Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

In 15 Days.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: In 15 Days.....

    Originally posted by GrangeRusHibbert View Post
    I've seen multiple reports saying multiple teams were interested in Murphy. I doubt it's Cleveland or bust.
    Just to get this thread back on track......we've heard multiple reports of other Teams being interested in Murphy...but we have not really been given any names or real details.

    Unless Bird is still working the phones and it hasn't really been leaked by other sources, given that we have heard nothing outside of Cleveland leads me to believe that there may have been some initial interest...but none that have really progressed to the level of talks that Bird had with Cleveland.

    IMHO.....when it comes to Murphy....it is Cleveland or Bust. I've always like Foster....but if we don't move Murphy in 2 weeks.....I really hope that he does retire after this wretched season ends. If Murphy isn't dumped....we need to shave off some $$$ from the 2010-2011 SalaryCap just to give us some breathing room in the Summer.

    For the record, I think that we are going to regret not simply dumping Murphy for Cap relief before the 2009-2010 Trade deadline. I don't think that we will get the type of deal that many of you are hoping for. At best...we will be getting back a Player(s) with a longer contract ( think Andres Nocioni or Corey Maggette as opposed to Amare or Joe Johnson ) where all we will end up doing is "kicking the can" down the road when it comes to having any SalaryCap/Financial Flexibility ( think what happened on a Financial end to the Team when we traded SJax/Harrington's shorter contracts for MurphLeavy's contracts ). I know that many of you disagree with me....but IMHO, that is the likely scenario.
    Last edited by CableKC; 02-04-2010, 02:23 PM.
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: In 15 Days.....

      Originally posted by GrangeRusHibbert View Post
      For the record, I was on the Ford & Murphy for Arenas bandwagon over a month ago:





      Of course this was all prior to the handgun drama, which was likely the nail in the coffin to any proposed deal, assuming it was even feasible to begin with.
      Not trying to step on your thing at all. Normally I'm not that big on trade ideas. Someone mentioned getting him at a party this weekend, not someone who knows the team nearly at the level we do, and it got me wondering.

      Then when you add in the CLE, WSH, IND, Troy dynamic and the fact that the Pacers would love to turn Troy/TJ into something, it started sounding a lot less crazy and a lot more "two sides both in tough spots help each other out".


      I'm NOT an Arenas fan really and I worry about health a ton. But OTOH the Troy, TJ, Dun thing has been really tough and ticket sales are in huge trouble. If GA could play next year and isn't in jail you have to wonder.

      Then again is it even possible that they would try to do this before the deadline? Seems pretty big and with him out you don't get any PR help this year.

      But Troy and TJ both moved....that's quite a lot. Tough call between this and they Troy for Z (buyout) and 29th pick.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: In 15 Days.....

        And Cable I'm really mostly in your camp here. You know I hated the GSW move from day 1, primarily from a cost perspective (and yet I put in that GA deal which can be seen as something similar ).

        I do think too many posters have this vision of huge players coming back for either expiring deals or as FA signings eventually. I don't think the Pacers will add significant talent through either of those methods.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: In 15 Days.....

          Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
          And Cable I'm really mostly in your camp here. You know I hated the GSW move from day 1, primarily from a cost perspective (and yet I put in that GA deal which can be seen as something similar ).

          I do think too many posters have this vision of huge players coming back for either expiring deals or as FA signings eventually. I don't think the Pacers will add significant talent through either of those methods.
          Of course, it's entirely possible that we work out some S&T for some Top Tier FA.....but at what cost? BRush? Hansbrough? Multiple 1st round picks? Willingness to take on future Salary? Giving up BRush or Hansbrough along with a single 1st round pick may be worth it ( which I assume would be their starting asking price ).....but anything beyond that? That's questionable.

          But even if I ignore all that.....I think that Teams willing to do a S&T for their Top Tier FA will field better offers from Teams that are under the SalaryCap ( and therefore send back a TPE instead of actual Players that won't affect their SalaryCap IF THEY choose not to exercize it ) and can offer more then just a Pick ( such as better prospects that they can afford to part with....something that we can't afford at this point ). On top of that....you think that any Top Tier FA will want to come to Indy? Many of them are on record saying that they want to end up on a Championship ( if not Playoff ) bound Team. We're no where near that for the next 2 seasons.

          IMHO...the likely scenario is that we'd end up with some Player(s) that won't impact the Team as much as we'd need in order to make a difference at the cost of any future Financial/SalaryCap flexiblility that we have. Again...think the GSW trade and what it did to this Team on a Financial and Talent level.
          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: In 15 Days.....

            Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
            Not trying to step on your thing at all. Normally I'm not that big on trade ideas. Someone mentioned getting him at a party this weekend, not someone who knows the team nearly at the level we do, and it got me wondering.

            Then when you add in the CLE, WSH, IND, Troy dynamic and the fact that the Pacers would love to turn Troy/TJ into something, it started sounding a lot less crazy and a lot more "two sides both in tough spots help each other out".


            I'm NOT an Arenas fan really and I worry about health a ton. But OTOH the Troy, TJ, Dun thing has been really tough and ticket sales are in huge trouble. If GA could play next year and isn't in jail you have to wonder.

            Then again is it even possible that they would try to do this before the deadline? Seems pretty big and with him out you don't get any PR help this year.

            But Troy and TJ both moved....that's quite a lot. Tough call between this and they Troy for Z (buyout) and 29th pick.
            I think Birds position is relatively safe. However, if he suggested the Pacers make an Arenas deal, I think he would be fired on the spot.

            Arenas epitomizes the type a player that put us into the mess that we are currently in. And I disagree he would fill up the seats. And Herb Simon knows that.

            The guy just pleaded guilty to a felony gun charge. He may have to spend time in jail. How quickly we forget Tinsley, Jackson, Daniels, etc.

            Pacers make that deal and the vast majority of the fanbase would say WTF? They could play the games at a junior high gym and not sell out.

            They are finally nearing the completion of digging out from under that era of lawbreaking primadonnas. Murphy and Dun will soon be expiring. Do you really think theyre gonna go out and get another one-only this time one that makes 20 million a year? Not to mention the fact Arenas plays ball in such a fashion that many would despise. Hes the consummate gunner.

            Seems all the losing has affected our sense of reality a bit. There are two chances they deal for Gil. Slim and none.

            And Slim just left town.
            The Most Common Cause of Stress is Dealing with Idiots

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: In 15 Days.....

              looks like charlottes hardcore shopping augustin for a vet bigman
              i personally wouldnt mind seeing him here in indy
              Peck is basically omniscient when it comes to understanding how the minds of Herb Simon and Kevin Pritchard work. I was a fool to ever question him and now feel deep shame for not understanding that this team believes in continuity above talent.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: In 15 Days.....

                Originally posted by HanSolo View Post
                looks like charlottes hardcore shopping augustin for a vet bigman
                i personally wouldnt mind seeing him here in indy
                Odd....I thought that one of the reasons why they drafted Augustin was because they missed out on trying to trade for Ford ( a few seasons ago ).

                I know that they are doing better now and probably looking to not make any real change....but I guess Felton must be doing much better.

                Too bad that Foster is out....Foster totally fits the type of Player that Brown likes to have on his Team.
                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: In 15 Days.....

                  I could see Bosh thinking of Indy as a place to come to. Think about playing next to Danny, Hibby, Rush and AJ. Maybe he thinks he could be the guy that puts this young core over the top to being competitive.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: In 15 Days.....

                    I would love to pick up Tayshaun Prince in a Derrick McKey-like roll.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: In 15 Days.....

                      Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                      I can't believe you posted this! Oh, I'm not condeming, it's just as I was doing my daily diligence of looking at the box scores I was thinking about the samething. I was also thinking of Blatche too. I've always kept my eye on him over the years. A few years ago when he was a RFA I wanted Bird to go after him, but at that time the Pacers still had the Hulk.

                      My fear of getting Arenas isn't the baggage issue, but his health issue. We all know the Pacers,and the luck they have with injuries.
                      I'd rather have Caron Butler. That's Robin! Plus he has no major off court stuff to worry about.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: In 15 Days.....

                        Originally posted by jeffg-body View Post
                        I could see Bosh thinking of Indy as a place to come to. Think about playing next to Danny, Hibby, Rush and AJ. Maybe he thinks he could be the guy that puts this young core over the top to being competitive.

                        Thinking and reality is 2 different things. The Pacers don't have the money to sign Bosh.... or any other Allstar FA

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: In 15 Days.....

                          Originally posted by QuickRelease View Post
                          I'd rather have Caron Butler. That's Robin! Plus he has no major off court stuff to worry about.
                          We need more than Robin......we need Superman!!!
                          I'm not perfect and neither are you.

                          Romans 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the esteem of Elohim,
                          Ephisians 4: 32 And be kind towards one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as Elohim also forgave you in Messiah.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: In 15 Days.....

                            Originally posted by QuickRelease View Post
                            I would love to pick up Tayshaun Prince in a Derrick McKey-like roll.
                            Pretty sure Tayshaun died last summer.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: In 15 Days.....

                              Originally posted by QuickRelease View Post
                              I'd rather have Caron Butler. That's Robin! Plus he has no major off court stuff to worry about.
                              I like Caron as well, but where would we play him, at the 4 and play Danny at the 3? I kind of like that, but isn't his natural position the 3? He would stretch the defense, but how is his low post defense, don't think he is known for that. His deal is manageable...

                              Anyways 15 days we will see. Moving Troy is our best option.
                              Avatar photo credit: Bahram Mark Sobhani - AP

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: In 15 Days.....

                                Caron would probably play the 2.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X