Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

  1. #1

    Default Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    This may have been mentioned somewhere. If so, please merge.


    Reggie was on a draft show tonight on NBATV and was asked about the Pacers pick.

    The talk he's been hearing is that we're looking to trade either Ford or Jack in order to draft a "point guard for the future".

    This goes back to articles from Bird/O'Brien after the season ended. There's been a lot of focus on us taking a big, but I think there's a legit chance we take a PG and either a) trade Ford for a big or b) sign and trade Jack for a big.

    I also think it's intriguing we've worked out two PGs that have been projected in the top 8. It sounds like we expect one of them to drop or we are considering trading up. I suspect the former.

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to imawhat For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked


  3. #2

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by imawhat View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This may have been mentioned somewhere. If so, please merge.


    Reggie was on a draft show tonight on NBATV and was asked about the Pacers pick.

    The talk he's been hearing is that we're looking to trade either Ford or Jack in order to draft a "point guard for the future".

    This goes back to articles from Bird/O'Brien after the season ended. There's been a lot of focus on us taking a big, but I think there's a legit chance we take a PG and either a) trade Ford for a big or b) sign and trade Jack for a big.

    I also think it's intriguing we've worked out two PGs that have been projected in the top 8. It sounds like we expect one of them to drop or we are considering trading up. I suspect the former.
    well let's hope the pacers pull the trigger. did he go into any more detail than that?

  4. #3
    Member Placebo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Age
    33
    Posts
    357

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    http://www.nba.com/video/channels/dr...nba/index.html

    If you scroll down and go to the 2nd page, Pacers/Reggie video is there.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Placebo For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Release Psycho T pwee31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,171

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Foster isn't a free agent!?!

    How are these guys informed?

  7. #5
    when will he ever learn? underwave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Seoul, South Korea
    Age
    27
    Posts
    159

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    what's going to happen to tinman?

  8. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Age
    33
    Posts
    28,142

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    I really hope they do that, draft maybe best player maybe a pg , trade Ford and get a big.

  9. #7
    Member DEEman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    32
    Posts
    508

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by vnzla81 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I really hope they do that, draft maybe best player maybe a pg , trade Ford and get a big.
    What kind of big you think we can get by trading Ford?
    Proud owner of 'Dutch Pacers'

  10. #8
    Pop your balloon Hitman02's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    93

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    As much as I like TJ, it would be a dream come true to have Jennings come off the bench behind Jack.

  11. #9
    soul brother #1 BKK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    HCMC, Vietnam
    Age
    29
    Posts
    890

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    I think we have more chances of getting a swingman ala Mike Miller for Ford which would not be bad at all considering:
    1. he replaces Dunleavy in a similar role while we wait for Mike to return
    2. he expires after next season and Minny is not really a serious candidate for the 2010 sweepstakes
    3. Minny needs a true PG
    4. there's no 4

    this deal s been discussed before but i think it's the most realistic one. i don't see us getting a quality big for ford just beacause those don't grow on trees or because some of the interesting ones ala Haslem expire after next season and play for teams who want to position themselves for 2010 (plus Beasley needs to improve on defense to be reliable)

    there are options to trade a guy like Ford (the most likely gone when u think about it with Foster) but it won't land us the needed athletic defensive big man...

  12. #10

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Uh...yeah, not impressed with NBATV's coverage in the least. The Reggie part was nice though. I think that's what we're going to do too, and I really think it's going to be Ty Lawson, unless one of the bigger PGs like Holiday falls to us. Even then I wouldn't be shocked to see us take Lawson.

    I still think we could work a deal with Portland to get someone like Outlaw or Webster for TJ Ford.

  13. #11

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by BKK View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think we have more chances of getting a swingman ala Mike Miller for Ford which would not be bad at all considering:
    1. he replaces Dunleavy in a similar role while we wait for Mike to return
    2. he expires after next season and Minny is not really a serious candidate for the 2010 sweepstakes
    3. Minny needs a true PG
    4. there's no 4

    this deal s been discussed before but i think it's the most realistic one. i don't see us getting a quality big for ford just beacause those don't grow on trees or because some of the interesting ones ala Haslem expire after next season and play for teams who want to position themselves for 2010 (plus Beasley needs to improve on defense to be reliable)

    there are options to trade a guy like Ford (the most likely gone when u think about it with Foster) but it won't land us the needed athletic defensive big man...
    This is one of my favorite ideas; I was pondering it again last night (although I still see #13 as "in between" what we need, as Seth and others have also reported). Miller's on the decline, so if Minnesota were to play along, we should be able to extract their #28, too. Probably not quite enough to nab Hansbrough, but perhaps 3-4 Brown, or certainly Pendergraph. If only there were a way to improve that to their #18 instead ... .

  14. #12
    Pacer Junky Will Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,051

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by imawhat View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Reggie was on a draft show tonight on NBATV and was asked about the Pacers pick.

    The talk he's been hearing is that we're looking to trade either Ford or Jack in order to draft a "point guard for the future".
    We can't trade Jack to draft a future point guard. Jack's a restricted free agent. And it's not a guarantee we will be able to resign Jack. So I call a 'foul' on that part of what Reggie said.

  15. #13
    100 Miles from the B count55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,772

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by Will Galen View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    We can't trade Jack to draft a future point guard. Jack's a restricted free agent. And it's not a guarantee we will be able to resign Jack. So I call a 'foul' on that part of what Reggie said.
    We could potentially sign & trade Jack. It seems reasonable to me that we're shopping both, though probably Ford more than Jack.

    Why would teams trade for Jack when they could sign him outright? It depends on his price. Most teams won't have more than the MLE, and while I expect Jack to be less than that, stranger things have happened. Also, teams may want to use the MLE on someone else, or teams may want to pick up Jack without adding salary (thus, the trade).

    While Reg may not have the technicalities right, the spirit of what he's saying seems to be very reasonable and believable.

  16. #14
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,748

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by DrFife View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This is one of my favorite ideas; I was pondering it again last night (although I still see #13 as "in between" what we need, as Seth and others have also reported). Miller's on the decline, so if Minnesota were to play along, we should be able to extract their #28, too. Probably not quite enough to nab Hansbrough, but perhaps 3-4 Brown, or certainly Pendergraph. If only there were a way to improve that to their #18 instead ... .
    Miller's ok, but doesn't do much with the "build for the future" thing.

    I'd love Ford for Cardinal and the #18.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  17. #15
    Member idioteque's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    washington dc
    Age
    28
    Posts
    9,917

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    If we want a PG in this draft, I sure hope that means we are trading up to get one like Reggie mentioned rather than drafting one in our range.

    As much as I try to warm up to Ty Lawson I really cannot. The guy's weakness is playing in a half court set, which is the key to winning in the NBA. The run n' gun may win you National Championships, but it is not going to win any NBA titles.

    I'll predict Lawson's career as a Pacer right now: JOB's system makes him look better than he really is, after JOB leaves Larry hires a coach who demands we play a more controlled, half-court style of play, which exposes Lawson and he is traded for peanuts, beginning what becomes a relatively long journeyman career.

    Lawson would be best served going to a team like the Spurs who play disciplined basketball, as that way he would be able to learn to play the half court style effectively while he is still pretty young. He might look hot under JOB for a couple years in Indiana, but that is not what is best for him career wise.

    We have enough backup PG's right now on our roster. We need a starter. We need either Holliday or Jennings or to look elsewhere.

  18. #16
    Pacer Junky Will Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,051

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by count55 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    We could potentially sign & trade Jack. It seems reasonable to me that we're shopping both, though probably Ford more than Jack.

    Why would teams trade for Jack when they could sign him outright? It depends on his price. Most teams won't have more than the MLE, and while I expect Jack to be less than that, stranger things have happened. Also, teams may want to use the MLE on someone else, or teams may want to pick up Jack without adding salary (thus, the trade).

    While Reg may not have the technicalities right, the spirit of what he's saying seems to be very reasonable and believable.
    Reggie said that we're looking to trade either Ford or Jack in order to draft a "point guard for the future".

    That means trading Jack this draft, not in the summer. That's what I called foul on.

  19. #17

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthem View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Miller's ok, but doesn't do much with the "build for the future" thing.

    I'd love Ford for Cardinal and the #18.
    Yeah, I like that a lot, too. 'Course, I like Tinsley for Cardinal + #28 even better.

  20. #18

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Saying Lawson can't play in the half court is an assumption though. UNC didn't do it much, so people just assume that Lawson can't. It's an unfair knock because of the system he played in. But he is great at penetrating into the lane, and makes good decisions with the ball. There's no reason that he can't be a good P+R, half court PG.

    We're all guessing more than anything with that. I believe that he could be very effective. Others believe he can only play run 'n gun, because that's all we've seen. What ultimately matters is whether the Pacers believe that he can play in the half court. If they don't, then I highly doubt they'd be interested in drafting a one trick pony. JMO, but we want guys that can both run and play smart half court basketball. I suppose we'll just have to wait and see. I think the Pacers will wind up getting a guy that they really wanted.

  21. #19
    Member idioteque's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    washington dc
    Age
    28
    Posts
    9,917

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by ESutt7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Saying Lawson can't play in the half court is an assumption though. UNC didn't do it much, so people just assume that Lawson can't. It's an unfair knock because of the system he played in. But he is great at penetrating into the lane, and makes good decisions with the ball. There's no reason that he can't be a good P+R, half court PG.

    We're all guessing more than anything with that. I believe that he could be very effective. Others believe he can only play run 'n gun, because that's all we've seen. What ultimately matters is whether the Pacers believe that he can play in the half court. If they don't, then I highly doubt they'd be interested in drafting a one trick pony. JMO, but we want guys that can both run and play smart half court basketball. I suppose we'll just have to wait and see. I think the Pacers will wind up getting a guy that they really wanted.
    I get what you're saying but let's not pretend that UNC never ran a half court set last season.

    If you go back and watch the National Championship, you will see that UNC ran a lot of half court in the second half. Lawson's weaknesses in the half court were on full display and he settled for a lot of bad jumpers rather than finding open teammates. That is another thing that bothers me about Lawson: the lack of a midrange jumper. In a halfcourt set it is very important that a PG have a nice pull up and mid range to keep the defense honest when penetrating into the lane. Otherwise every defender will know that a pass is going to be made and it makes it more difficult for the PG to pass and makes turnovers much more likely.

    I am with those who believe that the Pacers may pick Lawson, but that is not because I think he is an excellent player. Whoever picks him is just going to get a really gimmicky backup at best.

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to idioteque For This Useful Post:


  23. #20
    Member Trophy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    8,556

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Jack fits into our system so I'd figure we'd trade Ford and not him.

    I like Jack at our PG over Ford.
    Last edited by Trophy; 06-19-2009 at 04:11 PM.

  24. #21

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    I think Ford to Minnesota makes a lot of sense for both teams. Minnesota needs a true point with experience and someone who can lead a team. They have Telfair and Bobby Brown right now. Although Telfair isn't bad, he's better suited coming off the bench and Brown is more of a 3rd stringer right now.

    With that said, a deal like:

    -- Ford to Minnesota for Miller straight up works
    -- Ford for Craig Smith and Brian Cardinal also works

    Would Minnesota be willing to do a deal like this? I think it's possible, especially since Kahn is now in charge and is looking to make a splash out of the gate. Ford has a player option the 2nd year, but that would also give Minnesota an expiring contract to work with too

    I think the Pacers would probably like to trade Ford more so than Jack because:

    -- Ford has a larger contract (2 years/17 million) right now
    -- Pacers have Jack penciled in as their starter for the next few years
    -- Jack will be cheaper to sign (4-5 million a year)
    -- Pacers are going to draft a point (Lawson, Teague or Maynor)
    -- Pacers could fill a need elsewhere or obtain cap relief by trading Ford

    Minnesota will not take Tinsley unless we're either throwing in Rush, Roy or a 1st round pick and Bird will not do so. New T-Wolves GM David Kahn knows Jamaal too well and that doesn't fit with what Minnesota is looking to do.

    Should we do a Miller for Ford straight up, we could have a lineup of say:

    Jack, 1st rd pick, Diener or f/a signing, Tinsley
    Rush, Miller, Dunleavy
    Granger, Graham, fa
    Troy, Josh, fa
    Roy, Jeff, fa

    That gives the Pacers a shooter coming off the bench and 6th man in Miller who would take over for Quis and give us some scoring until Dunleavy came back. Plus, he would be in the last year of his deal and could either be dealt at the trade deadline or the Pacers could let his salary come off the cap next summer.

  25. #22
    Release Psycho T pwee31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,171

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    I think the Pacers will get their PG at #13 and Ford or Jack will be move for an additional pick, or a solid veteran or two

    I see could see Ford going to either Philly, Atlanta, Minny, or Dallas for a 1st round pick and vet or 2 to match salaries
    Last edited by pwee31; 06-19-2009 at 07:15 PM.

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to pwee31 For This Useful Post:


  27. #23
    Yeah, I'm a Pacers fan. MyFavMartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    In the Washington DC area
    Posts
    4,322
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Very few teams will be taking on salary this summer so TJ Ford may be returning next season.

  28. #24
    Member Trophy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    8,556

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    Quote Originally Posted by pwee31 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think the Pacers will get their PG at #13 and Ford or Jack will be move for an additional pick, or a solid veteran or two

    I see could see Ford going to either Philly, Atlanta, Minny, or Dallas for a 1st round pick and vet or 2 to match salaries
    I agree, something kind of similar to last year's draft night deal.

  29. #25
    Twitter: @SuprCityIndyFan PacerGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Indy's North Side
    Posts
    1,540

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Reggie Miller's Pacers Rumor

    -Most agree Ford the one the Pacers want to move 1st. His P/O for n/y, could be viewed as a + or a - depending on ones '10 plan. This will help deside what suitors are in play. As stated, J.Jack could also be moved in a S&T, something teams who may not have much $ to spend or don't want to add payroll but want JJ, but not sure what the Pacers can affordto take back. It would have to either fill a need for us w/ a player we like, or bring in picks IMO to be an option. "picks could be picks already made in this draft - like the R.Hibbert deal from l/y, if a deal were already in place.
    -I don't see the Pacers including #13 w/ either Ford or Jack, unless they are in love w/ a player (Evans?) & have a team picking that high w/ interest in trading down & w/ Ford or Jack. This combonation is not likely. This leaves trading Ford or Jack by themselves, unless there is a need to combine other players or future picks. The Pacers cap situation t/y & n/y is very tight, so they will more then likely be looking for multible smaller contracts &/or 2nd rd picks. As we all know, the Pacers will not take back any contracts going past '11, unless its a young player or vet they really like & is low $. (In '11 T.Murphy, M.Dunleavy, J.Tinsley, T.Ford, J.Foster are all FA's).

    Some deals that have been mentioned here & elsewhere:
    -Ford for M.Miller
    (Min gets a true PG & one for the draf pick to learn from & IN gets a replacement @ SG/SF while Dun recovers) or...
    -Ford for B.Cardnial/ C.Smith/ 2nd (Min gets a starting PG & IN gets a young PF, expiring, & a desired pick) ** remove C.smith & 2nd for #28 &/or we add something for #18
    -Ford to GS for Crawford
    (GS rids themselves of Craw & get a true PG who will likely opt out at yr end, freeing up cap while IN gets bench depth (spot starter) while Dun recovers)

    Not sure I love any of these, but I think they are more or less on track. I really think the Pacers would love to get a defensive (or young) PF in a deal here, or if they can't, find help to solidify our wing issue. My wish would to find a 3rd team for TJ & send their assets to N.O. for Chandler-type deal.
    "Larry Bird: You are Officially On the Clock! (3/24/08)"
    (Watching You Like A Hawk!)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-11-2009, 06:46 AM
  2. Pacers Kill Raptors, 130-101
    By rocksballer58 in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-09-2009, 11:45 AM
  3. How The Pacers Got Where They Are
    By MillerTime in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-01-2008, 06:15 PM
  4. TNT Mavs-Rockets, Reggie talking about pacers
    By Conflict in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 10-31-2008, 08:38 PM
  5. IBJ: Pacers' troubles bad for city, too
    By Putnam in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 02-08-2008, 01:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •