Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Milwaukee

  1. #1
    Member pacergod2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    2,882
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Milwaukee

    Here is another one.

    Charlie Bell 2 yr, 7,951,360
    Michael Redd 1 yr, 18,300,000
    #15 in 2010
    #37 in 2010

    for

    Dahntay Jones 3 yr, 7,100,000
    Troy Murphy 1 yr, 11,968,253
    Mike Dunleavy 1 yr, 10,561,984
    #10 in 2010
    #57 in 2010

    They take on Murphy and Dunleavy/Jones to help shore up their two positions of need. Redd won't be back before calendar year 2011 is over. Who knows what Redd will be once he comes back, but I doubt Milwaukee and Redd see that marriage lasting any longer. We get a few million dollars off of next year's cap situation, while improving our second round pick signifaicantly. This is assuming that the players we like are not available at 10 and we could move down to 15 and still get our guy in thenext tier of players. Just a thought. Bash away!!!

  2. #2
    Member jeffg-body's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Anderson, IN
    Posts
    3,355
    Mood

    Default Re: Milwaukee

    I would be ok with this if Redd is on track rehab wise.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Milwaukee

    Bash away I will.

    Why give up 3 mil in expiring for Redd that is worse off injury wise than Dunleavy. At least with Murphy & Dun, you are going to have players that can contribute on the court.

    No thanks to Bell. I'd rather keep Jones than Bell. Bell hasn't done anything since signing his contract. Jones is better, and a better trade piece as well.

    Nor would I give up the #10 for their #15. I don't feel Dallas isn't going to give up their #57 pick in this draft either.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Justin Tyme For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Member OakMoses's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Montana
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,031

    Default Re: Milwaukee

    I have absolutely no idea why we would give up the #10 pick in this trade. It makes absolutely no sense and swings it horribly in Milwaukee's favor.

    I was thinking of something like this:

    Murphy + Dunleavy\Foster

    for

    Redd + #15

    Redd was terrible this year when he played. As of right now, he has less on court value than Dunleavy. His only value is as a big expiring contract. In your version of this trade, we're giving up everything and getting nothing.

    In this version of the trade Milwaukee gets a two productive veteran players (both with expiring contracts) in exchange for the #15 pick.
    "A man with no belly has no appetite for life."

    - Salman Rushdie

  6. #5
    Member Trophy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    8,556

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Milwaukee

    IND: Michael Redd

    MIL: Troy and Mike.

    We still keep Dahntay who can backup Danny at SF.

    If Redd plays as well as he did 2 seasons ago, we'll have some extra money left over to bring him back for a cheaper contract for a few more years if he agrees.

Similar Threads

  1. 04/06/2008 Guess The Score - Pacers vs. Milwaukee
    By RoboDoug in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-06-2008, 08:20 PM
  2. 04/04/2008 Guess The Score - Pacers at Milwaukee
    By RoboDoug in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-04-2008, 11:10 PM
  3. Milwaukee Bucks fire Terry Porter
    By sweabs in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-22-2005, 10:38 PM
  4. 03/28/2005 Guess The Score - Pacers at Milwaukee
    By RoboDoug in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 03-28-2005, 11:47 PM
  5. Milwaukee & the Expansion Draft
    By Jose Slaughter in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-02-2004, 10:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •