Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

    if you ever listen to "wired" and del negro talk, you'll notice that he says absolutely nothing productive. "guys! make smart passes! make good plays! play good defense! derrick rose- attack!"
    Peck is basically omniscient when it comes to understanding how the minds of Herb Simon and Kevin Pritchard work. I was a fool to ever question him and now feel deep shame for not understanding that this team believes in continuity above talent.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

      Don Nelson.

      I have a tremendous amount of respect for his entire body of work, but his time with the Warriors has been a disaster.

      He was brought in to implement his run-n-gun, play guards as centers brand of basketball. He tried that, and even had some middling success his first year. When the Warriors failed to make any more progress beyond that, he tuned out, and now you can catch him openly scanning the crowd during the games and just generally not giving a crap. The only reason he's still there is his massive guaranteed contract. In terms of pure lack of interest, Don Nelson takes the cake.
      2010 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champion Baltimore Bulldogs

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

        In interviews I've seen with Mike Brown, he talks about how he had to scale back his coaching and just let Lebron do his thing. That is smart coaching kind of. He gets to coach when Lebron is on the bench.

        But the conversations in the Cav's huddle go something like this.
        "Ok guys, we need to get Lebron the ball. Lebron, make sure you get the ball. Then Lebron is going to run a play. Make sure you look for clues as to what Lebron is going to do. On the count of three! Go Team! 1 2 3..."

        My views on Jim are like this. Either he is the worst coach ever and is absolutely incompetent...

        Or he is really devious and is doing a masterful job of tanking. He knows what we know about the 5 game win streak. He knows Troy and Dunleavy suck. He knows TJ is terrible at running the offense. He knows we should be playing through Hibbert in a low post inside outside offense. And he knows AJ is our best PG. But all that means we would be winning games, and we can't have that. That is pretty far fetched..

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

          Originally posted by bulldog View Post
          Don Nelson.

          I have a tremendous amount of respect for his entire body of work, but his time with the Warriors has been a disaster.

          He was brought in to implement his run-n-gun, play guards as centers brand of basketball. He tried that, and even had some middling success his first year. When the Warriors failed to make any more progress beyond that, he tuned out, and now you can catch him openly scanning the crowd during the games and just generally not giving a crap. The only reason he's still there is his massive guaranteed contract. In terms of pure lack of interest, Don Nelson takes the cake.
          If you were approaching 70 years of age and had to coach a roster full of D-League players while working for people like Chris Cohan and Robert Rowell, you would quickly lose interest too. Nellie is the only coach to have taken the team to the playoffs in Cohan's era of incompetent ownership.

          If I were in that situation, I'd probably just be collecting a check and going through the motions, too.
          Last edited by d_c; 02-27-2010, 06:08 PM.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

            There are NBA JAM coaches better than O'Brien.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

              Originally posted by HanSolo View Post
              if you ever listen to "wired" and del negro talk, you'll notice that he says absolutely nothing productive. "guys! make smart passes! make good plays! play good defense! derrick rose- attack!"
              That's what a lot of coaches do. "We need energy. We need rebounding. Play with some pride out there." Etc...

              Notice that Flip Saunders hasn't done anything for the Wiz that Eddie Jordan didn't already do. Notice that Eddie Jordan isn't doing anything for the 76ers that JOB (yes, JOB) or Mo Cheeks didn't already do.

              What has Kurt Rambis and his 8 years of apprenticeship under Phil Jackson done for the T-Wolves? What kind of improvment have they made under him compared to a stiff like Randy Whitman? I don't see a big change.

              And of course Vinnie del Negro has done absolutely nothing to improve upon what Scott Skiles did. And Skiles never had anything like the playmaker Derrick Rose is.

              People always act like some coaching change is a magic wand that will have all kinds of dynamic effects on the team. And more often than not it's nothing more than a cosmetic change, as the real changes come from changes in the roster.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                Originally posted by d_c View Post
                That's what a lot of coaches do. "We need energy. We need rebounding. Play with some pride out there." Etc...

                Notice that Flip Saunders hasn't done anything for the Wiz that Eddie Jordan didn't already do. Notice that Eddie Jordan isn't doing anything for the 76ers that JOB (yes, JOB) or Mo Cheeks didn't already do.

                What has Kurt Rambis and his 8 years of apprenticeship under Phil Jackson done for the T-Wolves? What kind of improvment have they made under him compared to a stiff like Randy Whitman? I don't see a big change.

                And of course Vinnie del Negro has done absolutely nothing to improve upon what Scott Skiles did. And Skiles never had anything like the playmaker Derrick Rose is.

                People always act like some coaching change is a magic wand that will have all kinds of dynamic effects on the team. And more often than not it's nothing more than a cosmetic change, as the real changes come from changes in the roster.
                When you have a coach who changes the rotation, to a more screwed up rotation every other game..as well as continuing to play the same players over and over again, and refusing to play what works because it doesn't go with your system (jog and hoist + vets)

                It really affects a team. A good coach could have won plenty of more games with this team.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                  Originally posted by Sookie View Post
                  It really affects a team. A good coach could have won plenty of more games with this team.
                  You mean how like JOB won more last year and the year before compared to what he's on pace to win this year? This year, the best player has been beat up and they lost their 2nd best 4th quarter player to free agency. They've also lost their most reliable role playing bigman for basically the entire season.

                  Anyone coaching this team is going to be working with a physically beat up midlevel all-star, the worst PG rotation in the league, a PF who can't post up and is among the worst defenders at his position, a starting SF who still still hasn't gotten over his injury and a 2nd year starting center who never even averaged more than 26 mpg in college.

                  Whoever is going to win "plenty more" with that kind of roster should be getting paid a mint. Why do I think you're going to have a hard time finding a coach like that?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                    Nelson makes for fun basketball, anywhere he's coached. He's won some too...I think with Dallas...although his talent level at the time was off the charts. Honestly, I can't stand the product he puts on the floor.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                      Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                      Nelson makes for fun basketball, anywhere he's coached. He's won some too...I think with Dallas...although his talent level at the time was off the charts. Honestly, I can't stand the product he puts on the floor.
                      Nellie had good talent in Dallas, but the Lakers and San Antonio were just better. Just like he had good teams in Milwaukee and won a lot, but the 76ers and Celtics were just better. This is a league where the best teams ultimately win, and Nellie has never had the best team, though he has had some pretty good ones.

                      Not too long after Nellie got to Dallas (when they were horrible), he traded an unprotected pick for another team's backup PG. Imagine the Pacers right now trading their 2011 unprotected pick for another team's backup PG. That's exactly what Nellie did. That's how he got Steve Nash. People thought he was equally nuts for taking Dirk.

                      FTR, the 2007 "We Believe" team didn't beat the Mavs with a bunch of fun gimmicks, as many people would like to believe. They upset them by simply getting up in the Mavs' faces, being physical and playing harder.
                      Last edited by d_c; 02-27-2010, 07:30 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                        Originally posted by d_c View Post
                        You also don't want to give him credit for beating a 3rd seeded Pacer team with his a less talented 6th seeded Celtics team, then eventually getting that team to the conference finals.

                        The season prior to hiring JOB, the 76ers won 33 games. With JOB the next season in 2004-2005, they won 43 games in his only season in Philly. Since getting rid of JOB, Philly has yet to win that many games. It's been 5 years since getting rid of JOB and Philly hasn't found a way to get better, so firing JOB obviously wasn't the magic, 1 trick solution to fixing all their problems.

                        I haven't looked it up, but I'm pretty confident you can find a coach in the league right now with a worse career winning percentage than JOB's 48.6%.
                        I'm going to say this in the most respectful way...Frankly, I don't give a d*mn what he did with those teams. Good for him, but his "fine" coaching in Boston and Philly is NOT being seen in Indiana. If he implemented this same type of coaching back in Philly/Boston (not developing rookies/young players, constant rotation changes, public belittling of players, no defense, chucking 3's, playing SGs at the PF spot), then I'm going to call it for what it is. He's was probably one of luckiest coaches in his time.

                        Now, you continue to defend him by saying he has no "talent" on this roster, but the majority of the posters will disagree. The talent is there and this team SHOULD be WAY better than it is, but the COACH (as I said numerous times before) doesn't know how to use the talent on this squad. Right now, I'm watching the Bulls vs. Pacers and wondering how long will it be before Roy is given the ball in the post.
                        Last edited by ksuttonjr76; 02-27-2010, 07:44 PM.


                        Remember when we could have gotten 1-2 solid players and a possible Top 3 draft pick in the 2017 NBA Draft by trading away Paul George?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                          Originally posted by d_c View Post
                          Nellie had good talent in Dallas, but the Lakers and San Antonio were just better. Just like he had good teams in Milwaukee and won a lot, but the 76ers and Celtics were just better. This is a league where the best teams ultimately win, and Nellie has never had the best team, though he has had some pretty good ones.

                          Not too long after Nellie got to Dallas (when they were horrible), he traded an unprotected pick for another team's backup PG. Imagine the Pacers right now trading their 2011 unprotected pick for another team's backup PG. That's exactly what Nellie did. That's how he got Steve Nash. People thought he was equally nuts for taking Dirk.

                          FTR, the 2007 "We Believe" team didn't beat the Mavs with a bunch of fun gimmicks, as many people would like to believe. They upset them by simply getting up in the Mavs' faces, being physical and playing harder.
                          GS had a lot of talent. P Diddy is all-star talent. So is Monte. Jack is not far off. Also, they started defending better. But they beat the Mavs because they were a matchup nightmare for them more than anything else. I think the Mavs were the better team against most teams.

                          I suppose Nellie helped to take advantage of those matchups, so he probably deserves some credit. BTW, while I don't think Nellie is a good coach, he's not bad and he has some good characteristics. He gets along with most players...and I think most like to play for him. I just don't like his style and I don't think it's the best style to win championships. In fact, I think his style might prevent him from winning a championship even if he had the better team. As much as I don't like Phil Jackson, Phil is the better coach by some distance.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                            Originally posted by ksuttonjr76 View Post
                            Now, you continue to defend him by saying he has no "talent" on this roster, but the majority of the posters will disagree. The talent is there and this team SHOULD be WAY better than it is, but the COACH (as I said numerous times before) doesn't know how to use the talent on this squad. Right now, I'm watching the Bulls vs. Pacers and wondering how long will it be before Roy is given the ball in the post.
                            LOL.

                            It I'm not"defending" the coach. If I had to pick a coach to lead a team, JOB wouldn't be among my top 20 choices. But the point is whining about the coach with this roster is putting the cart before the horse.

                            It's a talent poor roster. Go ask Bird. Why is he not yet disposing of the coach but yet he's alwaystalking about the flexibility to makes all kinds of roster moves in 2011? Why is that?

                            Because he knows he isn't winning with this roster, no matter who coaches it. I personally can't wait to see him revamp this roster so people will quit whining about how this team should be winning 38 wins but can't because they don't have a good coach. If that's the potential your roster has to offer, I'd put a lot more energy into changing the players first.
                            Last edited by d_c; 02-27-2010, 08:40 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                              Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                              In fact, I think his style might prevent him from winning a championship even if he had the better team. As much as I don't like Phil Jackson, Phil is the better coach by some distance.
                              I'll take Phil over Nellie 8 days a week, too. He is the best coach in the game

                              But you know who I'll take over both those guys? Tim Duncan, Shaq and Kobe Bryant. It's a players' game. I'll take a combination of Nellie and Kobe over a combination of Phil and Dirk.

                              FWIW, a lot of teams (like the Suns in recent years) play the "never gonna win a championship style" because they don't have the personnel to win like the Spurs. Sure, you can play just like the Spurs if you want, but you'll never win a championship either playing like them because you don't have Duncan. The Suns tried playing that way with an over the hill Shaq. That didn't appear to get them any closer to a title.

                              There's a reason Tim Duncan went #1 in the draft while Steve Nash went #15. Every coach in the league from Nellie to Phil to JOB would take Duncan over Nash.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: What Other NBA Coaches Are Worse Than JO'B?

                                Originally posted by d_c View Post
                                LOL.

                                It I'm not"defending" the coach. If I had to pick a coach to lead a team, JOB wouldn't be among my top 20 choices. But the point is whining about the coach with this roster is putting the cart before the horse.

                                It's a talent poor roster. Go ask Bird. Why is not yet disposing of the coach but he he's alwaystalking about the flexibility to makes all kinds of roster moves in 2011? Why is that?

                                Because he knows he isn't winning with this roster, no matter who coaches it. I personally can't wait to see him revamp this roster so people will quit whining about how this team should be winning 38 wins but can't because they don't have a good coach. If that's the potential your roster has to offer, I'd put a lot more energy into changing the players first.
                                Why change him now...JOB is doing his job by insuring Indiana's Top 8 pick. Contrary to what Bird said, JOB will not be coaching this team next season. It's one thing if I'm watching the games, and JOB is making good coaching decisions, but we're still losing. Okay, then I'll blame it on the roster. However, I watch the games, and I see some of the most questionable coaching decisions that I have ever seen in my life. At that point, I have to blame the coach.

                                Hold up..so, he wouldn't be your Top 20 pick, yet it's the players' lack of talent that causing Indiana to lose so much? That don't even make sense.


                                Remember when we could have gotten 1-2 solid players and a possible Top 3 draft pick in the 2017 NBA Draft by trading away Paul George?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X