Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

    What has happened to Addai? Is he really as washed up as he appears or are there other factors?

    While I'm sure the refs will be blamed in this SD loss but if the calls are valid then they have to make them (regardless of the clock or which team has the ball). ...Of course that goes both ways.

    I wouldn't have challenged on the Reggie Wayne play because that appeared to be a waste to begin with. I wouldn't have challenged on the other play tho either... IF I'd already challenged on the Wayne play. OTOH, since that is the case (I wouldn't have challenged on the Wayne) I certainly would've challenged that the SD WR didn't get both feet down.

    I really think I would've went for the intentional safety, given up 2 points, and gotten the free kick with hopes of pinning SD deep. Especially with SD out of TO's towards the end of regulation. I realize that would've given SD the opportunity to win with a FG... but then by getting to overtime that is what it was anyway. And there were a few things that could've went wrong with punting from the endzone anyway so it wasn't exactly a safe play (plus in all likelihood SD was going to get good field position for their final regulation drive with a punt no matter what).

    Going for it on 4th down when the Colts did was crazy. They ran on 3rd down up the middle for a wasted play (basically) and then threw on 4th down and didn't get it. Considering how well SD was punting there was no reason to give SD good field position that early in the 2nd half with the score that close. The Colts should've punted and tried burying SD deep and playing defense.... not giving them midfield area and STILL having to play defense (by not getting the 1st down) (and then with SD having a punter having the game of his life). And IF you are going to make it 2 down territory, throw on both downs because Lord knows the Colts can't get the tough yards with Addai this season.

    One of my Manning peeves is he uses ALL of the play clock EVERY play. That allows teams to get gimmicky on defense and only get into their real defense in the last 5 secs. It also takes away the element of surprise on the snap. If you're in the hurry up/no huddle take advantage of ALL elements of it and don't give the defense back an advantage. SD took advantage of that and when Indy quit it (for a while) in the 2nd half we had some success.

    Point two on the same thing, I don't mind the hurry up offense... EXCEPT when Manning starts changing the play at 5 secs and we have a fire drill at the snap that we barely get off and it never pans out. Usually, we get burned on that rushed of a play. I'm not talking about catching the defense napping and going to a quick snap...

    It was fitting seeing our season end on a long run from a runner we couldn't stop when we needed to.

    Bob Sanders could be Jesus in cleats but if he can only play 1/3rd of a season every year then we need to look elsewhere and find some continuity... not count on a player that can't be counted on.

    I hope this is Dungy's last game as coach. It's time.

    We were outcoached... but it's the playoffs and Dungy is our coach. That happening was a given from the start. I don't know what it is but Dungy's reputation as not a playoff coach is IMHO validated again.

    Naming the next HC for whenever Dungy decides to retire was STUPID. The Colts cannot afford to be overly loyal and should look at the Pacers for a lesson on what that gets you. Look at the available names right now. Is Caldwell REALLY the right man considering some of the names that are out there (or suspected to be out there) this season? Why close off your options?

    And BTW... was that REALLY a first down on that one close measurement for SD?
    Last edited by Bball; 01-04-2009, 01:20 AM.
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  • #2
    Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

    I read the first line and already had to say something about Addai.

    Joseph Addai = Shaun Alexander V.2

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

      Joe Addai looks to be pretty much done... which sucks. I think I still have something about him in my sig.

      I don't agree that we were outcoached, but I am open to the argument. Can you provide examples, evidence? Mostly I thought our total inability to run the ball killed us. Our running game was pathetic all season, and I don't know how we expect Manning to succeed against defenses that don't ever have to worry about our run game.
      You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

        I agree with you about those questionable decisions the Colts made. And in a game as close as this one, they really did make a difference.

        I'd add the decision to send Addai wide on that 3rd and 2 (the one where Manning was sacked) to the list of questionable decisions the Colts made.

        I'm also worried about Caldwell. I'm very leery of having a Dungy disciple take over. Hopefully he does things a little differently (read: better), but I'm afraid he'll be at best another Dungy clone.

        I know the Colts have already said that Caldwell will be the next coach, but why not shoot for Bill Cowher? Longshot, I know, but it's worth a shot. The Colts are probably Cowher's best shot at taking over a winner, so that may be an incentive.

        I just don't know if a rookie head coach is the best idea for a team with most of its players only having about 3-4 years of their prime left.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

          It certainly didn't help that we were getting the ball on the one yard line every other time.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

            Running on 3rd and 1 on the first drive of the 2nd half with that stupid alignment that is 1-8 in success rate was a horrible coaching decision. Should've passed out of that formation since we ALWAYS run from it.

            Dominic Rhodes didn't play enough and should've been in when we were pinned late in the game. He'll get the 3rd and 2 to put the game away. Only time we should've run.

            Punter for San Diego won the game today. Without him pinning us 3 freaking times!! we win the game 17-0. Punter was the MVP and our inability to get 1 first down either of those 3 pinnings was the reason we lost. 1 freaking 1st down and we win this game!

            ARGHHHH!!!!! I'm am so freaking tired of cheering for teams that continue to fail!! Colts, Pacers, Purdue! Just freaking done!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

              Originally posted by grace View Post
              It certainly didn't help that we were getting the ball on the one yard line every other time.
              Read my thoughts about going for it on 4th down when we did. It was our opportunity to pin them deep for once and maybe take away that advantage... and instead we played right into their hands and give them great field position. Now, even if we played great defense, the Chargers still had the opportunity to pin us deep.
              Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

              ------

              "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

              -John Wooden

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

                Would Cowher be open to passing as often as a team w/ Manning should?
                You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

                  This is why we lost:

                  - penalties
                  - unable to stop SD on critical 3rd downs

                  Simple as that, really. Oh, and we are the Chargers' *****.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

                    Originally posted by SoupIsGood View Post
                    Would Cowher be open to passing as often as a team w/ Manning should?
                    Cowher is not the only coach out there but how much should a Manning team pass? We only need to pass enough to win... whatever that means.
                    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                    ------

                    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                    -John Wooden

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

                      Often enough to achieve a nice balance between the run and pass, rather than going with a middling run game over and over and over when you've got a 3-time MVP handing the ball off.
                      You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

                        Get the o-line improved, and I would be interested to see just how "done" Addai really is.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

                          Originally posted by Aw Heck View Post
                          I know the Colts have already said that Caldwell will be the next coach, but why not shoot for Bill Cowher? Longshot, I know, but it's worth a shot. The Colts are probably Cowher's best shot at taking over a winner, so that may be an incentive.

                          I just don't know if a rookie head coach is the best idea for a team with most of its players only having about 3-4 years of their prime left.
                          I don't know if Cowher would be the best choice either. I mean doesn't have the same stigma(of losing in big games).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

                            If we actually had a good running game, Manning shouldn't have to pass so much. Running the ball effectively doesn't mean Manning hands the ball off 2 times out of 3 necessarily.

                            Manning won't be Superman forever. Maybe it's time to start orienting this team towards a more running-game, smash mouth defense type of team. Then we'd wouldn't need to Manning to be an MVP. He could still be a great player, but we wouldn't have to rely on him so much to play perfectly and save us at the last minute.

                            I just don't think that the Colts should just sit on their hands this offseason when a guy like Cowher is out there. I think he could really energize this team.

                            But I expect the Colts will keep their word and let Caldwell take over. Cowher probably comes at a pretty hefty price tag and I'm sure he has some conditions that might prevent the Colts from hiring him. And heck, he might just not want to come to Indy.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Bball's Post Season and Game Thread

                              Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                              Get the o-line improved, and I would be interested to see just how "done" Addai really is.

                              The O line did a good job of pass blocking... it makes me question how much they could be improved to make Addai look better. Addai is a RB for a team known for passing. That right there should give a good RB some advantage since the D has to focus so heavily on the pass.
                              Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                              ------

                              "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                              -John Wooden

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X