Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: 6 years, 39 mil. Why are people saying it's more than the MLE?

  1. #1
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,748

    Default 6 years, 39 mil. Why are people saying it's more than the MLE?

    Well?

    It's identical to what some previously signed players have gotten at the MLE.

    If there's been an explanation, it got lost in the noise.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  2. #2
    Artificial Intelligence wintermute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,556

    Default Re: 6 years, 39 mil. Why are people saying it's more than the MLE?

    it's been corrected in other threads. reported deal in star was 6 years 44 mil. this is also mle, but at the higher 12.5% raises allowed for the home team, rather than the max 10% raises allowed for pacers.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •