Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)


    The Indianapolis Motor Speedway celebrates its 100th year of existence.



    Cars begin to roll into position on the grid for the 93rd Indy 500.



    Oriel Servia shows off his entry for "Strangest Helmet Design"



    The Purex car hoped to clean up today... but it wasn't to be...
    Driver Mike Conway has a shot at Rookie of the Year with contender Matos hurting his chances with a late wreck (that was avoidable).



    Sarah Fisher had perhaps her best all around month of May.



    Milka Duno provided the role of 'moving chicane'.


    A photo for Dukie of John Andretti making a pit stop.



    TV Star Buddy Ebsen makes an appearance at the 500. OK... I know it's Letterman but the older he gets the more he looks like Buddy Ebsen (Jed Clampett, Barnaby Jones).



    Townsend Bell had an excellent run today. He was on a 2nd week program and parlayed that into a solid 4th place finish.



    Townsend shows his racing smarts by getting around a pitted Milka Duno rather than having to pass her on the track. For anyone who needs to test their scanner at the track, I recommend tuning in Milka's channel. It's a constant stream of coaching and spotting "Hold your line... Get up on him... Get in the draft... Watch your line... You got it, keep it up... Be patient...."



    The only thing 'pinker' than Pink Lloyd's car was his driving suit.



    Ryan Hunter-Reay puts the Vision Racing Izod car into a couple of walls (outside wall and then pit wall).



    Vitor Meira's AJ Foyt Crew put out the fire on his ABC Supply Co. machine... and then send him back out to race. Meira was later involved in the Matos crash which left Vitor with a couple of broken vertebrae.



    Eventual race winner Helio Castroneves makes a pit stop.



    Winner Castroneves is discouraged from climbing the fence by Indy 500/IRL personnel (AKA Idiots).



    He didn't care.... He was climbing the fence!

    ----
    Let's talk about the fence climbing first. I'm pretty sure the reason they didn't want him climbing the fence was because ABC/ESPN was trying to rush the finish to wrap the show. As Helio was coming around on his victory lap off turn 4 the Penske team informed him TV was running late and they wanted him rolling straight into victory lane. Helio replied "(But) I wanna climb the fence!"
    ...And so did every last person at the track... and I'd venture to say, so did every TV viewer. This kind of stuff is EXACTLY why I appreciate the job Versus does with their race coverage. Let the natural drama and story develop... don't worry about the clock! Screw you ABC/ESPN!!

    The race didn't have a lot of drama itself. It appears some of the recent rule tweaks have hurt the racing more than helped. Tweaking of the rear wheelbase was disallowed this year and there was some speculation this made the cars harder to handle in traffic. With that in mind, the Helio drama was the storyline to save the race for fans and media. To try and short-circuit and abbreviate that storyline for both Helio and fans is just inexcusable in my opinion. Let it play out in its own time. Totally short-sighted by ABC/ESPN and for the speedway to actually try and accommodate them...BOO! HISS!!

    I know I'm big on slamming Danica... but she did have a good race today. I actually saw her passing cars on the track. And on the final restart, not only did she not go backwards (as often happens), she got racy with Dan Wheldon and forced him to think more about defending his 2nd place position than taking a shot at Helio. And in the clean air, Helio checked out. 3rd place was a very solid finish for Danica... and it appeared to be a "legitimate" 3rd place (solid pit stops and the accelerator)... not a "massaged" 3rd place (short pitting, fuel strategy, and a lucky timed yellow flag or two).

    Since she's "Danica" that 3rd place probably overshadowed the 2nd place that Wheldon got in his Natl Guard sponsored Panther machine. ...Or maybe that camo paint job just made him too hard to see.
    He had a steady drive to where he needed to be at the end... but just like Vitor last year (also in a Panther machine), 2nd place was all that was in it.

    This race marked a first... It's the first time that a 500 featuring both an Andretti and a Foyt had both those names finishing all 200 laps. John Andretti and Foyt IV made it happen. Hard to believe Mario and AJ didn't do it more themselves in all the years at the speedway.

    Crowd:
    I don't know... I heard the radio yapping on about the traffic and crowds really being up this morning. We were going to park at the airport and pay the (now) 30.00ea for the shuttle service but apparently the charter service was not operating in the same way Indygo did. No "race parking" signs etc at the airport that we saw directing people to the proper area and we ended up just driving on in toward the track and paying to park in someone's yard. With all the radio talk we were worried we didn't have time to figure out the bus deal or take chances with parking. Well, we could've parked closer... and we had little trouble getting in at the gate. In fact, if we would've went to our 'suggested' gate #6 we would've been in with NO waiting.

    It breaks my heart to see empty seats at the Speedway. The lower seats at Pit in are in all likelihood overpriced. You look at those seats sitting empty and then you look just a few feet on down at the infield viewing mound and see it just jam packed (way before the race start even). I don't think the T4 viewing mound is a better 'seat' than the lower level seats at pit in. But it's probably a better value. The empty aluminum is sending the wrong signal though. I'd GREATLY reduce the price of those seats at the least (to general admission rates)... Or I'd paint them blue... or red... and make them actual general admission seats (first come, first served). OR... I'd just admit those seats aren't very desirable and just do away with them and put in some kind of vendor area (gift shop, restaurant, display area (cars, mini museum, etc) with seating above it (since the upper level seats are being used).

    I'm not sure there was really more people this year but that seems to be the storyline. That said, we just took our seats today and didn't walk around in the infield. If the majority of the extra crowd was in the infield, we wouldn't have seen it.

    Racing:
    I'd re-look at the recent tweaks and car data and try and figure out where they made running in traffic so much more difficult. Maybe it isn't the rule tweaks per se', maybe the teams have just decided to go with low downforce for sheer speed and are making the on track passing problem themselves while expecting pit strategy to move them to the front where their low downforce will keep them there. If that's the case, I don't know what you do about that. That means the teams have made a decision that might not make for battles on the track, but they feel is in their best interest to win the race.

    ...Of course... there is the constant drumbeat to bring back innovation to the cars.... I'm right there with that drumbeat. I remember a few years back when Scott Sharp's team developed the 'soft limiter' which gave him an advantage to keep him out of the momentum killing 'hard limiter' and ultimately saw him win the pole that year. The media immediately jumped on this tiny innovation almost like they did with the Penske push-rod Mercedez. It became a story itself. I've long advocated opening the rulebook more for the Indy 500. Make a normal IRL car perfectly legal for the Indy 500... but allow for more chassis tweaks that wouldn't be legal for another IRL race. If someone wants to make an Indy only engine, if it fits within the engine rules, let them. Don't require them to supply the entire field. Same with the chassis.

    Misc...
    Is this "Engine Check" a new thing? For the life of me I don't remember this dedicated 'engine check' time being on the schedule before. At about (I think) 11:50AM there was a designated period where teams fired their engines with the cars on the grid. I thought year's ago there was even a rule where the engines could NOT be fired up on race day until the "(Ladies and) Gentlemen, start your engines!" command. I'm just curious if this is new... and if there's another point other than to check that the cars will fire for real when the command is given?

    I'm sure I'll think of some more comments and add them later...
    I ended up with a last minute late gig on Saturday afterall (after having the date blacked out) so I ended up not getting my battery charged on the camera (among many things I'd left to the last minute) which limited my photo taking (I was worried about it lasting to the finish)... I also had someone to my right front who managed to stand several times just at the absolute wrong moment. I'd be following a car in my viewfinder and then there this guy is... right where I planned to snap the shot... Oh well...
    I still managed about 100 photos. Now... if I just had a nicer camera...
    Last edited by Bball; 05-25-2009, 03:36 PM. Reason: Typo repair
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  • #2
    Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

    Additional comments:

    Does anyone remember when Penske was 'the bad guy'? T-shirts that said "Anyone but Penske" weren't unusual. But at some point it all changed. Sure, there were fans too... and fans of his drivers... But there was always that "Anybody but Penske" undercurrent too.

    Was it Rick Mears? Giving Al Unser Sr the ride that got him his 4th Indy 500? Did it change in '94 with fan favorite Little Al's 2nd win? In '95 when Penske's team didn't even make the race showing they were human after all? Maybe it was a view of the landscape without Penske during the split? Is it Helio?

    Maybe it's all that rolled up into a realization that Penske has gotten where he's gotten by "playing the right way". Hard work, good character, and more hard work. He's not just throwing more money at running his team, he's throwing more effort at it. He's surrounded himself with quality people, and people that have a healthy respect for the Indianapolis 500 and open wheel racing.

    Whatever the case, the Penske haters have all but disappeared.... and that's good. You have to respect what Penske has been able to do. 15 Indy 500 wins does not just 'happen'.

    Congrats not only to Helio but all of Team Penske as well. They set the bar high for everyone.
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

    -John Wooden

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

      Good shots.

      Milka does have enough curves to be a human chicane. Just shows that it's not a field of the 33 best drivers, but a field of the 33 best sponsor grabbers.

      Pat on the back to Sarah. She's done an excellent job building a team and running it. Let's hope her sponsors stick around and next year she can run a full schedule.

      Helio is a hell of a driver with a hell of a team. I think some of his interviews were a little 'cheesy and/or scripted' emotionally, but I guess that's what sells and draws in the crowd.

      And kudos the the SAFER barriers. TK would have been in bad shape without them.

      It's gotta suck to be Marco Andretti. Maybe he should change his last name.

      And as required by law, any mention of the race is required to have a mention of Danica. Good run for her, but since she 'demands' to be treated like a male driver, can the media do the same ?? "Helio wins the race, Danica comes in 3rd." Maybe mention who came in 2nd ?? After all, he had quite the run also.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

        Dan Wheldon came in 2nd.

        They mention Danica because she's a fan favorite.

        Sort of like Dick Trickle.

        But, of course, in a different way.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

          Nice seats - nice shots.
          The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

            Originally posted by PacerDude View Post

            And kudos the the SAFER barriers. TK would have been in bad shape without them.
            Vitor had a solid hit too. Even though he had some injuries I can't help but think it would've been worse without the SAFER barrier.


            It's gotta suck to be Marco Andretti. Maybe he should change his last name.
            I dunno... I think he forgot he had a brake as well as an accelerator... and that he could also lift on the accelerator....

            He put himself into a bad position for the 1st lap. If he would've said "Moreas is such a clean racer I didn't have a second thought about taking that hole" I might feel a little different. Instead, Marco said something about Moreas being "Clueless..." and "Never gonna learn..." and several other things that more than implied you had to be careful of Moreas. Well, if all that is true, why wasn't Andretti careful of him?

            So the way I see it: Accident = Moreas' fault.
            Putting one's self in a position to be in an accident with Moreas in turn 1 on lap 1? Andretti's fault... made even worse by Andretti's comments afterwards which indicated he didn't think Moreas was a good driver.

            And as required by law, any mention of the race is required to have a mention of Danica. Good run for her, but since she 'demands' to be treated like a male driver, can the media do the same ?? "Helio wins the race, Danica comes in 3rd." Maybe mention who came in 2nd ?? After all, he had quite the run also.
            Seconded
            Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

            ------

            "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

            -John Wooden

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

              Thanks for sharing. I have a few, most notably Dario giving me a thumbs up. We had great seats for watching the race, just not taking photos of the race.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

                Originally posted by Bball View Post
                So the way I see it: Accident = Moreas' fault.
                Putting one's self in a position to be in an accident with Moreas in turn 1 on lap 1? Andretti's fault... made even worse by Andretti's comments afterwards which indicated he didn't think Moreas was a good driver.
                And WOW, how is it possible he STILL doesn't get it?
                Reminds me of a coworker who had her insurance cancelled. None of the accidents were her fault, BUT why was she involved in so many?
                Don't thank me, I'll kill ya.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

                  More Photos...


                  Yes, we have balloons...



                  While Matos had a shot at Rookie of the Year, and Conway kept his car in one piece to finish 18th and on the lead lap, Alex Tagliani is the likely winner. He might also be in the running for the oldest Rookie of the Year. He drove from 33rd to 11th.



                  Sharp didn't really have a day to remember (finishing 14th and never really a contender), but I like photos with smoke rolling off the tires!



                  Penske's other full-time driver: Ryan Briscoe. Penske has been credited with saying you can teach a driver to stay out of wrecks but you can't teach a driver to go fast. Since joining Penske Briscoe has remained fast and gotten much better at finishing races.



                  Ryan Hunter-Reay spent all month trying to get his car hooked up. He finally got it hooked up on race day... but not the way he meant!

                  Sorry... that joke has been ripening on the vine all day since I saw the photos I'd taken of the car on the hook. It also crossed my mind that it's become so common place to see Tony Kanaan's car on the hook at Indy that I didn't even bother to snap a photo of it (since battery power was so low).
                  -


                  2008 Winner and leader of most laps in the 2009 Indy 500 (73 laps led)- Scott Dixon.
                  Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                  ------

                  "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                  -John Wooden

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

                    Originally posted by Bball View Post
                    We were going to park at the airport and pay the (now) 30.00ea for the shuttle service but apparently the charter service was not operating in the same way Indygo did. No "race parking" signs etc at the airport that we saw directing people to the proper area and we ended up just driving on in toward the track and paying to park in someone's yard. With all the radio talk we were worried we didn't have time to figure out the bus deal or take chances with parking. Well, we could've parked closer... and we had little trouble getting in at the gate. In fact, if we would've went to our 'suggested' gate #6 there would've been in with NO waiting.

                    .
                    Hmm, that's weird. We went to the airport as always and there were plenty of "race day parking signs" directing us to the area to park (with people waving you in as you got closer). They then shuttled you from the parking lot to the area where you paid for your tickets and boarded the charter bus.

                    It sucks that the charter buses were 15 more a ticket, but at least parking was cheaper than it has always been (11 as opposed to 20), so with that in mind it was 20 dollars more to ride the shuttle this year than it was to take the indygo bus for the 2 of us. And the ride back to the airport on the charter was much quicker than the indygo bus for whatever reason.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

                      Nice photos. Thanks for posting.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

                        Originally posted by Adam1987 View Post
                        Hmm, that's weird. We went to the airport as always and there were plenty of "race day parking signs" directing us to the area to park (with people waving you in as you got closer). They then shuttled you from the parking lot to the area where you paid for your tickets and boarded the charter bus.

                        It sucks that the charter buses were 15 more a ticket, but at least parking was cheaper than it has always been (11 as opposed to 20), so with that in mind it was 20 dollars more to ride the shuttle this year than it was to take the indygo bus for the 2 of us. And the ride back to the airport on the charter was much quicker than the indygo bus for whatever reason.
                        I've always came in a bit of the back way without ever getting on/off the interstate. In year's past there were checkerboard signs saying "Race Parking" (or something like that) as we headed north. But I never saw one sign going this way this year. IIRC, we headed north and then turned west toward the bus area where the parking was. The area where we always parked before was the area where the buses arrived and departed from so there was no reason to be shuttled from the parking lot to the buses.

                        That said... I thought parking was always 10.00 and the bus was 20.00 last year. Maybe I just paid with a 20.00 and got a 5 back and just don't remember it. Pretty certain parking was 10.00 though.

                        Maybe all those years of getting there for the first buses meant I parked in a different place than later arrivals did and so this new arrangement changed things more for me than it did people that arrived after that first lot was full in years past.

                        If the radio hadn't been talking about the traffic jams and crowd increase we would've tried to sniff out the changes more but we felt we needed to get parked and into the track before the gates got overloaded with lines.
                        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                        ------

                        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                        -John Wooden

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

                          Originally posted by Knucklehead Warrior View Post
                          And WOW, how is it possible he STILL doesn't get it?
                          Reminds me of a coworker who had her insurance cancelled. None of the accidents were her fault, BUT why was she involved in so many?
                          Pretty stupid comment.

                          I wonder how long to would have taken Graham Rahal to knock Marco out if he had the same thing about him crashing in the same place for the same reason two years in a row.
                          The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

                            Originally posted by Bball View Post
                            Does anyone remember when Penske was 'the bad guy'? T-shirts that said "Anyone but Penske" weren't unusual. But at some point it all changed. Sure, there were fans too... and fans of his drivers... But there was always that "Anybody but Penske" undercurrent too.

                            Was it Rick Mears? Giving Al Unser Sr the ride that got him his 4th Indy 500? Did it change in '94 with fan favorite Little Al's 2nd win? In '95 when Penske's team didn't even make the race showing they were human after all? Maybe it was a view of the landscape without Penske during the split? Is it Helio?
                            I was one who hated Roger Penske with the fire of 1000 suns. I don't any more. I think missing the race in '95 humbled him a bit. I still hated him while his team was in CART. Once they came here with Helio and Gil it was kind of like his drivers were so likable I didn't hate him any more.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Bball's Indy 500 Photos and Comments (2009)

                              Why is there so much hate around for Milka Duno? I don't get that at all. She completed 199 laps, was running at the end, moved up from 32nd to 20th, and kept her car out of trouble which is something you cannot say about many of the drivers who finished behind her. Let me ask this: If you put any of the drivers behind her in her car, is the order of finish different for that car? Can someone explain the hate?
                              Last edited by travmil; 05-25-2009, 04:18 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X