Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

  1. #1
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    2011 UPDATE:

    Upon review, my numbers are not accurate. I had falsely assumed the odds remain the same each year (at least starting with 1994), I inadvertently produced the wrong odds in my thread.

    I had assumed that team records and tie breakers first determined the order of the draft, and then once the order was established, I assumed that the number of lottery balls was always the same for each slot. I was wrong. They are NOT the same. Turns out, if teams tie in record, FIRST they SPLIT the AVERAGE of the number of balls between both of their slots, and THEN there's a tie breaker to determine who gets the extra ball (if applicable). Looking again at draft express, the ball count for teams changes every year. Even the #1 slot may not receive the usual 250 balls. If that team ties with another team, they SPLIT the number of balls the 1st and 2nd slot usually receive.

    So if you are the #1 slot in the lottery, you MAY NOT NECESSARILY HAVE 250 balls

    ===============

    For anyone wondering where we stand in the 2010 lottery, I was curious so I decided to take a look at the modern history results of the lotto.

    1994 was the first year for the lottery's current system that will still be in use for the 2010 selections.

    I wanted to look at the history of the lottery since '94 to compare what was supposed to happen (so to speak) versus what did happen.

    Let's look at the #1 overall pick.

    1994 - Went to the 4th worst record
    1995 - Went to the 5th worst record
    1996 - Went to the 2nd worst record
    1997 - Went to the 3rd worst record
    1998 - Went to the 3rd worst record
    1999 - Went to the 3rd worst record
    2000 - Went to the 7th worst record
    2001 - Went to the 3rd worst record
    2002 - Went to the 5th worst record
    2003 - Went to the 1st worst record
    2004 - Went to the 1st worst record
    2005 - Went to the 6th worst record
    2006 - Went to the 5th worst record
    2007 - Went to the 6th worst record
    2008 - Went to the 9th worst record
    2009 - Went to the 3rd worst record

    In 16 years, the worst team has won the lottery twice (12.5%)

    The 2nd worst team has won the lottery once (6.25%)

    The 3rd worst team has won the lottery five times (31.25%)

    The 4th worst team has won the lottery once (6.25%)

    The 5th worst team has won the lottery three times (18.75%)

    The 6th worst team has won the lottery twice (12.5%)

    The 7th worst team has won the lottery once (6.25%)

    The 8th worst team has never won the lottery.

    The 9th worst team has won the lottery once (6.25%)

    The 10th or worse team has never won the lottery.

    ================================================

    Now let's look at the #2 overall pick.

    1994 - Went to the 1st worst record
    1995 - Went to the 1st worst record
    1996 - Went to the 3rd worst record
    1997 - Went to the 5th worst record
    1998 - Went to the 5th worst record
    1999 - Went to the 1st worst record
    2000 - Went to the 4th worst record
    2001 - Went to the 8th worst record
    2002 - Went to the 2nd worst record
    2003 - Went to the 6th worst record
    2004 - Went to the 4th worst record
    2005 - Went to the 1st worst record
    2006 - Went to the 2nd worst record
    2007 - Went to the 5th worst record
    2008 - Went to the 1st worst record
    2009 - Went to the 6th worst record

    In 16 years, the worst team has won the 2nd pick five times (31.25%)

    The 2nd worst team has won the 2nd pick twice (12.5%)

    The 3rd worst team has won the 2nd pick once (6.25%)

    The 4th worst team has won the 2nd pick twice (12.5%)

    The 5th worst team has won the 2nd pick three times (18.75%)

    The 6th worst team has won the 2nd pick twice (12.5%)

    The 7th worst team has never won the 2nd pick.

    The 8th worst team has won the 2nd pick once (6.25%)

    The 9th or worst team has never won the 2nd pick.

    ================================================

    Finally, let's look at the #3 overall pick.

    1994 - Went to the 2nd worst record
    1995 - Went to the 4th worst record
    1996 - Went to the 1st worst record
    1997 - Went to the 2nd worst record
    1998 - Went to the 1st worst record
    1999 - Went to the 13th worst record
    2000 - Went to the 1st worst record
    2001 - Went to the 5th worst record
    2002 - Went to the 1st worst record
    2003 - Went to the 2nd worst record
    2004 - Went to the 2nd worst record
    2005 - Went to the 5th worst record
    2006 - Went to the 3rd worst record
    2007 - Went to the 4th worst record
    2008 - Went to the 3rd worst record
    2009 - Went to the 4th worst record

    In 16 years, the worst team has won the 3rd pick four times (25%)

    The 2nd worst team has won the 3rd pick four times (25%)

    The 3rd worst team has won the 3rd pick twice (12.5%)

    The 4th worst team has won the 3rd pick three times (18.75%)

    The 5th worst team has won the 3rd pick twice (12.5%)

    The 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th worst teams have never won the 3rd pick.

    The 13th worst team has won the 3rd pick once (6.25%)


    ================================================

    Math versus History thus far:

    Mathematically, the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd pick are most likely to go to the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd worst teams (obviously).

    Historically, it has yet to ever go exactly that way for all three. Only once have the 3 worst teams all won a top-3 pick at the same time (in 1996, 1st got #3, 2nd got #1, and 3rd got #2).

    Since 1994, (I rounded up/down when necessary, but I'm listing the actual odds of each, so they won't match up perfectly):

    The overall worst team "should have won" the lottery four times (25%), but it has in fact won it only twice (12.25%).

    It "should have won" the #2 pick three times (21.5%), but it has in fact won it five times (31.25%).

    It "should have won" the #3 pick three times (17.8%), but it has in fact won it four times (25%).

    Therefore, historically speaking, if you have the worst record, you're more likely to end up with the 2nd pick, then the 3rd pick, and then the 1st pick in that order.


    The 2nd worst team "should have won" the lottery three times (19.9%), but it has in fact won it only once (6.25%).

    It "should have won" the #2 pick three times (18.8%), but it has in fact won it only twice (12.5%).

    It "should have won" the #3 pick three times (17.1%), but it has in fact won it four times (25%).

    Therefore, historically speaking, if you have the 2nd worst record, you're more likely to end up with the 3rd pick, then the 2nd pick, then the 1st pick in that order.


    The 3rd worst team "should have won" the lottery twice (15.6%), but it has in fact won it five times (31.25%).

    It "should have won" the #2 pick three times (15.7%), but it has in fact won it only once (6.25%).

    It "should have won" the #3 pick twice (15.6%), and it has in fact won it twice (12.5%).

    Therefore, historically speaking, if you have the 3rd worst record, you're more likely to end up with the 1st pick, then the 3rd pick, then the 2nd pick in that order.

    As of this post (1/7/2010), the Indiana Pacers have the 5th worst record in the NBA.

    Mathematically, their odds of winning the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd pick in the lottery are 8.8%, 9.7%, and 10.7% -- 29.2% for winning something (1, 2, or 3)

    Historically, they're looking at 18.75%, 18.75%, and 12.5% -- 50% for winning something (1, 2, or 3)


    Food for thought.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_Draft_Lottery
    http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-draft-lottery-history/
    http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-draf...story/winners/

  2. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Hicks For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked


  3. #2

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Great stuff that I'd been pondering. Thanks for posting!

    If anything this should mathematically and historically eliminate all suggestions of tanking. You don't tank for a 5-10% margin of luck (3rd worst to worst record), especially when the max chance for a top pick is 25%.
    Last edited by imawhat; 01-07-2010 at 08:54 PM.

  4. #3
    FREE LANCE MillerTime's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    4,824

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    nice post....Someone like John Wall alongside Granger and Hibbert could really turn this franchise around
    "So, which one of you guys is going to come in second?" - Larry Bird before the 3 point contest. He won.



  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dillon, Co
    Posts
    3,920

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    What position was Orlando in when they drew the #1 pick for Shaq?

  6. #5
    Go Colts! Shade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    36
    Posts
    44,233

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    So, the 3rd worst record would be ideal. We definitely don't want to finish below 6th.

  7. #6
    Artificial Intelligence wintermute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,245

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    the problem is that the sample size is too small - only 16 lotteries to date. this is what probably produces the mismatch in the "mathematical" and "historical" odds. in the long term, the mathematical odds should hold. still, it's interesting to know how past drafts played out.

  8. #7
    Go Colts! Shade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    36
    Posts
    44,233

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by Pacerized View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What position was Orlando in when they drew the #1 pick for Shaq?
    Orlando had the second-worst record behind Minnesota.

  9. #8
    100% REAL, 0% OF THE TIME the jaddler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Greencastle, In
    Age
    31
    Posts
    301

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    well thank you for that info.....and im not sure if this is the place for it....but lets just throw the draft lottery out!!!!
    I CANT SPELL!

    THERE ARE THOSE THAT HAVE AND THOSE THAT WILL!

  10. #9
    Go Colts! Shade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    36
    Posts
    44,233

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by the jaddler View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    well thank you for that info.....and im not sure if this is the place for it....but lets just throw the draft lottery out!!!!
    Problem is, that leads to tanking.

  11. #10
    NaptownSeth is all feel Naptown_Seth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Downtown baby
    Posts
    12,618

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    A Priori called and it's pi**ed.





    Each lottery is a new lottery with no history of the past. Stern, on the other hand, may or may not be so mutually exclusive in determining the probability of winning the lottery.

    And the reason you don't want to tank is the 25% chance of winning the lottery. Not worth the risk to be that bad. 75% chance you come up short.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Naptown_Seth For This Useful Post:


  13. #11
    Pacer Junky Will Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,045

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Actually a top five pick should give us someone we could really use.

    And you don't actually have to get the top pick to win the lottery. The consensus number one doesn't aways turn out to be the best player. For instant MJ was a number three pick.

    I want Wall, but I know that's far fetched, so I would be happy to get someone to go with Granger and Hibbert, and the chances of doing that are better the higher in the draft you pick.

  14. #12
    Member CableKC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA ( 1123, 6536, 5321 )
    Age
    41
    Posts
    24,560

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Can someone tell me if the next draft is going to be like last seasons where there a few top picks and then drops off from there?
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    This is David West, he is the Honey Badger, West just doesn't give a *****....he's pretty bad *ss cuz he has no regard for any other Player or Team whatsoever.

  15. #13
    100% REAL, 0% OF THE TIME the jaddler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Greencastle, In
    Age
    31
    Posts
    301

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by Shade View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Problem is, that leads to tanking.
    yeah but if you tank for the sole reason of getting the number 1 pick....you wont be able to do anything with that pick........i mean i dont know what the true solution is here.....i dont think you can get a whole team of players to tank.....can you??????

    ok does anyone have the press release's or any storys from and about the reasoning for the lottery?
    I CANT SPELL!

    THERE ARE THOSE THAT HAVE AND THOSE THAT WILL!

  16. #14
    Pacer Junky Will Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,045

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by the jaddler View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    yeah but if you tank for the sole reason of getting the number 1 pick....you wont be able to do anything with that pick........i mean i dont know what the true solution is here.....i dont think you can get a whole team of players to tank.....can you??????

    ok does anyone have the press release's or any storys from and about the reasoning for the lottery?
    All O'B has to do is play the players he's been playing. The losses will bring the team spirit down, which would get the same result as tanking.

    I didn't understand your last question. If you want to read about the upcoming draft see this thread.

    http://www.pacersdigest.com/showthread.php?t=48913

  17. #15
    Headband and Rec Specs rexnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    8,751

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    A Priori called and it's pi**ed.





    Each lottery is a new lottery with no history of the past. Stern, on the other hand, may or may not be so mutually exclusive in determining the probability of winning the lottery.

    And the reason you don't want to tank is the 25% chance of winning the lottery. Not worth the risk to be that bad. 75% chance you come up short.
    Thank you for your statistical sense post.

  18. #16
    Junior Member GermanPacersFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Looking at how things work out in Lottery land, we should be clear that the worst record guarantees you everything but the #1 pick, as long as you aren't the Orlando Magic.

    Though, with the way the Nets are "playing basketball" this year, i doubt we'll be able to beat them for the worst record, even if we would trade Danny.

    So we should have a good shot at a top 3 pick this year, as long as the team doesn't goes onto one of it's streaks that won't get us to the playoffs, but somewhere around the #10 pick.

  19. #17
    100 Miles from the B count55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,772

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead Script



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Bet?



    Heads I win.



    Again...



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Heads.



    Whoops!



    It must be indicative of something
    besides the redistribution of wealth.



    Heads.



    A weaker man might be moved
    to re-examine his faith,



    for nothing else at least
    in the law of probability...



    Heads.



    Consider.



    One,



    probability is a factor which
    operates within natural forces.



    Two, probability is not
    operating as a factor.



    Three, we are now held within um...



    sub or supernatural forces.



    Discuss!
    What?



    Look at it this way.
    If six monkeys...



    If six monkeys...



    The law of averages,
    if I have got this right means...



    that if six monkeys were thrown
    up in the air long enough...



    they would land on their tails
    about as often as they would
    land on their...



    Heads, getting a bit of
    a bore, isn't it?



    A bore?
    Well...



    What about the suspense?



    What suspense?



    It must be the law
    of diminishing returns.



    I still spell about to be broken.



    Well, it was an even chance.



    Seventy eight in a row.
    A new record, I imagine.



    Is that what you imagine?
    A new record?



    No questions?
    Not a flicker of doubt?



    I could be wrong.



    No fear?
    Fear?



    Fear!



    Seventy nine.



    I think I have it.
    Time has stopped dead.



    The single experience of one coin
    being spun once has been repeated.



    A hundred and fifty six times.



    On the whole, doubtful.



    Or, a spectacular vindication
    of the principle.



    That each individual
    coin spun individually is...



    as likely to come down
    heads as tails



    and therefore should cause no
    surprise each individual time it does.
    Heads.

  20. #18
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    32,762

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Having the worst record still gives you the best chance of getting the number 1 pick. History means nothing when it comes to this sort of thing. It is like if you flip a coin 5 times and each time it comes up heads (assuming the coin is not defective) and then you toss it a 6th time, there is a 50% chance that it will be heads and a 50% chance it will be tails. So suggesting that we should pick heads because it is on a roll, or saying the odds are it will be tails - both arguments have no value.

    Hicks - one thing that I believe needs to be factored in is they have I think 2 or 3 times over the years changed the weighting system to give the worse teams a better chance at the number 1 pick . When the lotterry started it was a pure blind draw involving 7 teams. I think they have changed the weighting since 1994, although I'm not sure about that
    Last edited by Unclebuck; 01-08-2010 at 01:00 PM.

  21. #19
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    A Priori called and it's pi**ed.





    Each lottery is a new lottery with no history of the past. Stern, on the other hand, may or may not be so mutually exclusive in determining the probability of winning the lottery.

    And the reason you don't want to tank is the 25% chance of winning the lottery. Not worth the risk to be that bad. 75% chance you come up short.
    Quote Originally Posted by rexnom View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Thank you for your statistical sense post.
    Condescension FTW!

    I thought it was obvious and went without saying that the past doesn't change the odds any other year. I just thought it was interesting to look at and fun to calculate the "historical odds".

  22. #20

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    It is not about sports, but the following book backs up Hicks' argument. Taleb is the guru of Randomness and Uncertainty.

    Seth and Rex and Count55 are right, too. Eventually a very large number of trials (which the NBA draft hasn't seen) will show that the worst team is the most likely to win the first pick. But the odds of the worst team winning the first pick in any given year is very small.

    EDIT: Note that, after an infinite number of trials, the worst team will still be getting the top pick only 25% of the time.


    And I won't be here to see the day
    It all dries up and blows away
    I'd hang around just to see
    But they never had much use for me
    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

  23. #21

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by MillerTime View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    nice post....Someone like John Wall alongside Granger and Hibbert could really turn this franchise around

    Don't you get it?

    We aren't talking about John Wall. We are talking about 12.5% of him. What's that worth?
    And I won't be here to see the day
    It all dries up and blows away
    I'd hang around just to see
    But they never had much use for me
    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

  24. #22
    FREE LANCE MillerTime's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    4,824

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by Putnam View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Don't you get it?

    We aren't talking about John Wall. We are talking about 12.5% of him. What's that worth?
    Seems like we're talking about odds to get the #1 pick with respect to the worst records (of a team) of a given year.

    What does 12.5% of John Wall mean?
    "So, which one of you guys is going to come in second?" - Larry Bird before the 3 point contest. He won.



  25. #23
    100 Miles from the B count55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,772

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Wasn't trying to make a point, per se.

    Just always loved that scene.

  26. #24
    NaptownSeth is all feel Naptown_Seth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Downtown baby
    Posts
    12,618

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Condescension FTW!

    I thought it was obvious and went without saying that the past doesn't change the odds any other year. I just thought it was interesting to look at and fun to calculate the "historical odds".
    Oh, my tone wasn't meant that way. It's more that you could see where the discussion might head after that jump off point.


    BTW, not just in the lottery but in all your standard gambling and gaming, it's in the interest of the house to keep it random. If for some reason the #5 team card actually did come up statistically more often (like a roulette wheel with a balance issue), teams would take advantage of that. Instead of tanking you'd have some insane battle of tanks and wins to hold the #5 spot instead.

    Admittedly that could be pretty entertaining.



    And I'm in no way knocking the leg work you did Hicks. I did read your post and was interested in seeing the statistical history. It does add context to the situation.
    Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 01-08-2010 at 12:23 PM.

  27. The Following User Says Thank You to Naptown_Seth For This Useful Post:


  28. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Age
    33
    Posts
    28,142

    Default Re: NBA Draft Lottery History from 1994-2009 versus the odds

    I'll be ok with at least a top five pick.

Similar Threads

  1. Tbird analysis: 2009 draft night leaves more questions than answers
    By thunderbird1245 in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-28-2009, 10:38 PM
  2. The PD NBA Draft - #11 New Jersey
    By Jose Slaughter in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-17-2009, 04:18 PM
  3. The PD NBA Draft - #10 Milwaukee
    By Jose Slaughter in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-16-2009, 09:36 AM
  4. The PD NBA Best Pick Left in the Draft 4
    By Hicks in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-30-2008, 08:33 PM
  5. Top Draft Prospects
    By Will Galen in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-18-2008, 11:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •