Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

An early look at the AFC South

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • An early look at the AFC South

    http://www.football.com/nflheadlines...afc_south.html
    An early look at the AFC South

    J J Pesavento May 25,2008
    Print E-mail Del.icio.us Digg

    An early look at the AFC South
    Are the Indianapolis Colts still the cream of the crop in the AFC South? Or is this the year the Jacksonville Jaguars finally overcome their division rivals? The Tennessee Titans improved last season but can they take the next step? And what does the 2008 season hold in store for the Houston Texans? J J Pesavento takes an early look at the AFC South and gives his opinion on how the teams stack up thus far.

    INDIANAPOLIS COLTS

    The Colts, despite predictions of gloom and doom from some experts, continue to win. And last season, they did so without two key performers. Defensive end Dwight Freeney and wide receiver Marvin Harrison both missed a good portion of the 2007 campaign due to injuries. Freeney played in nine contests while Harrison saw action in only five. But the Colts still won 13 games to take the division crown. Both players look to be on the way back to full health, which only makes the Colts a bigger problem for their division rivals. The one question mark will be how a shooting incident outside a bar owned by Harrison pans out. Harrison has talked to authorities but is not considered a prime suspect.

    With basically all the key players returning on offense, there is no reason to believe the Colts will not have the best offense in the NFL. Peyton Manning is a machine. Running back Joeseph Addai is a solid performer and now he has veteran Dominc Rhodes to back him up. Indianapolis also drafted Mike Hart out of Michigan. With Dallas Clark, Reggie Wayne and Harrison, the Colts have more weapons in the passing game than any quarterback could ask for. The Colts also have Anthony Gonzalez, who should be more of a factor in 2008 if he progresses. Tight end Ben Utecht has departed, but the Colts added Jacob Tamme in the draft. The offensive line will be without Jake Scott and Dylan Gandy, but it should still be solid. The Colts have suffered decimating injuries across the line at times in the past and have still managed to plug in the right combination and protect Peyton Manning. Don't look for that to change. And they added depth in the recent draft by taking three offensive lineman; Mike Pollak, Steven Justice and Jamey Richard.

    With an offense led by Manning, the defense doesn't get a great deal of attention. But the Colts accomplished more than many think they did a year ago. Despite being without Freeney, as well as linebacker Rob Morris for much of the season, they allowed fewer points (262) than any other team in the NFL. Considering the fact that, more often than not, the only way to beat the Colts is to outscore them, that speaks volumes. With a healthy Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis at the ends, the Colts are in good shape. They also picked up Marcus Howard in the draft. Raheem Brock is their best player inside, but they need a little more from Ed Johnson, Quinn Pitcock or someone. Linebacker Rocky Boiman is gone and the Colts added Phil Wheeler in the draft for more depth. Gary Brackett returns in the middle with Tyjuan Hagler and Freddie Keiaho on the outside. The Colts appear set in the secondary with Marlin Jackson and Kelvin Hayden at the corners and Antoine Bethea and NFL Defensive MVP Bob Sanders at the safeties. The one concern here may be quality depth if the injury bug hits.
    In my opinion, the Colts are still the best team in the AFC South and the 2007 season only supported my opinion. To run off a six game winning streak down the stretch without the services of Harrison and Freeney showed how good they truly are. Until someone else knocks them off, they will remain atop the South.

    JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS

    According to a whole lot of people, this is the year the Jaguars finally take over the top slot in the division. If that truly is the case, then the Jags have to be more consistent week in and week out. In four of their five regular season losses a year ago, the defense failed them miserably. In those four losses opponents scored 140 points. That is not how a team knocks off the likes of the Colts or Patriots. So that is where we will begin.

    Defensive tackle Marcus Stroud, defensive ends Bobby McCray and Shantae Orr and safeties Lamont Thompon and Sammy Knight are all gone. The Jags re-signed defensive tackle Rob Meier to a long term deal and added cornerback Drayton Florence and safety Pierson Prioleau. To reload up front, the Jags paid a large price to draft defensive end Derrick Harvey out of Florida in the first round. And then they drafted Quentin Groves from Auburn in the second round. With Henderson and Meier in the middle, the Jags should be okay. And Paul Spicer had a respectable 2007 campaign. But the Jaguars felt, and for good reason, that they needed more help in terms of rushing the quarterback. Enter Harvey and Groves. If Spicer and Reggie Hayward do not get the desired results, one of the rookies may see action sooner rather than later. Mike Peterson is flanked by Clint Ingram and Daryl Smith at linebacker. Thomas Williams from USC was added through the draft. Rashean Mathis will be back at corner, but who plays opposite him will be the question. Drayton Florence has the experience and the Jags also have Trae Williams, a late round draft pick as an option. Reggie Williams and Brian Williams will return at the safeties.

    On the offensive side of the ball, veteran Fred Taylor and Maurice Jones-Drew power the running game for Jacksonville. The two combined for over 1,900 yards on the ground a year ago. Jones-Drew also makes an impact in the return game. And with Taylor in the latter stages of his career, the Jags added USC running back Chauncey Washington as insurance on draft day. Quarterback David Garrard will likely not win any passing titles, but in the Jacksonville offense, he is not expected to carry the offense. He may not throw a lot of touchdown passes, but he also won't throw a lot of picks either. He threw only three last year. Backup Quinn Gray is gone so he will be backed up by Cleo Lemon and Todd Bouman. There are no major changes on the offensive line to speak of. The biggest changes will be at wide receiver. Jerry Porter was picked up and the Jags traded for Troy Williamson. With the addition of the two vets, Matt Jones, Reggie Williams and Dennis Northcutt will be battling for playing time, if not their jobs.
    The Jags showed a lot of aggressiveness adding players that they felt could put them over the top. They may have paid too steep a price for Derrick Harvey, and they may also have reached signing Porter and trading for Williamson. Only time will tell if that is the case. But the bottom line is that the Jaguars will have to find a way to beat the Colts to take over the division and they haven't done so as yet. Jack Del Rio is 3-7 against the Colts and his Jaguars have lost three of the last four meetings with Indianapolis. Until they can reverse that trend, nothing in the South will change much at the top.

    TENNESSEE TITANS
    The Titans defied the odds and fought their way into the playoffs in 2007. Now the question is how much more can be expected from this team. One thing is for sure. Don't take your eyes off the television when the Titans are playing. Half their games were decided by seven points or less in 2007.

    Quarterback Vince Young didn't set the world on fire in 2007 as he threw 17 picks as compared to a meager nine touchdown passes. But his mobility gives the offense another dimension. His passing prowess will need to be as potent for him to be an effective quarterback in the league. Running back Chris Brown was expendable after LenDale White rushed for over 1,100 yards in 2007. So now it will be White, Chris Henry and rookie Chris Johnson carrying the ground game for Tennessee. Tight ends Ben Troupe and Ben Hartstock and wide receiver David Givens are all gone. But the Titans reloaded by adding tight ends Alge Crumpler and Dwayne Blakley and wide receiver Justin McCareins. Crumpler should pay immediate dividends for the Titans. McCareins will join Roydell Williams and Justin Gage at receiver. The Titans will be without guard Benji Olson, who has retired. Jacob Bell also moved on. The Titans added Jake Scott from the Colts to fill the void left by the loss of Olson.

    On defense, the biggest question will revolve around defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth. Haynesworth was tagged by the team but wants a long-term deal. The Titans lost defensive ends Travis LaBoy and Antwan Odom, but signed Jevon Kearse and drafted Jason Jones and WIlliam Hayes to help offset the losses. Opposite Kearse will be Kyle Vanden Bosch, who may be one of the more underrated defensive ends in the business. Linebacker Gilbert Gardner has departed but the Titans added Josh Stamer to provide depth at the position. Keith Bullock, David Thornton and Ryan Fowler all return at linebacker. Pacman Jones will be the most notable loss in the secondary, but the Titans also lose cornerbacks Kelly Herndon and Mike Waddell. Nick Harper and Cortland Finnegan will be at the corners with Michael Griffin and Chris Hope at the safeties. Chris Carr came over from the Raiders, but his presence will be felt more on special teams than in the secondary. And with Rob Bironas booting the football, the Titans get an edge in the close games.

    The Titans probably accomplished more than most people expected them to in 2007. Now they have to take the next step. LenDale White will play a big role in that but Tennessee needs more from the passing attack. The Titans scored only four more points than they allowed in 2007. That will have to change if Tennessee wants to be a contender in the South.

    HOUSTON TEXANS
    The Texans found ways to score points in 2007, but they also gave up far too many. They also were -13 in takeaway/ giveaway differential, which placed them next to last in the NFL.

    It looks as though Matt Schaub has finally cemented himself as the starter in Houston after being relegated to being a clipboard carrier in Atlanta. Schaub has the protection that David Carr never had in Houston. What he needs now is a healthy Andre Johnson. Johnson missed seven games in 2007 due to injury. With a healthy Johnson and more production from Kevin Walter, Jacoby Jones or Andre Davis, his numbers will improve despite the loss of Jerome Mathis. Ahman Green is still expected to be the feature back for Houston, but the Texans also added Chris Brown from the Titans and drafted Steve Slaton for more depth. Mike Flanagan and Steve McKinney are both gone from the offensive line. The Texans traded for Chris Myers and took Duane Brown in the first round of the recent NFL Draft to shore up the line, but the group with Chester Pitts, Eric Winston, Ephraim Salaam and Fred Weary performed well in 2007 allowing a total of only 22 sacks the entire season.

    The defense will need to improve if the Texans plan to make their presence felt in the South. The Texans allowed over 114 yards per game rushing and picked off only 11 passes last season. Much of that will depend on the defensive line. Anthony Weaver, Mario Williams, Travis Johnson and Amobi Okoye are the foundation up front. Houston also has some depth and added more by drafting Frank Okam. There will be many new faces in the back seven for the Texans. Shawn Barber, Danny Clark, Charlie Anderson, Michael Boulware and Von Hutchins are all gone. Kevin Bentley, Nick Ferguson, Jacques Reeves and Chaun Thompson have all been added. DeMeco Ryans and Morlon Greenwood will return with Bentley, Thompson and the recently drafted Xavier Adibi in the mix. In the secondary, having Dunta Robinson, who missed seven games in 2007, back will make a huge difference in pass defense. Fred Bennett could be on the other side. But Reeves and Demarcus ***gins also figure into the mix, as does third round draft pick Antwaun Molden. C.C. Brown, Will Demps, Nick Ferguson and Glenn Earl will be battling for reps at safety.

    The AFC South is the toughest division in the NFL. The Colts have won at least 10 games in eight of the past nine seasons. No other team in the NFL has been as consistent. So despite some rumors of their possible demise, the road to the AFC South title goes through Indianapolis.

  • #2
    Re: An early look at the AFC South

    I would be very surprised if Jacksonville beats us for the top seed. Don't get me wrong we have some question marks on our O-line but the guard spot isn't particularly hard to figure out.

    With one more year of a maturing defense and Anthony G. coming back we should be able to win the AFC south.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: An early look at the AFC South

      It's going to be very difficult for any of these teams to overtake the Colts. I mean really:

      Peyton Manning
      David Garrard
      Vince Young
      Matt Shaub

      There is no question Jax has improved but when the game is on the line who do you want behind center?
      The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: An early look at the AFC South

        Originally posted by ABADays View Post
        It's going to be very difficult for any of these teams to overtake the Colts. I mean really:

        Peyton Manning
        David Garrard
        Vince Young
        Matt Shaub

        There is no question Jax has improved but when the game is on the line who do you want behind center?
        Plus the fact that nearly every time they have had an opportunity to step up in a game that matters, they have been exposed for the jaw jacking frauds that they truely are.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: An early look at the AFC South

          Originally posted by travmil View Post
          Plus the fact that nearly every time they have had an opportunity to step up in a game that matters, they have been exposed for the jaw jacking frauds that they truely are.
          Yep, but if they ever get around to acting professionally instead of shooting themselves in the foot at critical moments, they can beat us. It starts with del Rio.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: An early look at the AFC South

            Originally posted by PacerPete View Post
            Yep, but if they ever get around to acting professionally instead of shooting themselves in the foot at critical moments, they can beat us. It starts with del Rio.
            Which is exactly why they won't. When your coach gets a 15yd penalty in crunch time, it shows a lack of leadership from the top.

            Del Rio has been in the league, is a coach, and is probably about as mature as he will be in both situations, it's not his first time around the block. His shtick is being in your face tough, and hard hitting. It gets the better of him.

            Teams take the character of their coach, and Jack melts down when things get tough with emotion. How can the team stay calm, when he can't?
            Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: An early look at the AFC South

              If we stay healthy, I don't see anyone overtaking us.

              Comment

              Working...
              X