Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Asset Allocation

  1. #1
    Member mcampbellarch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    olympia, wa
    Posts
    169

    Default Asset Allocation

    I hate to go simple but the TJ thing is bugging me. Can someone please explain why TJ is completely absent? Is this tin man redux? Like most, I would rather see Watson and Price (so long as AJ is passing more than he is shooting) but why would you totally bench a capable ball handler?

  2. #2
    Denim Chicken duke dynamite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Bloomington
    Posts
    13,373
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Asset Allocation

    TJ is in the coach's "not doghouse".

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to duke dynamite For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Age
    33
    Posts
    28,142

    Default Re: Asset Allocation

    they are waiting for him to be traded

  5. #4
    Member mcampbellarch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    olympia, wa
    Posts
    169

    Default Re: Asset Allocation

    Neither of those seem to bode well for trade unless a deal is already in the works though. I was thinking trade as well. Though, not showcasing his obvious skills (while perhaps not what this team needs) or showing that there are issues between him and the coach don't seem like selling points.

    Add: Hibbert was solid, Rush made me root for him, and MCR received no minutes.
    Last edited by mcampbellarch; 01-17-2010 at 02:04 AM. Reason: Add

  6. #5
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    32,771

    Default Re: Asset Allocation

    Quote Originally Posted by efhead View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I hate to go simple but the TJ thing is bugging me. Can someone please explain why TJ is completely absent? Is this tin man redux? Like most, I would rather see Watson and Price (so long as AJ is passing more than he is shooting) but why would you totally bench a capable ball handler?
    It isn't that difficult to figure out. You can only play two point guards in the course of a game. So you have to decide which two. It is not fair to any of the three to mix and match and play one guy games 4 minutes as you try to give all three time. O'Brien has wanted to give Price a real look as he has looked good in practice. So how do you do that, and a "real look" is minutes every game consistantly. Do you bench Watson or Ford? those are your only two choices.

    O'Brien believes that Watson is a great leader, Watson is a better defender than Ford, he also runs the offense as Jim likes - he passes the ball, moves without the ball. So Jim decided he didn't want to bench Watson, so the only other choice was to bench Ford and that is what he did and I think it has worked out very, very well

    One of the better decisions JOB has made. I think it maks perfect sense and no I don't think there is some hidden mystery or some underhanded meaning or reason for the change

  7. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Unclebuck For This Useful Post:


  8. #6

    Default Re: Asset Allocation

    Exactly. JOB only likes to play two point guards. I think it's pretty clear which two point guards the team plays better with.

    As for trades. Ford's trade value continued to go down every game this season.

    The only thing different between how JOB treated Price and how he's treating Ford, is that Price would get in the game during blow outs. But JOB has said he thinks it's insulting to do that to a veteran.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Sookie For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Headband and Rec Specs rexnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    8,751

    Default Re: Asset Allocation

    Eh, Ford's contract expires next year anyways. It's not like we were trading him before next year, if at all, anyways.

  11. #8

    Default Re: Asset Allocation

    Quote Originally Posted by rexnom View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Eh, Ford's contract expires next year anyways. It's not like we were trading him before next year, if at all, anyways.
    I agree. It will be next to impossible to move Ford before next season. I think everyone should get over the notion of that happening.

  12. #9
    Member Mr. Sobchak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    704

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Asset Allocation

    Quote Originally Posted by rexnom View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Eh, Ford's contract expires next year anyways. It's not like we were trading him before next year, if at all, anyways.
    I cant see him turning down his player option though. He'll be on the books for about 8.5 mil next season IIRC

    Edit: Unless you meant after next year...

Similar Threads

  1. Bob Kravitz is a great asset to the Pacers
    By McKeyFan in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-24-2004, 06:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •