of punch in their backcourt.

    I'm not sure there are enough basketballs in Memphis for all these guys, but you have to like the talent they're acquiring.



    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Oklahoma City
    (via Phoenix)


    Daniel Orton

    Position: C
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 269
    Age: 19
    School: Kentucky
    (Orton's previous position: No. 21 to Oklahoma City)

    Analysis: Orton is a bit of an enigma. His 3 ppg and 3 rpg as a freshman at Kentucky certainly won't wow you. But he has the raw tools to be a successful big man in the pros.

    The Thunder were among the teams that were on him early, and they might just get lucky and get him here. While Orton is in the discussion starting at the 10th pick, concerns about his knees and his relative lack of playing time over the course of the past two seasons are weighing on teams.

    He could easily end up in the lottery (he's working out for the Pacers on Tuesday), but I doubt he slips further than this.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    New Jersey
    (via Dallas)


    Dominique Jones

    Position: SG
    Height: 6-5
    Weight: 216
    Age: 21
    School: South Florida
    (Jones' previous position: 25)

    Analysis: Jones was one of the best scorers in college basketball last year. He's tough, physical and relentless getting to the basket. While he's not quite the shooter teams want, he's been a guy who has consistently drawn praise in workouts. I think his range starts at No. 17 with the Bulls, and I don't think he slips past here to the Nets.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Memphis
    (via L.A. Lakers)


    Devin Ebanks

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-8
    Weight: 208
    Age: 20
    School: West Virginia
    (Ebanks' previous position: No. 34 to Golden State)

    Analysis: The Grizzlies likely won't end up with three first-rounders. They are talking to several teams about trading one or both of their picks in the 20s. However, if they stay here, look for them to focus in on a wing defender to go with the two scorers they drafted ahead of them. Ebanks may not be a special offensive player, but he can guard three positions on the floor.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Orlando


    Darington Hobson

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-7
    Weight: 204
    Age: 22
    School: New Mexico
    (Hobson's previous position: No. 33 to Sacramento)

    Analysis: The Magic haven't worked out many players. Each year they pick a small handful of prospects they like and then grab from there. Of the group they've had in, Crawford and Ebanks are off the board. Of the group left, Hobson makes a lot of sense. His playmaking ability and versatility remind some scouts of Turkoglu. The Magic missed that this season.


    PICK TEAM PLAYER VITALS


    Washington
    (via Cleveland)


    Quincy Pondexter

    Position: SF
    Height: 6-7
    Weight: 220
    Age: 22
    School: Washington
    (Pondexter's previous position: No. 30 to Washington)

    Analysis: Pondexter is coming off a great senior season and is one of the best athletes in the draft. With the Wizards trying to rebuild with young players who can get up and down the floor, he seems like a good bet here.

  • #2
    Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

    My guess is that Udoh will be drafted by the Pacers, there will be a huge cheer from the PD contingent at the Draft Party......15 minutes later, we'll find out we traded down for Orton and Maynor...and there will be a collective "WTF" reaction from the crowd.
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

      Watch us trade Ford for Hinrich. Or Ford/Rush for Hinrich/James Johnson while drafting George or Hayward to be the 2 of the future.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

        Originally posted by CableKC View Post
        15 minutes later, we'll find out we traded down for Orton and Maynor...and there will be a collective "WTF" reaction from the crowd.
        I like Maynor, but Orton will draw a big groan from me. I don't care how great your teammates are, if you can't get on the court, stay on the court, and play well enough to get over 3 points and 3 rebounds a game in college, nobody in their right mind out to be picking you in the first round of the NBA draft.
        The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

          Originally posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
          I like Maynor, but Orton will draw a big groan from me. I don't care how great your teammates are, if you can't get on the court, stay on the court, and play well enough to get over 3 points and 3 rebounds a game in college, nobody in their right mind out to be picking you in the first round of the NBA draft.
          AGREE!!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

            I continue to believe that Udoh is not BPA @ 10, given how I would imagine the draft going at this point:

            Wall
            Turner
            Johnson
            Favors (traded)
            Cousins
            Monroe
            Davis
            Aminu
            Babbitt

            I continue to believe that Xavier Henry is the guy you have to take at this point. I have a bad feeling though, that we'll grab Udoh and watch Henry compete in the ROY race.

            This guy is an absolute baller. Could play the 2 and 3, would intermix with Rush and Granger, and is hungry about the game of basketball. Has a good head on his shoulders.

            He's going to be a stud player, IMO... and if he doesn't get drafted by us, he'll go from 11-14. Mark my words.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

              Originally posted by docpaul View Post
              I continue to believe that Udoh is not BPA @ 10, given how I would imagine the draft going at this point:

              Wall
              Turner
              Johnson
              Favors (traded)
              Cousins
              Monroe
              Davis
              Aminu
              Babbitt

              I continue to believe that Xavier Henry is the guy you have to take at this point. I have a bad feeling though, that we'll grab Udoh and watch Henry compete in the ROY race.

              This guy is an absolute baller. Could play the 2 and 3, would intermix with Rush and Granger, and is hungry about the game of basketball. Has a good head on his shoulders.

              He's going to be a stud player, IMO... and if he doesn't get drafted by us, he'll go from 11-14. Mark my words.
              I don't disagree with you. I think Udoh will be a good player, not sure how high his ceiling will be, though. Henry is somewhat comparable to Rush I think, but the differences, imo, between the two are that Rush is the better defender, but on the offensive end, I don't think Henry will be nearly as shy about shooting the ball as Brandon is.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

                Originally posted by docpaul View Post
                I continue to believe that Udoh is not BPA @ 10, given how I would imagine the draft going at this point:

                Wall
                Turner
                Johnson
                Favors (traded)
                Cousins
                Monroe
                Davis
                Aminu
                Babbitt

                I continue to believe that Xavier Henry is the guy you have to take at this point. I have a bad feeling though, that we'll grab Udoh and watch Henry compete in the ROY race.

                This guy is an absolute baller. Could play the 2 and 3, would intermix with Rush and Granger, and is hungry about the game of basketball. Has a good head on his shoulders.

                He's going to be a stud player, IMO... and if he doesn't get drafted by us, he'll go from 11-14. Mark my words.
                You could be on to something here, he is certainly worth a look. I liked his interview at the workout, struck me as a very confident player who is not afraid to take the shot and know what he needs to do to get better. The only knock I have heard is that he is not a super athlete. How would you compare him to RUSH?
                Avatar photo credit: Bahram Mark Sobhani - AP

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

                  Originally posted by ESutt7 View Post
                  Watch us trade Ford for Hinrich. Or Ford/Rush for Hinrich/James Johnson while drafting George or Hayward to be the 2 of the future.
                  If we were to take on Hinrich.....he'd be the Starting SG for the near future.
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

                    Originally posted by ChristianDudley View Post
                    I don't disagree with you. I think Udoh will be a good player, not sure how high his ceiling will be, though. Henry is somewhat comparable to Rush I think, but the differences, imo, between the two are that Rush is the better defender, but on the offensive end, I don't think Henry will be nearly as shy about shooting the ball as Brandon is.
                    I see more Joe Johnson in Henry than Rush, to be honest. He has consistently gotten better over time, and is still young.

                    He'd likely vibe very nicely off of Hibbert, Granger, and Hansbrough.

                    For a #10 pick, I think what you get in Henry is a solid starting 2 that's borderline All Star at some point in his career. That's pretty good value, and then opens up the conversations about what you do with Rush at the trade deadline or next offseason.

                    I think Henry likely rubs off very positively on Rush, and then we have the happy circumstance, for a change, of a *real* trade chip that we can leverage long term.

                    What made me a full-on buyer was his Pacers post-interview where he spent most of the time just talking about how much he enjoys playing basketball. It's in his blood.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

                      I think Udoh will get better. I am most interested in his shot blocking and defense, we really need someone, besides Hibbert who can hold it down on the defensive end in the paint. I think on the offensive end he is going to be a get better with his mid-range scoring, and also scoring on the block. Rebounding will be another area I think is going to do well with...
                      Avatar photo credit: Bahram Mark Sobhani - AP

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

                        Originally posted by docpaul View Post
                        I continue to believe that Udoh is not BPA @ 10, given how I would imagine the draft going at this point:

                        Wall
                        Turner
                        Johnson
                        Favors (traded)
                        Cousins
                        Monroe
                        Davis
                        Aminu
                        Babbitt

                        I continue to believe that Xavier Henry is the guy you have to take at this point. I have a bad feeling though, that we'll grab Udoh and watch Henry compete in the ROY race.

                        This guy is an absolute baller. Could play the 2 and 3, would intermix with Rush and Granger, and is hungry about the game of basketball. Has a good head on his shoulders.

                        He's going to be a stud player, IMO... and if he doesn't get drafted by us, he'll go from 11-14. Mark my words.
                        I agree. My dark horse pick at #10 would be Xavier Henry or Paul George ( if he can truly play as a SG ).

                        My first preference is still Udoh...but if we were to pass on him and had the choice between Xavier or Hayward, I'd go with Xavier. I don't get the sense that Hayward or Xavier is that much better then the other that there is a noticeable difference ( in terms of draft stock ) where it would be a "no-brainer" to choose one over other. It's more a matter of fit at the SG spot. Xavier Henry would be a better fit alongside Granger as a SG.
                        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

                          Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                          I agree. My dark horse pick at #10 would be Xavier Henry or Paul George ( if he can truly play as a SG ).

                          My first preference is still Udoh...but if we were to pass on him and had the choice between Xavier or Hayward, I'd go with Xavier. I don't get the sense that Hayward or Xavier is that much better then the other that there is a noticeable difference ( in terms of draft stock ) where it would be a "no-brainer" to choose one over other. It's more a matter of fit at the SG spot. Xavier Henry would be a better fit alongside Granger as a SG.
                          I agree, if your picking between Xavier and Hayward, you go with Henry.
                          Avatar photo credit: Bahram Mark Sobhani - AP

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

                            Originally posted by docpaul View Post
                            I see more Joe Johnson in Henry than Rush, to be honest. He has consistently gotten better over time, and is still young.

                            He'd likely vibe very nicely off of Hibbert, Granger, and Hansbrough.

                            For a #10 pick, I think what you get in Henry is a solid starting 2 that's borderline All Star at some point in his career. That's pretty good value, and then opens up the conversations about what you do with Rush at the trade deadline or next offseason.

                            I think Henry likely rubs off very positively on Rush, and then we have the happy circumstance, for a change, of a *real* trade chip that we can leverage long term.

                            What made me a full-on buyer was his Pacers post-interview where he spent most of the time just talking about how much he enjoys playing basketball. It's in his blood.
                            I also like Henry and if Udoh and Davis are both off the board at 10 than I think the Pacers will be forced to make the pick for themselves and not for a trade partner.

                            At that point their options would seem to be Paul George, who they have repotedly shown interest in, Henry, Patterson , Bledsoe or Bradley. I would like them to consider James Anderson as well who dominated Henry last season.

                            But you are right that SG should almost be as big a priority as PG since we are awful at both spots. Even if you believe that Dunleavy has a big bounce back year, are we really going to give him a big long term extension ? I would hope not.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Chad Ford's Mock 6.0 6/22/10 ROUND ONE

                              Originally posted by odeez View Post
                              I think Udoh will get better. I am most interested in his shot blocking and defense, we really need someone, besides Hibbert who can hold it down on the defensive end in the paint. I think on the offensive end he is going to be a get better with his mid-range scoring, and also scoring on the block. Rebounding will be another area I think is going to do well with...
                              I'm with you on this. I'd love to have a Smits/Davis-esque frontline, a Pacers version of the Two Towers. Hibbert can be a great player and putting a guy like Udoh, who is a 6'10" shot-blocker, next to Hibs would mean we could likely own the paint in the near future. And if we learned anything from this year's Finals, the team that wins the battle in the paint is likely to win the game.

                              --pizza
                              It's a new day for Pacers Basketball.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X