Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2008 NBA Draft Contest winner is Avoidingtheclowns

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2008 NBA Draft Contest winner is Avoidingtheclowns

    SEE POST 51 FOR THE RESULTS

    The NBA draft is June 26 and will be televised from 7:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. on ESPN, eastern time.

    GUESS THE DRAFT CONTEST

    RULES
    1] This contest will only cover the 14 picks in the lottery.

    2] Your picks have to be made by 7:00 eastern time on June 26. You may edit your picks as many time as you like as long as your last edit is by the 7:00 p.m. deadline.

    3] There are a total of 31 points available. You get one point for each player you have in the correct position. This means if you pick someone going 5th in the draft he has to be picked 5th. What team picks him doesn't matter.

    You get one point for each player you have in your draft, that gets picked, regardless of position. (That means if you pick Eric Gordon going at pick 6 and he's picked at 7 you get a point regardless of which team picked him. If you have 14 players all in the wrong position you would still get 14 points.)

    You get three bonus points for getting the Pacers pick correct. (Edit; You only get the bonus for getting the Pacers pick in the lottery correct, not at 17. If they should acquire another pick in the lottery I'll count that.)

    4]The first tie breaker is getting the Pacers pick correct.
    The second tie breaker is the most correct picks.
    The third tie breaker is the earliest correct pick, then second earliest correct pick, third earliest correct pick, etc. (This means if you pick the first three picks correctly and then you miss number four, and the other person picks the first four correctly, they win.)

    -------------------------------------

    Player Profiles http://www.collegehoopsnet.com/Draft/2008/

    Draft Order and Team Needs
    [1] Chicago ............Low-post scorer, Backcourt depth
    [2] Miami ...............Outside Shooters, Big Man, Bench Dept
    [3] Minnesota .........Center, Perimeter Scoring
    [4] Seattle ...............Point Guard, Veteran Leadership
    [5] Memphis ...........Frontcourt depth, Backup swingman
    [6] New York ..........Point Guard, Leadership, Interior Defense
    [7] LA Clippers .......Point Guard, Scoring, Athleticism
    [8] Milwaukee .........Small forward, Chemistry
    [9] Charlotte ............Interior Scoring Presence, Bench Depth
    [10] New Jersey .......Interior Toughness, Interior Scoring. Perimeter Shooting
    [11] Indiana ..............Point guard, Frontcourt depth
    [12] Sacramento .......Point guard, Post scoring, Defensive-minded players
    [13] Portland ............Bench Depth, Veteran Leadership
    [14] Golden State .....Rebounding, Defensive toughness, Three-point shooting



    Fill in
    [1] Chicago ............
    [2] Miami ................
    [3] Minnesota .........
    [4] Seattle ...............
    [5] Memphis ...........
    [6] New York ...........
    [7] LA Clippers .......
    [8] Milwaukee .........
    [9] Charlotte ............
    [10] New Jersey .....
    [11] Indiana .............
    [12] Sacramento .....
    [13] Portland ...........
    [14] Golden State ...
    Last edited by Will Galen; 06-27-2008, 12:34 AM.

  • #2
    Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

    [1] Chicago .................Rose

    [2] Miami ....................Beasley
    I think Miami will take Beasley and then trade with Minnesota which assures them of getting Mayo. They will get another player and doing it this way means Mayo won't cost as much if they drafted him themselves.

    [3] Minnesota ..............Mayo

    [4] Seattle .................B. Lopez

    [5] Memphis ................Gordon

    [6] New York ...............Gallinari

    [7] LA Clippers .............Westbrook

    [8] Milwaukee ..............Alexander

    [9] Charlotte ................Love

    [10] New Jersey ...........R.Lopez

    [11] Indiana ................Bayless

    [12] Sacramento ..........Augustin

    [13] Portland ...............Rush
    I think the surest thing in this draft is this pick will be traded, so anybody could go here.

    [14] Golden State ........Ajinka



    17]
    Pacers .................Hibbert
    Last edited by Will Galen; 06-26-2008, 11:55 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

      1) Beasley

      2) Rose

      3) Bayless

      4) Mayo

      5) Randolf

      6) Love

      7) Westbrook

      8) Gordon

      9) B. Lopez

      10) D Jordan

      11) Augustin

      12) Galanari

      13) Budinger

      14) McGee
      Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

        1. Rose
        2. Beasley
        3. Mayo
        4. Bayless
        5. Love
        6. B. Lopez
        7. Westbrook
        8. Alexander
        9. Kofous
        10. Gallinari
        11. Speights
        12. Augustin
        13. Gordon
        14. Randolph
        Last edited by MyFavMartin; 06-19-2008, 03:07 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

          1. rose
          2. beasley
          3. mayo
          4. bayless
          5. lopez
          6. randolph
          7. Gordon
          8. Gallinari
          9. Jordan
          10. Love
          11. Arthur
          12. Westbrook
          13. Alexander
          14. Speights

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

            Cool initiative, Will . I'll join in.

            [1] Chicago ............ Rose.
            Though Beasley makes good sense for them aswell, but I'm guessing they will go with the hometown player along with Rose playing at a more difficult position to fill in.

            [2] Miami ................ Beasley. Great talent, maybe will get traded by Miami, maybe he won't, but he won't go below two whatever happens. I don't buy Mayo going above Beasley for a single second.

            [3] Minnesota ......... Mayo. Sure they allready are well-filled there, but he's the best player on the board and has a huge ceiling on top of the huge quality he obviously allready had. Love is IMO definitely a smoke-screen. I don't see Minnesota ending up with Love unless if they make a trade down with another team a little lower. Maybe a team that likes Mayo a lot and could pick Love for Minnesota. Even if not then still Mayo is a major addition even if they have the position well-covered. And they could still make moves at SG in the summer.

            [4] Seattle ............... Bayless. Could go third to Minnesota, but somehow... I dunno. Seattle seems like a good fit. I think they will keep one of either Watson and Ridnour, while shopping the other. Just not buying the talk of Seattle maybe going for Lopez at all.

            [5] Memphis ........... Lopez. Sure, he might not go top-3, but I see more then enough teams that might have a LOT of interest in this guy playing at a tough position to fill. I think Memphis has been looking for a decent center for years and years now and the need on their frontcourt for a quality player has only increased with Gasol getting traded away for scraps. They might go for Love, but for now I choose to believe that is a smoke-screen and they will go for the legit 7-footer.

            [6] New York ........... Gordon. Sort of a surprise maybe to see him picked by New York, but we have first experience in Indiana with names ending up on our team we hadn't really seriously considered before and turning out solid to spectacular. Now the guy most responsible for that here is in New York. I'm hearing too much Westbrook and Gallinari to think it will be them who will be picked by Donnie. Gordon has huge offensive potential, is still very young, so can be molded, has a good character and easily has NBA 3pt range. My earlier pick, Randolph seems to be sliding on every single draft mock I have seen the past two weeks, indicating his workouts aren't going too well and there are some questions regarding his motivation to persevere. That all combined would probably make him too much of a risk for the Knicks at such a high position.

            [7] LA Clippers ....... Russell Westbrook a talent with big upside at the spot they need reeinforced most. Picking Gordon or Gallinari (whom I had here before) would definitely help them aswell, especially if Maggette does bolt, but at PG they are atrocious at the moment and Westbrook also adds another perimeter defender next to Ross. Is a local player from UCLA.

            [8] Milwaukee ......... Alexander. Rapidly emerged in the second half of the college season and has had good workouts. Had Gordon here before, but EVERY site with a mock draft has the last two weeks pencilled Alexander in here and kept him there. I'm trusting on them to be right this time ().

            [9] Charlotte ............ Love. I had Augustin pencilled in here before, but then I remembered they have Larry friggin Brown over there now and Larry friggin Brown doesn't LIKE rookie PG's! And considering that Love had good workouts and the Bobcats have to be massively dissappointed in Sean May and want to get Okafor some help upfront makes them picking Love (or Lopez depending which one is still there) and more logical choice, while they help the (back up) PG spot through free agency, preferably an experienced veteran Brown can work with. Then there's the thing that the Bobcats seem to have a serious hard-on for college heroes and Love (aswell as Lopez) fit that bill perfectly.

            [10] New Jersey ..... Gallinari. Probably the best talent left and has good upside, has shown leadership with his pro-team in Italy as a youngster this season and makes dealing Jefferson "easier" for them should it come to that.

            [11] Indiana ............. Speights. I think everyone is focusing on a PG, but I don't think there's that many Guards the Pacers would be interested in and atleast one of two that they might want will be gone. I hope Augustin will be the one picked, because I think us not beying ABLE to pick him would be a good thing (). Westbrook is the other obvious candidate that we could make a go at. I'm betting on Speights though (with some convincing from some around here I freely admit ), while I think they will go with a player more ready to contribute straight away at #17 (Chalmers, Rush, Arthur).

            [12] Sacramento ..... Augustin. They need a PG. BADLY since Bibby left. He, like Bibby, has range and likes to play uptempo and is a decent disher aswell. Works I would say.

            [13] Portland ........... Randolph. Dunno why really, but I don't see him falling much further then this. Maybe they will pick him for someone else who couldn't get him otherwise.

            [14] Golden State ... Arthur. A reasonably ready PF with good offensive motions and pretty mobile. Sounds like someone Nellie would like to add to his frontcourt, especially with him not as enthousiastic about Harrington. This would make Harrington (over time) more expendable.

            Regards,

            Mourning
            Last edited by Mourning; 06-26-2008, 03:04 AM. Reason: changing picks
            2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

            2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

            2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

              1. Derrick Rose, PG, Memphis
              • Simply the best player in this draft.

              2. Michael Beasley, PF, Kansas State
              • Simply the most productive in this draft.

              3. OJ Mayo, SG, USC
              • Honestly, I would draft him over Beasley. He seems more likely to be a championship player.

              4. Jerryd Bayless, PG, Arizona
              • Don't believe the hype. How does a team go from loving this guy to loving Russell Westbrook instead? I don't get it. Bayless is better.

              5. Kevin Love, PF, UCLA
              • Love's ready for this spot. So am I.

              6. Eric Gordon, SG, Indiana
              • Sorry Knicks fans.

              7. Russell Westbrook, PG, UCLA
              • I hate this thing.

              8. Joe Alexander, SF, West Virginia
              • A match made in Milwaukee.

              9. Danilo Gallinari, SF, Italy
              • First of many Larry Brown love-'em, leave-'em guys in Charlotte.

              10. DJ Augustin, PG, Texas
              • Guessing at a swoop in from Portland. Just guessing

              11. Brook Lopez, C, Stanford
              • Hey, he's big.

              12. Anthony Randolph, SF, LSU
              • The Kings suck. Just being honest.

              13. Brandon Rush, SG, Kansas
              • One of my favorite players in the draft. Since this slot is likely to be traded, I'll take Rush. I'd love the Pacers to find a way.

              14. Donte Green, SF, Syracuse
              • Slotted on talent and athleticism.


              Others I considered late but didn't care enough to try to fit them in or that I skipped altogether because I didn't like their last name or school: Kosta Koufus, C, Ohio State
              Last edited by Kraft; 06-26-2008, 01:19 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

                bump!
                2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

                  I might change/shuffle my picks the coming weeks a little too, so you are not alone in that, Jose.

                  I'm just interested in seeying other peoples opinions, picks and reasonings for them .

                  Regards,

                  Mourning
                  Last edited by Mourning; 06-14-2008, 10:09 AM.
                  2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                  2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                  2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

                    Fill in
                    [1] Chicago ............ Derrick Rose
                    [2] Miami ................ Michael Beasley (trade?)
                    [3] Minnesota ......... Oj Mayo
                    [4] Seattle ............... Jerred Bayless
                    [5] Memphis ........... Kevin Love
                    [6] New York ........... Eric Gordon
                    [7] LA Clippers ....... Russell Westbrook
                    [8] Milwaukee ......... Joe Alexander
                    [9] Charlotte ............ Brook Lopez
                    [10] New Jersey ..... Danillo Gallinari
                    [11] Indiana ............. Kosta Koufos
                    [12] Sacramento ..... Anthony Randolph
                    [13] Portland ........... Dj Augustin
                    [14] Golden State ... Darrel Arthur
                    Last edited by pwee31; 06-26-2008, 01:15 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

                      Making a new one of these, but leaving the old one up for reference.
                      6-26-2008

                      [1] Chicago - Michael Beasley
                      [2] Miami - Derrick Rose
                      [3] Minnesota - OJ Mayo
                      [4] Seattle - Eric Gordon
                      [5] Memphis - Kevin Love
                      [6] New York - Jerrod Bayless
                      [7] LA Clippers - Brook Lopez
                      [8] Milwaukee - Russell Westbrook
                      [9] Charlotte - Joe Alexander
                      [10] New Jersey - Danillo Gallinari
                      [11] Indiana - DJ Augustin
                      [12] Sacramento - Anthony Randolph
                      [13] Portland - Roy Hibbert
                      [14] Golden State - Kosta Koufos


                      -------------------------------------
                      6-17-2008
                      [1] Chicago - Michael Beasley
                      [2] Miami - Derrick Rose
                      [3] Minnesota - OJ Mayo
                      [4] Seattle - Jerrod Bayless
                      [5] Memphis - Brook Lopez
                      [6] New York - Russell Westbrook
                      [7] LA Clippers - Eric Gordon
                      [8] Milwaukee - Danillo Gallinari
                      [9] Charlotte - Kevin Love
                      [10] New Jersey - Anthony Randolph
                      [11] Indiana - DJ Augustin
                      [12] Sacramento - Roy Hibbert
                      [13] Portland - Joe Alexander
                      [14] Golden State - Kosta Koufos
                      Last edited by maragin; 06-26-2008, 03:55 PM. Reason: Crazy Draft Day Trades

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

                        [1] Chicago - Derrick Rose
                        [2] Miami - Michael Beasley
                        [3] Minnesota - OJ Mayo
                        [4] Seattle - Jerryd Bayless
                        [5] Memphis - Kevin Love
                        [6] New York - Eric Gordon
                        [7] LA Clippers - DJ Augustin
                        [8] Milwaukee - Joe Alexander
                        [9] Charlotte - Russell Westbrook
                        [10] New Jersey - Danilo Gallanari
                        [11] Indiana - Brook Lopez
                        [12] Sacramento - Darrell Arthur
                        [13] Portland - Brandon Rush
                        [14] Golden State - Anthony Randolph
                        Last edited by Mr. Sobchak; 06-21-2008, 12:03 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

                          [1] Chicago - Derrick Rose
                          [2] Miami - Michael Beasley
                          [3] Minnesota - OJ Mayo
                          [4] Seattle - Brook Lopez
                          [5] Memphis - Kevin Love
                          [6] New York - Jerryd Bayless
                          [7] LA Clippers - Russel Westbrook
                          [8] Milwaukee - Joe Alexander
                          [9] Charlotte - DJ Augustin
                          [10] New Jersey - Danilo Gallerini
                          [11] Indiana - Eric Gordon
                          [12] Sacramento - Darrel Arthur
                          [13] Portland - Brandon Rush
                          [14] Golden State - Kosta Koufos

                          .
                          .
                          .
                          .

                          [17] Roy Hibbert

                          Alright. There is the final edit. Somewhat wishful thinking that we get Gordon at 11, but if Seattle really takes Lopez like some are saying, it changes things a bit.
                          Last edited by Infinite MAN_force; 06-26-2008, 02:41 AM.
                          "As a bearded man, i was very disappointed in Love. I am gathering other bearded men to discuss the status of Kevin Love's beard. I am motioning that it must be shaved."

                          - ilive4sports

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

                            [1] Chicago - Derrick Rose
                            [2] Miami - Michael Beasley
                            [3] Minnesota - OJ Mayo
                            [4] Seattle - Jerryd Bayless
                            [5] Memphis - Kevin Love
                            [6] New York - Russell Westbrook
                            [7] LA Clippers - Eric Gordon
                            [8] Milwaukee - Joe Alexander
                            [9] Charlotte - Brook Lopez
                            [10] New Jersey - Mareese Speights
                            [11] Indiana - DJ Augustin
                            [12] Sacramento - Darrel Arthur
                            [13] Portland - Danilo Gallinari
                            [14] Golden State - Anthony Randolph





                            [15] Phoenix- Kosta Koufus
                            [16] Philadelphia- Roy Hibbert
                            [17] Toronto- DeAndre Jordan
                            [18] Washington- Donte Green
                            [19] Cleveland- Mario Chalmers
                            [20] Denver- Nicolas Batum
                            [21] New Jersey- Brandon Rush
                            [22] Orlando- Chris Douglas-Roberts
                            [23] Utah- Robin Lopez
                            [24] Seattle- Joey Dorsey
                            [26] San Antonio- Alexis Ajinca
                            [27] New Orleans- JaVale McGee
                            [28] Memphis- Jason Thompson
                            [29] Detroit- JJ Hickson
                            [30] Boston- Nathan Jawai
                            Last edited by Isaac; 06-23-2008, 01:58 AM. Reason: Realized the contest was only lottery

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 2008 NBA Draft Contest

                              [1] Chicago - Derrick Rose
                              [2] Miami - Michael Beasley
                              [3] Minnesota - Kevin Love
                              [4] Seattle - OJ Mayo
                              [5] Memphis - Brook Lopez
                              [6] New York - Jerryd Bayless
                              [7] LA Clippers - Russell Westbrook
                              [8] Milwaukee - Joe Alexander
                              [9] Charlotte - DJ Augustin
                              [10] New Jersey - Danilo Gallinari
                              [11] Indiana - Eric Gordon
                              [12] Sacramento - Anthony Randolph
                              [13] Portland - Brandon Rush
                              [14] Golden State - Darrell Arthur
                              Last edited by TRich; 06-25-2008, 08:38 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X