Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

  1. #1
    Denim Chicken duke dynamite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Bloomington
    Posts
    13,373
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/rankings

    T.J. Ford at 22
    Danny Granger at 89
    Mike Dunleavy at 103
    Troy Murphy at 111
    Rasho Nesterovic at 119 (one better than Jason Kidd!)
    Jeff Foster at 140


    Noteworthy:
    Jermaine O'Neal at 127
    Stephen Jackson at 159

  2. #2
    Banned Jonathan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,833

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    I do not understand. Is this fantasy? Overall? What is the formula for ranking players?

  3. #3
    Denim Chicken duke dynamite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Bloomington
    Posts
    13,373
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    This is Mr. Hollinger's way of ranking the players. Not fantasy related.

  4. #4
    It is ka Thankee sai Major Cold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Garrett, IN
    Posts
    9,079
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by duke dynamite View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This is Mr. Hollinger's way of ranking the players. Not fantasy related.
    might as well be.

  5. #5
    One man show ajbry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,696

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Hollinger needs to go away. Why does ESPN still employ this clown?

    PER is an inherently flawed measure, and it was created by a nerd who doesn't watch games...

  6. #6
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    He's saying he thinks TJ will be the 22nd best player in the league?

  7. #7
    One man show ajbry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,696

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He's saying he thinks TJ will be the 22nd best player in the league?
    Yes. And Carl Landry is the 24th. Leon Powe is the 30th best player in the NBA.

    He takes his PER very seriously, so to him it is the purest indicator of who is a good player and who isn't (Stephen Jackson and Shane Battier, for example).

  8. #8
    PROUD 2 B A PACERS FAN! xtacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    TURKEY
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,746

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by ajbry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Carl Landry is the 24th. Leon Powe is the 30th best player in the NBA.
    this guys saying this and still getting paid being an nba writer. some people are just born lucky.

  9. #9
    Feed the big fella. Infinite MAN_force's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Broadripple
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,253

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    I don't think its a measure of "best" per se, just a stat based ranking.
    "As a bearded man, i was very disappointed in Love. I am gathering other bearded men to discuss the status of Kevin Love's beard. I am motioning that it must be shaved."

    - ilive4sports

  10. #10
    Denim Chicken duke dynamite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Bloomington
    Posts
    13,373
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Looking at it, I think it's a highly flawed system.

  11. #11
    100 Miles from the B count55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,772

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Strictly speaking, it's an Efficiency rating. It's a way to measure how much statistical production a player can squeeze out of the minutes he plays. It's essentially an over-engineered way to look at the numbers. It's as if you turned an economist loose with BBR.com.

    Now, the problem with Hollinger is that he substitutes efficiency for quality. I would have no problem believing that Carl Landry, as an example, was one of the 25 most efficient players in the league. To me, that says he gets the most out of his time. However, when he makes the leap to say that he's one of the 25best players in the league, he's over-reached the utility of the analysis.

    The problem that this runs into, (as well as any per-40 or per-36 type analysis) is the law of diminishing returns. Travis Diener can be very useful, in short stints. Play the guy 36 minutes, and he will get exploited. Jeff Foster maximizes his 20-24 minutes a game, but 32 minutes too often will grind on him physically and highlight his offensive weaknesses.

    Statistical metrics like these tend to be directionally correct, but they have a lot of outliers. I'm usually unsurprised about where a player falls. However, when a ranking doesn't jibe with my view of the player, I'll look a little closer. Sometimes (maybe 1/3 of the time), I'll realize my view of the player was flawed, and adjust my views to be more aligned with the ranking. However, most of the time it ends up being just another case of lies, damn lies, and statistics.

  12. #12

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Its not a player quality rating, It is what it is --- productivity per minute rating

    Some highly productive players, if they played a lot more minutes, would drop way off. Some very good players would be more productive with a capable backup to give them more rest.

    Guys like Landry and Powe who played in the teens in minutes are good players but if they doubled their court time they would no way double their stats. Lots of their production comes off of high energy and favorable matchups with second-stringers.

    Among players with similar roles though it can have meaning, like ranking efficiency of all players at the same position who play 30-35 min/g as an example.

    Any system where Jackson scores low is fine with me though.




    --
    edit-- I sorta said what count 55 said, in different words! I started before his was posted but then I got sidetracked.
    Last edited by Slick Pinkham; 10-16-2008 at 03:50 PM.

  13. #13
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by ajbry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yes. And Carl Landry is the 24th. Leon Powe is the 30th best player in the NBA.

    He takes his PER very seriously, so to him it is the purest indicator of who is a good player and who isn't (Stephen Jackson and Shane Battier, for example).
    Of course, another way to look at it is it's not an indicator of the BEST players but the best players at putting positive stats on the board. Which is not bad, just misleading.

  14. #14
    Administrator/ The Real Jay ChicagoJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    44
    Posts
    17,000

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    I had a coach in middle school that was a math teacher.

    Our halftimes consisted of him calculating our "team effeciency ratio" on the chalkboard. Then he would write the score underneath it. We were usually trailing. Often, we were losing by a lot.

    He would then tell us the key to success was to raise our effeciency ratio, and with that great insight, we'd run out for the second half and get crushed.

    I don't recall that he ever diagrammed a play. Oh yeah, we also had a goofy defensive formula to memorize (trap after a made FT, 2-3 zone after a made FG, man-to-man after a missed FG or turnover.)

    Sounds like Hollinger. All of those stats just result in the quantification of a really stupid analysis in the first place.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  15. #15

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    The main problem is putting together a huge list for all sorts of players with different roles.

    The stat would have meaning, I think, if similar-position players playing similar minutes were binned together.

    period.

    Not a huge list with 12 mpg backups and 40 mpg starters, one a C and the other a G, for example, clustered together.

  16. #16
    100 Miles from the B count55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,772

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by ChicagoJ View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I had a coach in middle school that was a math teacher.

    Our halftimes consisted of him calculating our "team effeciency ratio" on the chalkboard. Then he would write the score underneath it. We were usually trailing. Often, we were losing by a lot.

    He would then tell us the key to success was to raise our effeciency ratio, and with that great insight, we'd run out for the second half and get crushed.

    I don't recall that he ever diagrammed a play. Oh yeah, we also had a goofy defensive formula to memorize (trap after a made FT, 2-3 zone after a made FG, man-to-man after a missed FG or turnover.)

    Sounds like Hollinger. All of those stats just result in the quantification of a really stupid analysis in the first place.
    In a review early in my career, I was told I needed to improve my patience.

    Being a good young brown nose, I promptly and brightly inquired, "Yes, I agree. What kind of things do you think I could do to improve in that area?"

    She responded, "Gee, I don't know...I think it would help a lot if, when you were dealing with people, that you were more patient. That's probably the best way to make this a strength, rather than a weakness."

    Gee...Thanks.

  17. #17
    Member pacergod2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    2,885
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    I find this thread hilarious. I love Chicago J's Math teacher story. I will refrain from even calling him a basketball coach. And Count as always, you are spot on. I hate Hollinger and think he is nothing but a waste of ESPN website space. He knows NOTHING about basketball. I am an accountant. Give me his job. I tell you what i would do.... is multiply that efficiency rating by the average minutes played and get back to a gross analysis of the players production. That is more telling than his bull**** efficiency stat. I love efficient bench players. I really do, but Hollinger is a toad and so is his analysis. You could just look at a players stat sheets on a whole and get a better indication of a player than what hollinger puts out there. You take out the few anomaly games... like Landry putting up 22 points against he Pacers or whatever he did and you have yourself an indication of what a player is.... STATISTICALLY.

    I tell you what I would rather have though. An analyst that talks about real basketball. Give credit to guys that set picks. Give credit to guys that defend well. Give credit to PG's that set up plays for two passes ahead of the pass they make. Or how about a guy that can make an entry pass to the post. GIVE ME THAT. THAT'S what I want. But I am selfish.

    The Treasurer of HOLLINGER HATER NATION,

    pacergod2

  18. #18
    Intuition over Integers McKeyFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Free Lance!
    Posts
    8,081

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by ChicagoJ View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I had a coach in middle school that was a math teacher.

    Our halftimes consisted of him calculating our "team effeciency ratio" on the chalkboard. Then he would write the score underneath it. We were usually trailing. Often, we were losing by a lot.

    He would then tell us the key to success was to raise our effeciency ratio, and with that great insight, we'd run out for the second half and get crushed.

    I don't recall that he ever diagrammed a play. Oh yeah, we also had a goofy defensive formula to memorize (trap after a made FT, 2-3 zone after a made FG, man-to-man after a missed FG or turnover.)

    Sounds like Hollinger. All of those stats just result in the quantification of a really stupid analysis in the first place.
    Yeah, I gotta prop that story too. Very funny.
    .

    .

    .

    .


    “People talk about how quiet he [McKey] is, but he’s really been helpful. He gives a lot of insight to players in how to guard certain teams and what their weaknesses are. The whole team listens to him, and it makes my job a lot easier. Having players like him is what pro basketball is all about for me.” —Larry Brown

  19. #19
    Remember #31 dohman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,333

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    should we trade granger for leon powe?

  20. #20
    Tyrant maragin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,216

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    I like statisticians' views of sports, including Hollinger. He doesn't make outlandish claims, presents it as just a tool, and if you read the details surrounding the numbers, he generally makes plenty of sense. He's just one of many guys making a living around APBRmetrics.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APBRmetrics

    I'd love to get articles from the Winval guys. They've been providing player efficiency stats for the Mavericks since '01, and Cuban seems to think Wayne Winston and Jeff Sagarin have done a hell of a job. Their stats are referenced in all player/ lineup decisions.

    Sports, to me, are a mix of art and science. Increasingly useful statistical analysis is another way to gain a competitive edge, be it as an owner of a pro team, or the owner of a fantasy team. As a gambler, I enjoy removing as much bias as possible to increase the accuracy with which I view a system. Hollinger articles provide predictions with a basis in stats, rather than pure conjecture or feel. He then encourages the reader to "apply your own logic from there."

  21. #21

    Default Re: 2008-2009 Hollinger's Player Predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by justinDOHMAN View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    should we trade granger for leon powe?
    They don't need an understudy for Paul Pierce.

Similar Threads

  1. Hollinger's Forecast
    By OakMoses in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-02-2008, 02:04 PM
  2. Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...
    By Major Cold in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 2039
    Last Post: 06-27-2008, 11:43 PM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-26-2008, 01:21 AM
  4. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 04-10-2008, 10:59 PM
  5. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-23-2008, 01:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •