Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

    Originally posted by Hicks View Post
    Was his fall the night Dallas was in town?
    Very possible. 95% sure it was a home game. It was also pretty close in time to the game where Dahntay Jones took a really hard foul but finished the game.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

      Originally posted by Bball View Post
      I must be on ignore
      Hmmm...I missed that post. My bad......so you're saying that this is something that he could have gotten prior to entering the draft?

      Still....seems wierd to me.
      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

        Originally posted by BillS View Post
        For a change the pre-revelation rumors were vindicating the Pacers (that this all was not disclosed prior to the draft), and people still are yelling that the FO is lying.

        Sometimes the elephant in the room is just an elephant, not a big gray tent with wire armatures made to look like an elephant in order to disguise the crates of rabid weasels.
        Sometimes.


        But usually it's weasels, sneaky f****ers.

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

          Originally posted by BillS View Post
          For a change the pre-revelation rumors were vindicating the Pacers (that this all was not disclosed prior to the draft), and people still are yelling that the FO is lying.

          Sometimes the elephant in the room is just an elephant, not a big gray tent with wire armatures made to look like an elephant in order to disguise the crates of rabid weasels.
          what exactly are we talking about when we say that the FO is vindicated bc this "was not disclosed before the draft?"

          Whose job is it to disclose this stuff? Tyler's? He's supposed to volunarily say "I have PCS, so drop me into the second round," or what?

          Or is it team doctors' responsibility to test for it? Or is it the FO's responsibility to look into the number of (reported) concussions he had at NC, and take the risk that there would be aftereffects into account when making the draft choice?

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

            As I understand it, all medical conditions need to be revealed by the potential draftee. That's the same as filling out a job application - things that affect your ability to do the job are supposed to be disclosed.

            Also, the reason PCS is so controversial is that there is no good way to find it except symptomatically. If you aren't showing symptoms - which is very possible - then it isn't detectable.

            So, on the one hand, if UNC or Tyler knew about it, it should have been disclosed. On the other hand, if they didn't know about it, no one could have known about it. In both cases, the Pacers FO is not screwing up here.

            As always, I'm all for slamming someone when the reasons are there, but coming up with arguments with no backing other than force of habit isn't a valid debate technique.
            BillS

            A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
            Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

              Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
              I doubt they would just make that up out of thin air. he is complaining of headaches (teams doctors already know that he had a concussion a few weeks back) they examine him, and just lie and make up an ear infection? that makes no sense. (I'm sure Bball will tell me I'm crazy)

              I believe he had an ear infection also and that is/was a factor in the dizziness......
              I'd be curious if there was anything to back up the ear infection diagnosis besides symptoms like pain in the ear and dizziness.

              I believe it's likely they misdiagnosed the ear infection to begin with because that was the simple answer to what he was experiencing. When the symptoms didn't subside as expected with treatment and rest, they looked further and uncovered what they believe is the real problem.
              Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

              ------

              "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

              -John Wooden

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                Originally posted by Ozwalt72 View Post
                Deaconess health system has this to say about vestibular disorders...

                http://www.deaconess.com/body.cfm?id=844

                Looks like you're on to something.
                That's a good article. I suspect PCS is often used to describe a certain set of symptoms that may have been caused by a brain injury or not. Hansbrough is apparently dealing with a vestibular disorder, the doctors know that he had an inner ear infection and a concussion and can't really diagnose a single cause.

                FWIW, Scalabrine dealt with a serious PCS last season. Off the top of my head, he was shut down for almost 3 months with a couple of sporadic and unsuccessful attempts to come back earlier. Ok, let's look it up: he had his concussion in a game vs. Dallas in January 25th (Dirk's elbow to his head), played 3 games in late February, was shut down again and only returned for the playoffs in late April (you may remember the special headband he used, a la Jackie Moon).

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                  Originally posted by Bball View Post
                  I'd be curious if there was anything to back up the ear infection diagnosis besides symptoms like pain in the ear and dizziness.

                  I believe it's likely they misdiagnosed the ear infection to begin with because that was the simple answer to what he was experiencing. When the symptoms didn't subside as expected with treatment and rest, they looked further and uncovered what they believe is the real problem.
                  I don't understand the apparent desire to declare that there was a misdiagnosis involved. Why is a misdiagnosis more likely than the idea that he REALLY had an ear infection whose major symptoms subsided but left remnants that turned out to be from PCS?
                  BillS

                  A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                  Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                    Originally posted by imawhat View Post
                    He had a concussion this year. I can't remember the game, but he took a really hard fall with a few minutes to go in the 4th and was questionable the next game with concussion like symptoms.


                    The question I want to know is: is this better or worse than inner ear damage from an ear infection?

                    *edit* a google search on tyler hansbrough concussion reveals at least 2 different concussions sustained while at UNC.

                    12/16/07
                    http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/22289260//

                    2/17/09
                    http://ncaabasketball.fanhouse.com/2...cussed-sunday/
                    I'm not finding anything on Tyler and a concussion this season. There was AJ who had the concussion and was out a few games.

                    I'm also looking for anything about the fall, certainly I'm not finding anything to suggest he was diagnosed with a concussion as a result of that.

                    Whatever you come up with would be helpful.
                    BillS

                    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                    Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                      I've had a number of ear infections in my life and they were very easy to diagnose - the doctor would look in my ear and say yes you have an ear infection - here is a Rx. I'm sure the Pacers doctors can diagnose it rather easily.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                        For those thinking that Hansbrough had some mysterious injury at UNC that wasnt disclosed.. Well you can stop right there because it isnt true. You dont average 20 and 10 while hiding a serious injury that could set you out an entire season. It isnt possible.

                        He had already played this season and that proves this head injury happened during the season at some point and judging by the mini groove he was in before he started missing time tells us that he was fine at that point.

                        IMO he had an ear infection and that ended up making his PCS worse by giving him lingering vertigo.

                        For all we know his concussion could have happened while he was out.. He might have fell and hit his head or the ear infection just gave him some PCS symptoms.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                          Originally posted by BillS View Post
                          I don't understand the apparent desire to declare that there was a misdiagnosis involved.
                          Because that is how the Pacers roll...

                          Seriously, you go to the doctor with some ear pain, some vertigo, etc and no history that would indicate otherwise, the initial diagnosis is going to be the simple one: Ear Infection.

                          The doctor may or may not see some tell-tale inflammation when he looks into the ear but the other symptoms fit and the diagnosis is complete... until improvement doesn't follow normal treatment and timelines and they have to investigate further.

                          Now that we're hearing this (PCS) was something that he had before being drafted (that the Pacers were unaware of), and we also hear he took an elbow to the head this season, it puts the initial diagnosis into more question.

                          Factor in the rigors of NBA ball compared to college.

                          IMHO It's no longer a slam dunk that he ever had an ear infection to begin with unless we hear that he had more symptoms to begin with that confirmed the initial diagnosis. We're probably not going to get that level of detail.

                          The reason it matters is that if there wasn't an ear infection then that means this was triggered by simply playing the game and/or not so unheard of contact that happens during the course of the season.

                          He may never get another ear infection, if he even had one this time, but I can almost guarantee he'll take more contact on the basketball court.
                          Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                          ------

                          "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                          -John Wooden

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                            I'm not saying there's a big conspiracy at play but I am saying that we might start preparing ourselves for the possibility that Tyler's career could be a short one due to this.

                            He had several million reasons to play thru it and conceal this during his college career... but the rigors of an NBA season, the possibility that symptoms are worsening, and the level of emphasis being placed more and more on these type head injuries could mean medical advice will sway towards a shortened career.
                            Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                            ------

                            "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                            -John Wooden

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                              Is PCS something that can be diagnosed on an MRI? Since the concussion presumably healed and there is no concussion presently the diagnosis has to be POST .
                              I'm just wondering whether they are just making this diagnosis up because they have no idea what is causing his symptoms. No present sign of damage from ear infection or concussion from imaging so they make up a plausible reason for his problems.

                              I am certainly not convinced they have any idea what his problems are. No conspiracy just a lot of doctors who are guessing. When the time for PCS symptoms to heal have passed they will have to conjure up another diagnosis.

                              I still wonder how Bender got back the cartilage in his knees so he could play. Some possible cartilage regrowth is possible but he was said to have bone on bone.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                                Bender still doesn't have cartilage.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X