Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

  1. #1

    Default Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Today I profile the 10th player in this series, forward Anthony Randolph from LSU.

    The young freshman wing player from LSU is only 18 years old, not turning 19 until July 15th. Because of his extreme lack of experience, gauging how good of a pro player Randolph may become is going to be a matter of predicting the future, as the young "4" man is far from a finished product.

    There is little argument that Randolph has huge potential to be an impact forward in the league. Randolph looks like a potential starting caliber player in time, if he continues his current upward path as a player.
    However, that word in the previous sentence, "if", is a gigantic question, because it may be just as likely that Randolph ends up being much more sizzle than steak. Randolph carries with his selection a lot of potential, but a huge amount of risk.

    Admittedly, I am pre disposed to like left handed players who are multi faceted in their game. I really liked watching Jalen Rose and Calbert Cheaney play the game, and I feel like Lamar Odom and Manu Ginobili are both very entertaining to watch play today. Randolph has the potential and profile to be similar to the above mentioned Odom if he turns out to be as good as many of the talent evaluators project him to be.

    Most of the experts have a higher opinion of Randolph than I do however. I don't mind so much waiting on pure post players to develop their games and talents, as history tells us that pure centers take longer to grow into their bodies and games. However, regardless of where he is projected to be drafted, I see no reason why a lottery team, such as the Knicks for example, would have interest in taking a flyer on a player who even when he develops will be slotted at a position that is the easiest to fill in basketball.

    Randolph projects to be a classic "face up 4" in my opinion. I don't see him being a low post factor on either end, as his super thin frame at this point will limit him to playing on the perimeter. I see his potential as an offensive player in time, but I fail to see who Anthony Randolph will ever be able to guard, even giving him a huge benefit of the doubt.

    As I said, I see potential for growth as an offensive player, but let it also be said that as of right now today, Randolph will have a difficulty contributing on the offensive end. You cannot be a perimeter playing "4" man like Shawn Marion unless you can consistently make outside shots, and Randolph cannot currently do that. The most troubling thing I see about him and his potential is his shooting form itself, which is awkward, slow, and inaccurate. He seems to lack the decision making prowess (maybe it is lack of experience, maybe it isn't) to know what a good shot is and what one isn't.

    The inability to be a good shooter will enable slower defending forwards who potentially would have match up problems against him to be able to lay back from him, negating his single biggest weapon, which is a really good first step. He really covers a bunch of ground with it, and it has to be what the experts are drooling over watching him play. Without the ability to make the open jumper however, Randolph will find his biggest asset to be useless.

    Defensively, Randolph, as I said, looks like a sieve. He can't hold his spot against people posting him up, and he can't defend quickness without putting his hands all over people. He is the type of defender who may look more impressive than he actually is, as occasionally he will make a great steal or big block that wows the fans, but when you examine closely he is also the guy who loafs back on defense, gets screened too easily, fails to help his teammate on a drive, and gets pushed underneath the rim while trying to box out. I don't see, even if Randolph fulfills his highest potential, who he consistently can defend at the next level.

    There are things about Randolph that trouble me as an analyst. I see the athletic ability no question, and I see the raw potential. But I have real concerns about why his team was so pitiful in college, why his potential doesn't match his production, and whether he seems like the kind of player who will continue to work on his game after recieving the big checks. Being an NBA player takes a huge commitment playing against real professional men who take their craft seriously, and Anthony Randolph is completely not ready, in my judgment, to deal with that currently.

    Randolph looks like a player who has always been the biggest and best player his whole life, so he has never had to learn the nuances of the game, or the fundamentals of how to really play. He looks totally and completely reliant on his natural talents, which at the NBA level won't be enough to make it long term.

    Randolph would be a great player I think for some team that is totally loaded, and that has a winning culture and lockerroom, to draft and then bring along slowly, and if you did that, perhaps in three years or so you might have a really quality player. But I don't see how Randolph helps anyone this year or probably next, and the fact that he may be drafted as high as 5th or 6th is starting to convince me that this draft and its talent may be a bit overrated. The best thing for Randolph and his long term future would to be drafted by someone like Jerry Sloan, just to teach him how to play and to toughen him up, but instead Randolph looks to me much more likely to be drafted by a team that is a cesspool of losing, selfish play, or incompetence, such as Memphis, New Jersey, or perhaps the Clippers.

    While I suspect that it is likely he will be drafted in the top 10, I would not be at all surprised to see Randolph drop as the draft gets closer. The huge risk he carries with him, and the lack of ability to help this season in my opinion makes him a tough sell to a losing organizations fanbase.

    We have seen Larry Bird already pick a very similar player in Shawne Williams, so I would be shocked to the core if Bird selected his left handed clone in Randolph. Williams may or may not eventually be a major contributor, the jury is still out on that. But remember, Williams was picked much lower in the pecking order than Randolph will be a few days from now. Remember also that Williams can actually shoot, where as Randolph can't, at least right now, from outside of 10 feet.

    As is my custom, I am trying to think of a good comparable player to Randolph that played in the eighties or nineties, but I really can't. Guys as raw and as limited as Randolph is couldn't make it in the league back then.....they stayed in college and honed their games. I guess the best I can think of is a much bigger version of Harold Minor, who looked athletically superior in warmups, but once the games started he looked more like the journeyman that he actually was.

    If in the unlikely event Randolph slips to 11, the Pacers should either pass altogether and choose someone else or attempt to find a team to trade down with. Randolph cannot help us and would be a really bad fit for us and our current situation.

    As always, the above is just my opinion.

    Tbird
    Last edited by thunderbird1245; 06-15-2008 at 07:15 PM.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    when evaluating randolph, one must take into account the coaching situation there concerning john brady and his firing.

  3. #3
    100 Miles from the B count55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,772

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    God, he does sound like Bender (except for the shooting part, which doesn't exactly give me warm fuzzies).

  4. #4

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by count55 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    God, he does sound like Bender (except for the shooting part, which doesn't exactly give me warm fuzzies).
    you talk as though bender was an untalented scrub...? without his knee issues, i'm willing to bet bender would have become our best player within 2 years time.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Bender's knees notwithstanding, I always thought his biggest hiderance
    was his head, or more specifically, his seemingly almost complete lack
    of hoops-IQ. The kid not only had no in-between game whatsoever,
    he seemed to not even grasp the possibility of it's usefullness.

    He was an athletic freak though. I'll give him that.

    No opinion on Randolph. I've never seen him play in game
    action and in fact, didn't even know he existed until the draft
    speculation got underway. But, croz24 has a point, Brady couldn't
    coach his way out if a paper bag.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Frankfort, IN
    Posts
    9,136

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by Rajah Brown View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Bender's knees notwithstanding, I always thought his biggest hiderance
    was his head, or more specifically, his seemingly almost complete lack
    of hoops-IQ. The kid not only had no in-between game whatsoever,
    he seemed to not even grasp the possibility of it's usefullness.

    He was an athletic freak though. I'll give him that.
    He was athletic but had almost no basketball skills. Should have been a high jumper.

    I'll be very curious to see where Randolph goes - I know as much about him as I do the Italian player, Gallinari.

    However, once you get past Rose, Beasley, Bayless and Mayo nobody knocks my socks off in this draft, so I could see him being taken as early as 5 just because of the upside. Lopez is a legit NBA big man so he may get a top 5 spot by default but I don't see him making a bunch of all-star games either.

    I've never seen less of a difference between the 5th best player and about 25th than I have this year. I don't think it would be any more surprising if, say, CDR (picked in the 20's) was an impact player rather than Gordon (probably 7-10).
    The poster formerly known as Rimfire

  7. #7

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by croz24 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    you talk as though bender was an untalented scrub...? without his knee issues, i'm willing to bet bender would have become our best player within 2 years time.
    Hell yes I would love to see what Bender could do if he was able to be healthy. It's a damn shame.

    Bender, I thought, showed some signs of life he just wasn't able to get out on the court much which is a damn shame.

    Anyways I think Randolph can be a pretty good player. I think he could end up being a lot like Lamar Odom and not just in skills but in terms of the best role for him too. I think like Odom Randolph is best being the third opition on a team. Which really ain't so bad.

    The problem with this is that it is hard to judge where to select him. He is too good to slide out of the top 10 but really will probably never be the man on his team.

  8. #8
    Feed the big fella. Infinite MAN_force's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Broadripple
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,253

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Two guys I have been very skeptical of in this draft have been CDR and Randolph, So the fact that you don't like either one is very comforting to me.
    "As a bearded man, i was very disappointed in Love. I am gathering other bearded men to discuss the status of Kevin Love's beard. I am motioning that it must be shaved."

    - ilive4sports

  9. #9
    Member PR07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,962

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Randolph is a twig right now. Wait until he hits the weight room and begins an NBA training regime until passing judgment on whether he can play the 4. I'd love to get Randolph. You could groom him behind JO for two seasons, and after that, you might be looking at your next franchise player. He's obviously not going to be a guy that can come in right away and play starter's minutes, but if you wait, I think you could easily be looking at a Lamar Odom or maybe even a Chris Bosh type player (Did anyone see Bosh at GTech? Skinny as a rail).

  10. #10
    Member Mr. Sobchak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    704

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by PR07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Randolph is a twig right now. Wait until he hits the weight room and begins an NBA training regime until passing judgment on whether he can play the 4. I'd love to get Randolph. You could groom him behind JO for two seasons, and after that, you might be looking at your next franchise player. He's obviously not going to be a guy that can come in right away and play starter's minutes, but if you wait, I think you could easily be looking at a Lamar Odom or maybe even a Chris Bosh type player (Did anyone see Bosh at GTech? Skinny as a rail).

    QFT. The guy has a 7'3'' wingspan and runs the floor like a guard. He is a one man fast break.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CRtna5iDFc

  11. #11

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    basically, after mayo, rose, and bayless, the only player i desperately want on the pacers and who would be a joy to watch is joe alexander. some call me crazy for wanting him because he's a tweener sf/pf, but not only can you not teach athleticism, you also can't teach desire, intensity, and unrivaled work ethic.

  12. #12
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,738

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Bosh was pretty skinny.

    So was JO, for that matter.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  13. #13
    Member PR07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,962

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph




    After: ????
    Last edited by PR07; 06-15-2008 at 11:45 PM.

  14. #14
    It is ka Thankee sai Major Cold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Garrett, IN
    Posts
    9,112
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Who is next? I am really enjoying these assessments.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    You should put a link to your previous 9 profiles, and continue to add to it as you make each analysis. Thanks for doing these, they're fun reads.
    Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    asdfasdfasdfasdf
    Last edited by imawhat; 06-16-2008 at 02:21 AM.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    somewhat curious as to where people on here are getting their stats from...this is the third or fourth time i've heard that 41% number when in actuality he shot 46.4% from the floor...

  18. #18
    You Did It Joseph!!!! AesopRockOn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    honolulu
    Age
    26
    Posts
    7,877
    Mood

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by imawhat View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    asdfasdfasdfasdf
    In what way?

  19. #19
    Member Taterhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,288

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by croz24 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    you talk as though bender was an untalented scrub...? without his knee issues, i'm willing to bet bender would have become our best player within 2 years time.
    I agree, Bender was just about to break out when he retired. It's a shame. I don't get the constant bashing of him, but I have noticed people on here seem downright offended by players health problems. Anyways, the kid had some great skills for a 7 footer. There was a time I was absolutely drooling over an Artest, Bender, O'neal front line being the Pacers core for the next 7-8 years. It could have been something really special. We put a lot of time into Bender, and him reitring has hurt us just as much as the injuries and the off the court problems, IMO.

    As for Randolph, I actually like him a lot as a SF and a PF prospect. However I agree he's not a 4, especially for the next 3-4 years. But he could probably play some SF until then.

  20. #20
    100 Miles from the B count55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,772

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by Rajah Brown View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Bender's knees notwithstanding, I always thought his biggest hiderance
    was his head, or more specifically, his seemingly almost complete lack
    of hoops-IQ. The kid not only had no in-between game whatsoever,
    he seemed to not even grasp the possibility of it's usefullness.

    He was an athletic freak though. I'll give him that.

    No opinion on Randolph. I've never seen him play in game
    action and in fact, didn't even know he existed until the draft
    speculation got underway. But, croz24 has a point, Brady couldn't
    coach his way out if a paper bag.

    This pretty much sums up what I thought of Bender. Could shoot. Could Jump. Could run (until his knees gave out). Had no idea how to play basketball. Though lacking the size and the freakish athletic ability, Shawne Williams showed more understanding of the game in his pro debut at Chicago than Bender did his entire career. (And we all know that Shawne Williams still has a ton to learn about the game even today.)

    This is the exact quote that made me think of Bender:

    Quote Originally Posted by tbird
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Randolph looks like a player who has always been the biggest and best player his whole life, so he has never had to learn the nuances of the game, or the fundamentals of how to really play. He looks totally and completely reliant on his natural talents, which at the NBA level won't be enough to make it long term.
    Bender was a spectacular bust. I never really thought he was going to amount to much more than a rotational player, so I never thought of the knee problems as the reason he was a bust. I always thought that he was an athlete, not a basketball player. I didn't see any kind of learning curve demonstrating that would've changed had he remained healthy.

  21. #21

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by croz24 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    basically, after mayo, rose, and bayless, the only player i desperately want on the pacers and who would be a joy to watch is joe alexander. some call me crazy for wanting him because he's a tweener sf/pf, but not only can you not teach athleticism, you also can't teach desire, intensity, and unrivaled work ethic.

    We are of the same thought concerning Alexander. I'd trade both Shawne and Ike in a heartbeat to get him! I can't wait to watch his growth over the next few years, and I'd love it to be in a Pacers' uni. That chance is slim and next to none, for he won't slide to 11.

  22. #22
    Member Mr. Sobchak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    704

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin Tyme View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    We are of the same thought concerning Alexander. I'd trade both Shawne and Ike in a heartbeat to get him! I can't wait to watch his growth over the next few years, and I'd love it to be in a Pacers' uni. That chance is slim and next to none, for he won't slide to 11.

    I like him a lot as a player but I don't really understand why you guys want him for this team. I am a believer in drafting the bpa in most scenarios but our two most consistent players are small forwards. I don't think adding another one would help us that much. I just don't see Alexander playing the 4 spot because he is only 6'8" which is basically Ike size without Ike's long wingspan.

  23. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brown County, Indiana
    Posts
    3,750

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by croz24 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    ...some call me crazy...
    Some?

  24. #24

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Peskoe97-

    Just playing devil's advocate, an arguement could be made that,
    if Alexander is the best player left at #11, you take him and
    ultimately give yourself more flexibility down the road when
    making a deal. If he comes to Indy and pans out, either he,
    DG or Williams would then be pretty expendable.

    At this point, any and every valuable/attractive asset the Pacers
    can acquire is a plus as at this point, that cupboard is pretty bare.

  25. #25

    Default Re: Tbird draft analysis: Anthony Randolph

    Quote Originally Posted by Peskoe97 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I like him a lot as a player but I don't really understand why you guys want him for this team. I am a believer in drafting the bpa in most scenarios but our two most consistent players are small forwards. I don't think adding another one would help us that much. I just don't see Alexander playing the 4 spot because he is only 6'8" which is basically Ike size without Ike's long wingspan.
    i want him regardless of who's on my team just because of the way he plays and approaches the game, as well as his freakish athleticism. he'd be much more of a joy to watch imo than anybody else to be had at that #11 slot. the pacers have no clear stregths. as good as many think granger is, there are still 15+ sfs in the game you'd rather have than him. as a player, regardless of position, there is nobody at #11 i want more.

Similar Threads

  1. Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush
    By thunderbird1245 in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 10:35 AM
  2. Tbird draft analysis: Kosta Koufos
    By thunderbird1245 in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 06-02-2008, 12:24 PM
  3. The PD NBA Best Pick Left in the Draft 2
    By Hicks in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-24-2008, 09:42 PM
  4. The PD NBA Best Pick Left in the Draft
    By Hicks in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-23-2008, 10:23 AM
  5. Top Draft Prospects
    By Will Galen in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-18-2008, 11:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •