Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

    Originally posted by Quis View Post
    The Suns continue to suck, they're getting blown out by the Warriors. Amare with a very mediocre game. This is going to add to the speculation that he's on the trading block, and hopefully to rumors about possibly coming to Indiana. Even if it never comes to pass, it'll at least give us something exciting to talk about for the next 3 weeks.

    Suns were rumored to be after T.J. before we acquired him....

    T.J. Ford
    Troy Murphy
    2009 1st Round (unprotected)

    Works in the trade checker.


    Jack/Diener
    Dunleavy/Quis
    Granger/Rush
    Amare/Foster
    Rasho/Hibbert

    I could live with that.
    Amare has what 2 years left on his contract, what are the chances that we are able to resign him? If we cant get that done he's just a rental at a time where we have more holes than he can fill. Lets stay the corse rebuild with young talent through the draft. Just my 2c.

    Comment


    • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

      Originally posted by MiaDragon View Post
      Amare has what 2 years left on his contract, what are the chances that we are able to resign him? If we cant get that done he's just a rental at a time where we have more holes than he can fill. Lets stay the corse rebuild with young talent through the draft. Just my 2c.
      Ignoring that I think that other teams can put together better trade offers then I am willing to give up and what the Suns would probably be looking for in trading Amare......in NBA2k9 land where I can push a button and force teams to accept trades......even if Amare was to leave in the 2010 season...I'm okay with that....I think that we are going to be doing our best to make the Playoffs until the 2011-2012 season...so getting 1.5 seasons of play out of Amare to continue to make a stronger push for the Playoffs would fit into those plans.

      Besides....I think that the Suns would be more apt to trade Shaq before Amare. If you're on a team that is rebuilding....unless that reason is because of the attitude/personality concerns that Amare brings and the Team wants to exercize that from the locker-room.....why would you keep a player that can only play every other game as opposed to one that is an All-Star Talent?
      Last edited by CableKC; 02-05-2009, 01:07 PM.
      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

      Comment


      • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

        Originally posted by CableKC View Post
        Ignoring that I don't think we have the necessary pieces to acquire him......in NBA2k9 land where I can push a button and force teams to accept trades......even if Amare was to leave in the 2010 season...I'm okay with that....I think that we are going to be doing our best to make the Playoffs until the 2011-2012 season...so getting 1.5 seasons of play out of Amare to continue to make a stronger push for the Playoffs would fit into those plans.
        Plus bringing in a big name could help market the team and fill the seats!

        w00t

        Comment


        • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

          Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
          Plus bringing in a big name could help market the team and fill the seats!

          w00t
          Of course, it depends on what we have to give up and what TPTB are willing to pay ( in the future ) to get him.

          Ignoring the salary cap implications....the most straight forward "Expiring Contracts and Picks" that I would be comfortable doing would be:

          Rasho+Marquis+BRush+2009 1st Round Pick for Amare

          This doesn't mean the Suns would do it.....I'm guessing that the Suns would want to force the Pacers ( much less any team interested in him ) to take on Barbosa as well for more Cap clearing space....which could be a major concern for us unless we included someone like Dunleavy....which would negate any SalaryCap benefits from moving Barbosa in the first place.

          For the Pacers, unless we were to include Dunleavy or Murphy ( which I doubt any team would take if they are looking to FA to rebuild ), we would be way over the Luxury Tax with ONLY 8 players ( not including Tinsley ) for a team that would be Playoff contenders...but not Championship material.

          Either way, this is one of the many reasons why I doubt the Pacers would have any real chance of making any move for Amare. The cost would be too great. It's nice to dream...but when that dream eventually becomes a nightmare in a season or two.....it's not worth the effort.
          Last edited by CableKC; 02-05-2009, 01:44 PM.
          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

          Comment


          • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

            The Suns are just out of the playoffs right now, right behind Utah who currently has the 8th seed. If they falter before the deadline and are a few games out and we are willing to include draft picks, I see the Suns as possibly trading Amare for expirings, youth, and a good pick and trying to retool quickly in the offseason.

            Comment


            • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

              we can't trade both rasho and daniels for amare. that's like adding 16 million to our payroll next year and will throw us well into luxury tax land, not to mention squash any hope of resigning jack or an other FA. we have to include either foster, dunleavy, murph, or ford.

              now, from PHX's standpoint. no way do they take on more $$$$ this year then they give back, simply b/c they are already in the luxury tax. they also don't have a lot of dead salary they could throw into any deal either. guys like barnes, hill, amudson, etc. are guys PHX values and would want to keep.

              the only feasible deals i see are as follows.

              murphy
              baston
              rush
              2009 1st

              amare

              i actually think murphy would do well in PHX and he is a solid PF (although overpaid). playing next to shaq would help space the floor. baston is an expiring. rush and our 1st give them something for the future. PHX saves a little money this year (1 million) and 3 million next year.


              foster
              marquis
              2009 1st
              possibly rush (maybe giving up too much)

              amare

              salary wise this fits too. PHX takes back a little less, gets an expiring, and some nicce pieces for the future. quis would probably do well in PHX on the wing with nash. not sure they would want foster though as they already have shaq and lopez - maybe include a third team or try jeff at PF w/ shaq.

              Comment


              • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                just found this article on yahoo sports about everyone in phoenix being on the table but nash..


                http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...yhoo&type=lgns

                Comment


                • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                  With Larry Brown's halfcourt / slow the game down offense....you would have to think that the Bobcats would consider making a move for Shaq. Heck....if we had a Coach that slowed the offense down....I would even consider making a trade for Shaq.
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                    IMO, i think the bulls will make the stongest play. they have all the tools to get it done and they need a player like amare in the worst way.

                    they're in the east, which you know something kerr would prefer. they have an expiring PF who can fill in this season in drew gooden. a probable lotto pick. lots of nice young pieces in hinrich, gordon, thomas, and noah.

                    Comment


                    • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                      Quote from yahoo

                      If Kerr and assistant GM David Griffin do trade Stoudemire, a four-time All-Star, they want a combination of expiring contracts, a talented young player – preferably a forward – and draft picks

                      The pacers have expiring contracts and draft picks but I don't know about a talented young player that is not call Granger, could they take Roy?
                      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                      Comment


                      • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                        I would be highly disappointed if we included Hibbert in any deal ..

                        I just really like the guy , and think if we DID trade him, he would end up being a franchise center ..
                        "Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

                        Comment


                        • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                          Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
                          Plus bringing in a big name could help market the team and fill the seats!

                          w00t
                          I don't think he is a big name. Among big NBA fans he is of course, but he's not really flashy headlines material. His rep with hardcore fans is much bigger than with the general not-going-to-games Indy public.

                          I just don't see him being THE answer that brings fans back OR gets the team winning a lot more games. He has yet to prove himself as the center of the focus. That's Nash, or at times Shaq. That's Duncan and perhaps Ginobili. That's Dwight Howard.

                          Right now he's just a bit more than Granger IMO, meaning good, all-star, but not so good or so well known to fix what is wrong with the Pacers.


                          Rasho (expiring), Quis (SG/SF, expiring at their option) and a top 10 pick would match salary to do this. But you only do it if you are resigning him, otherwise it's pointless. This is a rebuild, not a closing window of opportunity.

                          Comment


                          • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                            Originally posted by Quis View Post
                            I see no reason why Granger and Amare wouldn't coexist with both being 20+ ppg scorers for our team. Danny's clearly the more mature of the two and would have the longer tenure here, so there's no question that he would be the team leader. Amare would accept this.
                            Obviously, because the reason PHX is trying to trade him is his massive level of acceptance at any amount of compromise asked of him in order to play with two HOF players.

                            Come on Quis, Amare wants to be the man and he's far more aggressive/vocal than Granger IMO. He's not Vince Carter profile, but he's higher profile than Danny and I think he feels that way right now.

                            Consider Marion, his ego, and how well that got fixed by moving to Miami to share time with Wade.

                            What you get is 10 games in the plays are being drawn up for Amare and Danny is slipping back into his more natural (up till now) role of 2nd fiddle. But DG has the chance to be better than that and an ACCOMODATING star would not only allow that to happen but would nuture it. I don't see what in Amare's current situation suggests that he doesn't have issues with exactly this subject.

                            What, PHX just doesn't need AS PF that young any more?

                            Comment


                            • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                              Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                              Obviously, because the reason PHX is trying to trade him is his massive level of acceptance at any amount of compromise asked of him in order to play with two HOF players.

                              Come on Quis, Amare wants to be the man and he's far more aggressive/vocal than Granger IMO. He's not Vince Carter profile, but he's higher profile than Danny and I think he feels that way right now.

                              Consider Marion, his ego, and how well that got fixed by moving to Miami to share time with Wade.

                              What you get is 10 games in the plays are being drawn up for Amare and Danny is slipping back into his more natural (up till now) role of 2nd fiddle. But DG has the chance to be better than that and an ACCOMODATING star would not only allow that to happen but would nuture it. I don't see what in Amare's current situation suggests that he doesn't have issues with exactly this subject.

                              What, PHX just doesn't need AS PF that young any more?
                              Just curious, why does DG have to be the main guy? Why can't Danny be the "accomodating" star sidekick to a guy like Amare? You want to wait around for the absolute perfect match, but what if that never comes? To me, Granger is the perfect accomodating #2 guy you speak of, that happens to be able to step his game up whenever needed to a #1 level. Plus, Amare would make life much easier for Danny.

                              Also, if you don't think Amare Stoudemire would create major excitement in the city of Indianapolis, I completely disagree. He has dropped 40+ points on us the last two times he has been in town. Everybody who fallows the NBA at all knows who he is and what kind of player he is.
                              "Don't get caught watchin' the paint dry"

                              Comment


                              • Re: chad ford said this about the Pacers/Amare in his chat today...

                                Originally posted by Taterhead View Post
                                Just curious, why does DG have to be the main guy? Why can't Danny be the "accomodating" star sidekick to a guy like Amare? You want to wait around for the absolute perfect match, but what if that never comes? To me, Granger is the perfect accomodating #2 guy you speak of, that happens to be able to step his game up whenever needed to a #1 level. Plus, Amare would make life much easier for Danny.

                                Also, if you don't think Amare Stoudemire would create major excitement in the city of Indianapolis, I completely disagree. He has dropped 40+ points on us the last two times he has been in town. Everybody who fallows the NBA at all knows who he is and what kind of player he is.
                                Bingo.
                                "I had to take her down like Chris Brown."

                                -Lance Stephenson

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X