Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

  1. #1
    International Counter bellisimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,125

    Default 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    could there be any truth to this?!

    06/01/2008 - Every significant Internet provider around the globe is currently in talks with access and content providers to transform the internet into a television-like medium: no more freedom, you pay for a small commercial package of sites you can visit and you'll have to pay for seperate subscriptions for every site that's not in the package.
    Almost all smaller websites/services will disappear over time and multinationals who are used to using big budgets to brute force their content into every media outlet will finally be able to approach the internet in the same way.
    This well-known illustration of why we need net neutrality turns out to be very close to the truth:




    more info @

    http://ipower.ning.com/netneutrality

  2. #2
    Headband and Rec Specs rexnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    8,755

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    Anthem?

  3. #3
    DIET COKE! Trader Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Troll Hunting
    Age
    28
    Posts
    36,910

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    I'd be shocked if they did this.



  4. #4
    Member LG33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    20,543

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    Time to blow up some offices.

  5. #5
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    22,630

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    I haven't followed the link but this seems like an overhyped scare tactic to me.

    For one thing, we already have cable (and satellite) television. I'm not sure what benefit the overall effect of the above proposal would be to morph the internet into something that more resembles cable TV.

    More importantly, many of the things that make up the world wide web want to remain available to everyone. They'd probably prefer that ISP's offer broadband connections for FREE... not charge and place their sites into tiers.

    Besides that, sites that do want to charge for their services are certainly able to do so already. Pay sites exist all over the web. I see very little benefit to these sites to enter into agreements that would bury them further behind a curtain. If anything, they'd prefer to see potential customers get on the internet for free (to maximize their potential customer base).

    Sites already have advertising... Again, I see no real benefit for content providers to enter into ISP agreements that limits, not maximizes, their customer base.

    Certainly, as time goes on people will find creative ways to try and profit from the internet. Laws will continue to evolve. It's the World Wide Web, not the Wild Wild West, and I look for some of the 'anything goes' attitude and ability to get limited more and more over time. But that doesn't mean I look for the web to evolve into something that looks remarkably like a product we already have (cable tv).

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  6. #6
    13/31 Shade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    37
    Posts
    48,817

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    They've been trying to push this through for a while now.

    This is America. If there's money to be made, someone will find a way to bleed everyone for it.
    Skip Bayless:

    "Derek Fisher will prove to be a much better NBA head coach than Steve Kerr."

    "The Houston Texans will forever regret it if they do not take Johnny Manziel with the No. 1 overall pick. He will haunt them."

    "You bet I'd take Tebow late in games over ARodg."

    "Manti Te'o: the next Ray Lewis."

  7. #7
    flexible and robust SoupIsGood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lappy Go Hucky
    Age
    28
    Posts
    17,540

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    If they did that I feel like those significant internet providers would fail to remain significant in a pretty quick way. The fringe providers still offering "neutral" service would get booming business, and all the giants would die. No way they ever do this, IMO, unless it's somehow written into law.
    You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

  8. #8
    13/31 Shade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    37
    Posts
    48,817

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    Isn't 2012 the year the world is supposed to end?

    I would imagine the internet would end by default.
    Skip Bayless:

    "Derek Fisher will prove to be a much better NBA head coach than Steve Kerr."

    "The Houston Texans will forever regret it if they do not take Johnny Manziel with the No. 1 overall pick. He will haunt them."

    "You bet I'd take Tebow late in games over ARodg."

    "Manti Te'o: the next Ray Lewis."

  9. #9
    How are you here? Kegboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northside Bias
    Posts
    13,011

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    The real question is, where does PD fall into this. It's a good thing the blogs never took off, or we'd definitely be in the upper tier.

    I'm surprised there's not a porn level. I'd hate to see PD cost $12.99 for a 3-hour block just because of DSP.
    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

  10. #10
    How are you here? Kegboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northside Bias
    Posts
    13,011

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shade View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Isn't 2012 the year the world is supposed to end?

    I would imagine the internet would end by default.
    Well, it was built to survive a nuclear war. Of course, that's before AT&T got their hands on it.
    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

  11. #11
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    24,392

    Default Re: 2012: The Year The Internet Ends?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bball View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    For one thing, we already have cable (and satellite) television. I'm not sure what benefit the overall effect of the above proposal would be to morph the internet into something that more resembles cable TV.
    I never thought I'd say this, Bball, but you're not cynical enough. The above proposal is FAR more beneficial than an open internet. And by "beneficial" I mean "easy for media companies to monetize."

    Bad for consumers? Sure. But good for Comcast and Time Warner Cable.

    This is basic net neutrality stuff. The ISPs want to double-charge for their connections... charge me once for the privilege of connecting to Google, and charge Google once for the privilege of connecting to me. PLUS charge Google for its own connection to the Net. There's about a billion writeups on the web: google is your friend. Here's an example of this principle in action:

    Virgin Media CEO Neil Berkett has attacked the principle of net neutrality, whereby internet service providers do not interfere with or degrade the speed at which content is delivered from websites to consumers, branding it as “bollocks”.

    Berkett’s cable operator ranks as the second largest internet service provider in the UK with approximately 3.6m customers.

    In an interview with the Royal Television Society’s Television magazine, Berkett said that “this net neutrality thing is a load of bollocks”, and revealed that Virgin is already in talks with unnamed content providers about paying to have their content delivered faster than others.

    Feeding into the debate between internet service providers and the BBC over iPlayer, Berkett even warned that public service broadcasters who choose not to pay for faster access to Virgin’s subscriber base would end up in “bus lanes”, effectively having their content delivered to consumers at a lower speed.

    Thus far, Ofcom has made little comment on the network neutrality debate. In 2007, long before the current iPlayer discussions, the then Ofcom policy chief Douglas Scott indicated that the regulator planned a “hands off” approach to the issue. Scott has since departed the regulator for Channel 4.
    Here's another perspective:

    [yt]7vD0g9Z0egQ[/yt]
    This space for rent.

Similar Threads

  1. Counting: It's Fun.
    By N8R in forum Market Square (General Non-Sports Discussion)
    Replies: 66943
    Last Post: 07-23-2010, 10:59 AM
  2. The PD NBA Draft - Selection #4 - Seattle
    By Jose Slaughter in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-30-2008, 03:01 PM
  3. The PD NBA Best Pick Left in the Draft 3
    By Hicks in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-27-2008, 11:37 AM
  4. PD NBA Draft - Selection #3 - Minnesota
    By Jose Slaughter in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-25-2008, 04:09 PM
  5. The PD NBA Draft
    By Jose Slaughter in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 05-21-2008, 04:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •