Quote Originally Posted by count55 View Post
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think you're making this too complicated. We just have to be willing to take back an equally ugly or uglier contract - a la Jerome James, Brian Cardinal, or Jared Jeffries, and we'll find a taker for JT.
Yep. There are guys with similar money/time on their deals with teams that just have no use for them. So Tins sits there and their guy sits here and both teams hope the change improves things beyond that.

Maybe the Pacers can lose a year by taking on more money, or reduce cost by taking the extra year. Basically a contract structure swap. But no one is saying you are using Tinsley to improve anything. It's just an adjustment for equal value (as seen by Pacers, ie not much).