Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

    We roll on with the draft threads, this time analyzing the Indiana University standout forward, D.J. White. White seems to be headed for a long and uncertain draft night on Thursday, as he could be selected anywhere between 26 and 50. Like many players who have simialr games and talent level, landing in a spot with the right "fit" for him will be the key to his future success.

    When you think of DJ, more often than not you think of his high character and intangibles. He was a noble leader for his time here in Bloomington, coming back through all sorts of adversity and injuries and turmoil to be one of the favorite IU players among the fanbase in the last 10 years or so.

    White hits the NBA as the classic "slightly undersized" power forward. He will never have the height to play center, and will never have the quickness or skills to play alngside 2 bigger players. In this way, he is a player with "position purity."

    Offensively, he has some assets. He shows a decent post up game, with nice touch around the rim. He elevated well and has strong hands in terms of catching the basketball. He gets position well, as he has the move I like so well of driving his back leg in between the feet of the defender playing behind him. He finishes putback attempts with authority, no worries about this player going up soft trying to score in the paint, he much prefers to gather himself and flush the ball with 2 hands. He is a bit slow to jump, and takes some time to gather himself, but those aren't fatal weaknesses in a backup power forward/role player, which is what White really projects to be.

    He projects to be a pretty good jump shooter from the high post/short corner area, from about 12-15 in. His release is kind of slow and weird, but he usually has enough basketball savvy to only take jump shots from this distance that he clearly has time to get off unhurried. He won't be able to make tough contested shots like Kevin Love can, but if open he will be able to make the mid range jump shot.

    He has a huge gigantic weakness in his offensive game, but it isn't one that will likely ever be an issue in the NBA. DJ White is terrible at trying to pass out of the post when double teamed. He seems to really struggle to tell where the "doubler" is coming from, and is slow to recognize who among his teammates is open. He lacks the leaping ability or dexterity to either jump over/through/slide between a double, so he often grinds your offense to a halt when he faces 2 defenders. However, at this level very few times will present themselves where DJ will be drawing that kind of attention anyway, so this major weakness is rendered meaningless mostly.
    What he ends up doing to avoid a double team is to simply dribble back out toward the perimeter, which of course creates all sorts of advantages for the defensive team. Rarely have I seen such a smart, effective player be this bad at this particular area. It's very weird actually.

    DJ never played with another good post player at IU really, and the system his various coaches played didnt really lend itself to this, but I think DJ might develop into a nice post FEEDER from the short corner or high post/elbow area. Occasionally, when having the ball in these areas, DJ will really crouch low and seem like he'd be in good position to make a pass, except Indiana had no one decent for him to feed really. As noted, White is not a good ballhandler or passer in any other way, so me projecting him to be an excellent post feeder someday could be totally wrong. In the least, I think DJ will be extremely coachable in this area and be a WILLING passer of the basketball, and that's really all you can ask of him at this point.

    White was not taught very well at IU to be a very good screener. At this point, Id say that bothers me more about him than anything else. He stands almost straight up when screening, and narrows his stance instead of widening it, letting the man he is screening get around him way too easily. This compounded the problems Eric Gordon had as a cutter that I wrote about in the draft thread about Eric. Gordon wasnt a good cutter at all, White was a bad screener, so that really hindered the IU offense in my opinion. I think in the NBA level he projects to be taught much better than he was at IU, so I think he can overcome this. I blame it much more on the staffs he played under than DJ himself.

    DJ rebounds well. He blocks out physically, and really does a nice job of pulling the ball down hard and keeping it high after he gets his paws on it, keeping elbows out to protect the ball and himself. He isn't the quickest player into the air, which is why he won't ever be a great rebounder at the NBA level, but he will always put in the effort and give you what he has. He will get the ones a 100% of the time that come to him or near him. He also shows decent form on making a great 2 handed outlet pass, except it seems to take him forever to **** the ball into position to pass. He doesnt show super alertness or "feel" to just KNOW where his teammates might be, he normally has to look and actually SEE them before firing the ball ahead. This often means he loses some chances to start fast breaks because he doesnt quite recognize advantages soon enough. I liken this to a quarterback who waits to his reciever is open to release the football, instead of reading the defense and ANTICIPATING he will be open, and throwing it then.

    Defensively, DJ will give you an honest day's work. He will fight for position, is willing to take charges, and can block some shots occasionally when the opportunity presents itself. I see him taking more and more charges as his body wears down, and his leaping ability, which already isn't anything great due to all the injuries, begins to fade even more. Occasionally when he gets tired, he will let up just a bit and let a man post him too easily and score on him. When this happens to him no one takes it harder than DJ himself, which is one of the traits so many IU fans liked about him.

    So much of White's future depends on where he goes Thursday night. In an ideal world, he would go to a team with some veteran guys to mentor him and who would appreciate his lunch pail work ethic. He'd be best suited to play alongside a true legitimate big man, not a power forward masquerading as a center, and with a team that plays a more traditional, half court, power brand of basketball. White will be useless in my opinion to New York, Golden State, Denver, Seattle, Orlando, and teams like that.

    But, put him on a team like Boston (I think DJ is better than Glen Davis), or Detroit (lots of halfcourt sets, good teammates) Cleveland (playing next to Ilgauskus), Houston (next to Yao, splitting time with the similar Carl Landry), and I think he makes some nice contributions potentially.

    I grew to be a big fan of White in his days here in Bloomington, so I want the kid to make it. I think the most likely scenario for White is also one I think would be great for him and his future development: Being drafted by Portland in the early second round, and then being sent to play overseas for a couple of years like Antonio Davis did.

    If Portland does this like I think they might, it would be an ideal marriage of smart roster management for them, and a chance to have a bright future for White. Over in Europe, he could play many more minutes earlier, and make alot of money developing his game. After an "apprenticeship" there, he could come back to Portland and be a sidekick for Greg Odon.
    That is what I would do if I were Portland, and I think it is a real possibilty to happen. I hope it does.

    If the Pacers need to use Ike Diogu as a sweetener to move back into the first round (another thing I find likely to happen), with his local ties and intangibles, White wouldn't be a bad fit for the Pacers at #41, if he slips that far. There are alot of guys I'd pick ahead of White, but I couldn't argue much with a selection of a great teammate that DJ is.

    There are bunch of guys with DJ's skill level and size who havent made it in the league. There are also a bunch of guys who have. So much depends on who picks him and the situation he lands in. Some similarities I think White could potentially become like include Clarence Weatherspoon, Corliss Williamson, or Antonio Davis. Or, he could end up being Marcus Fizer, who pretty much was a NBA washout.

    I'm hoping for the best for DJ White, one of the best character guys I've seen come thru Bloomington in a long while.

    As always, all the above is just my opinion.

    Tbird

  • #2
    Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

    I agree that he's a situational guy, as in where he goes and what he's asked to do will impact his staying power. He did show tons of heart and maturity this year and does have more than just a college game to him.

    I don't think he could be a 2nd rounder of the Tony Davis caliber but I could see him helping out a team to the tune of 10-15 minutes right away thanks to his mental strength. Unlike Tony I think he's topped out already and doesn't need a lot more fine tuning. Maybe a lesser Carl Landry perhaps.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

      He has a huge gigantic weakness in his offensive game, but it isn't one that will likely ever be an issue in the NBA. DJ White is terrible at trying to pass out of the post when double teamed.
      It's a major issue in the NBA for Ike Diogu.....

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

        Originally posted by Hicks View Post
        It's a major issue in the NBA for Ike Diogu.....

        True.

        What I meant by saying it won't be as much of an issue for DJ is that he won't be quite good enough of an offensive player to BE double teamed in the first place. I think White is a better overall player than Diogu, but Ike is clearly a much bigger threat in the low post to score against single coverage. Teams should be able to play DJ straight up I think.

        Ike Diogu is another player who would look much better if he was playing next to a really good, bigger post player who demanded enough attention so that the opponent couldn't afford to send a double at him.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

          Originally posted by Hicks View Post
          It's a major issue in the NBA for Ike Diogu.....
          .... because posting up is the only thing Ike does well.
          This space for rent.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

            Originally posted by Anthem View Post
            .... because posting up is the only thing Ike does well.
            And he's not all that great at that.
            STARBURY

            08 and Beyond

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

              Originally posted by Robertmto View Post
              And he's not all that great at that.
              First of all, Ike has the best post-work of any Pacer I've seen in a long time; it's just his size that limits him. He is extremely quick at getting position and he's really strong. I kind of wish everyone else would pay attention because they could learn a lot from his moves. If David Harrison had Ike's post work, David would've been a 25 pt/game scorer.

              Also, Ike has a good jump shot; a really good jump shot. And he gets offensive rebounds and putbacks. The only thing he lacks is a face-up game, and his passing out of double teams, which improved last year (though he appears to have a low basketball IQ).

              Originally posted by Thunderbird1245 View Post
              He gets position well, as he has the move I like so well of driving his back leg in between the feet of the defender playing behind him
              The "Karl Malone". It's a great move.

              I wouldn't be disappointed if we got White, but only if we're moving Ike. Like others have said, his future seems situational, but I think he could wind up being a very important bench player.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

                Originally posted by imawhat View Post
                First of all, Ike has the best post-work of any Pacer I've seen in a long time; it's just his size that limits him.
                His size, and his inability to handle a double-team. Nobody's saying he's not a beast one-on-one. The question is, can he play in a team game?
                This space for rent.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

                  Originally posted by Anthem View Post
                  His size, and his inability to handle a double-team. Nobody's saying he's not a beast one-on-one. The question is, can he play in a team game?
                  His inability to think and act quickly and decisively is his biggest problem and will be difficult if not impossible to fix. Passing out of the double team is one symptom of that problem. It's a shame because he is capable of scoring efficiently and has a nice midrange game.

                  I do agree his size is an issue, but it is down the list. There are other players in the league roughly his size (e.g. Elton Brand) that have learned to play with that limitation. He certainly has the strength to handle the PF position and he has long arms. He just has too many other issues...and JOb's system is not helping him.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

                    I think DJ White will be one of the pleasant surprises in this draft. He has nice post moves, a good jumpshot, and he rebounds well. I read some article that said he outplayed Arthur in a workout. I could certainly see DJ going in the late first round to a Detroit or San Antonio.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

                      Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                      His inability to think and act quickly and decisively is his biggest problem and will be difficult if not impossible to fix. Passing out of the double team is one symptom of that problem.
                      Yeah, that's probably a more accurate diagnosis. Well done.
                      This space for rent.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Tbird draft analysis: D.J. White

                        Originally posted by Anthem View Post
                        His size, and his inability to handle a double-team. Nobody's saying he's not a beast one-on-one. The question is, can he play in a team game?
                        I like his post POSITION game, he gets a spot quickly and well, but if Hulk gets the ball in the same spot I like his ability to score it more. Ike has the jumper too which helps. And Hulk simply does not get low post position nearly as well as Ike does so the comparison ends up moot. If only you could combine them a little.

                        But Anthem is right, the point of Ike when you put him in is to focus the offense on him in the low post. The rep on him now means that he's getting doubled as soon as he hits the block and quickly coughs up a TO or struggling pass that maybe you save possession on but that kills time off your clock and forces a reset for everything.

                        White would be more Foster like to me with maybe a bit more offense, yet still nothing to warrant real defensive pressure and simply not that many chances to go after him in the first place.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X