Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

    It cracks me up that there is so much talk about the next Batman movie

    Comment


    • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

      I think they should call it Batman Forever 2.

      Comment


      • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

        I really don't think there'll be another one, at least be CN at least.
        You Got The Tony!!!!!!

        Comment


        • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

          Going to see it for the third time tomorrow at 11 am.

          Comment


          • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

            All I can say is that each and every one of you that love this new version of Batman had better get down on your knees and kiss the butt of this man.



            Because before him Batman was this.



            Frank took that and made this



            All hail Frank Miller


            Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

            Comment


            • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

              I'm surprised people aren't giving more props to Chris & Jon for the writing in this flick, by far the most unexpectedly brilliant portion of the production. Lines like
              Spoiler Spoiler:
              made this more than just entertainment for me. I almost want to watch Insomnia again.
              You Got The Tony!!!!!!

              Comment


              • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                Originally posted by AesopRockOn View Post
                I'm surprised people aren't giving more props to Chris & Jon for the writing in this flick, by far the most unexpectedly brilliant portion of the production. Lines like
                Spoiler Spoiler:
                made this more than just entertainment for me. I almost want to watch Insomnia again.
                I wouldn't worry about using a spoiler for that. That quote was used in the previews...

                Comment


                • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                  By the way, my girlfriend loved it more than I did. I think it helped that she just saw BB a few days ago and hasn't seen the original Batmans, the cartoons or read the Comics. I think this movie was actually just as enjoyable as a non-comics movie. That's why it's the best super-hero/comic book movie ever.
                  Spoiler Spoiler:
                  Last edited by rexnom; 07-23-2008, 11:12 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                    I had never seen anything Batman-related until just a few hours ago, never read any of the comics, etc. Just not my thing.

                    But the movie was excellent. Heath Ledger was amazing and it was SWEET to see Tiny Lister in an important part of the movie.

                    Comment


                    • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                      Now you should go watch Begins.


                      Comment


                      • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                        I know, I actually feel somewhat interested in seeing it.

                        Comment


                        • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                          First off...do we really need these spoiler tags?

                          Second off...This is maybe gonna sound really bad, but I really did like the movie a lot. It's a definite 8-9 out of 10 level and one of the better superhero flicks ever made.

                          Originally posted by avoidingtheclowns View Post
                          i just saw TDK last night and i'm still trying to process my thoughts but here is a quick run-down

                          Spoiler Spoiler:
                          Basically.

                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          Couldn't agree more. And I'll even say that very few of the action scenes were actually remarkable.

                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          Agreed. Underwhelmed is the best word to describe most of the action sequences I thought. Maybe it's because of all the hype going in...but there was very little in many of those that were things I hadn't seen before.

                          Other weird issues I had.

                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          I didn't mind it, per se', but it was weird. Made him very one-dimensional as a character, which I guess is somewhat fine when he's suited up...but that kind of carried over to Bruce Wayne too. I think he "went through" a lot more emotionally in Begins.

                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          I also thought there were two specific things that set Ledger's Joker from being very good to great was his mouth tendancies and his laugh. It really reminded me a lot of Dustin Hoffman's character in Rain Man. I don't mean the actual characters but how they played the roles. The littlest things like Heath wetting his lips like that in such timed places just completely sold it. I thought the pauses in his speech when he would do it were perfect. It could have been corny. I had a hard time even picturing Heath under that makeup. No wonder why he was in the mental state that he was. I really hope he wins awards for that role, because embodied that role.
                          I couldn't agree more. Heath was incredible. Truly remarkable. And it was mostly the little physical facial ticks and other things...and of course the line delivery. I gotta assume he's already got the posthumous Oscar locked up. He'll actually be only the second actor to receive one (Peter Finch won Best Actor for Network). He'll also be one of the younger Best Supporting Actors of all time.

                          Originally posted by avoidingtheclowns View Post
                          Spoiler Spoiler:
                          The two highlights of the film, IMO.

                          Originally posted by AesopRockOn View Post
                          I'm surprised people aren't giving more props to Chris & Jon for the writing in this flick, by far the most unexpectedly brilliant portion of the production. Lines like
                          Spoiler Spoiler:
                          made this more than just entertainment for me.
                          That was a great line. But like a bunch of other really good ones, did it have to be repeated so many times? I got it the first time. Or at least the second.



                          After a Naptime-like paragraph break...I just wanna say I really, really liked this movie. It was great. I love superhero flicks and this was one of the best. I'm only pointing out flaws cause all the praise has already been said. Had I gone in without the "THIS FILM WILL WIN BEST PICTURE" and "It's barely even a superhero movie it's so full of drams" hype, I probably would have fewer problems. But aside from most every Heath part
                          Spoiler Spoiler:
                          and Two Face's awesome make-up, there really wasn't much where I was like "WOW...this is better than I ever even thought it could be."

                          I probably could have just saved 500 words here and just said "I preferred Iron Man" and summed it up just as quickly. Sorry. X2 was also certainly better.
                          Last edited by JayRedd; 07-24-2008, 08:47 AM.
                          Read my Pacers blog:
                          8points9seconds.com

                          Follow my twitter:

                          @8pts9secs

                          Comment


                          • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                            I just got back from watching this movie. I won't spoil it for those yet to see, but there are a few things I would like to say about it.

                            1. It's a must see. And I don't mean on DVD, I mean in the theater. Even though I will definately be getting it on Blu-ray and am looking forward to seeing it in HD.

                            2. This movie is one of the most impressive action movies I have ever seen. Amazing special effects, very creative sequences and overall very well done. And I don't know if it was just the theater I was in, but the sound was crazy.

                            3. Heath Ledger was great. His performance completley blows away Nicholsons' interpretation from the older Batman movie. He should definately get at least an oscar nomination for it, IMO. I would probably vote for him to win.

                            I don't like super hero movies in general, and I wasn't even a Batman fan growing up. I find most of them rather cheesy and made more for children. But after seeing Batman Begins I changed my mind, at least for this series of Batman movies.

                            Keep in mind this movie is pushing three hours including previews and what not. But it was so good I didn't leave the theater to even go to the bathroom, which was a struggle for about the last hour and a half BTW. It already has me looking forward to the next one. It's just a shame Ledger won't be in it.
                            "Don't get caught watchin' the paint dry"

                            Comment


                            • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                              Spoiler Spoiler:


                              Over all I really liked TDK but its a lot different than BB. I liked Begins a little better, mainly due to the story line.

                              Comment


                              • Re: The Official I can't ****ing wait for The Dark Knight Thread

                                Originally posted by JayRedd View Post
                                Spoiler Spoiler:



                                Spoiler Spoiler:
                                Last edited by Trader Joe; 07-24-2008, 08:26 AM.


                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X