Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The restaurant review thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Your favorite downtown Indianapolis restaurant

    Originally posted by travmil View Post
    Yes that's a good place to eat as well. I usually get the reuben sandwhich which rivals Shapiro's for best in Indy. They also serve an outstanding sunday brunch. We used to live at 56th and College so we know ALL of the best spots around there. Binkley's and of course Yats are other area standouts. I absolutely loved living within walking distance of Yats. Best cheap eats in the city hands down.

    I wasn't aware that Mama's was closed for renovations. We haven't been since early in the year.
    Ever try Papa Roux at 10th & Post? It's really good cajun.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Your favorite downtown Indianapolis restaurant

      Originally posted by Los Angeles View Post
      I have an admin request - can we just have one restaurant thread? I travel a lot and sometimes get the benefit of eating in some pretty classy places (and sometimes some amazing hole-in-the-walls as well). This might be a good place to check in if someone is travelling to the same towns.

      Maybe just change the title of this one to "The Restaurant Review Thread" or something?

      Just a thought ...
      I second the motion - great idea.
      The poster formerly known as Rimfire

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: The restaurant review thread

        OK, I changed the title - we'll see how it goes.

        Does anyone know of any good Chinese restaurants in Carmel - I have been to three different ones. One is OK, one is not good, the third is not edible.
        Last edited by Unclebuck; 07-23-2008, 09:53 AM.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: The restaurant review thread

          The only Chinese place I've eaten at consistently in Carmel is just north of 116th and Rangeline, and I really don't like it, but my family does. The name escapes me now, but it's in the strip center that now has the Pizza Hut/WingStreet and the drug store. It has two stone lions in front of it. We really are lacking a good Chinese place in the area, so I usually just get Thai food at Sawasdee.


          Comment


          • #20
            Re: The restaurant review thread

            McDonald's - 10/10.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: The restaurant review thread

              Originally posted by Indy View Post
              The only Chinese place I've eaten at consistently in Carmel is just north of 116th and Rangeline, and I really don't like it, but my family does. The name escapes me now, but it's in the strip center that now has the Pizza Hut/WingStreet and the drug store. It has two stone lions in front of it. We really are lacking a good Chinese place in the area, so I usually just get Thai food at Sawasdee.
              Yeah, I've been to that Chinese place twice and the first time I thought it was not good at all, the second time it wasn't edible. I won't be going back - Mandarin House - is the name.

              I do not like buffets

              Beijing City - is OK - nothing special though. It is located off og Greyhound pass near the panera bread, Honey Baked ham place - Kohls shopping center.

              Lin's Garden - which they have changed the name to China Garden - it is at 131st and Meridian - neat the O'Malias - it is halfway decent - although I haven't been since the na,me change

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: The restaurant review thread

                I'm interested in trying something new for lunch today. Anyone have a recommendation for something along the Keystone corridor? I work at 82nd and Keystone.


                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: The restaurant review thread

                  Originally posted by Indy View Post
                  I'm interested in trying something new for lunch today. Anyone have a recommendation for something along the Keystone corridor? I work at 82nd and Keystone.
                  I used to work in that area - what type of food are you looking for. When you say 82nd and Keystone you mean Keystone at the Crossing?



                  The best barbeque ribs in the city without question are available at Scotty's Brewhouse - on east 96th street.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: The restaurant review thread

                    If you are ever in Charlotte, here are a couple resturants to try in no particular order:

                    1. Brixx Wood Fired Pizza (several locations). Excellent wood fired pizza resturant with a good selection of microbrews too.

                    2. Ezee's Asian Fusion(Huntersville in Brikdale) Excellent upscale asian cuisine. Just awesome food and great service.

                    I'll add more later but since this is a Resturant review thread for all cities, maybe this will give places to go for different cities. I would look forward to reading of other places in other cities to go when I travel for work.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: The restaurant review thread

                      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                      I used to work in that area - what type of food are you looking for. When you say 82nd and Keystone you mean Keystone at the Crossing?



                      The best barbeque ribs in the city without question are available at Scotty's Brewhouse - on east 96th street.
                      Yeah basically, a little bit South.

                      I've eaten at Scotty's before, never tried the ribs though.


                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: The restaurant review thread

                        Fellow DC-ties....Old City Cafe in Adams Morgan...is it any good?

                        I was walking by it yesterday and I saw they had shwarma, which brings back all kinds of Netherlands memories for me since I cooked it for myself all the time when I lived there.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: The restaurant review thread

                          Indy,

                          Have you tried Capri? It's a bit north of the Wal Mart on Keystone behind the plaza with the Blockbuster. In fact you have to get there by going through Wal Mart's parking lot. I think their food is good, but they are pretty proud of it. A tad on the expensive side. They hand make their own spaghetti noodles. I've never been there for lunch and don't know if the menu differs or not. They prefer reservations for dinner and they are most definitely NOT kid friendly. We were not aware of that and they were not very kind when we brought our toddler.

                          Also if you like Chinese, I've always like the place that's across the street from Wal Mart (not in the plaza where Franks nursery used to be).

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: The restaurant review thread

                            Are you referring to Chinese Ruby?


                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: The restaurant review thread

                              Originally posted by Indy View Post
                              Are you referring to Chinese Ruby?
                              Yes, that's the one. I couldn't think of the name off the top of my head.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Your favorite downtown Indianapolis restaurant

                                Originally posted by Erik View Post
                                Ever try Papa Roux at 10th & Post? It's really good cajun.
                                No I haven't. I've seen it many times driving around the neighborhood and wondered. I'll have to stop in and check it out.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X