Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

    First and foremost I want to give a shout out to Larry Brown for taking one for the team. I'm sure going into tonight he probably figured that Herb Simon had taken enough abuse over the past few seasons so he thought he would get one for the Gipper so to speak.

    Now to us.

    The Smashing Pumpkins said it best for me here, "Despite all my rage I am still just a rat in a cage".

    What does that mean? Well no matter how badly I want to rage against the machine and bang my head and even jump off of a tall building I am still at the mercy of the coaching staff of this team.

    First I want to give respect to the Jazz. A well oiled machine that maximizes the talent that is on the floor.

    There was one play in the second quarter that I hit replay for about 6 straight times by the Jazz. It was a picture perfect high post, double cut to the glass with a picture perfect lay-up.

    I replayed this for myself because I wanted to see what an organized offense actually looked like as I haven't seen one in about 9 years now.

    Now to us.

    I have been holding off doing one of these because I wanted to kind of do one after a win, but with this team.....

    Well I have chosen to go ahead and do one after we have had two games where we did not at least become the event horizon for a black hole. If I would have done one after the Golden State loss I assure you I would have had to ban myself from posting ever again.

    But while we have been beaten again by both the Kings and the Jazz at least I felt like we competed.

    It did not start out that way tonight though. Honestly with the way this started I was wondering if we would score 70 points for the game while holding them below 100.

    But thankfully we picked it up a little anyway.

    There are so many ways to go from here. At first I was just going to make this a Troy Murphy and Jim O'Brien free zone and not even talk about them. But it hit me that no matter what I was going to say it was always going to come back to them so I am not even going to avoid the issues.

    I don't intend for them to be my main talking points, but I make no guarantees on that.

    Although we are not at the 20 game mark it's close enough and I think I am going to go ahead and look at the team overall right now and give the evaluations.

    I'll start with the players:

    Jeff Foster: By far the most consistent player on the team night in and night out this season. As I stated about 5 years ago to U.B. that Jeff would become a better player once he got older and no longer had the athleticism to rely on. Well I believe that has come true. Since he no longer has the foot speed that he had just a few short years ago he now relies on position, contact and being (I can't believe I'm about to type this) more physical.

    In fact by today's NBA standard I would actually consider Jeff a banger.

    He has been great on the defensive end, good with rebounding and has not been a total waste of space on offense. He is the elder statesmen of the team.

    Now having said all of these warm fuzzy things about Jeff I will still say this. I want Hibbert to start and play more min. Jeff is like Jeff always is; he is good no matter what role or how many min. he is going to play. But the simple reality of the situation is we are not going to compete for much of anything this season so while I still want Jeff to play I don't want to see him gobbling up to many min. because when we are to the point of not being a door mat in the NBA again Jeff will most likely not be here.

    However for a person who has never been a Jeff Foster fan I am going to give him a grade I have never given him before that I can remember.

    Jeff Foster = A

    Danny Granger: Much like Fox Mulder "I want to believe". Look it may just be that after so many years of being a sewer for malcontents, prima donna (notice I did not put that in a plural phrase) and troublemakers Danny looked like Captain America. In other words not only could the guy play ball but he was also the exact image at the exact time that this franchise so desperately needed.

    He still is, to a degree.

    But as I have been saying in almost every single one of these posts all season long. There is something not right here. I want to believe that it is the heel. I want to believe it is the knee. I want to believe it is some form of physical ailment that is making him at times look like a zombie on the court.

    Sadly so for this season he has put away his Captain America costume and picked up his new super hero persona's outfit, Danny the Chucker who's powers seem to be taking the farthest, fastest shot in the entire NBA.

    Here is where I will force myself to not go off track and complain about O'Brien, although believe me I want to. I am certain Danny has a green light to shoot, (to a point I am sure he deserves this) and I'm sure Jim doesn't mind Danny taking a quick shot from 3 early in the game to probe the defense.

    But I am almost positive (well at least I hope I am anyway) that Jim is not telling him to throw it up from wherever you are with whoever is on you. It could be Danny has lost the faith in his team mates and feels the added burden of trying to be "the man". It could be weighing on him and who could blame him.

    But I'm just saying the guy most of the time does not seem to be enjoying playing, at least not like last year. Again it could all be the pain from the heel.

    If this is the case coupled with the fact that he is not practicing with the team then I have to wonder if maybe for everybody's long term benefit if we shouldn't sit him for a couple of games. What is the worse that could happen we lose 4 in a row, oh wait...

    Defensively he seems to be about what he was last season. Maybe a little better than last season. Rebounding has been hit and miss with some outstanding games and a couple of really low number games.

    Leadership is where I seem to be seeing a lapse. Last season only Roy Hibbert cheered more from the bench than him and now this season he seems to not be so involved.

    This sounds a lot more negative than I intended for it to be but I guess that is really where I am at right now with him. I still love him as a player and would not trade him for anything less than upper tier talent but I will just say I was hoping for a little more. Maybe my expectations were too high?

    Danny Granger = B

    Dahntay Jones: Better than expected. In fact up until the mindless benching (I promise I am not going to go off of track here) I thought that he was probably the most important part of the very early success that we had.

    Offensively he was far better than advertised and on defense he was giving us exactly what we expected. However what was more important than either of those things was the fact that he brought toughness to our lineup that we have lacked for several years. A player who would bite, kick, scratch and claw not to lose a game.

    Now he is not without faults though. While certainly his offense has been a very pleasant surprise he will probably end up with the Al "I've never met a shot I don't like" Harrington award for being the teams black hole. Once it goes in it ain't coming back out. Come hell or high-water he is either going up with a shot or going to take it to the rack. Sometimes this has spectacular success; other times he misses team mates who have wide open shots.

    However I tend to be more forgiving, maybe even more that I should be, to players like him because he is always fighting and does not give up. I guess he is the type of player you would want to go to war with.

    Dahntay Jones = B

    T.J. Ford: His game is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you are going to get. There have been games where he is simply the worst point guard in all of basketball; I'm including my nephew's 6 year old league btw here. But then there are other times that he has been vastly under rated on this board for sure and actually put in solid overall play.

    On defense there has been several times that he was very disruptive to the other team only to be outdone by being very disruptive to our offense on our end of the court.

    Look the guy is never going to be a Mark Jackson style of point guard. In fact, again I will not go off of track to talk about O'Brien even though I want to, in style of offense that we employ he would not be allowed to be even if he was. So for those who complain about is few assists a game and lack of overall being a floor general I want to say that while we all might want that our coach does not. So it is hard to blame T.J. for not being something we might want but playing in the style that the coach wants.

    But it really has been erratic for him this season. I mean he has had monster swings from game to game and really that is not what you are looking for from your p.g. no matter what style the coach is playing. So while I am not nearly as down on him as others are I will be the first to say that an improvement at the point would not be a bad thing.

    T.J. Ford = C

    Earl Watson: Exactly about everything you would want from your back up point guard. Hard nosed defender, does not do many stupid things with the ball and has the ability to hit a shot when needed.

    Now that is not to say that he is without problems either. He went through a streak of games where he made Jeff Foster look like Jeff Hornacek from the floor. While his defense never waned his pure lack of offense would sometimes kill us.

    But very hard to be upset with someone signed to a min. contract asked to come in and be the main backup right away who at least does the first rule of medicine "first do no harm".

    Earl Watson = B (this is not an indication that he is better than T.J. btw, it is just based on his play vs. what is expected of him)

    And now we come to the musical portion of our show.

    [yt][yt]

    Roy Hibbert: This will be very very very very very hard for me not to talk about the coaching staff here. I will try with all my might but I may not be able to help myself.

    To begin the year with this guy was as good as any of us would have ever expected him to be. In fact he had far exceeded any expectations I had of him. On offense he was solid, on defense he was not a liability in fact he was actually somewhat of a space eater inside and the rebounding, oh my the rebounding. I never dreamed that the guy would average over 5 rebounds a game for any length of time but he was pulling in 9+ a game and was one of the league leaders in blocked shots.

    Then Troy Murphy returned from injury.

    From there it has been a free fall that would make any Army HALO jumper proud. However since we are not the army this is not a good thing.

    He is at best a shell of himself from earlier this season. Now you can blame it all on Roy or on circumstance or whatever, but there is a disconnect the size of Texas between the way he played when he was paired with an athletic power forward who could defend his man vs. being paired with a power forward who's idea of defense is to formally write and request that his opponent not drive on him.

    I don't really even know how to rate Roy here. I know some think I am too easy on him, maybe I am. No matter who is out there with him on defense that does not give him excuse for dropping the ball in the post or getting fooled by a pump fake from 45 feet out from the basket. But still I just think there was a world of difference.

    Roy Hibbert = C+

    Solomon Jones: Again I will make myself refrain from talking about coaching here. When he was given a chance early in the season he was affective, to his abilities anyway, and he offered up some form of resistance in the post when Roy was not there. In fact between Roy & Solomon and the others we were the best shot blocking team in the NBA.

    He is a better free throw shooter than you think; he is also a better scorer than you think as he can hit a jump shot from about 10-12 without much problem.

    Look don't get me wrong the guy is not going to challenge Dwight Howard anytime soon as a post presence and I am not saying he should be a starter or even the first backup off of the bench or anything. But I am saying that compared to others who are getting ungodly min. compared to what they are producing I just can NOT see why this guy is getting DNP-CD'd game after game.

    But again, low cost back up who is willing to be a good soldier makes me maybe be a little soft on the grade scale with him.

    Solomon Jones = C

    Luther Head: Oh let's see here the last game we won I believe that Luther had 14 points in 22 min. of play. Then the next night he played 11 min. and was one of only 3 players in the + side of the +/- category (which I pay no attention to but for some reason our coach seems to want to go there when talking about certain players) but since then? Not a single min. on the floor.

    This is actually somewhat surprising to me because to be honest with you I would have thought that Luther would have been exactly what O'Brien would want from a p.g. But he has not chosen to go that route.

    There are only so many min. in a game so someone is not going to get to play that some of us think should so I guess that would be Luther and Solomon for me.

    Defense can tend to be a little spotty as I still have nightmares about S. Jones picking up a foul in the pre-season because Luther let his man blow past him like he was in cement.

    But again super cheap back up that is willing to be a good soldier and does seem to produce when called upon?

    Luther Head = C

    Tyler Hansbrough: Wrecking ball. When I see him on the floor I see a player who is not afraid. Look I have no dog in the fight of if he should or should not have been drafted or if he should have been taken lower or where he went to college at or any of that.

    But from what I have seen, I like it. That is why his second half disappearance vs. the Jazz was so both disappointing and maddening. I won't say it is a mystery as to why he didn't play; I think we all know why.

    I saw Carlos Boozer back up to him and try and back him down and he did not budge. In fact Carlos bounced off of him and lost the ball. Ford will get the steal for that but it was created by the rock hard physic of Tyler. Btw, this guy dwarfs Millsap in both height and much to my shock strength. In fact Paul looked like a guard compared to Tyler.

    For the season though I think we are getting good work from him. I have no idea what his ceiling is and I don't think any of us can really speculate with anything other than a guess.

    He does have weaknesses for certain but what I like about him so far anyway is that he seems to be able to learn from his weaknesses and tries to compensate for them.

    I want to see more time from him, not less. So you can guess who I want to give up min. for him to get them from.

    Decent face up shooter, far better than expected defender. Rebounding seems to be coming along although he does need some work on this. He does have a legitimate problem sometimes getting lift in the lane so he has had his shot blocked a few times.

    But overall I will have to say I am pretty happy with him.

    Tyler Hansbrough = B

    Brandon Rush: To call him a disappointment would be to say that the Titanic was a small mishap.

    Look I love defense. Defense wins games yada yada yada...

    But you can NOT have your shooting guard score so few point in a game. Unless your name is T.R. Dunn and you are a shooting guard you damn well put the ball in the basket at over 12 points a game.

    Look this is one time that I can NOT blame coaching. In fact he has gone out of his way the other way to help Brandon (Oh if only he would do this for Roy). But like Mel Gibson said to the Land Barons in BraveHart "for Chists sake help yourselfs". Well the only person standing between Brandon Rush and success is Brandon Rush.

    He was all but given the job on a silver platter. Heck Dunleavy didn't even play for the first few games so that wasn't even an issue.

    But giving him minutes on the floor is like giving him the GlennGary leads, he is just throwing them away.

    Brandon Rush = D (the only reason this is not an F is because he has done a very admirable job on defense and while I appreciate that we need something else)

    Troy Murphy: I think I will just sum up my thoughts on Troy Murphy by posting a photo of his defensive stance.



    No it is not fair to state that our entire problem is Troy Murphy, in fact I am glad that vs. the Jazz he didn't suck as bad on defense as he usually does (now that is a ringing endorsement if I have ever uttered one). But to say that he, and to be more specific our coach's love of his game, is not a major problem would not be right either.

    This guy is so bad on defense on most nights that he literally makes player around him worse. His shot had not been dropping prior to the Utah game so the one thing he did offer the team (his three's) has not been there either. However to his credit it does look like he has worked on driving the lane this year so I will give him full credit for that.

    Look I don't want to sound like a reactionary here but I will just go ahead and make this statement now.

    I understand the long term plan. I understand that 2011 is the goal but, and believe me I know this is a huge but, if there is anyway at all to expedite his departure from the team we have got to do this now.

    Ok, I'll caveat that by saying he can stay but O'Brien has to go. Actually the more I think about that I still want Murphy to go as well.

    Look him playing center instead of Roy makes me want to experiment with LSD. Him playing over 35 min. a game while Tyler plays less than 15 makes me want to put on sack cloth and ashes and whip myself with chains.

    Remember this is coming from a person who wanted him here. This is also from the same person who used to defend him to his naysayer for his salary.

    But no more. This guy has got to go and I do not want to wait till 2011 to do it.

    But like I started out saying "despite all my rage I am still just a rat in a cage" and I know that this suck fest will continue for the next year and a half at least.

    Troy Murphy = F

    A.J. Price, Mike Dunleavy & Josh McRoberts have not played enough for me to score yet.

    I will get to O'Brien and Bird later; it will take an entire post all by itself I assure you.

    Now for those of you who have suffered through this nonsense I present you with a parting gift of fruit.




    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

  • #2
    Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

    Always great to read these, Peck. Thanks .
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

      So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

      If you've done 6 impossible things today?
      Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

        Thanks for the read. They have about five more games before I make any overarching judgment/analysis. Not happy with how things have gone, but glad to at least see a little fight out of them lately.

        Two things I hope I don't conclude once I get to where you are (early season trends/state of the team), but that I will need to be convicend otherwise of in the next 5 of so contests:

        1) This team is not nearly as talented as I thought, which is not saying much because, IIRC, I predicted 34 or 35 wins so I don't think I was ever overestimating it.

        2) The pieces of our alleged young future core may only amount to bench or role players, not legit starters/contributors to a good team. (Hard to assess I know given the playing time consistency ?, but as of now, I am just not impressed.)
        I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

        -Emiliano Zapata

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....



          Look, no one needs to be quoting a post a mile long just to make a small response to it that doesn't go point by point. Just makes the page a lot longer than it has to be. Thanks.



          Peck, why bother with grading the other players, just say it plain, Troy sucks and he is the reason the Pacers suck. Really it is discouraging to see one of the PD's best posters resort to this type of trashing of a Pacer player. Hell, I bet Hitler would get more love than Troy does from this board.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

            Two words of advice from a fellow poster:
            1) If a post is seven thousand words long, you probably shouldn't quote the entire thing.
            2) Familiarize yourself with Godwin's Law.

            I don't think we're a bad team - we just play that way.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

              Originally posted by GuffeyRay View Post
              Peck, why bother with grading the other players, just say it plain, Troy sucks and he is the reason the Pacers suck. Really it is discouraging to see one of the PD's best posters resort to this type of trashing of a Pacer player. Hell, I bet Hitler would get more love than Troy does from this board.
              Can you please defend Troy? I would like to see a well-crafted defense for why he should be playing the second-most minutes on this team.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                Originally posted by rexnom View Post
                Can you please defend Troy? I would like to see a well-crafted defense for why he should be playing the second-most minutes on this team.
                Well crafted, do you mean like the ones that simply say Troy sucks and should not be playing one minute? As I have previously stated, I am not a Troy supporter, however I will speak up for him when he is being made as the team scape goat.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                  Peck, have you become a little more optimistic about some of the players or have I become more pessimistic about the other ones and the coaching staff?

                  I don't know which is is but I am finding myself agreeing with you more than usual.

                  We saw "good TJ" last night after the first quarter. I still get really nervous when he dribbles below his knee but as long as he keeps it in control he can do good things. In the first quarter he looked like a 5th grader trying to dribble like Curly Neal and failing miserably.

                  Troy at least finally hit some shots. That's all I'm going to say about that.

                  Roy's confidence should be boosted by some of what he accomplished, though his numbers are still kind of ugly. He had that monster block without fouling, which is what he should be doing.

                  Dun is coming along and actually had some very good defensive moments.

                  Earl should be getting a lot more minutes.

                  I have no idea why Tyler only played half his allotment, once again the lineup while he was on the floor was the one that got the flow started.
                  Last edited by BillS; 12-05-2009, 11:36 AM. Reason: Roy wasn't in the game down the stretch, my bad memory.
                  BillS

                  A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                  Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                    Originally posted by GuffeyRay View Post
                    Well crafted, do you mean like the ones that simply say Troy sucks and should not be playing one minute? As I have previously stated, I am not a Troy supporter, however I will speak up for him when he is being made as the team scape goat.
                    I thought Peck was pretty specific as to what the problems were with Troy. What more do you want, a minute-by-minute breakdown?
                    BillS

                    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                    Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                      Originally posted by GuffeyRay View Post
                      Well crafted, do you mean like the ones that simply say Troy sucks and should not be playing one minute? As I have previously stated, I am not a Troy supporter, however I will speak up for him when he is being made as the team scape goat.
                      Well crafted as in unlike 99 percent of your other posts.

                      I do remember one where you went into some detail to make your point.
                      "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                        Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                        Well crafted as in unlike 99 percent of your other posts.

                        I do remember one where you went into some detail to make your point.
                        Well now coming from a one trick pony I can't be too offended. Leading the pack in trashing Troy does not make it true. My point is Troy is less popular than Jackson, JO, Tinman, Artest, S. Wiiliams etc combined. Now if you and others can't see what is wrong with that picture heaven help us.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                          In fact by today's NBA standard I would actually consider Jeff a banger
                          He bordered on dirty last year. He's no stranger to the hard foul, that's for sure.

                          Personally I love his awareness. He's not a scorer on offense, but you need screens and picks too, and Jeff understands this. He could easily work within the Utah offense because it would give him a chance to impact the game.

                          But I'm just saying the guy most of the time does not seem to be enjoying playing, at least not like last year. Again it could all be the pain from the heel.
                          This keeps coming up and I'll bump my own conspiracy once again - was Mel Daniels referring to Danny when he said not everyone was thrilled that JOB was extended.

                          Danny's offense right now reminds me of when Kobe responded to Phil asking him to pass more by blatantly passing up shots and ONLY passing, basically out of spite. Is Danny ramping up the chucking because he's tiring of JOB's system, or other players not being held accountable or having roles adjusted to get the best groups on the court at all times?

                          Personally I've found that actions and body language are a lot more revealing that people want to think. Poker players making a living off this truth. People struggle to REACT according to their false front, they give it away in moments of quick thought or reaction, and I think Danny might be saying to us "I'm annoyed here".

                          Maybe my reason is wrong, but I'm with Peck in thinking that something or someone is bugging the heck out of him.
                          Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 12-05-2009, 12:15 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                            I doubt that this is true, but maybe this is all part of the three year plan? Bird extended O'B knowing that either:

                            A. O'Brien would minimize results and get us better draft picks just by being O'Brien

                            or

                            B. O'Brien would be willing to tank as instructed in an effort to get us in position to get us better draft picks without really changing much of how he coaches

                            Or maybe it is simply that we are all blind and simply cannot see what O'Brien sees because he has "A Beautiful Mind" when it comes to basketball.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                              I have no idea why Tyler only played half his allotment, once again the lineup while he was on the floor was the one that got the flow started.
                              Bill, did you just get "McRoberts'd"?

                              Look, I know you don't see McBob's reason for playing, but I don't see Tyler doing anything more myself. So let's split it and call us both right, both guys show promise and at the very least simply need to play so they can learn and improve.

                              Then you get a mysterious benching, often when the player seems to be actively involved in a period of good team play.

                              That's being "McRoberts'd". How long before Tyler is in a suit behind the bench? I'll say next season, game 11. (Injury not included)

                              Oh wait, JOB won't be the coach then. Nevermind.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X