Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

    All right, you knew it was coming.

    I even promise that I'll be as "fair and balanced" as Fox News.

    This is the Super Bowl of Super Bowls, and who better to open for Springsteen (a man who usually needs no warmup act to preceed him) than the Steelers?



    The theme of this Super Bowl is "an irresistable force [Kurt Warner and his trio of WRs] hits an unmovable object [the Steelers Defense]."

    If this game were to be played in Pittsburgh, in January, I think we know who would leave the field battered and bruised. But it is not. It is Tampa, and February. Even though the high temperature was 55 degrees last week when I was at Clearwater Beach (not a good way to get a suntan), I understand it has warmed back up.

    This matchup will be strength on strength. How the Steelers offense does against the Cardinals defense likely won't make any difference (with one caveat, below), and special teams likely won't make any difference. If Warner & Company can move the ball and strike quickly, this game will be competitive and the Cardinals can win. If they can't, I'm not sure the game will even be competitive.

    Caveat: If Big Ben turns back into Turnover Ben, and gives the Cardinals the the same type of field position that he gave Manning, it could be a real problem for the Steelers defense. However, Ben only has one interception in the past three games, and with the exception of the Titans game in Week #16 has really protected the ball well over the past two months.

    Now to the articles:

    From Monday's Tribune:

    Five Underhyped Super Bowl Stories
    David Haugh
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...1076497.column

    Fitzgerald has 419 receiving yards in the playoffs and, more than any other player in the Super Bowl, has the ability to dominate the game. Though Taylor will have help from a blitzing pass rush and safeties over the top, the cornerback typically assigned to the opponent's top receiver must believe he has to be the best player on the NFL's best defense. If Taylor can be, it could create quite the Super Bowl legend for a fourth-round draft pick out of Louisiana-Lafayette. It wouldn't be the first time Taylor has shut down an elite receiver. In back-to-back wins this season, he limited Randy Moss (45) and Terrell Owens (32) to fewer than 100 yards combined. Bears cornerback Charles Tillmans's college teammate plays a similarly physical style. People in Pittsburgh will tell you there are bricks used to build Heinz Field softer than Taylor's hands, but knocking down passes would suffice against the Cardinals.
    (I love the "bricks used to build Heinz Field are softer than Taylor's hands line... its so true.)

    Born to not lose: Grown-up Big Ben leads Steelers
    Alan Robinson, AP
    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slu...v=ap&type=lgns

    “I hate to lose. I hate being second,” Roethlisberger said. “When it comes down to it, I want the ball in my hands and I want to win the game.”

    And which NFL quarterback won the most games by age 26? Brady? Dan Marino? John Elway? Joe Montana? No, Roethlisberger, with 51. In a few days, he could join only Brady by winning a second Super Bowl before he turns 27.

    Consider this, too: Roethlisberger has started during each of his five NFL seasons. Terry Bradshaw, against whom all Steelers quarterbacks are measured, didn’t become an unquestioned starter until midway through his fifth season, in 1974. Before then, Bradshaw endured several awful seasons, benchings for Terry Hanratty and Joe Gilliam, while he did a lot of growing up.

    So much has happened to Roethlisberger during those five seasons: Going 13-0 as a rookie before losing in the AFC title game; winning the Super Bowl in his second season; the motorcycle crash that seriously injured him in 2006; the down season that followed; a comeback year (32 touchdowns, 11 interceptions) under a new coach in 2007; another Super Bowl appearance this season, despite a falloff in production (17 touchdowns, 15 interceptions).

    “I have been through a lot,” Roethlisberger said. “It’s rewarding to get here, it would be more rewarding to win it. A lot of people find ways to doubt you and hate you and love you, and it’s fun to prove people wrong.”

    His reckless, playground style creates some of the punishment he absorbs. He doesn’t believe any play is irretrievably broken, so he hangs onto the ball longer than many quarterbacks.
    Much has been made about Ben's new, big contract. It is very out of character for the Steelers to believe in paying big money to a QB. The sentiment throughout Steelers Nation is that Ben is proving to be worth the money. Its not gaudy passing stats that will ever impress Steelers Nation. On the other hand, what Ben did late in the regular season in Baltimore against the Ravens defense, marching 92 yards in 12 plays in just under three minutes for the game winning score.

    Or as Nate Washington said after the AFC Title game,

    Big Ben's scrambles produce one key play after another
    Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09020/943058-13.stm

    "I tell people all the time, he's a good quarterback but he's one heck of a football player," receiver Nate Washington said yesterday after a team meeting. "There's a difference in those two. That's what Ben does, he prides himself on making plays."
    Ben may not be the best QB in the NFL. But I don't think you can name a better football player at the QB position. Maybe Brady, but I'm not certain I've seen Brady throw his body into a block on a reverse like Ben does, or make an outstanding open field tackle when he has to.

    Moving on, my all-time favorite player, who will be elected to the Hall of Fame this week, has a very good analysis of the strength-on-strength aspect of the game. And it scares me.

    Rod Woodson sees trouble ahead for the Steelers; praises Cardinals' passing
    Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09028/945036-66.stm

    "I think it's going to be a tough task in the secondary for the Steelers just to match up on a play-by-play basis and shut those receivers down," Woodson said yesterday. "To me, this is the toughest draw the Steelers had in the NFC.

    "Playing against Philly, I think they could out-tough the Eagles. Playing against the Arizona Cardinals against spread-out football, who can find all their receivers? And Kurt Warner's doing an outstanding job. I think it's a tough draw for them."

    "If the Steelers are going to win this football game, the secondary -- the back end -- and the linebackers in coverage have to play the best they played all season long," Woodson predicted. "And if they can do that, they can win the football game. But if they have a bad day, it's over for the Steelers."

    The Steelers often had trouble with spread offenses in the early part of this decade, but they've tightened up since Dick LeBeau's return as coordinator in 2004.

    "You have to think ... a little advantage has to go to the Cardinals just for the fact they can spread you out, they can throw the football," Woodson said. "I can see them going to their two-minute [strategy] in their first series. What that does, you don't have the whole blitz package for Dick LeBeau at hand because you can't get into all that, the checks."
    So the Steelers need Harrison, Woodley, and Timmons to put a lot of pressure on the QBs. Nobody else has been successful at pressuring Warner this season, but nobody else has the Steelers' front seven, either. Again, strength on strength.

    Speaking of Harrison...

    Harrison makes his statements on field
    Barry Wilner, AP
    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_yl...v=ap&type=lgns

    His development was slow through the next two seasons, held back in part because the Steelers had a Pro Bowler at outside linebacker in Joey Porter.

    But the Steelers allowed Porter to leave for Miami as a high-priced free agent in 2007, and Harrison efficiently moved into the starting spot.

    Pittsburgh was so impressed by Harrison’s improvement that it already had extended his contract through 2009 even though he was not a starter.

    “I figured the last time I got cut, that if I didn’t get picked up, that it would probably be over for me,” Harrison said. “Fortunately for me, Clark broke his hand and the Steelers called me back and here we are now.”

    At the Super Bowl, and without the kind of attention the league’s top defensive performer should command.

    Toward the end of the Steelers’ one-hour availability, as Harrison counted down the minutes, along came a camera crew and a hulking, sweating man holding a microphone.

    “Sapp,” Harrison said, “You got a question for me?”

    Warren Sapp, the 1999 defensive player of the year, did, indeed. But first, Harrison played the reporter’s role.

    “Hey, Sapp, how come you never had tough times and got drafted first round?” Harrison asked, a smile barely crossing his lips.

    “Because I was a better player than you,” Sapp said, quickly adding, “In college.”

    “Now, we’re both defensive players of the year,” Sapp said.

    Both own Super Bowl rings, too. But Sapp was a regular for the Buccaneers when they won in 2003. Harrison was a backup in 2006 and was involved in three tackles on special teams.

    So Harrison admits he has a little more catching up to do with Sapp, beginning Sunday against the Arizona Cardinals.

    “It means a little bit more to me because I am a starter instead of playing just on special teams,” he said. “I have matured. I handle situations a lot differently now than I would back then. I have gotten better since then, too. I have learned the game and taken time to study the game.

    “I didn’t know if I had it in me to play this well, but it has all come out.”
    And his partner in crime, Woodley:

    OLB Woodley becomes disruptive force
    Ron Musselman, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09025/944133-66.stm

    "You think of some of the great linebackers they've had here, names like Kevin Greene, Levon Kirkland, Jack Ham, Jason Gildon, Joey Porter, and you want to be a part of that group," Woodley said. "You want people talking about you like that when you're done playing football."

    Woodley's popularity skyrocketed when he was featured on the cover of the Dec. 22 Sports Illustrated, glaring down at Ravens quarterback Joe Flacco after yet another sack.

    "[LaMarr] has played at a high level," Tomlin said. "The thing that we need from him is consistent pressure. I think that he provides that."

    Woodley, who dreamed of being a WWF wrestler or an NBA player as a youngster, was the Steelers' sixth-leading tackler in the regular season with 78 stops. He also tied for the NFL lead with four fumble recoveries.

    "He's played great for us this year," defensive end Brett Keisel said. "To only be a second-year pro and make the type of plays he makes and do the things he's asked to do is pretty amazing."

    Woodley's pass-rushing skills have drawn the most attention. He has 21 1/2 sacks since joining the Steelers and making the successful transition to outside linebacker in their 3-4 defense.

    At Michigan, he was primarily a defensive end in a 4-3 alignment.

    "It's always hard to draft a college defensive end and turn them into a pass-rushing linebacker," Polamalu said. "But, obviously, LaMarr's done a great job with it.

    "This defense is built for our linebackers to have a lot of success, and he's had a lot of it so far in a short period of time."
    That's true, Troy. But come on, he lists the Steelers all-time great LBs and leaves out the two best: Jack Lambert and Gregg Lloyd?? Come on.

    And lastly, if you aren't familiar with the story Aaron Smith and his son Elijah's battle with Leukemia this season (don't confuse Aaron with loudmouth Anthony Smith, who has been "inactive" for both playoff games and Tomlin has probably stuffed a sock in his mouth), you should read this article.

    Football becomes nice distraction for Smith
    By Jason Cole, Yahoo! Sports
    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_yl...yhoo&type=lgns

    For three hours and change every week, Aaron Smith can escape.

    He can leave behind the image of long needles being stuck in his 5-year-old son Elijah as doctors check his bone marrow, measuring the effects of the medicine the little boy is taking to fight leukemia. Smith can escape from having to explain to his son that, despite the painful evidence to the contrary, the doctors are trying to help, not hurt.

    For those few, precious hours, Smith can forget about such scary words as “oncologist” and “chemotherapy” and terms like “white-cell count,” the stuff most people hope they never have to deal with or at least get a chance to live a full life before hearing.

    Sure, Smith gets to spend much of that time in the midst of violent collisions with other men weighing 300 pounds – men who would like nothing more than to inflict the kind of pain that would cause their opponent to quit.

    But when you compare that to the pain and fear inspired by a doctor asking you, “What do you know about leukemia?” or the image of your little boy bloated by steroids as he goes through chemo, double-team blocks don’t measure up.
    But don't underestimate Smith's importance to the team. When he got hurt (torn bicep muscle) last season, that was far worse than Willie Parker's broken foot.

    Same article/ links as above...

    Few people in football understand what Smith means to the Steelers. He is a lynchpin of the team’s 3-4 defense, particularly against the run.

    In 2007, after Smith was placed on injured reserve with three games remaining, the Steelers went into a tailspin. They gave up 224 yards rushing at home to Jacksonville in the first game without Smith; they proceeded to lose three of their final four, allowing at least 135 yards rushing in each of the losses. That included a first-round playoff loss to Jacksonville at home.

    “He’s the focal point of our run defense, no question,” nose tackle Chris Hoke said.

    “This is the best way I can say it,” said defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau. “I’ve been here five years since I came back, and I can count on one hand how many times I’ve seen Aaron Smith blocked. He never gets blocked, and there’s no way you can overstate that value to any defense. He gets his job done on a consistent basis.”

    OK, but that sounds like hyperbole.

    “You would say that, but I’m telling you,” LeBeau said. “That’s why I can never understand why he doesn’t go to the Pro Bowl every year. He doesn’t get quite as many sacks as the defensive ends in a 4-3 scheme, but I think our guys should be in competition with the defensive tackles. …
    To me, Aaron Smith is a shoo-in for the Pro Bowl.”

    -snip-

    Said LeBeau: “I could never overstate my admiration for him. He has been unbelievable – every day, to be with your son and to deal with this. He’s a great husband, a great father, a great family man, and he’s been a great leader for our defense.”
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  • #2
    Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

    My key to the game: http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick...=149&map.y=136

    Sunday: Mostly sunny, with a high near 68. East wind between 6 and 9 mph.

    Sunday Night: Partly cloudy, with a low around 46.
    The poster formerly known as Rimfire

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

      Go Cardinals!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

        Originally posted by DisplacedKnick View Post
        I've been thinking that. But these Steelers rely less on physical strength and more on speed than the stereotypical Steelers team. That's been Tomlin's stamp on LeBeau's schemes. Whether its Willie Parker vs. Jerome Bettis, Holmes vs. Randel-El, Harrison and Woodely vs. Porter and Hagaans, etc., this team is quicker, and not quite as strong, than a typical Bill Cowher team.

        So this may be less of an advantage to the Cardinals. Still an advantage - don't get me wrong. And probably more meaningful than any advantage that Whis and Grimm have by coaching against us. (Don't forget, LeBeau knows Whis's offense pretty well, too.)
        Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
        Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
        Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
        Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
        And life itself, rushing over me
        Life itself, the wind in black elms,
        Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

          Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
          I've been thinking that. But these Steelers rely less on physical strength and more on speed than the stereotypical Steelers team. That's been Tomlin's stamp on LeBeau's schemes. Whether its Willie Parker vs. Jerome Bettis, Holmes vs. Randel-El, Harrison and Woodely vs. Porter and Hagaans, etc., this team is quicker, and not quite as strong, than a typical Bill Cowher team.

          So this may be less of an advantage to the Cardinals. Still an advantage - don't get me wrong. And probably more meaningful than any advantage that Whis and Grimm have by coaching against us. (Don't forget, LeBeau knows Whis's offense pretty well, too.)
          Whisenhunt has almost nothing to do with the Cardinals offense so LeBeau wont have any extra advantage there. Going the opposite way, I think Whisenhunt and Grimm still know quite a bit about the Steelers and their players capabilities so that could help the Cardinals out a little bit. Regarding the weather, the Cardinals have been fortunate to play in such great weather throughout the playoffs because playing in cold weather makes a huge difference for them as they haven't won a cold weather game against a good team all year. Looks like the weather in Tampa will be at the minimum 50 degrees so it shouldn't hurt the Cardinals finesse passing game.

          I think the two keys of the game are the Cardinals OLine vs the Steelers DLine and Big Ben not being a TO machine. If the Steelers DLine can't get any pressure onto Warner without blitz help, the Cardinals are going to shred them through the air. The Patriots had great sucess against the Cardinals by rushing 4 and dropping everyone else into coverage because Wilfork and Seymour were able to get heavy pressure on Warner right away. On the Steelers offensive front, Big Ben needs to remember not to try and do to much. If he turns the ball over a few times, the Cardinals will win this game. Their defense has been inconsistent but they have the talent to make big time plays.

          I think the Steelers are going to win, but I am pulling hard for the Cards. I have been rooting for them ever since they beat the Falcons in the wild card round.
          Last edited by Moses; 01-28-2009, 04:23 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

            Interesting comments.

            I do agree on the Roethlesberger turnover factor. 100%.

            Let me clarify on the weather: the warm weather favors the Cardinals, but not as much as cold weather would strongly favor the Steelers.

            I don't agree with your assessment of the Steelers D-line, from a scheme perspective. But I would like to hear more about how the Patriots put Warner under pressure.

            For the Steelers, Smith, Keisel and Hampton are run stuffers and against the pass their job is to occupy as many blockers as possible so that Harrison, Woodley and Timmons have blitzing lanes. Its the prototype 3-4, remember? Now, will LeBeau likely pull Hampton and Foote, and replace them with Timmons and a nickel back? Yes. Then he'll rush four, including the obvious three (Keisel, Smith, Woodley) but leave them guessing on whether Harrison or Timmons is rushing or dropping into coverage, and drop Farrior into coverage. If we've got to go to a dime, which I think we might, either Harrison or Timmons gets pulled. Said another way, our nickel D looks like a 4-2, but the "DEs" are really our LBs.

            I'll bet we've blitzed with a DB less than 10 times this season. Troy has become the master decoy in that regard. Collinsworth said earlier in the season that he's never seen LeBeau blitz this little, and remember those guys were together in Cincinnati for a decade so Collinsworth knows a lot about LeBeau.

            We'll concede the out pattern. They can't get enough first downs against us passing that way.

            If by "shred through the air", you mean the first QB to get over 240 yards against our pass defense, then okay.

            Manning, Rivers (twice), McNabb, Romo, Collins, Campbell, Cassel, Garrard, and the other Manning have all been held to 240 or less.

            Of our four losses, two were attributable to early season struggles with the pass rush (Eagles, Giants), and two were attributable to Ben's occasional tendency to turn the ball over (Titans, Colts).

            I was focusing on some of the less obvious story lines originally. Clearly the Whis vs. LeBeau story line is getting a lot of press. Neither Whis nor LeBeau thinks either coach has an advantage - they both know each other very well but what is going to matter is which group of players does a better job of executing the game plan. But to suggest that Whis doesn't have his thumbprint all over the Cardinals offense is misleading. If Whis and Grimm have an advantage at all, it is based on the knowledge of the personnel, not the strategy. So I do agree with the rest of your comments on the coaches.
            Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
            Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
            Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
            Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
            And life itself, rushing over me
            Life itself, the wind in black elms,
            Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

              Hopefully this puts another overplayed story to rest:

              Steelers defensive coordinator LeBeau says he's staying
              Gerry Dulac, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
              http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09028...d=steelers.xml

              After hearing repeated rumors he might retire after the Super Bowl, Steelers defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau told his players in a team meeting he intends to return next season.

              LeBeau, the architect of the league's No. 1 defense, said he told the players only because the rumors were persistent on the Internet and he didn't want them to think he would make such a decision without first informing them.

              "I would never make any kind of decision without the guys in that room, like my son, knowing first," LeBeau said. "The way they're playing, they're going to have to run me out of here."

              LeBeau, 71, has been in the National Football League for 50 years, the last 36 as an assistant coach, head coach and coordinator.

              "He said, 'I'm going to get this out of the way. I will be back next year,' " said cornerback Deshea Townsend.
              I can't figure out how he is not in the Hall of Fame as either a player or contributor? And by all accounts, he is a first-class human being as well.
              Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
              Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
              Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
              Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
              And life itself, rushing over me
              Life itself, the wind in black elms,
              Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

                Steelers suck. Cardinals rule.

                And that ends my Super Bowl preview.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

                  Wow. And I thought Adam had nothing to say.

                  Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                  Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                  Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                  Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                  And life itself, rushing over me
                  Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                  Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

                    And on a somewhat related note:

                    Lofgren Looks Forward to Super Sunday
                    Gary Graff, Backstreets Magazine
                    http://www.backstreets.com/news.html

                    What do you anticipate for the Super Bowl halftime show?

                    Lofgren: Well, it goes way beyond just a gig. First of all, TV's never your favorite thing to do in a great band because it removes the three-hour sweatfest. That being said, after 40 years on the road, it's without a doubt going to be the best and greatest TV opportunity any of us will ever have. I'll speak for myself on that one; Bruce did a great job on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial (at the "We Are One" pre-inauguration concert). I won't compare those kinds of gigs, but for me, playing the Super Bowl... It's going to be incredible. And, listen, Bruce has been turning down that gig since '75. We're all thrilled he accepted it this time.

                    So given the nature of football and the way the game is played, would it be appropriate for Bruce to call an audible when you guys are at the "line of scrimmage?"

                    My opinion would be yes -- but that's Bruce's call. Obviously after 12 minutes you're gonna get cut off and go to a commercial. Would it be appropriate? Well, sure -- but only if Bruce wanted to do it. If he just said, "We're gonna do these four songs together" and then after the second song it's like, "Man, this third one's not feeling right" and he just gave us a hand signal that we follow or vamp on a chord while he runs around and shouts at all of us or makes sure we read his lips and counts it off, then, yeah, of course. It would be appropriate, and there's no one better to do it than Bruce and the E Street Band -- not that I'm predicting it! [laughs]
                    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                    And life itself, rushing over me
                    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

                      I haven't been paying attention to all the SB hype, so I've got a few Q's. First, I'd expect that the Cards have been developing into a sort of massively likable, everyone-loves-the-underdog team. Is that happening? Or, no? And if so, Jay, what does it feel like going up against the team that almost everyone in the country would like to see win, if only for the 'boy, that's neat-o' factor? Crushing those sorts of teams is what builds that sort of Evil Empire vibe, over time... which could probably be pretty fun, dunno.
                      You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

                        I think they're struggling with the fact that they just aren't very popular in the first place. So they have a lot of unknown players, except for Warner. I think they are massively likeable though. I rarely cheer for the NFC in the Super Bowl (unless the Bengals, Colts, or God-forbid the Browns get in), but I would consider cheering for them against anybody other than the Steelers. They are well coached and I love their coaching staff. Warner is a legit star. Their receivers are both lucky to be playing with Warner and damn good in their own right.

                        Their second best/ most popular player played college ball for Pitt, so that doesn't exactly help bring "other parts of the country" in for cheering for them.

                        I read a survey not that long ago that the Steelers and Cowboys - thanks to the NFL's continued surge in popularity - are now battling with the Yankees for the most popular professional team in the country. Now it could be that the Steelers have won enough times that every non-Steeler fan wants them lose, and that's fine. If this turns into the Six Pack, then the "venom" that Shade and Adam demonstrated above is because of jealousy. But this will hardly be a situation where everybody jumps on the underdog bandwagon.

                        So this is nothing new. For the most part, the entire country wanted the Colts or Seahawks to beat us during our last Super Bowl run. If it weren't for it being Bettis's last game, in his home town, we wouldn't have gotten any fan sympathy whatsoever.

                        What we need is for the Cowboys to get over the hump, and have a few more Dallas-Pittsburgh Super Bowls. The "going retro" Lakers vs. Celtics NBA Finals seems to have been a big boost, so why not have the same thing in the NFL with its two most flagship franchises?

                        I was in Walt Disney World during the day of the AFC Title game, and I've got to tell you that there were so many Steelers jerseys/ shirts that it could have been the parking lot of Heinz Field on game day. (And a pretty strong exodus to the parking lot/ tram about 90 minutes before kickoff.) (Full disclosure, I was sporting a Hines Ward jersey). There were some Ravens jerserys, two Eagles jerseys, and we were asked a couple of times, "who are the Eagles even playing today?"

                        JMO. For what its worth.
                        Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                        Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                        Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                        Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                        And life itself, rushing over me
                        Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                        Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

                          And just like that, "The Buzz Log" has an innocuous article on the relative internet-search popularity of both teams. Cheesy, but a little bit interesting...

                          Super Bowl Search Showdown
                          By Mike Krumboltz
                          http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/92208
                          Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                          Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                          Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                          Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                          And life itself, rushing over me
                          Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                          Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

                            Six Pack?
                            You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Jay's official Super Bowl preview thread

                              Well, we finally got "the one for the thumb" a couple years ago.

                              I'm not too sure about "Six Pack." You can decide for yourself.

                              http://www.post-gazette.com/multimed...teelervidbox10
                              Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                              Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                              Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                              Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                              And life itself, rushing over me
                              Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                              Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X