Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Who's Getting Traded: The East/ Rumors from hoopsworld

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who's Getting Traded: The East/ Rumors from hoopsworld

    http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=15056

    By: Alex Raskin

    It's trade season, which means luxury taxes, salary caps and expiring contracts are on the lips and ears of everyone involved with the NBA. Just ask Miami's Dorell Wright.

    "It's just my luck my money matches what we are over the tax (by)," the HEAT forward told a group of reporters recently.

    Wright may have his $2.8 million deal dealt in order to move the team to the other side of the luxury tax threshold where it would take money, not pay money, from the league's tax redistribution.

    Wright is one of many players who could move in what should be a busy month before the trade deadline. Here are some of the Eastern Conference's most likely trade candidates:

    Atlanta
    The Hawks are one team that might not make a move. Teams with growing playoff aspirations often catalyze the current season at the expense of the future by trading young talent. Unfortunately, the Hawks don't have a true backup for Mike Bibby other than Jeff Teague, so trading the rookie would be costly both in the short-term and the long-term. Jason Collins or Randolph Morris could find themselves packing, but not for anything major in return.

    Boston

    •Tony Allen – Right now, the biggest thing keeping Allen in green is injuries. Marquis Daniels will take most, if not all of Allen's minutes when he returns from his thumb injury. Allen's cheap, expiring deal as well as his athleticism and defensive ability make him attractive to many suitors. Boston could keep Allen should another guard go down, but G.M. Danny Ainge wouldn't mind punching up the offense if given the chance. The Celtics rank third in defensive efficiency, but only 10th in offensive efficiency.
    •Brian Scalabrine – Celtics fans might riot without their beloved reserve forward, but his $3.4 million expiring contract could be flipped for some valuable depth. Whoever acquires him in a trade could very well waive him immediately thereafter leaving him free to return to Boston after 30 days.
    Charlotte

    •D.J. Augustin – A year ago it looked like Raymond Felton's days in North Carolina were numbered. But with Augustin's play suffering and Felton's Player Efficiency Rating (15.61) rising above his career average, Augustin appears to be the odd man out. Unfortunately, he may not be able to bring in what Larry Brown truly needs: Offense. The Bobcats will hit the playoffs with arguably the game's best defense, but it's hard to envision a trade that could ignite the other side of the floor.
    Chicago

    •Kirk Hinrich – With a deal that decreases in value over the next two seasons and solid defensive reputation, Hinrich might be on his way out of Chicago before the trade deadline. Sure, $9 million is a lot for a backup point guard, but there are some solid teams that could find use for him as a starter. If Hinrich does get traded, it will be because the Bulls were a motivated seller, not because there is a market clamoring for the former Kansas Jayhawk.
    •Tyrus Thomas – I hesitate to include him, because Thomas won't be easy to trade. Thomas will be a restricted free agent after next season. Whoever acquires him will need to make a $6.25 million qualifying offer to retain Thomas and it might cost more than that. Any potential suitor will have to decide whether Thomas is more of a power forward or small forward.
    Cleveland

    •Zydrunas Ilgauskas – Another player who could get traded only to return to his original team is Ilgauskas. The Lithuanian center's expiring contract is worth $11.5 million and he could be the ticket to acquiring a player such as Washington's Antawn Jamison. If he goes to a lottery-bound team, the chances of him returning to the Cavs for the playoffs would be extremely high seeing as the team wouldn't have a backup for Shaquille O'Neal.
    Detroit

    •Tayshaun Prince – 29 years old and in the midst of his worst season in the NBA, Prince offers very little to an NBA team right now. If someone still likes his defense, the Pistons would be interested in ditching his contract which pays over $11 million next season. The Pistons took Austin Daye and Jonas Jerekbo in last year's draft, so clearly G.M. Joe Dumars is through making room for Prince.
    •Kwame Brown – If anyone needs a center and can offer another expiring deal, Dumars would gladly hand over the former top pick. Brown is set to make $4 million this season but his PER has fallen to 10.36.
    Indiana

    •Troy Murphy – Murphy fits into the modern NBA because he's a big guy that can clog the lane on defense and spread the floor on offense. The Cavs don't need anyone else standing in LeBron James' way to the hoop now that they have Shaq around, so Murphy makes a lot of sense. Even though the persistent trade rumors have died down, it still seems likely that Cleveland will add either Murphy or Jamison at the deadline. Cleveland might prefer Murphy because he's cheaper and only signed through next season.
    •Jeff Foster – One rumor had Denver making a pitch for Foster, but other teams could emerge as well. Foster is signed for over $6 million per season through next year and he's been dealing with some back issues this season. With Roy Hibbert on board the team might hope to shed payroll while continuing to get younger.
    •T.J. Ford – More than anyone, Indiana wants to trade its rarely-used $9 million-a-year point guard. Ford will likely to pick up his option for next year, but with the end of this contract in sight there is a chance a trade could be worked out. It's hard to say what happened to Ford's NBA career, but he played much, much better basketball two years ago when he was splitting time with Jose Calderon in Toronto. Maybe Ford needs another situation where he can play less than 24 minutes per game because that's when he's at his best.


    •Dorell Wright – As we mentioned at the top of this piece, the HEAT are around $3 million over the luxury tax threshold and Wright's expiring deal is worth around $2.8 million. HEAT President Pat Riley told the South Florida Sun Sentinel's Ira Winderman that moving Wright would mean a, "$7 million swing," thanks to the tax redistribution. One thing is certain: the HEAT would only want a very inexpensive player in return.
    •Mario Chalmers – If need be, the HEAT can get a little bit further under the camp by trading Chalmers. The second-year point guard is in a sophomore slump and he's had his starting job taken away. Riley isn't known for his patience with young players, so if it helps moving Wright and making the numbers work, don't be surprised to see Chalmers on his way out of town. Chalmers' contract has a team option next season.

    Milwaukee
    The Bucks have a lot of expiring contracts and that's the way the team likes it. It's hard to see Milwaukee giving up any of those deals and the injury to Michael Redd probably cost the team its only trade chip.

    New Jersey

    •Devin Harris – If the Nets were blown away by a trade offer – one that included a young point guard as insurance in case they failed to win the John Wall lottery – then maybe Harris could be dealt. The recent trade rumors have come on the assumption that New Jersey would win the draft lottery, but time is on Nets' side and they could easily wait until this summer for a trade. Nets President Rod Thorn even told the Star-Ledger's Dave D'Alessandro, "It's very, very unlikely that we'd trade Devin. I never say never, but it's very unlikely that he's going to be traded."

    •Josh Boone – It's odd that he hasn't moved yet. Boone has had some bumps and bruises this year, but with good health should come a new team. Boone's body language after games says that he's more than ready for a change of scenery. And who wouldn't want a solid backup center with a $2 million deal?
    •Keyon Dooling – Offseason hip surgery has hindered his trade prospects, but most teams would want a veteran combo guard who scores. Dooling's $3.5 million a year deal wouldn't be hard to move, especially if he plays like he did in his 21-point, 23-minute performance against the Hornets on January 8th. Dooling's deal is not fully guaranteed next season.
    •Jarvis Hayes – Like Boone and Dooling, Hayes can get traded as soon as he proves he's healthy. Hayes has dealt with hamstring issues all year, which tends to be a nagging injury. However, even Hayes has admitted that he still feels like he's in training camp after missing the first few months of the year.

    New York

    •Nate Robinson – If, and only if, the Knicks can get an inexpensive young player in return, they'll part with Nate Robinson. If not, they'll be happy to keep the resurgent guard in the lineup for the rest of the season. After basically being benched for all of December, Robinson has averaged nearly 26 minutes and 16 points for the month of January. If nothing else, Robinson has created some free agent buzz for himself as he heads into the offseason... Many expect the team to trade Jared Jeffries, but there doesn't appear to be much of a market for him.
    Orlando

    •Brandon Bass – Even though he signed a $4 million per year deal this past offseason, Bass' name keeps circling in trade talk. Bass is having his best season in terms of PER, but if G.M. Otis Smith had a choice between trading him or center Marcin Gortat, the former would be jettisoned before the latter.
    Philadelphia

    •Andre Iguodala – At the beginning of the year, many expected Elton Brand and Samuel Dalembert's names to be kicked around, but it's been Iguodala that has been getting the most interest. One such rumor had him going to Houston for Tracy McGrady. That deal would have given the 76ers cap relief, but it hardly would have done anything for the team's roster. Iguodala is signed through 2012-2013 with an early termination option for 2013-2014. If there's anyone that wants to pay Iguodala around $17 million when he's 30, now is the time to make a move. Dallas and Cleveland have been mentioned, but the Cavs need shooters like Murphy. If Iguodala went to the Mavericks, Josh Howard would likely be involved in the trade.
    Toronto

    •Chris Bosh – It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that Bosh would like to sign with whomever holds his Larry Bird rights. Anyone with enough cap space can offer Bosh a max deal, but only Toronto can give him the incremental raises that would add up to an extra $30 million. Of course, that is, unless the Raptors trade Bosh first. If G.M. Bryan Colangelo doesn't feel confident Bosh will return, expect the Raptors to go shopping for a legitimate center and defensive presence in the post. Toronto can easily move Andrea Bargnani to power forward to make room for a new big man, which could seriously help the porous interior defense.
    Washington

    •Antawn Jamison – Did any team fall flat on its face this season the way Washington has? The Nets knew they had a loser on their hands, but the Wizards were gearing up for the rebirth of D.C. hoops. Instead they have a lot of undesirable contracts on their hands and Jamison's might be the first to go. His deal swells up to over $15 million per year in 2011-2012, so the time to move is now. Otherwise, the Wizards might have to take back too much salary to make any deal worthwhile.
    •Caron Butler – A down year for Butler could mean big savings for a contender. At 29-years-old, Butler can still score, but Flip Saunders' offense has played havoc with his stat line. He'll make over $10 million next season, but Butler's deal expires after that, so he might be a more realistic trade option than Jamison. One thing is for sure: Butler will never have a PER over 20 as he did in 2007-2008.
    •Brendan Haywood – Attention Houston! Haywood's $6 million deal expires after this season and he's healthy. Any playoff hopeful that needs a defensive presence in the middle should make a play for Haywood.
    •Mike Miller – Possibly another player that could end up in Cleveland, Miller offers shooting and veteran smarts for a playoff run. His deal expires after this season, and if his calf is better, some contender will have a valuable asset.
    •Gilbert Arenas – The former Arizona Wildcat is on this list because the Wizards are motivated to trade him – NOT because there is a market for a guy with two bad knees who is owed over $22 million in 2013-2014. Did I mention he still has yet to be sentenced on gun charges? Possibly the least attractive player on the trading block, Arenas is drawing very little interest for obvious reasons.
    @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

  • #2
    Re: Who's Getting Traded: The East/ Rumors from hoopsworld

    Lol,

    You beat me to it bro.

    HW is a great site, Ia m soooooo nervous about the deadline and praying Bird makes his mark in a positive way!!
    Sittin on top of the world!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Who's Getting Traded: The East/ Rumors from hoopsworld

      here is an explanation in how trades happen
      http://www.hoopsworld.com/chat.asp?c...&status=Active

      Steve Kyler:
      Welcome in everyone... hope the week was good to you... lots to get to so lets jump in...

      I think the concept missed is similar to those ads that run before the movie telling you to shut your phone off... it takes a million phone calls to get a movie made, it takes almost as many to get a trade done in the NBA.

      Most people believe GM A calls GM B and makes a deal --- that's rarely how it happens... what typically happens is Team A sets out goals, these are areas we want to improve and things we want to get done.... then the Player Personnel people, scouts and Assistant GMs start churning up the waters to see whats out there... once the framework of deals gets roughed in, that's typically when the GMs get involved.

      There is a reason a GM can say "I have never talked with Team X" because he probably hasn't, but that doesn't mean his Assistant GM or someone on the staff didn't make a pass to gauge interest.

      Most of what gets out is stuff that has been offered and turned down - sometimes when deals are complex or deals require more input than just the GMs approval that's when deals that go down get out...

      In our case, and I am speaking for myself exclusively, I get text messages when deals break, some of our guys that have strong relationships get calls as deals are getting approved... sometime an agent will tell me whats in the works with his client or a team he has a client on... sometimes GM or team presidents will reveal whats been discussed... so its a mixed bag of information.

      Should we "stop believing" - I don't believe anything until its done. I have my circle of people that I trust and rarely let me down and I think that's the goal --- find the people that you trust and are not leading you the wrong way... everyone claims to be an expert and everyone claims to be dialed in - to me its about accuracy.

      But always keep in mind that trades in the NBA is like Poker, you bluff to get a bigger pot, and you have to use misdirection to insure the assets you want are not scooped up by someone else - thats just how the game is played and we in the media are big pawns in that - especially us and HoopsHype because we reach so many people.
      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Who's Getting Traded: The East/ Rumors from hoopsworld

        I so that as well. Between the Colts and the trade deadline my stomach is extra quezey
        Sittin on top of the world!

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Who's Getting Traded: The East/ Rumors from hoopsworld

          At least Steve Kyler admits what the truth is in his last paragraph:

          But always keep in mind that trades in the NBA is like Poker, you bluff to get a bigger pot, and you have to use misdirection to insure the assets you want are not scooped up by someone else - thats just how the game is played and we in the media are big pawns in that - especially us and HoopsHype because we reach so many people.

          Comment

          Working...
          X