Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Coach 'em up, season 2: Troy Murphy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Coach 'em up, season 2: Troy Murphy

    After a brief writing hiatus, this series gets back on track today with a look at the Pacers likely starting power forward, Troy Murphy.

    Murphy had an excellent last part of the season a year ago statistically, and would seemingly be a player who fits well within the basic offensive scheme of Jim O'Brien. As usual, what this thread will attempt to do is to give some basic ideas on how both Murphy can improve his game, and how the staff can utilize Murphy to get the maximum return on the team's investment in him.

    While on the subject, let me first tackle the topic of the team's investment financially in Murphy. By all accounts, with almost no one in dispute, everyone feels Troy Murphy is overpaid based upon what talents and skills he actually brings to the table. Certainly, I wouldn't disagree with that assessment either.

    But, what Murphy or any other player is getting paid is, at this point, a "sunk cost". In other words, Murphy's contract is set in stone, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. Regardless of how much Murphy is cashing in on the vastly gargantuan contract Chris Mullin signed him to years ago, it is important I think for all of us to put that out of our minds as something none of us can control. It is easy for evaluators, fans, and coaches to factor a players contract in to your opinion of the individual talents of man, but that is a temptation that you must as overcome in order to evaluate fairly.

    This thread will try and analyze Murphy the player, and not factor in his numerical finanical value. Once you come on the hardwood, it simply doesnt matter what your salary is, you have to produce.

    Now, on to Troy Murphy the basketball player. Lets talk first about his best end of the floor, which is clearly the offensive end.

    Murphy is a face the basket power forward, in many of the same ways that Austin Croshere could be for us a few years ago. He has a smooth jumpshot that he is reliable and consistent with for the most part, and when allowed to go to his left he can go off the dribble some, and occasionally get all the way to the rim. He is a good foul shooter as well, although he is such a finesse player that he doesnt get to the line nearly enough.

    In an ideally built team, Murphy would be a player who saw spot minutes for you, when the matchups clearly favored him, or when you wanted to play 4 perimeter guys and only 1 inside player. In an ideal world, Murphy would be a pretty good 4th big man in a 5 man big guy system. However, both based on our own team weaknesses and Jim O'Briens preferred way to play, Murphy most likely begins the season as a starter for us.

    Murphy has many useful traits as on offensive player, some of which are somewhat hidden. I particularly like Murphy as a "post feeder", as he has the requisite size to make the entry pass, and the ability to make open shots from the perimeter, really creating space by forcing his man to have to play him honestly. Projecting ahead, I think Murphy will be a somewhat nice fit (offensively, not on defense) playing alongside Roy Hibbert, as long as Hibbert is a good enough offensive player to be able to post up and be a scoring threat inside himself.

    One thing I think Murphy needs to be better at is to MOVE AND CUT after he makes a post entry pass. Sometimes, the effectiveness of using Murphy as a post feeder can be negated by Murphy himself being a spectator instead of a basketball player once he passes the ball. Being a superior passer like Hibbert will be I think, Murphy will create some high quality scoring chances for himself simply by moving well without the ball. Most bigs struggle on the perimeter anyway defensively, so Murphy can reeally hurt teams by learning to move well after he is passed the basketball inside.

    When Troy Murphy moves, cuts, fakes, and cuts again, he really is a pretty tough cover for most players assigned to him. Instead however, Murphy often falls in the trap of watching the game instead of playing it. Maybe it is conditioning, laziness, lack of focus, play design.....I dont know, but if Jim O'Brien can get Troy Murphy to be a consistent and persistent cutter, he can be a very good offensive force, better even than he played the last part of the year.

    Murphy is an almost ideal "trailer" on a fast break, if you are a coach who likes to use a big man near the top of the circle to reverse the basketball. I could go in to an entire very long article about whether teams should in fact used a "controlled numbered break" or not, but if you have Troy Murphy on your roster, he fits that very well.

    Interestingly however, and this is anecdotal instead of statistical, but I dont have the impression of Murphy making that trailing, top of the key 3 point shot all that much for us. I would love to have the in depth breakdown the franchise no doubt has done on that situation (and many others) to see if I am right. That is a shot that Murphy SHOULD be able to make over 40-45% of the time, considering it would be in rhythm and wide open when he takes it.

    Ill be very interested to see if the Paces do indeed run a numbered break this year, and if Murphy is encouraged to be the trailer like I have described, and if he will take and make that shot. Running a numbered break is like being married, it takes a committment to be able to live with him taking that shot for richer or poorer, better or worse, in sickness and in health.

    The Pacers staff needs to devise plays and schemes that force Murphy to raise his activity level. Left to his own devices, he will just stand and be a spot up shooter. I like Murphy as a "flex cutter/screener", as someone who is screened for, and as someone who is set up to score. He seems to me to be intelligent, but not natural, as an offensive player. I also like him on a high, flat ballscreen near the top with TJ Ford, popping back for a perimeter shot.

    Murphy needs to, like all the Pacers bigs, make the two handed overhead outlet pass. After a rebound, Murphy needs to find TJ Ford as fast as possible, and fire the ball ahead to him accurately and with force. Then, he needs to be forced to run the floor, either to the numbered break spot he is assigned or to the rim or somewhere at least. Murphy lumbers up the floor too slowly for my taste as the soft player he is.....it isnt like he is Dale Davis or Shaquille O'Neal or something. Coach O'Brien needs to push him and be hard on him, and raise the expectations for him.

    If Murphy works hard and becomes the type of player offensively his skills possibly allow him to be, teams will counter the Pacers perhaps by putting a smaller man on Murphy, to crowd him on the perimeter and take away his outside game. Because of that likelihood, and because Murphy is a liability defensively (more on that later) it is crucial that Murphy at least develop a few different inside big man skills. He isnt a true big man, but Murphy has the ability to become good I think at a couple of helpful skills.

    The first of which is to become a good screener, so good that, when being guarded by a smaller player, that Murphy can set big on big screens four our other bigs, and make teams pay inside by having to "switch", leaving their smaller player (originally assigned to Murphy) to be faced with defending Hibbert or Rasho.

    The second of which is learn at least one really good post move you can rely on to score over a weaker smaller defender. Murphy doesnt need multiple moves, he just needs one or two. In his case, I'd prefer a "jump hook" with his left hand, over his right shoulder, as his base go to move.
    Off of that, he can develop a "drop step" going the other direction. If I were the Pacers, I'd eliminate the option for Troy to learn any fadeaway moves, as I dont want him doing that. In fact, Id prohibit it! His counter moves off the "jump hook" would either be the drop step or a fake jump hook, step through up and under kind of move.

    These are easy basic moves, and Id game plan all of that if I were the Pacers. If a team plays a small against Troy, he has got to be able to score on the block, otherwise he becomes almost useless to me as a coach.

    Defensively, lets face it, Troy is a sieve. But, for him to be able to help and be on the floor for any team good enough to make the playoffs, he has to get better. I'd try and make him better on the defensive end a few different ways. You have to look at Murphy as two separate players defensively....on the perimeter and on the inside.

    As a post defender, I'd emphasize to Murphy really only a few basic principles. One, his job is fight for position on the block, and to not let a player post him too deep under the rim. Don't go for steals, dont try and "front" anyone, just fight for position with your lower body BEFORE your man gets the ball. Secondly, dont try and block anything, just make a player shoot over your outstretched arms and make a shot.

    In reality, if I were coaching the Pacers last year, Murphy wouldnt be in the league anymore and I'd be in jail probably, because I would have attempted to kill him as many times as players took shots right over the top of him with Murphy having his hands at his sides. If nothing else, MURPHY MUST CONTEST SHOTS with his hands high.

    Lastly, I'd tell Murphy that I dont care if he blocks a shot or not, and I dont care if he fouls out in 5 minutes. But NO ONE he is near had better ever dunk the ball against my defense, or against him. I'm not advocating doing anything dirty, but the days of having Murphy get dominated and dunked on while he shrugs his shoulders and runs up court have got to end.

    On the perimeter defensively, there is only so much Murphy can be asked to do. He can't really pressure the ball, and he cant really recover if he backs off quick enough to pressure a shot well. The Pacers need to structure their game plan and give Murphy either one of those jobs or the other, but not both.

    I think if it were me that I'd go against my own usual philosophy (based on the personnel we have altogether, not just Murphy) and tell Murphy and Dunleavy and the others that I want them to force players on the wings TOWARD THE MIDDLE, instead of to the baseline like I normally would do. This will give the Pacers sagging defense less space to have to cover and recover to, and put the helpers closer to the ball.

    This should be something a slower perimeter defender should be able to do, and it is what the Pacers did when we had Chris Mullin, and what the Celtics did to protect Larry Bird. Have a player like Murphy or Dunleavy play "half a man", forcing him in a chosen direction, in this case toward the center of the floor, into traffic and help.

    This strategy has weaknesses too of course, but I think it is the most common sense way to help slower perimeter defenders, which we have in abundance, Murphy perhaps being the main culprit.

    We might as well face the fact that Troy Murphy is going to be on our roster for many more years. He isn't my ideal prototype for a power forward who starts, but he likely will start for us, so it is time for me and all of us to get on board.

    What are some other strategic ways you all think the staff can utilize Murphy better? Should he play less minutes? More minutes? Who does he play well with, and who does he struggle when paired with? These are likely some of the questions the staff spent all summer trying to figure out about Troy Murphy.

    Ill be curious to see if any of my suggestions/coaching points become reality, and if any of you have any other good points I left out.

    As always, the above is just my opinion.

    Tbird

  • #2
    Re: Coach 'em up, season 2: Troy Murphy

    Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
    The second of which is learn at least one really good post move you can rely on to score over a weaker smaller defender. Murphy doesnt need multiple moves, he just needs one or two. In his case, I'd prefer a "jump hook" with his left hand, over his right shoulder, as his base go to move.

    Off of that, he can develop a "drop step" going the other direction. If I were the Pacers, I'd eliminate the option for Troy to learn any fadeaway moves, as I dont want him doing that. In fact, Id prohibit it! His counter moves off the "jump hook" would either be the drop step or a fake jump hook, step through up and under kind of move.

    These are easy basic moves, and Id game plan all of that if I were the Pacers. If a team plays a small against Troy, he has got to be able to score on the block, otherwise he becomes almost useless to me as a coach.
    The Warriors tried for many years to develop some sort of low post game for Murphy. They tried everything. Every strength and conditioning program to put on weight/strength. Never worked. By then, that's when they told him to work on his 3 point shot because he just couldn't hold his position in the post.

    Murphy just doesn't have the lower body strength to be any kind of low post player at all. And I'm talking about the strength to just post up a 6'5" guard and make a move towards the basket. He can't do that.

    This is what I noticed: When you see a guy like Amare Stoudemire make a move towards the basket, he can get bumped or hacked on the ground and still power towards the basket as if nothing happened. What I've seen several times from Troy is that he'll put his head down and make a charge towards the basket. Often times he'd get fouled on the ground, but you could tell that once he got hit, he just couldn't elevate one bit. It would send him off balance and hurtling towards another direction. Now it was good that he was drawing fouls in this manner (going towards the basket), but what I saw just illustrated the point about his lack of strength.

    Defensively, Murphy can actually be decent as a one on one defender in the post when he puts effort into it. He's given Zach Randolph fits a couple times. His main problems defensively are when things start getting more complicated than just guarding the guy in front of him who has the ball: stuff like screens, pick/rolls, switches, guarding guys who are moving w/o the ball, picks set in the middle of the lane by an opposing guard, etc...

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Coach 'em up, season 2: Troy Murphy

      Question: if Murph can't score down low, and he can't defend bigs, then is there any reason we can't replace him with someone shorter who can also hit a three? Say, Shawne Williams, or even Dun or Danny at 4 and Jack or Quis at the 2?

      Just wondering.
      "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Coach 'em up, season 2: Troy Murphy

        Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
        Question: if Murph can't score down low, and he can't defend bigs, then is there any reason we can't replace him with someone shorter who can also hit a three? Say, Shawne Williams, or even Dun or Danny at 4 and Jack or Quis at the 2?

        Just wondering.
        Sure, you can do that and it's a viable alternative. You're just going to lose some rebounding.

        And you probably don't want to play your best player (Granger) out of position too much simply so you avoid beating him up over time..

        Comment

        Working...
        X