Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

    My series of looking at how our core players can improve their games continues today with a look at the Pacers veteran big man, Jeff Foster. This is the third of this series, with the first two looking at T.J. Ford and Mike Dunleavy, Jr.

    Jeff Foster is one of the Pacers front office favorites, really ever since being drafted by Donnie Walsh all those years ago. Because of his ever present hustle, good attitude, his consistency, his class, and his hard work, I sometimes feel that Foster's many strengths are praised too much, while his weaknesses are too often overlooked or glossed over. This is in no way meant to criticize a very key member of our franchise, and one who has represented us as fans for all these years with dignity, class, and honor.....I just see it as a fact of life.

    With too many fans I talk to, and in discussions even with fellow coaches about other players, it is too easy I feel to let a player we all like and respect off the hook, by using some phrase like "he is how he is, and he won't ever be any better." Prior to last season, I felt like that is how the Pacers previous coaching staffs had thought of Foster, never asking/demanding that he expand his game, even just a little bit.

    It is then in my view forever to his credit that Jim O'Brien didn't fall into this limited worldview of Jeff Foster. Perhaps owing to the concept that necessity is the mother of all invention, Coach O'Brien last season really for the first time in Foster's career asked him to sincerely be a part of our team's offensive structure. Jeff was used often by the Pacers to recieve the ball at the high post, and to feed the ball to cutters slashing by him, with little clever handoffs or interior passes in traffic. Occasionally, Foster was even asked to make the open perimeter jump shot, which every so often he was able to do.

    Foster was also asked to play defensively with more responsibility. With JO again out the majority of the season, it was Foster who was asked most nights to both defend the opponents best big man, but to also be the "communicator" in charge of the rest of the players on the floor defensively. While I didn't consider him to be particularly good at either of these tasks, it at least in the future bodes well for Foster's understanding in year 2 of the overall system Jim O'Brien wants to install and utilize.

    With all of that said, for the Pacers to be a playoff level team, and to justify playing Foster the minutes he is likely to get, Jeff simply HAS to improve in several key areas of play. This thread will discuss my views on what those things are, how our coaching staff can make that happen, and what the consequences are of the failure of this to occur.

    Let's talk defense first.

    On this end, I think it is likely that Foster will in fact NOT be asked as often to defend the opponents biggest player all that often. Assuming he is still here, I believe Rasho Nesterovic will get that assignment, and when he isn't playing I expect Roy Hibbert to inherit it. In fact, I believe Roy Hibbert was drafted for a few different specific purposes, most of which were to cover for all the weaknesses that Jeff Foster seems to have.

    When the Pacers defense really began to stink last year, many times it was our perimeter players who let us down. Flat out gettign beat off the dribble, not closing out on shooters, not rotating correctly.....these were all things our perimeter defenders struggled with mightily. This is really undeniable.

    However, in any defensive system as complex as the Pacers play, the backline interior defenders have got to be able to "captain" the defense. What I mean by that is that they need to be able to verbally communicate what they see, they have to be able to talk to the rest of the defense during game action and work as the defensive "foreman", if you will.

    I just felt like that Jeff Foster didn't do this well at all. In fact, I felt like the Pacers communicated with one another worse on the defensive end of the floor than any team in the league, and I felt that among the many giant defensive problems we had, that that was the biggest. I think one of the problems Jeff had was that he was always caught wrestling inside with someone who was bigger and better than he was, and he felt like he had all he could handle just trying to do his own job, let alone helping the others with their own.

    I think our new "big" acquisitions may potentially solve that problem, and may have a shot at solving our other big inside weakness, which is a lack of physical presence....a lack of force and strength. I already know Rasho is somewhat soft, so I'm banking on Roy Hibbert to develop into the "sheriff" inside.....no crime unpunished, no dunks, no one wants to drive unless they are willing to be punished for it. Let's face it, Jeff Foster doesnt physically intimidate anyone who blows by our porous perimeter defense. Perhaps Roy Hibbert develops into that.....let's hope so.

    So, Jeff will be asked to instead to mostly defend different people. He will need to roam, need to be able to play on the perimeter occasionally, and he will be used as a "trapper/doubler" way more often, instead of the guy who needs someone else to help HIM. Foster has the intelligence, speed, savvy, and athleticism to be able to do this well I think, so in many ways the effectiveness of Foster defensively will somewhat be reliant on how much and how well Roy Hibbert can play for us.

    Foster has very very good rebounding stats, there is no question of that. He needs to be able to continue his defensive prowess, but because of where he will be positioned on the floor defensively, it will be even more key for him to be able to improve in 2 key areas as far as rebounding is concerned.

    First, it will not be enough for Foster to just get the same rebounds he has always gotten. We now will need him to get the "supertough" rebounds....in traffic, surrounded by tough guys who are all younger and jump higher than he does. Many times, Jeff gets his rebounds because he is the only pursuer of the basketball. That is admirable and I dont want him to change from that, but we will need him to rebound in a more physical way than he ever has in his career. It is time for Jeff to show more strength and toughness....to throw some elbows, bloody some noses, and to become a player with a harder edge to him, so in crucila spots guys are hesitant to even battle him for the ball at all.

    This is key for one simple reason: Roy Hibbert (whom I expect to play quite a bit with Foster) is more of a "rebound preventer, block out" type of guy. What I mean by that is that Hibbert will keep the opponent from getting the ball most times, but he may lack the explosiveness and quickness to rebound the ball himself unless it bounces right to him. Jeff will need to be able to fight the others Hibbert cannot blockout to get the ball....so Foster will need to be in the very best condition of his entire life.

    Secondly where defensive rebounding is concerned, Foster simply must learn to be able to make the 2 handed, overhead outlet pass to start our fast break. T.J. Ford may be one of the top 3 or 4 fastest point guards in the league, and the Pacers want to run as much as possible. If Foster just rebounds the ball and then holds it, much of Ford's value is wasted. Foster needs to learn to hold the ball up high, pivot, look up the floor, and then be able to make an accurate hard pass to T.J. to start the break.

    This skill has not come naturally to Jeff Foster in the past, but previous regimes prior to O'Brien didnt want to push the ball anyway. Jeff can really help us win if he can master that skill. In fact, if I were the Pacers staff I'd have been drilling with Jeff that very skill every day since we acquired Ford. I look for Foster's rebounding to increase even higher this season, so it is vital for our transition game that Foster learn how to do this. This is a skill that I believe can be "coached up".....the ability to make the two handed, overhead outlet pass. He will need to learn to throw it about 30-40 feet or so, on a line accurately. If he can do it (I already believe Hibbert will be able to) then the Pacers suddenly become one of the league's more exciting transition teams. If not, the T.J. Ford will have to retreat, come back to Jeff to get the outlet pass/handoff, and the opponent will have dodged a big bullet from our weaponry before a possession even begins.

    I wrote this next part last season, and I am writing it again now: Jeff Foster is a terrible screen setter. He is so bad in fact that I believe that it seriously inhibits the type of offense in the half court a coach can install. Now, with our new acquisitions, our entire roster is set up to run cutters off multiple baseline screens in the half court.....OTHER THAN FOSTER that is. I have to believe that being so excited, as the Pacers brass seemingly was, to bring in guys like Hibbert (excellent screener), Brandon Rush (excellent cutter away from the ball, maybe the best in college basketball last year in my opinion), and T.J. Ford (point guard capable of taking the ball to any side of the floor a cutter may be getting free) is not a coincidence. The Pacers are showing their hand in this regard....they are going to run alot of old school, "single/double" baseline screens for cutters I believe this season.....at least it sure seems that way to me!

    That being said, Jeff Foster either needs to be a much better screener or he won't be playing apparently. To improve, Jeff needs to get better at many of the screening fundamentals. He needs to fake before he screens, get a huge amount better at getting the proper screen angle, he needs to get lower and wider at his base (to make himself wider so the defender has to go further to go around him), and he needs to be more physical, leading with his front foot to drive his power into the defender instead of the opposite happening. Lastly, he needs to stay STILL, and quit getting ignorant offensive fouls trying to screen twice a game.

    I would like, very very much, for the Pacers to try and create a post up game to be able to score inside. There is another thread about this already, so I wont bore you with my full ideas about that any more than you already are by reading this entire post. But I will tell you that one really solid coaching idea for a solution to the problem is for the Pacers to use a huge amount of "big on big" crossscreens on the interior, one side of the lane to the other. None of the Pacers bigs are really effective back to the basket players as far as posting up by themselves, but I think Coach O'Brien can create some inside scoring by having our bigs screen across for each other, then having the screener "roll back and flash" to the high post, Then, off that, the high post player (if he gets the ball) can make that little face up elbow jumper or can play a "high low" game with our other post player, who may have gained an advantage by virtue of being screened for.

    Another effective derivitive of that that Rick Carlise would use is to screen across inside, but instead of trying to have the cutter post up, just have him continue to the wing to set a ball screen for whomever has the ball, and play a wing "screen/roll" 2 man game. I found this little quirk hard enough to guard that I installed it as a half court "special" play the last school I coached for. The Pacers can use this alot, and it can even be more effective if this big player can, instead of rolling to the bucket, can face up and make the open 12 foot jump shot. Jeff needs to contine to be able to do that.

    Even though he was no threat to score really, I really liked Coach OBrien's use of Foster last year as a recipient of a post pass at the elbow, and flashing cutters past him. I think we should continue to use that. It would be recommended by me that on that play, that Jeff needs to learn the skill of letting the cutters both go by him, facing up to the rim, and being able to drive the ball past his slower defender. That is an area of the floor where a "2 dribble" move is all you need to score, and I think Jeff can learn that, in a limited way.

    Lastly, I want Jeff to find just ONE SPOT on the floor to become a dead eye 15 ft jump shooter. Instead of having him take shots from all over, if I were in charge of the Pacers I'd sit down with the coached, analyize where Jeff is most often going to recieve the basketball, and just drill him over and over in making that open shot from that one spot. In his case, I'd probably recommend the little short corner, baseline 15ft jumper, assuming like I do that T.J. Ford will often drive and create space for Jeff to get that shot off at least once a quarter. I would want Foster to become a deadeye set shooter from each baseline to the medium depth corner.

    For the first time in a while, I think the Pacers are likely to have predominantly healthy players in the front court for the entire season. For this reason, Jeff Foster for the first time in a long time actually has some pressure on him to perform well if he expects to get regular minutes throughout the season. Murphy, Hibbert, Nesterovic (if he is here), and even Maceo Baston are legitimate options for playing time if Jeff can't get the job done, and improve in the areas we need him to improve.

    I for one do not believe in the concept that a player cannot improve himself and his game, no matter how old he his. Jeff Foster has not always been pushed to get better by our franchise and its coaches, something that is to their eternal discredit. Last years staff looked at it differently, and rightly so in my view. It is now time for Foster to really become the leader and more effective player that his intelligence and skill set says he can potentially be....if he can do this, he can produce and be an even more helpful player than he has ever been to do things that arent flashy, but can help us be winners.

    And to close, lets state the obvious: Jeff Foster, if nothing else, has got to go up strong and finish offensive putbacks when he gets the opportunity, otherwise his offensive rebounds become near empty in their usefulness. I know that is the one gripe most have about Foster, so I wanted to mention it so all of you know I hadnt forgotten it. I think this is a matter of concentration and mental toughness....and frankly a matter of "coaching him up" to get the job done. Sometimes I wonder if some coaches are just too accepting of players faults, instead of demanding and expecting more. Its too easy perhaps to applaud the effort, instead of demanding the effort lead to the next step.........basically what I am saying in this entire thread is this: Jeff Foster can be a better player, and much better in some cases, than he in fact has been in the past. It is up to him and the staff to expect and demand that this happen, because our Pacers are going to either have to have him be the best he has ever been, or it will be time to look to a future that doesnt include our long time big man.

    As always, the above is just my opinion.

    Tbird
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

    I seriously doubt opposing front offices or scouting departments have this long a conversation about Jeff Foster

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

      Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post

      Even though he was no threat to score really, I really liked Coach OBrien's use of Foster last year as a recipient of a post pass at the elbow, and flashing cutters past him. I think we should continue to use that. It would be recommended by me that on that play, that Jeff needs to learn the skill of letting the cutters both go by him, facing up to the rim, and being able to drive the ball past his slower defender. That is an area of the floor where a "2 dribble" move is all you need to score, and I think Jeff can learn that, in a limited way.

      Lastly, I want Jeff to find just ONE SPOT on the floor to become a dead eye 15 ft jump shooter. Instead of having him take shots from all over, if I were in charge of the Pacers I'd sit down with the coached, analyize where Jeff is most often going to recieve the basketball, and just drill him over and over in making that open shot from that one spot. In his case, I'd probably recommend the little short corner, baseline 15ft jumper, assuming like I do that T.J. Ford will often drive and create space for Jeff to get that shot off at least once a quarter. I would want Foster to become a deadeye set shooter from each baseline to the medium depth corner.

      For the first time in a while, I think the Pacers are likely to have predominantly healthy players in the front court for the entire season. For this reason, Jeff Foster for the first time in a long time actually has some pressure on him to perform well if he expects to get regular minutes throughout the season. Murphy, Hibbert, Nesterovic (if he is here), and even Maceo Baston are legitimate options for playing time if Jeff can't get the job done, and improve in the areas we need him to improve.

      I for one do not believe in the concept that a player cannot improve himself and his game, no matter how old he his. Jeff Foster has not always been pushed to get better by our franchise and its coaches, something that is to their eternal discredit. Last years staff looked at it differently, and rightly so in my view. It is now time for Foster to really become the leader and more effective player that his intelligence and skill set says he can potentially be....if he can do this, he can produce and be an even more helpful player than he has ever been to do things that arent flashy, but can help us be winners.

      And to close, lets state the obvious: Jeff Foster, if nothing else, has got to go up strong and finish offensive putbacks when he gets the opportunity, otherwise his offensive rebounds become near empty in their usefulness. I know that is the one gripe most have about Foster, so I wanted to mention it so all of you know I hadnt forgotten it. I think this is a matter of concentration and mental toughness....and frankly a matter of "coaching him up" to get the job done. Sometimes I wonder if some coaches are just too accepting of players faults, instead of demanding and expecting more. Its too easy perhaps to applaud the effort, instead of demanding the effort lead to the next step.........basically what I am saying in this entire thread is this: Jeff Foster can be a better player, and much better in some cases, than he in fact has been in the past. It is up to him and the staff to expect and demand that this happen, because our Pacers are going to either have to have him be the best he has ever been, or it will be time to look to a future that doesnt include our long time big man.

      As always, the above is just my opinion.

      Tbird
      This is where I get really pissy with the Pacers about how they've developed Jeff. I've made this gripe in the past.

      I actually saw Jeff play, in person, when he was in college. He had a very nice 10-12 foot jumper that was a nice compliment to his rebounding skills. I was pretty excited when we got him.

      But then, you know what they say in the NBA; The way to make the roster is specialize in something. In Jeff's case, we needed rebounding, so he was forced into the role of garbage man. He was obviously told to defer his shots to our other specialists for shooting. It really bugged. Especially, as the years went by, he was forced more and more into the role of slop guy.

      I saw Jeff developing into a Brad Miller type player, although not as offensively gifted, of course.

      If Jeff was EVER to try and reinvent himself, now is the time.

      And yes, Jeff spends way to much time, at coach's behest, trying to play the role, well, that Dale used to play, of being an enforcer, who wrestles with the other teams' big guy and tries to out-tough him.

      Personally, I think Jeff is a classic case of a player who was developed all wrong for his skill set. Nice breakdown of Jeff. I think he's been here so long, we tend to overlook him. Like I said, this isn't the same player we drafted in college and it's a little disappointing for me.

      Thing is, it's never too late to change. Best example of that is Dan Mejerle. As a fan, I'd like to see Jeff really work to become a more well rounded player. He's had it drilld in him for so long to be the slop guy, I think that's all he knows.
      Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

        Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
        My series of looking at how our core players can improve their games continues today with a look at the Pacers veteran big man, Jeff Foster. This is the third of this series, with the first two looking at T.J. Ford and Mike Dunleavy, Jr.

        Jeff Foster is one of the Pacers front office favorites, really ever since being drafted by Donnie Walsh all those years ago. Because of his ever present hustle, good attitude, his consistency, his class, and his hard work, I sometimes feel that Foster's many strengths are praised too much, while his weaknesses are too often overlooked or glossed over. This is in no way meant to criticize a very key member of our franchise, and one who has represented us as fans for all these years with dignity, class, and honor.....I just see it as a fact of life.

        With too many fans I talk to, and in discussions even with fellow coaches about other players, it is too easy I feel to let a player we all like and respect off the hook, by using some phrase like "he is how he is, and he won't ever be any better." Prior to last season, I felt like that is how the Pacers previous coaching staffs had thought of Foster, never asking/demanding that he expand his game, even just a little bit.

        It is then in my view forever to his credit that Jim O'Brien didn't fall into this limited worldview of Jeff Foster. Perhaps owing to the concept that necessity is the mother of all invention, Coach O'Brien last season really for the first time in Foster's career asked him to sincerely be a part of our team's offensive structure. Jeff was used often by the Pacers to recieve the ball at the high post, and to feed the ball to cutters slashing by him, with little clever handoffs or interior passes in traffic. Occasionally, Foster was even asked to make the open perimeter jump shot, which every so often he was able to do.

        Foster was also asked to play defensively with more responsibility. With JO again out the majority of the season, it was Foster who was asked most nights to both defend the opponents best big man, but to also be the "communicator" in charge of the rest of the players on the floor defensively. While I didn't consider him to be particularly good at either of these tasks, it at least in the future bodes well for Foster's understanding in year 2 of the overall system Jim O'Brien wants to install and utilize.

        With all of that said, for the Pacers to be a playoff level team, and to justify playing Foster the minutes he is likely to get, Jeff simply HAS to improve in several key areas of play. This thread will discuss my views on what those things are, how our coaching staff can make that happen, and what the consequences are of the failure of this to occur.

        Let's talk defense first.

        On this end, I think it is likely that Foster will in fact NOT be asked as often to defend the opponents biggest player all that often. Assuming he is still here, I believe Rasho Nesterovic will get that assignment, and when he isn't playing I expect Roy Hibbert to inherit it. In fact, I believe Roy Hibbert was drafted for a few different specific purposes, most of which were to cover for all the weaknesses that Jeff Foster seems to have.

        When the Pacers defense really began to stink last year, many times it was our perimeter players who let us down. Flat out gettign beat off the dribble, not closing out on shooters, not rotating correctly.....these were all things our perimeter defenders struggled with mightily. This is really undeniable.

        However, in any defensive system as complex as the Pacers play, the backline interior defenders have got to be able to "captain" the defense. What I mean by that is that they need to be able to verbally communicate what they see, they have to be able to talk to the rest of the defense during game action and work as the defensive "foreman", if you will.

        I just felt like that Jeff Foster didn't do this well at all. In fact, I felt like the Pacers communicated with one another worse on the defensive end of the floor than any team in the league, and I felt that among the many giant defensive problems we had, that that was the biggest. I think one of the problems Jeff had was that he was always caught wrestling inside with someone who was bigger and better than he was, and he felt like he had all he could handle just trying to do his own job, let alone helping the others with their own.

        I think our new "big" acquisitions may potentially solve that problem, and may have a shot at solving our other big inside weakness, which is a lack of physical presence....a lack of force and strength. I already know Rasho is somewhat soft, so I'm banking on Roy Hibbert to develop into the "sheriff" inside.....no crime unpunished, no dunks, no one wants to drive unless they are willing to be punished for it. Let's face it, Jeff Foster doesnt physically intimidate anyone who blows by our porous perimeter defense. Perhaps Roy Hibbert develops into that.....let's hope so.

        So, Jeff will be asked to instead to mostly defend different people. He will need to roam, need to be able to play on the perimeter occasionally, and he will be used as a "trapper/doubler" way more often, instead of the guy who needs someone else to help HIM. Foster has the intelligence, speed, savvy, and athleticism to be able to do this well I think, so in many ways the effectiveness of Foster defensively will somewhat be reliant on how much and how well Roy Hibbert can play for us.

        Foster has very very good rebounding stats, there is no question of that. He needs to be able to continue his defensive prowess, but because of where he will be positioned on the floor defensively, it will be even more key for him to be able to improve in 2 key areas as far as rebounding is concerned.

        First, it will not be enough for Foster to just get the same rebounds he has always gotten. We now will need him to get the "supertough" rebounds....in traffic, surrounded by tough guys who are all younger and jump higher than he does. Many times, Jeff gets his rebounds because he is the only pursuer of the basketball. That is admirable and I dont want him to change from that, but we will need him to rebound in a more physical way than he ever has in his career. It is time for Jeff to show more strength and toughness....to throw some elbows, bloody some noses, and to become a player with a harder edge to him, so in crucila spots guys are hesitant to even battle him for the ball at all.

        This is key for one simple reason: Roy Hibbert (whom I expect to play quite a bit with Foster) is more of a "rebound preventer, block out" type of guy. What I mean by that is that Hibbert will keep the opponent from getting the ball most times, but he may lack the explosiveness and quickness to rebound the ball himself unless it bounces right to him. Jeff will need to be able to fight the others Hibbert cannot blockout to get the ball....so Foster will need to be in the very best condition of his entire life.

        Secondly where defensive rebounding is concerned, Foster simply must learn to be able to make the 2 handed, overhead outlet pass to start our fast break. T.J. Ford may be one of the top 3 or 4 fastest point guards in the league, and the Pacers want to run as much as possible. If Foster just rebounds the ball and then holds it, much of Ford's value is wasted. Foster needs to learn to hold the ball up high, pivot, look up the floor, and then be able to make an accurate hard pass to T.J. to start the break.

        This skill has not come naturally to Jeff Foster in the past, but previous regimes prior to O'Brien didnt want to push the ball anyway. Jeff can really help us win if he can master that skill. In fact, if I were the Pacers staff I'd have been drilling with Jeff that very skill every day since we acquired Ford. I look for Foster's rebounding to increase even higher this season, so it is vital for our transition game that Foster learn how to do this. This is a skill that I believe can be "coached up".....the ability to make the two handed, overhead outlet pass. He will need to learn to throw it about 30-40 feet or so, on a line accurately. If he can do it (I already believe Hibbert will be able to) then the Pacers suddenly become one of the league's more exciting transition teams. If not, the T.J. Ford will have to retreat, come back to Jeff to get the outlet pass/handoff, and the opponent will have dodged a big bullet from our weaponry before a possession even begins.

        I wrote this next part last season, and I am writing it again now: Jeff Foster is a terrible screen setter. He is so bad in fact that I believe that it seriously inhibits the type of offense in the half court a coach can install. Now, with our new acquisitions, our entire roster is set up to run cutters off multiple baseline screens in the half court.....OTHER THAN FOSTER that is. I have to believe that being so excited, as the Pacers brass seemingly was, to bring in guys like Hibbert (excellent screener), Brandon Rush (excellent cutter away from the ball, maybe the best in college basketball last year in my opinion), and T.J. Ford (point guard capable of taking the ball to any side of the floor a cutter may be getting free) is not a coincidence. The Pacers are showing their hand in this regard....they are going to run alot of old school, "single/double" baseline screens for cutters I believe this season.....at least it sure seems that way to me!

        That being said, Jeff Foster either needs to be a much better screener or he won't be playing apparently. To improve, Jeff needs to get better at many of the screening fundamentals. He needs to fake before he screens, get a huge amount better at getting the proper screen angle, he needs to get lower and wider at his base (to make himself wider so the defender has to go further to go around him), and he needs to be more physical, leading with his front foot to drive his power into the defender instead of the opposite happening. Lastly, he needs to stay STILL, and quit getting ignorant offensive fouls trying to screen twice a game.

        I would like, very very much, for the Pacers to try and create a post up game to be able to score inside. There is another thread about this already, so I wont bore you with my full ideas about that any more than you already are by reading this entire post. But I will tell you that one really solid coaching idea for a solution to the problem is for the Pacers to use a huge amount of "big on big" crossscreens on the interior, one side of the lane to the other. None of the Pacers bigs are really effective back to the basket players as far as posting up by themselves, but I think Coach O'Brien can create some inside scoring by having our bigs screen across for each other, then having the screener "roll back and flash" to the high post, Then, off that, the high post player (if he gets the ball) can make that little face up elbow jumper or can play a "high low" game with our other post player, who may have gained an advantage by virtue of being screened for.

        Another effective derivitive of that that Rick Carlise would use is to screen across inside, but instead of trying to have the cutter post up, just have him continue to the wing to set a ball screen for whomever has the ball, and play a wing "screen/roll" 2 man game. I found this little quirk hard enough to guard that I installed it as a half court "special" play the last school I coached for. The Pacers can use this alot, and it can even be more effective if this big player can, instead of rolling to the bucket, can face up and make the open 12 foot jump shot. Jeff needs to contine to be able to do that.

        Even though he was no threat to score really, I really liked Coach OBrien's use of Foster last year as a recipient of a post pass at the elbow, and flashing cutters past him. I think we should continue to use that. It would be recommended by me that on that play, that Jeff needs to learn the skill of letting the cutters both go by him, facing up to the rim, and being able to drive the ball past his slower defender. That is an area of the floor where a "2 dribble" move is all you need to score, and I think Jeff can learn that, in a limited way.

        Lastly, I want Jeff to find just ONE SPOT on the floor to become a dead eye 15 ft jump shooter. Instead of having him take shots from all over, if I were in charge of the Pacers I'd sit down with the coached, analyize where Jeff is most often going to recieve the basketball, and just drill him over and over in making that open shot from that one spot. In his case, I'd probably recommend the little short corner, baseline 15ft jumper, assuming like I do that T.J. Ford will often drive and create space for Jeff to get that shot off at least once a quarter. I would want Foster to become a deadeye set shooter from each baseline to the medium depth corner.

        For the first time in a while, I think the Pacers are likely to have predominantly healthy players in the front court for the entire season. For this reason, Jeff Foster for the first time in a long time actually has some pressure on him to perform well if he expects to get regular minutes throughout the season. Murphy, Hibbert, Nesterovic (if he is here), and even Maceo Baston are legitimate options for playing time if Jeff can't get the job done, and improve in the areas we need him to improve.

        I for one do not believe in the concept that a player cannot improve himself and his game, no matter how old he his. Jeff Foster has not always been pushed to get better by our franchise and its coaches, something that is to their eternal discredit. Last years staff looked at it differently, and rightly so in my view. It is now time for Foster to really become the leader and more effective player that his intelligence and skill set says he can potentially be....if he can do this, he can produce and be an even more helpful player than he has ever been to do things that arent flashy, but can help us be winners.

        And to close, lets state the obvious: Jeff Foster, if nothing else, has got to go up strong and finish offensive putbacks when he gets the opportunity, otherwise his offensive rebounds become near empty in their usefulness. I know that is the one gripe most have about Foster, so I wanted to mention it so all of you know I hadnt forgotten it. I think this is a matter of concentration and mental toughness....and frankly a matter of "coaching him up" to get the job done. Sometimes I wonder if some coaches are just too accepting of players faults, instead of demanding and expecting more. Its too easy perhaps to applaud the effort, instead of demanding the effort lead to the next step.........basically what I am saying in this entire thread is this: Jeff Foster can be a better player, and much better in some cases, than he in fact has been in the past. It is up to him and the staff to expect and demand that this happen, because our Pacers are going to either have to have him be the best he has ever been, or it will be time to look to a future that doesnt include our long time big man.

        As always, the above is just my opinion.

        Tbird
        I just want to thank you for giving Pacer Nation something interesting to read during a slow news time. Come to think of it, maybe no news is good news where the Pacers are concerned. Please keep up the good work as I always look forward to reading your threads.
        “It is what we learn after we know it all that really counts” - John Wooden

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

          Foster is what he is.

          While I'd like to see his offense improve, I can also simply give him some love for what he does bring to the table.

          TBird, I'm a fan of your posts, but somehow this one just seems to have an anti-Foster grudge smell to it.
          "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

            I would agree that the Pacers have not developed Foster into a well rounded player. To some extent he has improved his free throw shooting...at least his form seems much better...but yes he is limited. However, there are some good reasons for this IMO.

            During Jeff's first several years in the league the Pacers were loaded with offensive talent so developing the #12 option on offense simply was never a priority. I doubt TPTB expected the team to implode like it did, so keeping Jeff as a specialist is somewhat understandable. While your starting center should usually at least have the threat of a spot up jumper, establishing that would require giving him a certain number of touches in game situations, and giving those precious touches to Jeff when you are fighting for a championship with much more talented offensive players like Reggie Miller, Ron Artest and Jermaine O'Neal may be understandable. Consequently, Jeff filled and excelled in a specialist role...which was probably the best use of his talents on that particular team.

            Also, the feeling for many people over that time period was that Jeff Foster was the interim center on the Pacers. IDK, maybe he was passed over like the less gifted child in a family....or passed over because certainly he was close to being kicked out the door.

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

              Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
              Foster is what he is.

              While I'd like to see his offense improve, I can also simply give him some love for what he does bring to the table.

              TBird, I'm a fan of your posts, but somehow this one just seems to have an anti-Foster grudge smell to it.
              I rather agree with this statement. The issue with Jeff's defense is over blown....MOST of the defensive issues this team had was at PG. Not having a back up to Foster/Murphy was also a big item. We have improved greatly at both.
              Go Pacers!

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

                Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                Foster is what he is.

                While I'd like to see his offense improve, I can also simply give him some love for what he does bring to the table.

                TBird, I'm a fan of your posts, but somehow this one just seems to have an anti-Foster grudge smell to it.

                I disagree completely with this statement, and that was not at all what I intended to convey in what I wrote. I've re-read my own thread, and I just don't see anything "grudge like" in what I wrote at all.

                In fact, I believe that Foster has been honorable, hard working, a great teammate, and a fine representative of the franchise. Foster is a fine player and a guy with the professionalism and work ethic a team can win with.

                But, I also think he has weakneses he can improve, and ways he can be utilized more efficiently. As I said in the original piece, I completely DO NOT accept the statement that Foster (or any other player for that matter) "is what he is." Every player who works hard and has talent and is intelligent, all of which are characteristics Jeff has, can improve themselves and their game.

                The fact that some fans want and demand that some of our players improve their overall games but don't demand the same of Foster was my entire point.



                Regardless, I appreciate your opinions and feedback, and I'm sorry if I gave the impression of being a "Foster basher", because that was not my intent.

                I'll have more blunt assessments of others on our roster coming over the course of September.

                Tbird

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

                  You were very succinct in pointing out EXACTLY what you meant Tbird. I completely disagreed with McKeyFan the second i read his post. You ARE looking at things with complete disregard over your like or dislike of a player and their ACTUAL skill set.

                  Very much appreciated by the way.
                  "Your course, your path, is not going to be like mine," West says. "Everybody is not called to be a multimillionaire. Everybody's not called to be the president. Whatever your best work is, you do it. Do it well. … You cease your own greatness when you aspire to be someone else."

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

                    ...in any defensive system as complex as the Pacers play, the backline interior defenders have got to be able to "captain" the defense. What I mean by that is that they need to be able to verbally communicate what they see, they have to be able to talk to the rest of the defense during game action and work as the defensive "foreman", if you will.

                    I just felt like that Jeff Foster didn't do this well at all.
                    Yes, he could have done a better job at communicating defensively w/his teammates, but I think this is an area Foster hasn't had to be that involved in dictating. The Pacers have had other more vocal front-line defenders here in the recent past - D2, Artest, JO - Jeff just didn't have to be the defensive floor general you surmise he needs to become. In retrospect, I agree with you. And I believe Jeff will assert himself more in this role now that he knows he is the senior tenured vet.

                    Foster simply must learn to be able to make the 2 handed, overhead outlet pass to start our fast break. T.J. Ford may be one of the top 3 or 4 fastest point guards in the league, and the Pacers want to run as much as possible. If Foster just rebounds the ball and then holds it, much of Ford's value is wasted. Foster needs to learn to hold the ball up high, pivot, look up the floor, and then be able to make an accurate hard pass to T.J. to start the break.

                    If he can do it (I already believe Hibbert will be able to) then the Pacers suddenly become one of the league's more exciting transition teams.
                    Again, we agree, but this only becomes a problem if he gets the defensive rebound.

                    Jeff Foster is a terrible "baseline" screen setter.
                    So, very true, but I don't find that to be such a big problem as considering the Pacers seldom use baseline cuts to get to the baseket. Now, if they used alot of Curls or had someone like Reggie who relied heavily on baseline screens then I'd be worried. But we don't...or shall I say have not since Reggie retired. So, it's a moot point at present. However, if B. Rush, for examples, begins to use it in his offensive arsenal one of our Bigs will have to learn how to effectively sacrafic his body along the baseline. But for now, this limitation on Jeff's part doesn't bother me.

                    Another effective derivitive of that that Rick Carlise would use is to screen across inside, but instead of trying to have the cutter post up, just have him continue to the wing to set a ball screen for whomever has the ball, and play a wing "screen/roll" 2 man game. I found this little quirk hard enough to guard that I installed it as a half court "special" play the last school I coached for. The Pacers can use this alot, and it can even be more effective if this big player can, instead of rolling to the bucket, can face up and make the open 12 foot jump shot. Jeff needs to contine to be able to do that.
                    Agreed. Like you, I was very glad to see JOB allow Jeff to take that mid-range jumper. Just wish Mr. Rebounds would do it more often. He'd keep defensives very honest if he did it more often.

                    Even though he was no threat to score really, I really liked Coach OBrien's use of Foster last year as a recipient of a post pass at the elbow, and flashing cutters past him. I think we should continue to use that. It would be recommended by me that on that play, that Jeff needs to learn the skill of letting the cutters both go by him, facing up to the rim, and being able to drive the ball past his slower defender. That is an area of the floor where a "2 dribble" move is all you need to score, and I think Jeff can learn that, in a limited way.
                    Amen! Bingo!! We have a winner here, folks. Glad to see someone else noticed this besides me. I can't tell you the number of times Jeff has had real estate between himself and the basket where had he taken a few quick dribbles he could have scored easily. But instead, he'd generally pass the ball off to the back screener. Everytime I saw him do that I'd think to myself, "What a wasted opportunity!" Jeff can hit the mid-range jumper, but he lacks a power move to the basket from 8 ft and out. Part of the problem is Jeff doesn't have very good handles; he's not a long-distance dribbler. Meaning, if he had to dribble the ball say from the inbound to half-court, he'd obviously get trapped or get the ball stolen. But here's the beauty of what I'm suggesting: He doesn't have to control the ball for that distance! 2-3 quick dribbles from the top of the key once he gets the ball coming off a high screen will close the gap to the net by 5 feet placing him well within his shooting range. But if he could include a power move to the basket, I see plenty of easy dunks in Jeff's immediate future.

                    Good thread, T-Bird1245!.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

                      If JO'B plays Hibbert with Foster....I can see Foster's Offensive Rebounding #s go up. I can see Foster being a solid Top 3 Offensive Rebounder as opposed to be a Top 3-5 from year to year.
                      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

                        tbird...don't know if this is the right place for this question, but do you think Hibbert and Foster will be effective playing together?

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

                          Originally posted by count55 View Post
                          tbird...don't know if this is the right place for this question, but do you think Hibbert and Foster will be effective playing together?

                          Well, there is no way to really know until we see them all playing on the floor of course, but in my view Hibbert is the future center of our team the next time we are good enough to be legitimate contenders, so I think he has GOT to be given playing time, regardless of how raw or inexperienced he may be.

                          I see no real reason to play a guy like Rasho Nesterovic over Hibbert very much, regardless of how much better he may be in the short term. Hibbert will likely be here 4 years from now, Nesterovic almost certainly will not.

                          I think the Pacers best big man combinations are likely to be in this order:

                          1. Hibbert/Foster
                          2. Hibbert/Murphy
                          3. Hibbert/Nesterovic
                          4. Nesterovic/Foster
                          5. Nesterovic/Murphy
                          6. Murphy/Foster

                          We will need to see if it plays out this way thru the course of the season. My big problem right now is that I am fairly certain Coach OBrien is leaning toward my number 6 combination as his starting duo.

                          Tbird

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

                            Well, seeing that number six (Murphy/Foster) was our only real option last year when JO was often injured, things are looking up!
                            "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Re: Coach em' up, season 2: Jeff Foster

                              Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                              Well, seeing that number six (Murphy/Foster) was our only real option last year when JO was often injured, things are looking up!
                              That's how I saw the #6 Big Man combo option last year, too. IMO, pairing Murphy & Foster was done out of necessity. I think if JOB really had a choice, he'd have much rather gone with JO/Murphy (suprisingly w/JO @ Center and Murphy at PF). I can even see another option which Tbird left off the table - Foster/Baston. Why?

                              Imagine if Foster does incorporate some of the things TBird suggest into his game, i.e., the over-the-head lob for fastbreaks, the quick dribble to the basket, the mid-range jumper with more frequency, and both Foster and Baston are playing with TJ Ford on the floor. We all know Baston has ups! And he has speed. Now, imagine TJ, Baston, Foster, Granger and Dunleavy all out there knowing how Dunleavy was usually the only other player down court before pretty much anyone else on fastbreaks.

                              Can you imagine the quickness of that lineup?

                              Comment

                              Previous template Next
                              Working...
                              X