Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate Available

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate Available

    Here you go guys. This is what the newest version of Windows could be. It expires June of next year so you get a pretty stable OS for free for almost a year. However, I do not suggest you use this as a primary operating system.

    Microsoft does not provide technical support for preview software, however, you can submit bugs and help make it better for the final release!

    You can get your Free product keys and download either x86 or x64 versions here on May 5:

    http://technet.microsoft.com/nb-no/evalcenter/dd353205(en-us).aspx

    It is already out on Torrent sites, but I highly advise against downloading from them.

  • #2
    Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

    I'll probably try this out. Word on the street is it's pretty solid.
    This space for rent.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

      I've been getting the updates via TechNet, and they so far have been a lot better than Vista. (Not that I dislike Vista.)

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

        I did an upgrade over my Vista. I am in love.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

          I'm going to give this a whirl once I've backed everything up. I can always reinstall Vista if I don't like it.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

            Define upgrade.

            W95 had no usb support. So WMe would be an upgrade...a significant technological improvement. Can anyone name a significant technology change that Vista provided vs XP? Without that, and requiring more processing power, how is a new OS an upgrade?

            I asked a couple of PC weenies at work, and they cited the increased security protections for beginner-level users, and "user friendliness." I don't buy into either of those. Microsoft's concept of user friendliness seems to me to mean there's some annoying tendency incorporated as a default setting that I have to figure out how to turn off, so it will stop a bunch of unneeded background processes.

            How is Vista or this new one a significant technology break-through? Or is the package just shinier? Seriously, what's the new good thing that these post-XP platforms do? I've used neither one, so I ask.

            P.S. I went to the Windows blurb site for Windows 7, and the theme seems to be that W7 won't be as hosed up as Vista....

            "As for performance, I think Microsoft is going to surprise people. And if you're working for an enterprise that hasn't upgraded to Vista because it won't run acceptably on your existing PCs, you'll want to look again at Windows 7. Paul Thurrott, Supersite for Windows"

            "Your PC, simplified. You told us what you want in a PC. We listened. And made hundreds of little improvements and a few big ones that add up to a whole lot less. Less waiting, fewer clicks, and less complexity. With less of what you don’t need, Windows 7 helps you do more. More work, more play, and more of everything in between. Making every task simpler and every day easier. See for yourself—get the Release Candidate."

            Really? That's the sell? We went in a direction you didn't like, and we now know how to fix it?

            I know. I am old and bitter.
            Last edited by kester99; 05-07-2009, 12:33 AM.


            [~]) ... Cheers! Go Pacers!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

              Originally posted by kester99 View Post
              Define upgrade.

              W95 had no usb support. So WMe would be an upgrade...a significant technological improvement. Can anyone name a significant technology change that Vista provided vs XP? Without that, and requiring more processing power, how is a new OS an upgrade?

              I asked a couple of PC weenies at work, and they cited the increased security protections for beginner-level users, and "user friendliness." I don't buy into either of those. Microsoft's concept of user friendliness seems to me to mean there's some annoying tendency incorporated as a default setting that I have to figure out how to turn off, so it will stop a bunch of unneeded background processes.

              How is Vista or this new one a significant technology break-through? Or is the package just shinier? Seriously, what's the new good thing that these post-XP platforms do? I've used neither one, so I ask.
              This will actually explain this better than I can...

              http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2341805,00.asp

              Windows 7 is a lot more smooth and faster than Vista and possibly XP. It offers a new Windows XP compaitibility suite, as well as basically a built from scratch kernel. The development of 7 had focused on reliability, security, and ease of access. And when I mean ease of access, I mean totally user-customizable security options and appearance.

              Windows 7 utilizes memory and other resources more efficiently.

              More eye candy aside, this OS really has looked like it could bring a newer generation Microsoft OS into the enterprise with little to no worry for compatibility issues. Windows 7 still has the Vista-inspired Aero user interface, which can be turned off or tweaked to your liking.

              My opinion of Windows Vista will make most of you disagree with me, so I'm not going into that. I have had a few other of my fellow IT colleagues get into the Windows 7 Beta, and for the record they are mostly system admin Linux guys, and I have heard no negative opinions.

              Seriously, if you have the hardware, give it a shot. It is a really neat experience.
              Last edited by duke dynamite; 05-07-2009, 12:43 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

                This is the kind of thing that Microsoft does too often, IMO.

                "Ever missed a notification? The RC tweaks the alert function by making them more noticeable and adding a bolder orange color. Microsoft also more than doubled the number of flashes a user will see – from three to seven. "

                Have I ever missed a notification? No. I have tried in vain to get the machine to quit telling me that I'm trying to do something it won't let me do. My settings do not support...the information bar has blocked...would you like to learn more about the information bar (except how to stop it?) ...you must restart for the new settings to take effect. Would you like to restart now, or in 45 seconds when we remind you again?

                So they make it even more orange, and flash more. Urk.

                Anyway. Enjoy. I'll stick with what I know, but hope the new OS does good things for you (and your desktop experience).

                I guess I'd be happy enough if the 2010 Buick looked just like the 2009 Buick, which looked exactly like the 2008 Buick, which looked just like....etc. Does the engine have better performance? Good. Did you move the location of the cupholders, make a new color palette, and password protect the cigarette lighter? Not interested.

                I know I'll never put a damper on your enthusiasm, Duke, and I would never want to. Hey, I was the last guy in my office to be pried off the manual typewriter.


                [~]) ... Cheers! Go Pacers!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

                  Have I told you I loved you lately, Kesty?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

                    kes, to each their own.

                    I could name off many more improvements/features...etc. It's just all part of technology and software evolving. It's bound to happen sometime, sooner or later.

                    You don't have to try it, but if you do, hold your breath. It's a great OS.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

                      The only reason I would be reluctant to install W7 right now would be due to compatibility issues with some of my programs (most notably, Magic Online and Adobe products). I'm sure the latter is probably fine, but I use the former enough to not want to lose access to it.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

                        I've been running and tweaking a fixing the same XP build for years. It finally does exactly what I need it to, though I probably should have a degree in "XP" by now.

                        I'm not going to throw all of that away and fix what FINALLY isn't broken.
                        “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                        “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

                          Originally posted by Shade View Post
                          The only reason I would be reluctant to install W7 right now would be due to compatibility issues with some of my programs (most notably, Magic Online and Adobe products). I'm sure the latter is probably fine, but I use the former enough to not want to lose access to it.
                          I have Adobe CS4 Design Premium, and they work fine after upgrading to Windows 7. I didn't do a clean install.

                          Even if Magic Online doesn't work well under 7, you can put it in Compatibility Mode to Windows XP, or Vista. I would try that. Worst-case scenario, It won't harm anything to revert back to Vista.

                          I heard and interesting metaphor. "Sure, the horse and buggy got the job done, but why not have a car? It's called progression."
                          Last edited by duke dynamite; 05-07-2009, 02:04 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

                            Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
                            I heard an interesting metaphor. "Sure, the horse and buggy got the job done, but why not have a car? It's called progression."
                            Win7 might be nice, but it's not a move from the horse and buggy to the car. It's a horse and buggy to a slightly nicer buggy, or a horse and buggy to a slightly stronger horse.
                            This space for rent.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Microsoft Windows 7 Release Candidate available May 5

                              Originally posted by Anthem View Post
                              Win7 might be nice, but it's not a move from the horse and buggy to the car. It's a horse and buggy to a slightly nicer buggy, or a horse and buggy to a slightly stronger horse.
                              I'm going to stop talking about this. Clearly I sound like a jackass or something.

                              The offseason sucks.
                              Last edited by duke dynamite; 05-07-2009, 11:12 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X