Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Shaun Livingston

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shaun Livingston

    Do you think maybe we would be one of the teams to take a flier on this kid? He messed up his knee pretty gruesomely. But if he returns to form, he could be had relatively cheap.

    From HoopsWorld by Jason Fleming:

    http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=9007

    Shaun Livingston: It what may not be a surprise, word is the Los Angeles Clippers will not make point guard Shaun Livingston a qualifying offer by the end of the month to make him a restricted free agent. This means Livingston will be free to sign with whomever he likes, though considering he is still recovering from that horrible knee injury it's doubtful teams will be lining up to offer him big money. Or maybe any money. What wouldn't be a surprise is if Livingston then re-signed with the Clippers, but at something much lower than the qualifying offer for a former #2 draft pick – think two years and $3-4 million. That's enough money to entice Livingston given the likely market, and also cheap enough for the Clippers to hedge against whether or not the young point guard will fully make a recovery and be productive.

  • #2
    Re: Shaun Livingston

    Everytime I see him I think of when he bent his knee BACKWARDS!!!

    "I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about." - Peter Griffin

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Shaun Livingston

      I feel bad for the kid. That was one of the nastiest injuries I had ever seen in any sport and he is still rehabbing today. I think we would have to pass, just too much of a risk.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Shaun Livingston

        Prior to the injury I really wanted the Pacers to go after him, I suggested that the pacers should trade JO for him. Obviously now we don't know how well he's going to come back. But sure I would take a chance on him.

        I rememeber watching him I the 2006 playoffs and I was extremely impressed. Excellent defender, difficult to guard, sure he wasn't a great outside shooter, but if he can come back I bet his shooting really improves because I'm sure he has been practicing that a ton.
        Last edited by Unclebuck; 06-12-2008, 03:16 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Shaun Livingston

          The odds of players coming back from grusome injuries like that are slim. Just look at Jay Williams. If he came back to full strength, the Clippers would have signed him already.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Shaun Livingston

            Originally posted by eldubious View Post
            The odds of players coming back from grusome injuries like that are slim. Just look at Jay Williams. If he came back to full strength, the Clippers would have signed him already.
            Willis McGahee says hello.

            Tearing your knee up today isn't the same as having the same injury 10-15 yrs ago. Then, it was a death sentence, you would never be the same. Now, if you do your rehab correctly and be patient you can have just as strongly structured knee as before.

            The problem with people that continually retear something isn't so much their knee as opposed to their mechanics. Something in the way they move, or the way their body reacts, causes high levels of stress on the tissue.

            I'm not saying that he will never have knee troubles again. I'm just saying that taking a freak play like he did doesn't necessarily mean that he won't recover. If he doesn't have mechanical problems, and actually goes all the way through rehab without rushing, there is a very high percentage that his knee will be fine in the future. Trusting your doctors and trusting your knee when it is healed is the hardest part.

            I know several athletes that have torn up their knees in several different ways and are still performing without braces and without pain/side-effects.

            I understand that people are shy about knee situations from the Bender fiasco, but he really is an anomaly.

            EDIT: As a fun FYI, fun for me atleast, there are studies out now showing that women are at higher risks for knee tears because of the angle of their femurs due to their pelvis flaring.
            Last edited by Since86; 06-12-2008, 02:15 PM.
            Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Shaun Livingston

              You've got to swing for the fences every now and then, especially in our current situation. This guy would be a grand slam. The trick is to find out as much as possible and IF the chances of him regaining his mobility are good you have to beat the other suitors' offers before they make the same determination.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Shaun Livingston

                Before he got injured I thought he would be something great. He is a 6'7'' POINT GUARD. Think of a backcout of a healthly Livingston and Eric Gordon. I don't see why we shouldnt take a gamble on him if the price is right. Whats the worst that can happen?- He sits on the bench as a 10th-11th man?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Shaun Livingston

                  I think he's worth gambling on next summer if it's no worse than, say 3 years, $4mm a year. If it even takes that much to outbid anyone else.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Shaun Livingston

                    Yes, sometimes you have to take a chance. If you are going to take chances, why not a Livingston & Gerald Green backcourt?

                    Then there is that thing called reality. Where does the money come from to sign Livingston? MLE? That's not going to happen, for Bird has already said the Simons weren't going over the LT. Same as last year.

                    It's nice to fantasize, but then there is that thing called reality. Reality is such a stumbling block for a good thought/dream/fantasy.
                    Last edited by Justin Tyme; 06-12-2008, 07:57 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Shaun Livingston

                      Where could the Pacers come up with 3-4 mil to sign Livingston?

                      Trade JO for Hinrich and Gooden. The savings in salary could be used on Livingston. The Pacers could have a backcourt of Livingston and Hinrich. Sounds great. Ok, who nudged me thus bringing me out of my fantasy and back to reality?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Shaun Livingston

                        About 3 months ago when I said we should go after Shaun Livingston this offseason, people said there was no way the Clippers would give up on him and no way we could get him cheap.

                        Back in January I said we should have attempted to trade J.O. to Dallas before the deadline and try to grab Devin Harris in the mix of that somehow. My reason was because Dallas needed a post presence and we needed a point guard. There's another idea that was shot down however by most.

                        There was also the Al Harrington to Golden State with Mike Dunleavy coming back in return suggestion I made... a number of days before it actually happened.

                        What do I know though

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Shaun Livingston

                          Well, at least he'd make Jamaal and JO look like ironmen. This kid missed 50 games as a rook, 21 his second year...all before that disastrous knee injury. Maybe we try it if there are no guarantees, but I'd be shocked if he ever is able to play a significant amount of time again.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Shaun Livingston

                            Originally posted by count55 View Post
                            This kid missed 50 games as a rook, 21 his second year...all before that disastrous knee injury. Maybe we try it if there are no guarantees, but I'd be shocked if he ever is able to play a significant amount of time again.
                            I'm kind of in the same boat. Jermaine at least gave us an 80-game season and three 70-game seasons before he started to break down. Shaun's never ever been healthy.
                            Last edited by Anthem; 06-12-2008, 06:22 PM.
                            This space for rent.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Shaun Livingston

                              this reminds me of a section from a column dan wetzel wrote following shaun injuring his knee

                              But it seems Livingston never was meant to last. The body that allowed him that insane crossover at 6-foot-7 always was cursed. In three seasons in the NBA he's been a hobbled medical mess – dislocated right knee, sprained right ankle, torn cartilage in his right shoulder, a stress reaction in his lower back. Then came Tuesday, when the knee just ripped apart while he went for a simple layup. He tore his anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament and lateral meniscus. It is a wonder the thing stayed on.

                              ...

                              The freak part was there was no contact to set off the injury. There was no awkward cut on the floor. There was no reason for it to happen. This, essentially, was what the 21-year-old's knee was destined to do. This is what his body was about.


                              http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns
                              This is the darkest timeline.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X