Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

    2-3 weeks ago I would have said fire JOB and have Bird coach, but now that the season is getting out of hand, even though we are only 3 games out of the playoffs. I say let JOB finish out the year. If Bird has a 3 year plan to shed contracts and bring in a big FA, then honestly the performance of this team is according to plan. You aren't going to lure a Big FA here just with Granger alone, so getting a top 5 pick who can come in and be a difference maker is priority #1 for me. If you get that pick in the upcoming draft then come out next season and really show alot of promise, make the playoffs. You'll get some attention from FA. No big name FA wants to go to a team of losers. So if you are going to pick a year to be absolutely terrible, this is the year to do it in regards to the 3 year plan. I'd so say that picking a good head coach to go along with your top 5 rookie is a good idea too.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

      Originally posted by IndyPacer View Post
      He makes some good points here, but Kravitz also tries (once again) to play the "hindsight genius" with things like the David Harrison pick (wasn't he at the end of the 1st round; expecting a franchise player there?) or Sarunas not panning out (other teams were quite interested in him as well), which is why I absolutely can't stand him. What about getting Granger and Hibbert with mid-1st round picks? AJ Price could also turn into a steal. There are major things Bird needs to sort out, which includes the coaching and underachieving situation, but there have been some very positive moves by Bird as well, especially regarding cleaning out the behavior problem players.
      With Harrison, I imagine he is talking about not doing their homework in looking at his character, and mental make-up.

      Sarunas may have been looked at by other teams prior to signing with the Pacers, but past that point no one was interested. What teams are clamoring for him now?

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

        Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
        Yeah, this article was written around Sunday night, early to mid yesterday. I was forewarned about this article.

        Kravitz only shows up to a few games a season and is never at any practices. He sees the stat lines and reads what Mike Wells writes in his Insider Blogs.

        Shame on you, Bob. Way to be a journalist.
        This is truth, he admits as much on the Radio when ever anything is said about the Pacers, he is clueless and admits he doesn't really follow the Pacers.
        You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

          Originally posted by Tom White View Post
          With Harrison, I imagine he is talking about not doing their homework in looking at his character, and mental make-up.
          Yes but that is what you get with a project player at the bottom of the first round. Talented guy who isn't the full package, if he was the full package we would have been drafted earlier.
          You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

            Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
            I think you may be contradicting yourself here. Do you want JOB as coach so we'll continue to tank? Do you want him to develop the young players? (you say he won't).

            One or the other.
            I don't think O'Brien will develop young players unless forced to. I think he'll run home to his preferred 125-124 basketball attempt just as quickly as he can. And I think that will get us in lottery land. I'm thinking more about next year and a new coach developing the young players.

            Of course if O'Brien makes it to next season then that really will take the wind out of my sails.

            I'm conflicted on the firing him idea. I'm worried that about any replacement coach will be able to do better after a couple of weeks. All of a sudden we'll be in the hunt for the 8th playoff spot.

            I just don't think that is a good place to be in with this team. I could be wrong... maybe with someone else stirring the drink the pieces start fitting and all of a sudden FA upgrades will look like the way to go.

            I'm not totally down on Murphy. I think he does exactly what O'Brien wants. The question is-is that all he can do? The second question is- What does it tell you about O'Brien if Murphy is giving him what he wants on the court?

            It at least tells me all of O'Brien's talk about defense is just that- talk.
            Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

            ------

            "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

            -John Wooden

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

              First, I called Bob's paragraph on the Orlando game last night when Duke told me the article was coming. Way to dismiss a data point that doesn't fit into your neatly packaged data there, Bob.

              Bob isn't wrong, he just oversimplifies. I can read comments from any number of uninformed Indy Star readers for that.

              To name Diener as one of Bird's major blunders is pushing it, I think.
              BillS

              A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
              Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                This is truth, he admits as much on the Radio when ever anything is said about the Pacers, he is clueless and admits he doesn't really follow the Pacers.
                That doesn't justify his opinion, though. Even though you admit ignorance still doesn't mean what you say is any more credible.

                This is the time of year where he should be rippin' on the Colts. After that come to a few practices then I may actually buy into what he spoon-feeds the ignorant masses.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                  Originally posted by Tom White View Post
                  With Harrison, I imagine he is talking about not doing their homework in looking at his character, and mental make-up.
                  Everybody knew he was something of a bonehead. That's why he was available at 29. This was pre-brawl, and they had just gone to the Conference Finals, largely with a collection of talented boneheads. They took a flyer on the size and talent.

                  It's not that they made a mistake in understanding his character and mental make-up. It's that they deluded themselves into thinking that they still had a good locker room, when that probably hadn't been true since 2000.

                  Sarunas may have been looked at by other teams prior to signing with the Pacers, but past that point no one was interested. What teams are clamoring for him now?
                  Cleveland was sure they had him signed (and were quite disappointed when they lost him), and I believe (but I'm not sure) that Utah had pursued him pretty heavily.

                  Of course, this only proves that Bird wasn't the only one who was wrong about Saras.
                  Last edited by count55; 01-06-2010, 10:02 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                    Originally posted by BillS View Post
                    First, I called Bob's paragraph on the Orlando game last night when Duke told me the article was coming. Way to dismiss a data point that doesn't fit into your neatly packaged data there, Bob.

                    Bob isn't wrong, he just oversimplifies. I can read comments from any number of uninformed Indy Star readers for that.

                    To name Diener as one of Bird's major blunders is pushing it, I think.
                    I think if they had a do-over on Diener, they probably would have tried to get the third year to be a team option (or gone, altogether.) However, they basically got their money's worth out of him the first two years.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                      Originally posted by BillS View Post
                      First, I called Bob's paragraph on the Orlando game last night when Duke told me the article was coming. Way to dismiss a data point that doesn't fit into your neatly packaged data there, Bob.

                      Bob isn't wrong, he just oversimplifies. I can read comments from any number of uninformed Indy Star readers for that.

                      To name Diener as one of Bird's major blunders is pushing it, I think.
                      Yeah, my thoughts exactly especially about Diener. Seemed like Bob was reaching for concrete Bird mistakes and had to throw Travis in there to try and bolster his point.

                      Yeah on Harrison - I thought he was a wacko, but taking him at 29 was a good pick - worth a chance on a big guy who had some athleticism and some skills. So another reach there Bob

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                        Originally posted by count55 View Post
                        I think if they had a do-over on Diener, they probably would have tried to get the third year to be a team option (or gone, altogether.) However, they basically got their money's worth out of him the first two years.
                        yeah, small potatoes.

                        You could argue that Walsh handed Bird about fifty to seventy-five Dieners.
                        "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                          I am beyond tired of no-nothing's getting their loud mouths heard by masses of people. I almost feel sick that there are people among the masses who won't know better and will now believe what is being preached by this "journalist."

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                            Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                            I am beyond tired of no-nothing's getting their loud mouths heard by masses of people. I almost feel sick that there are people among the masses who won't know better and will now believe what is being preached by this "journalist."
                            "I have seen something else under the sun: The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned; but time and chance happen to them all."

                            —Ecclesiastes 9:11
                            "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                              Originally posted by hoopsforlife View Post
                              The irony of Sarunas, as I see it, is he would have fit into JOB's system extremely well.
                              No, he wouldn't. Any system where he had to face NBA defenders with NBA rules is a system where he'd be a liability on both ends of the floor.
                              This space for rent.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Pacers need Bird to take bold action Bob Kravitz

                                Well call me a monkey riding a dog. I misread the thread title and assumed it said "pacers need bird to take action against bob kravitz." I revoke my poll choice and check No.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X