Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

    Originally posted by Trophy View Post
    Talking about a new head coach for the Pacers, I'd prefer Alex English or Brian Shaw because they already have assistant coaching experience.

    I honestly think Mark is just going to become another Vinny Del Negro and he really hasn't done anything impressive to turn that team around as a coach.
    So you think he'll flop as a coach? And if so, is that primarily because he didn't go the route of being an assistant?

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

      Originally posted by Bball View Post
      I like Mark Jackson.... But I think Isiah Thomas has forever burned me on the idea of hiring a former player with NO coaching experience as head coach of an NBA team.

      That said, if there was ever a point in time there'd be little to lose, and if it's between Jackson or keeping O'Brien- Welcome new Pacers head coach Mark Jackson!
      I think Mark will be worlds more successful than Isaiah was. But the assistant coaching argument is fairly valid. I think Patrick Chewing would be a good choice, especially for Roy's sake. Then he could bring in Charles Oakley to work with Hans! Watch out world!

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

        Isiah was a lot more passive than Jack. Plus, Jack is more of a Type-A Personality which, combined with being able to better relate to the players, I think could be a positive. Plus, as someone mentioned, I'd be licking my chops to see him take AJ or, knock on wood, J-Wall, under his tutelage.

        At the same time, there is the obvious risks of him just not really fitting as a coach. But, I think a new draft pick, combined with Mark coming in and cleaning house scheme-wise, would at least get the guys up and rallying around him, putting out a better effort than they are now. Hell, it'd definitely get the fanbase excited.

        Plus, it would be the return of the ever-popular, ever-awesome Jackson Jiggle.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

          I don't know where you get Isiah Thomas as being passive. I still remember hearing about him ripping up the lockerroom at half-time if the team did poorly in the first half. I definitely remember Reggie referencing it after a game the won by playing much better in the 2nd half.

          The reporter asked him something like, "What happened at half-time to change this game around for you?" Reggie gets this 'oh my' look on his face and said, "Isiah Thomas happened." And there was something else mentioned before/after referencing him getting, shall we say, animated.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

            As for the uncertainty of bringing in a former player with no assistant coaching background, we really have seen the best and worst of that with Bird and Isiah.

            I guess it depends on how willing Mark would be to delegating like Larry did as opposed to trying to do too much too soon on his own.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

              I'd rather have Byron Scott or Chuck Person. Mark Jackson would be #3 on my list, however.

              I believe Chuck's pretty much been in hiding since he didn't get the HC job in Chicago and then the Reggie Theus thing blew up.

              As for Vinnie - he was working in the front office as a scout in Phoenix. Neither he nor Chuck are on particuarly good terms with Popovich, I believe. As part of the Popovich - Bob Hill fallout, Pop traded both of those guys away. And as much as I love Rifleman, if Rifleman is your returning-from-major-back-surgery starting PF and you've just drafted Duncan, I'd trade Rifleman too.
              Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
              Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
              Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
              Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
              And life itself, rushing over me
              Life itself, the wind in black elms,
              Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                I would hope to be the SECOND team Jax coaches, not the one he makes his learning curve mistakes on. We're not at a point we have a team that can balance the inexperience. Remember, much of Bird's success (and, as much as I didn't like Isiah, much of his problem) was due to the combined experience and time together (in IT's case, lack thereof) of his playing unit.
                BillS

                A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                  Originally posted by count55
                  Of course, as bad as Isiah was here, he was worse in New York.
                  Exactly - the difference being he PUT TOGETHER that batch of players who would have trouble ordering a family-style meal together, much less play together.
                  BillS

                  A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                  Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                    Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                    As for the uncertainty of bringing in a former player with no assistant coaching background, we really have seen the best and worst of that with Bird and Isiah.
                    I think this is right. I imagine that the players who succeed in the transsition to coaching do so because they've got the aptitude for it. Those who don't succeed lack the aptitude, not the experience.

                    Any NBA player has seen a lot of coaching by the time he retires, and being an assistant may have dubious benefit if he is an assistance under a coach whose style isn't going to work for him when he takes over the reins.

                    Certainly it would be preferable to have an experienced and proven coach. But if the Pacers are in the market for a new guy, I question whether spending three years as an assistant is going to add much to a veteran's player's knowledge of the game or the locker room.

                    I'd be happy giving Mark Jackson a shot.
                    Last edited by Putnam; 03-19-2010, 10:44 AM.
                    And I won't be here to see the day
                    It all dries up and blows away
                    I'd hang around just to see
                    But they never had much use for me
                    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                      "Been around coaches" is not the same as "prepared to organize and run a practice", "prepared to develop a game plan", "understands the scouting report for his own players and can maximize their strenghts and hide their weaknesses", and "ready to handle conflict resolution in the best interest of the team".

                      I've been around a pretty successful coach my entire life, and I don't have any interest in stepping directly into a head coaching role because I haven't spent the time as an assistant developing the necessary skills. There's a lot more to coaching than just yelling at the referrees and calling a timeout to stop the other team's momentum.
                      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                      And life itself, rushing over me
                      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                        Originally posted by BillS View Post
                        Exactly - the difference being he PUT TOGETHER that batch of players who would have trouble ordering a family-style meal together, much less play together.


                        But...

                        I'm not even sure those guys could order their own meals off the menu. No way were they going to agree on the family-style choices.
                        Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                        Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                        Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                        Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                        And life itself, rushing over me
                        Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                        Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                          Originally posted by indygeezer View Post
                          I still wanna puke every time I think of his lockeroom interviews...

                          it'll be ok, we'll be there come the playoffs, we're a veteran team.....(barf)
                          There's that, and that God would tell him to take a job in Toronto instead.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                            I still want Byron Scott. I'd be fine dealing with Mark Jackson, but I feel it would downward spiral into not the best scenario, and I don't want to see anything bad have to be dealt with between the Pacers organization and Mark. He has done too much for this franchise to end up having to be fired.

                            Hire Byron Scott, convince Mark to come and be a top assistant and mentor our young PG's. Hopefully that includes a player like John Wall. I swear, I lay awake nights wondering what it would be like if we got lucky enough to get the number one pick...and actually get him. Sigh.

                            Just get rid of Jim........PLEASE.



                            RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                              Originally posted by heywoode View Post
                              I still want Byron Scott. I'd be fine dealing with Mark Jackson, but I feel it would downward spiral into not the best scenario, and I don't want to see anything bad have to be dealt with between the Pacers organization and Mark. He has done too much for this franchise to end up having to be fired.

                              Hire Byron Scott, convince Mark to come and be a top assistant and mentor our young PG's. Hopefully that includes a player like John Wall. I swear, I lay awake nights wondering what it would be like if we got lucky enough to get the number one pick...and actually get him. Sigh.

                              Just get rid of Jim........PLEASE.
                              I agree....Bryon Scott has Coaching experience leading young Teams to the Playoffs and has ties to the Pacers Organization and Fans as a former Pacer. To me...it's a no-brainer if we had to find a new Coach.
                              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Mark Jackson decides to sign with an agent this week

                                Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                                I agree....Bryon Scott has Coaching experience leading young Teams to the Playoffs and has ties to the Pacers Organization and Fans as a former Pacer. To me...it's a no-brainer if we had to find a new Coach.
                                Thanks, those are the reasons I feel that way, in addition to him having a great basketball IQ as a player and a coach...

                                It just BAFFLES me that the Pacers are playing so badly, Obie is obviously the domino that needs to fall, AND Byron Scott is available. I know I'm talking about spending someone else's money, but if I owned the team and there was ANY way I could do it, I would spend the money and go get the guy. Aside from a nice coaching reboot for the players, it would be great for the fans. I mean COME ON! The guy is a proven coach and he hit the shot that carried the franchise back into being meaningful! Heck, I'LL DONATE A COUPLE HUNDRED BUCKS to get the guy here!


                                Originally posted by QuickRelease View Post
                                I think Mark will be worlds more successful than Isaiah was. But the assistant coaching argument is fairly valid. I think Patrick Chewing would be a good choice, especially for Roy's sake. Then he could bring in Charles Oakley to work with Hans! Watch out world!
                                I agree that Mark would be worlds more successful than Isiah "I destroy all that I touch" Thomas. Other than that, NO WAY. I don't want either of those stinking KNICKS anywhere near our players! hehe



                                RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X