Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Pacers - Bulls

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    4,653

    Default Pacers - Bulls

    TJ Ford & #10 for Kirk Hinrick & #17.

    Indiana dumps a player it doesn't want & gets a starting point for only 500K more, only moving back 7 picks in the process.

    Chicago gets an ending contract in Ford, for Hinrick's 2 year deal plus moving up 7 places on the draft.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Jose Slaughter For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Member jeffg-body's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Anderson, IN
    Posts
    3,591
    Mood

    Default Re: Pacers - Bulls

    I would be ok with this trade.

  4. #3

    Default Re: Pacers - Bulls

    I like the proposal. That would allow the Pacers to pick up Armon Johnson to groom for the next 2 years as the PG of the future, or possibly Udoh would still be available.

  5. #4
    streets ahead
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    DC
    Age
    30
    Posts
    5,783

    Default Re: Pacers - Bulls

    I guess I'll be the lone voice of dissent here. Hinrich gets pumped quite a lot on this board for some reason. But in reality he's grown worse each of the last several seasons. Some of that injury related but the point still remains is that he hasn't exactly earned having us send an expiring contract for him. Then on top of that to drop down seven spots so we can pay Kirk around $17mil for the next two years? I'd have to pass.

  6. #5
    DIET COKE! Trader Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Troll Hunting
    Age
    26
    Posts
    32,386

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers - Bulls

    Agreed with ATC

    “WE NEVER SURRENDER, WE NEVER GIVE UP, WE KEEP ATTACKING”- Frank Vogel
    momentarygodsblog.com https://twitter.com/momentarygods

  7. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7

    Default Re: Pacers - Bulls

    I wouldn't do this if I were the Pacers. How does this really make us any better? Hinrich is a serviceable point guard, but Ford is also "serviceable," and since I don't think we're planning on starting him anyway, why not just keep him for his expiring contact? He might be a nice trade chip to have at the deadline anyway.

    Also, I for one don't want to downgrade seven spots in the draft just to trade one bad point guard for another...that's just not something I like the look of.

  8. #7

    Default Re: Pacers - Bulls

    What about Ford for Hinrich straight up? Pacers are taking on an extra year of Hinrich's deal and the Bulls save money. Plus, we could either trade down or grab a guy like Bledsoe and groom him for the future.

Similar Threads

  1. Good explanation of the Pacers lease situation...
    By Iceman1 in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2010, 10:26 AM
  2. Wages of Wins Pacers Preview
    By OakMoses in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-28-2008, 01:33 PM
  3. 04/20/2005 Game Thread: Pacers vs Bulls
    By BostonConnection in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: 04-20-2005, 11:11 PM
  4. Complete Game 2 Coverage From The Detroit News & Detroit Free Press
    By obnoxiousmodesty in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-24-2004, 11:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •