Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2...ckDraft-080609

    Chad Ford's Mock Draft, Version 4.0: Picks 1-30
    Ford

    By Chad Ford
    ESPN.com
    (Archive)

    Updated: June 9, 2008

    * Comment
    * Email
    * Print

    Now that we are one week into NBA workouts, loaded down with combine results and measurements and getting word of GMs becoming very active on the trade front, we're starting to get a slightly clearer picture of what a number of NBA teams are looking for with their pick(s).

    Minnesota brought in Brook Lopez on the first day. Indiana looked at point guards D.J. Augustin and Ty Lawson. The Knicks worked out four of the draft's best athletes.

    And the first top prospect to work out for the Miami Heat wasn't Michael Beasley or Derrick Rose … it was O.J. Mayo in Chicago on Saturday.

    As we move forward, one major deadline looms over the draft: Underclassmen have until June 16 to withdraw from the draft. Most of the top underclassmen have hired agents, meaning they're in the draft for good. But a few potential first-rounders, such as Arizona's Chase Budinger, KU's Mario Chalmers and North Carolina's Ty Lawson, are still on the fence.

    While there aren't a lot of major changes in this mock draft, it will likely need a serious adjustment or two on June 17.

    Until then, here's our best educated guess, after talking to numerous NBA team sources, about how the draft might play out in June.

    Remember, this mock draft isn't a report of what I think teams should do, but what they are likely to do. To see a ranking of players' talent, check out our Top 100.

    CHAD FORD'S MOCK DRAFT
    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Chicago


    Derrick Rose
    Position: PG
    Height: 6-3
    Weight: 205
    Age: 19
    School: Memphis

    The skinny:The big news out of Chicago is that the team still lacks a head coach. That drama has overshadowed the Bulls' quest to find the best player in the draft.

    While most (though not all) signals still point to Rose being the pick, the truth is we're not hearing much of anything out of Chicago right now. The Bulls need to settle on a coach after whiffing on two high-profile candidates.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Miami


    Michael Beasley
    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 235
    Age: 19
    School: Kansas State

    The skinny: The Heat continue to wait and hope that somehow Rose falls to them at No. 2. If the Bulls take Rose, there are growing signals out of Miami that the Heat will either trade the pick or select O.J. Mayo at No. 2. The Heat were in Chicago on Saturday for a private workout with Mayo and the results were very positive.

    If the Heat want Mayo, they have a tough choice. Minnesota and Seattle don't have any tradable assets the Heat want. That would leave Miami trying to cut a deal with Memphis and hoping that Mayo's still on the board at No. 5. It's a risk … but it might be worth it given what the Grizzlies could send back in return.

    I'm leaving Beasley here at No. 2 because the most likely scenario remains another team moving up to No. 2 to get him. But I really don't see Beasley wearing a Heat uniform.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Minnesota


    O.J. Mayo
    Position: SG
    Height: 6-4
    Weight: 195
    Age: 20
    School: USC

    The skinny: This is the most difficult team to peg right now.

    Brook Lopez was the first guy in to work out for the Wolves. The Wolves have a need at center, and Lopez would be a good fit. Size sells in the draft, and Lopez is the only big man who looks like he's worth a pick this high. However, he doesn't have the upside of many of the other players in the draft, and some scouts believe he's going to be a bust. Lopez shot the ball well in the workout and impressed the Wolves with his skill set. But his very average athleticism might give them pause. Al Jefferson isn't a great athlete either, and it might be tough for the Wolves to have both in the frontcourt.

    That could lead the Wolves to roll the dice on a more talented player, such as O.J. Mayo or Danilo Gallinari.

    Mayo would duplicate what they already have in the backcourt with Randy Foye and Rashad McCants. But he's better than both of those guys and would give the Wolves some star power alongside Jefferson. It's too early to tell whether his reluctance to work out for them will affect whether they take him or not.

    Gallinari is a better fit. The Wolves could use a good small forward. They tried Corey Brewer there last year, but he struggled. Gallinari and Brewer would complement each other well. Brewer is an excellent defender and Gallinari is an offensive genius.

    The Wolves appear to be high on all three, but I'm keeping Mayo here because he's the best of the group.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Seattle


    Jerryd Bayless
    Position: PG
    Height: 6-3
    Weight: 190
    Age: 19
    School: Arizona

    The skinny: The Sonics need backcourt help, and O.J. Mayo and Jerryd Bayless might be the two best options available at the position. Sources say the Sonics are leaning heavily toward Bayless, even if Mayo is on the board.

    Bayless is an excellent athlete who can really shoot. Of all the combo guards in the draft, he also has shown the most ability, so far, to run the point. Luke Ridnour and Earl Watson have not excelled at the position in Seattle. So of the first four picks in the draft, this one looks like the closest to a lock.

    With one caveat, that is: I spoke with a couple of teams that say the Sonics have called them and made the pick available.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Memphis


    Kevin Love
    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 275
    Age: 19
    School: UCLA

    The skinny: The Grizzlies need a big man, and three interesting names could be on the board here. They could go the safe route and take Brook Lopez, gamble a little more and take Kevin Love or make a major leap of faith and grab a player with tremendous upside in Anthony Randolph.

    If I were drafting for Memphis, I'd take Randolph, who has a great combination of size and athleticism. He's a proven rebounder at the college level who has a little bit of Chris Bosh in him. He needs to improve his perimeter game and his strength, and he's not completely NBA-ready, but his upside and fit both look good for Memphis.

    That said, the strong feeling I got from talking to sources close to the situation in Memphis is that Love is the favorite. His toughness, rebounding and ability to score in the paint are unquestioned -- and he would fit some major needs for the Grizzlies. There are still questions about his athleticism, but he's got talent.

    I also wouldn't be surprised to see the Grizzlies try to move up to nab Michael Beasley. They have some pieces that could interest Miami -- namely a gunner in Mike Miller and a point guard in Kyle Lowry.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    New York


    Anthony Randolph
    Position: PF
    Height: 6-11
    Weight: 220
    Age: 18
    School: LSU

    The skinny: The Knicks want a lead guard who can push the ball and hit an open jumper. Derrick Rose and O.J. Mayo are their top choices, but if they are off the board, New York will have a tough choice to make.

    I had Danilo Gallinari here in the first two versions of this mock draft, thanks to his Italian ties with Mike D'Antoni.

    However, a Suns source told me that D'Antoni wasn't a huge fan of Gallinari when he was shown some tape during the season, which has made me seriously reconsider that forecast.

    The Knicks could gamble on one of another pair of point guards. D.J. Augustin is a great leader, a fantastic playmaker and the closest thing to Steve Nash in this draft. That will be a plus for D'Antoni. Russell Westbrook is also intriguing. He's a top-notch athlete, a tenacious defender and an emerging playmaker.

    Westbrook has already worked out in New York, and I hear he was impressive. I had Augustin here in my previous mock draft, but after getting some feedback on his workouts, I think that could be too high.

    Given the Knicks' need for talent over position right now, I think they'll take the best player on the board: Randolph. He can play multiple positions on the floor and give the Knicks some much-needed size and length in the frontcourt.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    L.A. Clippers


    Eric Gordon
    Position: SG
    Height: 6-4
    Weight: 215
    Age: 19
    School: Indiana

    The skinny: The Clippers need a point guard, but given the makeup of their team, they're probably better off finding one via trade or free agency.

    With Corey Maggette likely hitting free agency, the Clippers will need a big-time scorer who can shoot and get to the rim. Eric Gordon appeared to be a top-three talent before a late-season slump. He looks like a bigger, better version of Ben Gordon.

    The Clippers will also have interest in Danilo Gallinari here. Clippers coach Mike Dunleavy has always loved point forwards, and Gallinari's basketball IQ is off the charts.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Milwaukee


    Danilo Gallinari
    Position: SF
    Height: 6-9
    Weight: 212
    Age: 19
    Country: Italy

    The skinny: It's tough to project the Bucks right now. New GM John Hammond is ready to make changes, but what kind? Their biggest need is at small forward, but this is probably too high for Donte Greene or Joe Alexander.

    That leaves Danilo Gallinari, a point forward who can handle the ball and hit the midrange jumper -- and has winner written all over him. He's not the most athletic guy in the draft, but his upside might be too much to pass up here.

    The other option is to go with Russell Westbrook. One thing Hammond wants to emphasize is defense, and Westbrook could be an excellent addition. He can play both guard positions and be a Leandro Barbosa-style scoring threat off the bench.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Charlotte


    Brook Lopez
    Position: C
    Height: 7-0
    Weight: 260
    Age: 20
    School: Stanford

    The skinny: Brook Lopez could go as high as No. 3 to the Timberwolves. He could get a look from the Grizzlies at No. 5 and the Knicks at No. 6, too. However, he also could slip.

    As I wrote from Orlando, a lot of teams are questioning Lopez's upside. Teams love size, but they don't see Lopez as a star NBA player.

    The Bobcats have been looking for a big man so they can slide Emeka Okafor over to the 4 full-time. Lopez would be a great complement to Okafor up front.

    The other options are DeAndre Jordan, if Larry Brown is willing to gamble, or Kevin Love, if he wants a proven college player who will "play the right way."

    The team could also take a point guard -- Russell Westbrook would be an excellent complement to Raymond Felton.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    New Jersey


    DeAndre Jordan
    Position: C
    Height: 7-0
    Weight: 255
    Age: 20
    School: Texas A&M

    The skinny: The Nets are looking to make major changes this summer, so it's tough to project exactly what they'll do. They are set in the backcourt with Devin Harris and Vince Carter. They're set at small forward with Richard Jefferson, though sources say he's on the trading block.

    What they need is a dominant low-post player. They've had some success with Sean Williams and Josh Boone, but neither has the upside or size of DeAndre Jordan. While he definitely is a work in progress, this is the same position where the Lakers netted Andrew Bynum a few years ago.

    Other options include Ohio State's Kosta Koufos, KU's Darrell Arthur and Florida's Marreese Speights.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Indiana


    Russell Westbrook
    Position: PG
    Height: 6-3
    Weight: 189
    Age: 19
    School: UCLA

    The skinny:The Pacers have been eyeing D.J. Augustin and Russell Westbrook for a while.

    Augustin has already come in for a workout, and Westbrook will be visiting soon. If the Pacers were forced to choose between the two, I actually think they'd probably lean toward Westbrook, who has more upside. His athleticism, defense and ability to penetrate would all be welcome in Indiana. If he were ever to get a rock-solid jump shot, he'd have a chance to be a star.

    The Pacers could also go other directions if they find a way to move Jermaine O'Neal for a veteran point guard such as T.J. Ford or Kirk Hinrich. If they land a good veteran point guard, someone like Darrell Arthur could be the choice.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Sacramento


    D.J. Augustin
    Position: PG
    Height: 6-0
    Weight: 180
    Age: 20
    School: Texas

    The skinny:If D.J. Augustin is still on the board here, the Kings will have to pull the trigger. Their only decent point guard is Beno Udrih, and he's an unrestricted free agent this summer. Augustin's shooting ability and floor leadership would be welcome in Sacramento. The team does still need a 4, but Augustin is too good to pass on here.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Portland


    Joe Alexander
    Position: SF
    Height: 6-8
    Weight: 220
    Age: 21
    School: West Virginia

    The skinny: Right now it seems unlikely the Blazers will actually keep this pick. They are loaded with young players and have a history of being very active on the trade market. GM Kevin Pritchard is already burning up the phone lines. I think he either packages some of his young players with this pick and moves up or he trades for a veteran.

    If the Blazers keep the pick, it might be Joe Alexander, who could be the sleeper of the draft. His combination of size, athleticism and shooting ability has GMs drooling. His basketball IQ is still questionable, but on a team like the Blazers, his versatility could become an immediate asset.

    Donte Greene is also a possibility here.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Golden State


    Darrell Arthur
    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 225
    Age: 20
    School: Kansas

    The skinny: The Warriors are at a crossroads. The team has a plethora of free agents this summer and a veteran point guard, Baron Davis, who wants a big extension. Will they sign everyone or is it time to start thinking about rebuilding?

    Either way, at this point, Darrell Arthur should be an excellent pick. Arthur might not have done as well as hoped with his measurements and combine scores, but his ability to score in a variety of ways makes him a great pick at this point in the draft.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Phoenix
    (via Atlanta)


    Brandon Rush
    Position: SG
    Height: 6-7
    Weight: 205
    Age: 22
    School: Kansas

    The skinny: The Suns have a long history of trading or selling their first-round picks, and given their current situation, it wouldn't shock me if they do so again. The Suns want to win now and have been willing to mortgage the future to do it.

    If they keep the pick … Donte Greene and JaVale McGee might have more upside, but the Suns are in it to win it, and Brandon Rush should be able to step in and immediately play. His combination of shooting, athleticism, defense and basketball IQ, along with a newly minted championship pedigree, will make him tough to pass up.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Philadelphia


    Marreese Speights
    Position: C
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 245
    Age: 19
    School: Florida

    The skinny: The Sixers are still looking for a low-post banger. If they can't get Elton Brand this summer, they'll have to seriously consider Marreese Speights. He does a lot of the same things that Brand does, he just doesn't have the conditioning or motivation.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Toronto


    Donte Greene
    Position: SF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 225
    Age: 20
    School: Syracuse

    The skinny: Donte Greene has great upside as a combo forward who can do a little of everything. He's just a little raw. However, his ability to shoot and run the floor make this a home run of a pick this low in the draft. Robin Lopez is another real possibility here.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Washington


    JaVale McGee
    Position: PF
    Height: 7-0
    Weight: 237
    Age: 20
    School: Nevada

    The skinny: JaVale McGee is another wild card. Long, athletic and skilled, he has huge upside and can fly up and down the court. But his thin frame and lack of position mean he might be a few years away from contributing a lot.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Cleveland


    Kosta Koufos
    Position: C
    Height: 7-0
    Weight: 265
    Age: 19
    School: Ohio State

    The skinny: If Kosta Koufos slips this far, it will be tough for the Cavs to pass on him. He's a very skilled big man who gets up and down the floor really well.

    Some scouts compare him to a young Zydrunas Ilgauskas. He needs to get stronger, but he's got great upside for a pick this low in the draft.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Denver


    Robin Lopez
    Position: C
    Height: 7-0
    Weight: 245
    Age: 20
    School: Stanford

    The skinny: Marcus Camby is getting up there in age and he might be on the trading block this summer. Robin Lopez's combination of hustle, toughness, shot-blocking, rebounding and size have drawn comparisons to Anderson Varejao. He should be a good fit in the Nuggets' up-tempo offense.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    New Jersey
    (via Dallas)


    Chase Budinger
    Position: SG
    Height: 6-7
    Weight: 205
    Age: 20
    School: Arizona

    The skinny: Chase Budinger could easily be a late-lottery pick, but he could also slip. Teams love his size and shooting ability but worry a bit about his lack of aggressiveness and defense. At this point in the draft, the Nets will be glad to take the risk.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Orlando


    Mario Chalmers
    Position: PG
    Height: 6-2
    Weight: 170
    Age: 22
    School: Kansas

    The skinny: With Carlos Arroyo and Keyon Dooling both hitting the free-agent market this summer, the Magic could hedge their bets with Mario Chalmers -- a sweet-shooting, hard-defending floor leader who can play both the 1 and 2.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Utah


    Roy Hibbert
    Position: C
    Height: 7-2
    Weight: 275
    Age: 21
    School: Georgetown

    The skinny: It didn't come as a huge surprise when Roy Hibbert was among the first players to work out in Utah. The Jazz need size, and Hibbert needs a team that excels in the half-court set. Hibbert would be a great fit in Utah.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Seattle
    (via Phoenix)


    Serge Ibaka
    Position: PF
    Height: 6-10
    Weight: 220
    Age: 18
    Country: Congo

    The skinny: Expect Sonics GM Sam Presti to use a trick or two from his days in San Antonio and look internationally with his second pick. Serge Ibaka has the talent to be a potential lottery pick someday, but he's still very raw. The Sonics can leave him over in Spain and reap the benefits down the road.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Houston


    Nicolas Batum
    Position: SF
    Height: 6-8
    Weight: 210
    Age: 19
    Country: France

    The skinny: The Rockets will have a hard time passing on Nicolas Batum, an athletic swingman who can do just about everything. He lacks experience, but at this point in the draft, you take the best talent available.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    San Antonio


    Ty Lawson
    Position: PG
    Height: 5-11
    Weight: 195
    Age: 20
    School: UNC

    The skinny: Tony Parker is the man, but the Spurs have needed a solid backup for a while. Ty Lawson is a super-quick point guard who's going to have to learn how to play more than one speed for Gregg Popovich. However, he plays tough defense and limits turnovers and should be a great fit on the Spurs.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    New Orleans


    Chris Douglas-Roberts
    Position: SG
    Height: 6-6
    Weight: 195
    Age: 21
    School: Memphis

    The skinny: Chris Douglas-Roberts would be a great fit for the Hornets if he's still on the board. He is a big-time scorer who excels at slashing to the basket. He also is an excellent midrange shooter and should be able to step in and contribute right away.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Memphis


    J.J. Hickson
    Position: PF
    Height: 6-9
    Weight: 240
    Age: 19
    School: NC State

    The skinny: The Grizzlies need a power forward with some power, and J.J. Hickson, the freshman from North Carolina State, has great toughness and scoring ability inside the paint. If Hickson had stayed in school for another year, he would've been a potential lottery pick. He's a steal here.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Detroit


    Bill Walker
    Position: SF
    Height: 6-6
    Weight: 235
    Age: 20
    School: Kansas State

    The skinny: Joe Dumars has a history of taking talented players disregarded by other teams and turning them into stars. Bill Walker looks like a great fit on a team trying to get younger and more explosive.

    PICK

    TEAM

    PLAYER

    VITALS


    Boston


    Alexis Ajinca
    Position: C
    Height: 7-1
    Weight: 240
    Age: 20
    Country: France

    The skinny: French big man Alexis Ajinca isn't quite ready, but his size, length and athleticism are tough to ignore at this point in the draft. After a year or two in Europe or the D-League, the Celtics could have a sleeper.

  • #2
    Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

    That makes a lot more sense than when he had us taking Augustin.

    Still hoping for Mayo myself. We'll see - he COULD be there.
    The poster formerly known as Rimfire

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

      1. Chicago - Derrick Rose
      2. Miami - Michael Beasley
      3. Minnesota - O.J. Mayo
      4. Seattle - Jerryd Bayless
      5. Memphis - Kevin Love
      6. New York - Anthony Randolph
      7. LA Clippers - Eric Gordon
      8. Milwaukee - Danilo Gallinari
      9. Charlotte - Brook Lopez
      10. New Jersey - DeAndre Jordan
      11. Indiana - Russell Westbrook
      12. Sacramento - D.J. Augustin
      13. Portland - Joe Alexander
      14. Golden State - Darrell Arthur
      15. Phoenix - Brandon Rush
      16. Philadelphia - Mareese Speights
      17. Toronto - Greene
      18. Washington - McGee
      19. Cleveland - Kofous
      20. Denver - Lopez
      21. New Jersey - Budinger
      22. Orlando - Chalmers
      23. Utah - Hibbert
      24. Seattle - Ibaka
      25. Houston - Batum
      26. San Antonio - Lawson
      27. New Orleans - CDR
      28. Memphis - Hickson
      29. Detroit - Walker
      30. Boston - Ajinca

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

        The Pacers could also go other directions if they find a way to move Jermaine O'Neal for a veteran point guard such as T.J. Ford or Kirk Hinrich. If they land a good veteran point guard, someone like Darrell Arthur could be the choice.
        Holy crap I just said this in the prospects thread. I swear I hadn't read this (was it even posted yet?).

        A) move Dun for Jack and 13th pick, get Rush and draft Arthur. PG, SG, PF and you haven't even moved JO yet

        B) move JO for Hinrich/various, draft Arthur

        Stuff like Dun/Ike for Lafrentz/pick works, as does Dun/Tins for Lafrentz/Jack/pick. Sorry to go trade options outside that area, just making the point that they definitely have realistic ways to move back into the draft and adjust the roster a fair amount. Obviously there are plenty of JO deals (including to POR) that could also be thrown out with this to really shake things up.

        I just use Dun as a guy a young team could use and would be willing to spend a large expiring + mid pick to get.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

          Too many mocks have us taking Augustin or Westbrook. Has to be a smokescreen.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

            Originally posted by Shade View Post
            Too many mocks have us taking Augustin or Westbrook. Has to be a smokescreen.
            Everyone in the world, including Augustin, will be utterly convinced we're gonna draft him. Then we'll take Rush, just to make up for what happened to his brother.

            (Of course, you could certainly make the argument that we made it up to him by bringing him back from his Euro exile.)
            Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

              Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
              Holy crap I just said this in the prospects thread. I swear I hadn't read this (was it even posted yet?).

              A) move Dun for Jack and 13th pick, get Rush and draft Arthur. PG, SG, PF and you haven't even moved JO yet

              B) move JO for Hinrich/various, draft Arthur

              Stuff like Dun/Ike for Lafrentz/pick works, as does Dun/Tins for Lafrentz/Jack/pick. Sorry to go trade options outside that area, just making the point that they definitely have realistic ways to move back into the draft and adjust the roster a fair amount. Obviously there are plenty of JO deals (including to POR) that could also be thrown out with this to really shake things up.

              I just use Dun as a guy a young team could use and would be willing to spend a large expiring + mid pick to get.
              #A isn't a bad deal on paper, but I'm not sure Jarrett Jack is a long term answer at the PG spot. I'd really like to see the Pacers use the 11th pick to get that done. Portland has a higher cap hit than the Pacers do, so matching salaries is a must.

              You'd almost have to take Darius Miles in that deal instead of Jack, which would make it Dunleavy for the 13th pick. I'd be OK with that. I'd rather see the Pacers have Granger at SF, going another direction for a SG who can really defend it. Not that one is an option where the Pacers would draft.

              As for #B, you're looking at Hinrich for JO. It doesn't work as is. JO's '09 salary is $21M to Hinrich's $10M. They would almost have to include Drew Gooden $7M and another player, such as a throw in like Cedric Simmons, who is around $1.7M. That's a lot for them put into a deal just to make it work, especially when Gooden possesses an expired contract.

              If they were to do it for something like that, which I doubt, I could see them thinking JO's deal will be off the books the year after Gooden's, whereas Hinrich is signed through '12. The Pacers would have to throw them a bone, such as maybe their #2 picks for this year and next, assuming the Bulls value such a trade.

              Two years of JO with Deng, Noah, Derrick Rose, and Ben Gordon might be worth it to them, since Rose would benefit greatly from having a post presence on offense.


              The Pacers would be:

              SF - Danny Granger
              PF - Drew Gooden
              C - Jeff Foster
              SG -
              PG - Kurt Hinrich

              They could use #11 and #13 judiciously to fill needs. I kind of like Chase Buddinger at #13. Though his defense is seen as needing improvement, it can't be any worse than Dunleavy's.

              At #11, not sure now. If they felt Marreese Speights could be a low post presence on both ends, he could be a nice sleeper at #11. I like the idea of Darrell Arthur too. Both guys put up good numbers playing about 60% of each game. I kind of like the potential and size of DeAndre Jordan.

              Truly if you go the best available player, I'd go Joe Alexander at #11 and Chase Buddinger at #13. You get a player in Alexander who is skilled as a SF but the same size as Arthur. The Pacers still go with playing two SF's at the wings, using Granger and either Buddinger, Alexander or Shawne Williams at the other wing spot, and they would skilled, very skilled athletes on the floor almost all the time.
              Courtside: Featuring Indiana boys' high school basketball

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

                No offense, but that team would be beyond horrible.

                I'm talking 15 wins horrible.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

                  Originally posted by Shade View Post
                  No offense, but that team would be beyond horrible.

                  I'm talking 15 wins horrible.
                  15 wins? 30 wins, maybe, but 15?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

                    Originally posted by dcpacersfan View Post
                    15 wins? 30 wins, maybe, but 15?
                    There's no chance a starting line-up of Foster/Gooden/Granger/Hinrich/rookie SG selected at 11/13 is going to win 30 games.

                    That would probably be the worst team in the league.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

                      Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                      Holy crap I just said this in the prospects thread. I swear I hadn't read this (was it even posted yet?).

                      A) move Dun for Jack and 13th pick, get Rush and draft Arthur. PG, SG, PF and you haven't even moved JO yet
                      it's well known that portland is targeting the summer of '09 for making a big free agent signing - think max offer to the likes of chris paul and deron williams. and if they're bent on getting an sf, '09 also happens to be danny's restricted year...

                      in any case, portland won't take on deals that endanger their '09 or '10 cap space. the only way they take dunleavy is if they're sending back pryzbilla as filler, not lafrentz. darius miles might be out too since portland is reportedly trying to get him to retire due to injury.

                      so, dunleavy for jack, #13, and pryz? still good value for us, i think.

                      edit: this should probably go into the trade forum
                      Last edited by wintermute; 06-10-2008, 09:48 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

                        "I actually think they'd probably lean toward Westbrook, who has more upside. His athleticism, defense and ability to penetrate would all be welcome in Indiana. If he were ever to get a rock-solid jump shot, he'd have a chance to be a star."

                        Oh Gawd. I don't want to hear IFs especially about a guard without a jump shot. And I don't want to hear about a "Star". Heard that enough with a guy whose initials were JB. I would rather take a rock solid player who doesn't have to be a star.
                        The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

                          Originally posted by ABADays View Post
                          Oh Gawd. I don't want to hear IFs especially about a guard without a jump shot.

                          god is probably not a pacers fan.
                          "Sometimes, when you look Andy in the eyes, you get a feeling somebody else is driving." -- David Letterman

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

                            Now now, Kaufy, isn't our coach JOB?


                            [~]) ... Cheers! Go Pacers!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Chad Ford Mock Draft 4.0

                              Originally posted by Kaufman View Post
                              god is probably not a pacers fan.
                              I was talking about Seymour Gawd - thus the spelling.
                              The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X