Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

  1. #1

    Default Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    ...and to be honest, I'm not surprised. Not only am I not a proponent of Centers/PF's being "take over a game/clutch-time" players, but I can see where the writer, Billy Simons, is coming from. Having once lived in Minnesota for five years ('94-99), I use to watch the T-Wolves often. And while I felt KG was good, I think he would have been better had Marbury stayed around. They made a formidable tandum wheN Marbury was the "go-to-guy" there ...believe it or not...until he left for the East Coast (NJ Nets) to live closer to his family (mother and daughter; or atleast that's the excuse he gave back then).

    Simmons doesn't pull many - correction...ANY...punches in his article. It's hard to image any sports writer downing KG, but unless you take the blinders off just for a second you never really see beyond the hype. Don't get me wrong, though. I still think KG is one of the best PF's out there. He's certainly been one of the most consistent in terms of his overall game (scoring, shot blocking, rebounding, asst). But he's never been a clutch player any more than our own JO.

    Anyway, here's the article. Enjoy.

    THE SPORTS GUY

    Let's play word association: KG. Warrior? Sure. 2008 MVP? Maybe. Clutch? Eh.

    by Bill Simmons

    During the last few minutes of Game 6 of Boston's second-round series with Cleveland, poor Kevin Garnett looked like Forrest Gump right after Jenny pulled her top down in her dorm room. On one play, the ball swung to KG at the foul line; no Cav was within 10 feet of him. Strangely, he panicked, thinking about shooting an open J before realizing, Wait, I'm seven feet tall, that would be dumb, and barreling toward the basket to rush a clumsy jump hook. For a former MVP who makes $22 million a year, it was an astoundingly incompetent sequence.

    It also wasn't a surprise. Garnett's crunch-time woes have been the dirty little secret of this storybook Celtics season. Sure, he saved the franchise and made the C's relevant again. He's also the reason they might not win the 2008 championship. Put simply, Garnett shrinks from pressure more times than he comes through. The NBA is a simple league to figure out: In a playoff series, the best player prevails unless his supporting cast is significantly inferior to the other team's. So when Boston's best player can't dominate close games against a quality opponent … um, that's a problem.

    Fans spend an inordinate amount of time analyzing the mental makeup of their favorite players, so you can only imagine how many hours I've spent thinking about Garnett. After all, I'm the same guy who once wasted an entire afternoon trying to figure out Hickory High's box score in that final game in Hoosiers. (If you care, I had Chitwood down for 30 on 14-of-18 shooting.) The intriguing wrinkle with Garnett is he plays differently down the stretch by not playing differently. Selfless and passionate for 48 minutes a game, eight months a year, he can't raise his game because it's already raised. Like Nigel Tufnel's guitar, he's already up to 11.

    Sometimes, when Garnett's adrenaline kicks in during crunch time it's like watching a diabetic in the midst of a sugar rush. His body can't handle it. When he succeeds, he loses his mind, pounding his chest, belting out profanities and hollering at the crowd like a crazy person. When he fails (and it's happened a few times this season), his mistakes are unbelievably amateurish—intentional fouls when the team doesn't need them, taking too many steps on his signature fall-away, that kind of stuff. The pressure gets to him. You can see it. In Game 4 of the first-round series with Atlanta, after a near-altercation with Zaza Pachulia, the camera found KG on the bench and he was practically hyperventilating.

    Now, Garnett isn't the only NBA star who has struggled in big moments. Wilt was famous for it. The Mailman choked so many times I once wrote, "You know you're watching ESPN Classic if it's 2 a.m. and Karl Malone looks like he's about to throw up." David Robinson was an extremely nice guy who played like one in big games.

    The list of guys who came up short is as endless as the one of those who repeatedly came through in the clutch (Michael Jordan, Sam Jones, Reggie Miller, Dennis Johnson, Robert Horry, Larry Legend … ). The question is, how do you end up on one list or the other? What makes for clutch? Is it part of your DNA, or something that's honed through experience and repetition?

    Here's my answer: It's both. One of the most fascinating things about Jordan's career wasn't that he nailed the title-winning shot against Georgetown as a freshman, but that Dean Smith called the play for him. If someone is born with ice water in his veins, you know it. Smith knew it. Then again, get enough reps with anything in life, and you're more likely to succeed. Trying not to sound nervous when I started to do TV and radio a few years ago, I'd overthink and make myself nervous, battling a rush of adrenaline right before my segment started. I've learned to channel that energy now—I can speak in front of large crowds and everything. Why? Because I got my reps.

    How far can experience actually get you in matters of clutchness? After Garnett jumped from high school to the NBA, he played eight years without ever getting past the first round. Fellow high schooler Kobe Bryant landed on a talented Lakers team, failing famously as a rookie (remember his hideous air balls that ended the series against the Jazz in 1997?), then getting swept by the '98 Jazz and '99 Spurs. Name me one memorable Kobe moment from his first three springs. You can't. But 28 meaningful playoff games provided him with valuable pressurized situations. By the time the 2000 postseason rolled around, Kobe was asserting himself, capping it off with an MJ moment in Game 4 of the Finals for a championship team.

    By contrast, poor Garnett was trapped on lousy and half-decent teams until 2004, when he carried the Timberwolves to the Western Conference finals, submitting an ESPN Classic game of his own against the Kings (32 points, 21 rebounds in Game 7) in the second round. But just when it seemed as if he was getting the hang of clutch, Minnesota imploded, missing the playoffs in its next three seasons with KG. Now he's slightly past his prime. Can you blame him for not being clutch when he never got those reps in his formative years? Probably not. Think of his career like a video game: Spend a ton of time playing Grand Theft Auto, and you're much more likely to complete a mission than some guy who doesn't own a PS3, right?

    Fair or unfair, Garnett will always be measured against Tim Duncan, who has already carried the Spurs to four titles. It's easy to forget now that TD had his own blips and stumbles along the way, or that he played in 71 playoff games before famously demolishing the Nets with a 21/20/10 line in the clincher of the 2003 Finals. Wired very much like Garnett—completely selfless, phenomenally competitive, thoughtful as a teammate—Duncan learned to channel his intensity, saving peak performances for when they mattered most. He figured out that there was a crucial difference between a ho-hum January game in Atlanta and a must-win playoff game in LA. He's clearly developed a reliable mental alert: All right, unless I grab 20 rebounds tonight, we're going to lose. Or: If I don't take over this game right now and score every time down the floor, we're cooked.

    Bill Russell had that switch. So did MJ, Bird and Magic. Well, Garnett doesn't have it. Like every other Celtics fan, I've been looking for it, waiting for it … and it's just not there. A wonderful all-around player, ultimately he's only as good as his teammates. Even during the emotional Game 7 victory over Cleveland, Garnett was nearly invisible down the stretch. So if we can't find a way to stick him with Kobe, LeBron or someone of that ilk, he's probably not getting a ring unless Paul Pierce has a few more 41-point explosions in him.

    And we can think about what might've happened if he'd somehow switched places with Duncan back in 1997 and gotten all those playoff reps. Maybe things would have been different for Kevin Garnett.

    Maybe.
    Last edited by NuffSaid; 05-20-2008 at 05:52 PM.

  2. #2
    Banned Fool's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,408

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    Um, he seems to be declaring a Celtics loss at the end there.

  3. #3
    The New Gold Swagger travmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New Pal
    Posts
    7,100
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    Quote Originally Posted by Fool View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Um, he seems to be declaring a Celtics loss at the end there.
    He's just a Boston Homer laying the groundwork in case they lose. That way he's not stuck writing a column like he had to after the Pats lost the SB to the Giants.

  4. #4
    streets ahead
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    StL
    Age
    30
    Posts
    5,715

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    i wonder if he thinks garnett is any better than drew gooden...
    This is the darkest timeline.

  5. #5
    One man show ajbry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    4,696

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    I feel Simmons has actually been really slow to realize this. Undoubtedly he will probably get a lot of credit from casual fans for being so blunt about it, but at least he said it.

  6. #6
    Member owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,877

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    Quote Originally Posted by avoidingtheclowns View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    i wonder if he thinks garnett is any better than drew gooden...

    Well, you know JO isn't. ;-)
    {o,o}
    |)__)
    -"-"-

  7. #7
    DIET COKE! Trader Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Troll Hunting
    Age
    26
    Posts
    29,130

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    Quote Originally Posted by ajbry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I feel Simmons has actually been really slow to realize this. Undoubtedly he will probably get a lot of credit from casual fans for being so blunt about it, but at least he said it.
    I'm actually Bill Simmons.

    “WE NEVER SURRENDER, WE NEVER GIVE UP, WE KEEP ATTACKING”- Frank Vogel
    momentarygodsblog.com https://twitter.com/momentarygods

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,752

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    Quote Originally Posted by ajbry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I feel Simmons has actually been really slow to realize this. Undoubtedly he will probably get a lot of credit from casual fans for being so blunt about it, but at least he said it.
    I agree. Garnett's not the type of player who will go for 40 points. He's too unselfish, and I've never felt he was clutch.

    I think the best way for the Pistons to defend him is to single cover him with Sheed, Dice, Maxiell, Ratliff, maybe even Amir Johnson. Garnett just won't dominate single coverage like a player of his talent should.
    David Aldridge:

    "Oh, and conspiracy theorists? The NBA's Final Four are Miami (#16 TV market), Indiana (#26), San Antonio (#36), Memphis (#49). #tinfoil"

    UncleBuck:

    "See how stupid those fans sound complaining about the officials. That is one reason why I hate when Pacers fans complain about the refs - does not come across well at all, no matter the merit. "

  9. #9
    Tyrant maragin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,214

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    I read Bill Simmon's articles and occasionally listen to his podcasts... but my favorite part is watching him eat crow. After the Colts beat New England on their way to the Superbowl, I was checking ESPN multiple times a day just to see what his response would be. I vaguely remember being disappointed on this one.

    He writes some entertaining pieces, like his "Value of every NBA player" columns. If he promised to never make another Godfather reference, I'd consider putting him in my top 5 favorite sports writers.*



    * If he was widely published, I'd probably put Thunderbird1245 at #4. Throw some pictures and links into his articles and you're set.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,124

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    Quote Originally Posted by NuffSaid View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    By the time the 2000 postseason rolled around, Kobe was asserting himself, capping it off with an MJ moment in Game 4 of the Finals for a championship team.

    Now, why did he have to bring that game up!! Ouch!

  11. #11
    DIET COKE! Trader Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Troll Hunting
    Age
    26
    Posts
    29,130

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Ouch! KG gets very little love in this ESPN Mag article

    You can say that again.

    “WE NEVER SURRENDER, WE NEVER GIVE UP, WE KEEP ATTACKING”- Frank Vogel
    momentarygodsblog.com https://twitter.com/momentarygods

Similar Threads

  1. Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...
    By Major Cold in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 2039
    Last Post: 06-27-2008, 11:43 PM
  2. Tbird draft analysis: Kevin Love
    By thunderbird1245 in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 05-18-2008, 05:56 PM
  3. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-14-2008, 04:02 PM
  4. ESPN Trade talk: Ten teams to watch.
    By Will Galen in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-17-2008, 02:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •