Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Seriously:Boozer or AL?? I'll take Al read on.

  1. #1
    Thanks Kesty! Pig Nash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Age
    28
    Posts
    6,550
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Seriously:Boozer or AL?? I'll take Al read on.

    interesting opinion. I am just waiting for something to happen for us.

  2. #2
    Administrator Peck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    14,256

    Default Re: Seriously:Boozer or AL?? I'll take Al read on.

    Al is better than Carlos Boozer?

    While were at it Austin Croshere is better than Ben Wallace.


    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

  3. #3
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    33,911

    Default Re: Seriously:Boozer or AL?? I'll take Al read on.

    Boozer was very good his rookie season, I remember Peck among others were very high on Boozer towards the end of his rookie season. Silas helped him, but he was plenty good prior to Paul.

    As Peck likes to say Boozer is dale davis with a jump shot. I won't go that far because Boozer's defense is no where near DD


  4. #4
    Rebound King Kstat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    34
    Posts
    31,312

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Seriously:Boozer or AL?? I'll take Al read on.

    Boozer was always a very good prospect. He was passed over because he doesnt have awesome athletic skills. I was hyping boozer the entire month of june as the sleeper pick in the 2002 draft, and I have the archives to proove it.

    The man is as fundamentally sound as they come, he's chiseled out of granite, he has range out to 16 feet and he can go EQUALLY strong with either hand. He showcased all of the above at Duke.

    Personally, I'd take half of boozer's tenacity over Al HAarrington, who isnt as bright and plays half as hard. I like Pual Silas as a coach, but paul had NOTHING to do with boozer's early success.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

  5. #5
    Banned PacerMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,132

    Default Re: Seriously:Boozer or AL?? I'll take Al read on.

    HAarrington, who isnt as bright and plays half as hard.


    Now you're just plain goofy.

  6. #6
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    24,462

    Default Re: Seriously:Boozer or AL?? I'll take Al read on.

    Boozer > Harrington.

    But to PaceCar, Harrington >>>>> Boozer+Artest
    This space for rent.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Seriously:Boozer or AL?? I'll take Al read on.

    i don't know if i'd say ron is undersized. he's 6'7, not bad for a 3. i guess you see al as an all-star someday- i do not. al will be better off elsewhere because he wants the glamour of the starting title, it's obviously quite important to him.
    if i were looking for the 4 spot to fill i will take boozer over al everytime.

    al is a guy who can play the 3 spot pretty well but some have said he's better off at the 4 spot. i am not sure if he's better there or not. i definately think he can play the 4 but, he's no where near as good at that position as jermaine.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •