Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Game Theory and Foul Trouble

  1. #1
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,738

    Default Game Theory and Foul Trouble

    An interesting read for the mathematically inclined.

    http://theoryclass.wordpress.com/201.../foul-trouble/

    Observers of the NBA know that the direct effect of fouling out actually has less impact than the indirect effect of “foul trouble.” That is, if a player has a dangerous number of fouls, the coach will voluntarily bench him for part of the game, to lessen the chance of fouling out. Coaches seem to roughly use the rule of thumb that a player with n fouls should sit until n/6 of the game has passed. Allowing a player to play with 3 fouls in the first half is a particular taboo. On rare occasions when this taboo is broken, the announcers will invariably say something like, “They’re taking a big risk here; you really don’t want him to get his 4th.”
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  2. #2
    Custom User Titleist
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Pacer Purgatory Praying for Paul
    Posts
    3,556
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Game Theory and Foul Trouble

    Thanks for the interesting read overall, Anthem.

    I think, though, that the author fails to take into account what probably led to the player being in foul trouble to start with, whether it be the style of play employed by the opposition either offensively or defensively, mismatches with that player or others on his team that frequently leave the player in a position that has led to his foul trouble to begin with.

    Also, a coach with other knowledge of a particular game may lead the coach to believe that if all things are equal that his team will be better served by the additional aggressiveness the player can play with in latter stages of the game with less likelihood of fatigue leading to a given player fouling out and damaging momentum down the stretch of a game.

    So, while interesting, I would punt on 4th and two and take my chances that my good defensive team can hold off Peyton Manning on the last drive of the game, despite statistics that might be interpretted to mean that I should go for it against a Colts defense that has risen to the occasion throughout the course of the second half of that particular game.

Similar Threads

  1. Good Column by Bill Simmons
    By Will Galen in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-30-2009, 09:36 AM
  2. a challenge for the addition thru subtraction theory
    By stipo in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-16-2004, 06:52 PM
  3. Odd thoughts on game 2.....
    By Peck in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-25-2004, 09:22 PM
  4. Some thoughts....
    By Peck in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 05-16-2004, 01:40 AM
  5. sniff sniff
    By able in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-22-2004, 01:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •