Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

    Note: There's a lot going on with me these days and so I don't know how much posting you'll see from me in the future. I say that as a warning that the following post is rather long and rambling but I was trying to hit a lot of points while I was at it. -Bball

    -----------
    Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

    It's hard to know where to start or what words to choose when it comes to Walsh leaving the franchise. The easiest thing to say is: It was time. Walsh was very good for this franchise when he came onboard over a generation ago. But a lot changed in all this time. For starters, the NBA changed and Indianapolis changed. The fanbase changed. Walsh didn't always appear to acknowledge those changes. 24 years is a long time. A person can get set in their ways... They can get a bad case of tunnel vision. They can lose sight of the forest for the trees. What this team needed in 1984 is not the same as what it needed in 2004. Then, with the franchise hitting some terrible low points, the organization was handcuffed with bad contracts and paralyzed with a strange management structure that we all called "The two-headed monster".

    Now, I'm not going to come on here and declare Bird the savior or this reorganization of the hierarchy the perfect move. That, of course, is yet to be seen and the jury is still out. Bird could still prove to be an utter failure. The restructuring at the top could prove to be little more in the end than rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. But here's the thing: It's a real start. Whether the corner has been turned or not, at least now there's a sense that things will be different because the names have changed and there's a sense that roles have tightened behind the desks. But regardless, at least now there has been real change. How well it works is yet to be seen but to get to the next phase we needed to see some type of change take place. If we're trying to get from point A to point C, we needed to get to point B before it could happen. We might still find out we've taken the wrong fork in the road... but at least we didn't just sit there with the motor running deciding only not to decide which fork to take just yet.

    I'm on record as saying the drawn out process of this handoff from Walsh to Bird ruined any chance of a honeymoon period for Bird. He's already taking some hits for moves that were percieved to have been his moves.... whether that is true, deserved, or not. Basically, he's starting this new phase with quite a bit of collected baggage. It is what it is. It might not even be a bad thing that he starts this on a seat that is already starting to warm into a hotseat. It shouldn't take years and years to prove whether he's up to the task and can operate without Walsh... or he himself was part of the problem we've just suffered through.

    Notice I said "suffered", as in past tense. This season didn't end with the same weight and frustration as the last couple of seasons. It didn't end to a chorus of boos. I know the team didn't make the playoffs nor did they end with a shiny record. But they did end the season with several things that you have to think the team can build upon. Granger and Dunleavy both raised their games by leaps and bounds. Murphy seemed to reinvent himself as the season wore on. We have several players where no matter what else you an say, character just isn't an issue. It might take more than character to win big in the NBA, but without character you're not getting far anyway no matter the collected talent.

    Diener brought a breath of fresh air to the PG position. I truly hope that the Tinsley era is over. No true break from the recent past can happen until the question marks surrounding him are just no longer an issue for the Pacers. Whether he's traded or rides the pine in a suit makes no difference because either way means the team isn't counting on him. Maybe it's my bias, but I have to feel there's more to his sitting than an alleged injury. The timing (soon after the Phoenix debacle), length of the sitting, and OBrien's end of season comments just seem to indicate there's more. But even if not, OBrien was pretty clear in saying Tinsley is not in the team's future plans.

    The team actually came together as the season wound down. They showed heart and spirit. I don't care that they didn't make the playoffs, what was important was how hard they tried down the stretch. Maybe they learned something about themselves in that period? Had they made the playoffs, nobody could say they 'backed in'. They would've earned it with an excellent record over the last few weeks. And it's not just that they found a way to win, it's that they found a way to put themselves into position to win. Teams can lose and still show heart. The thing is... You play with effort and heart and eventually you find yourself winning.

    I'm not sure I'm ready to praise OBrien as to 'bringing back Indiana basketball to the Pacers' as Herb Simon did, but I do have to credit him with allowing chemistry to develop among what became the core 7 or so players. We can debate whether he wasted some development time with some of the younger guys, but I don't think there's much disagreement that we did see real improvement with the core players.

    Our defense pretty much was a disappointment. OBrien has said we just didn't have the horses to play his system. I'm not totally sold that the system couldn't have been tweaked or scrapped until we do have those horses... but if he has the total backing of management then I hope they stand behind him and get him the players he needs to strengthen his system. Sometimes you do have to make the point that the system is more important than any one player or players.

    I'm not overly thrilled with what I saw of the offense many times. For all the times things seemed to be clicking, there were plenty where things just looked rushed. I don't know how many times we took a hurried shot during an important stretch where we really needed a solid possession. I can't really believe OBrien was any happier with many of those than I was but yet I didn't see the "What the hell was that?" from him you'd expect after a player made a bad decision (or several). Could it be he let the players play and dig their own grave to make a point? I suppose it is. I have to think back to the Phoenix game and Jamaal and how OBrien let that display continue. I, like many others, was disappointed that he didn't pull Tinsley and give him an earful. That wasn't "Indiana" basketball, that was selfish basketball. But a funny thing happened after that game. Tinsley faded to the bench after a couple more appearances (chances?) never to be seen in a Pacer uniform again this season. If you don't believe the injury excuse, then it is strong evidence that OBrien was coaching for the long term, not the short term.

    If OBrien is trying to build confidence in the players and hoping they can learn from game experience what works and what doesn't with his system in real game situations then maybe the end of the season speaks volumes. In other words, maybe there was a method to the madness.

    I'm not convinced OBrien is the ultimate answer, but we could do worse in this transition period. These are mostly players that probably need confidence more than anything.

    Jermaine ONeal- What's left to be said? Every preseason report will start "If Jermaine can remain healthy...". Past history says "He can't".
    I doubt there's much chance of him being traded at this point. I have a feeling that had the front office been a little leaner and a little meaner, he would've already been traded long before we got to this point. But with the two-headed monster in place I just don't think a decision of that magnitude was going to happen. Too many "What ifs" for the two-headed monster to make a decisive move. At this point, his trade value is probably at an all time low anyway. He looked much older than his 29 yrs when he played and he again missed a significant portion of the season. His value goes up from here just because of his expiring contract in a couple of years... and maybe he has some kind of resurgance next season and ups his value that way.

    Actually, maybe this injury history will force JO to rethink his game and role on the team and play a more veteran savvy type of game. Certainly I hope it forces TPTB to rethink his role. He's not going to be the 'go to' guy again... and probably never should've been thrust into that role in the first place. That experiment went on too long and became a chemistry killer on a team with questionable chemistry anyway.

    I think the team has accepted that reality and I hope they keep up the limited minutes to some degree. There's no good reason to run JO into the ground. The question is whether JO has accepted this. If he can accept it, then we might not want to trade him afterall. JO can offer a lot as long as he (and the franchise) acknowledge his limitations and just what is needed from him.

    This summer should be interesting but maybe not the wheeling and dealing that some expect. I'm not sure we can expect big wholesale moves unless someone dangles something unbelievable in front of the team.

    There needs to be a starting quality PG that OBrien can work with and we need a player who can backup JO well enough to step into his starting role should JO go down with injury again. If TPTB neglect either of these issues I don't think it will be good for team morale. You have to give the players that are here a sense you are working as hard as they are to help them be competitive. These moves also need addressed for PR reasons. If they want to keep reconnecting with the fans, then TPTB need to build on the momentum they've created with the reorganization at the top as well as the resurgence of winning to wind up the season. You have to continually look to energize the fanbase, not always look to find an excuse to stand pat.

    Random thoughts:

    Winning back fans: I think this season went a long way toward that. It might not show in the seats just yet but I do think rock bottom has already been hit. As long as the players give us more of what we saw to end the season, and no more of the "Phoenix game"... or any more shoot 'em ups... or strip club incidents... or hanging out with Charlie Manson... or ... well you get the idea! ....It shouldn't be THAT hard for a team to keep their noses clean. ESPECIALLY during the season where dedicated professionals shouldn't have that much time available to find trouble anyway. That they do would only make me question their dedication to the team and their sport.

    I think the reduced seat prices and freebie tix are a great idea. I also think offering the freebies directly from the Pacer organization to fans rather than trying to seed tix to others (radio, tv for example) as giveaways (where they might simply end up with tickets going unused) is the proper way to go. If you're going to comp tix, comp them to people who will go to the game. That said, I think the franchise needs to find a way to make sure the season ticket holders don't feel cheated while the general public is getting these 'bargains'. I think a simple answer there is to offer 'seat upgrades' to selected games for season/pkg ticket holders when the general public is being offered reduced rates. The team needs to keep up these good will gestures to restrengthen their ties to the community.

    By the same token, the TV deal needs reconsidered. There were too many untelevised games this season (they ALL should be televised in the local market IMHO) and I'm not sure the exclusive Fox Sports cable deal is really in the best longterm interests of the team. At least in regards to connecting with the fanbase. Some over the air offerings still should be considered. I'm also not sure that the 'temporary' nature of FoxSports Indiana (at least on Directv) helps. Maybe if FSIN was a 24hr sports channel with some 'local' sports shows thrown in (how about a Pacers Weekly Report for example?) along with some national offerings I'd feel differently. But there's not much chance of building brand loyalty with a channel that doesn't even broadcast for most of the hours in a week.

    EDIT- Also on the subject of televison- I don't think the Fox Sports "Rock Concert" ad where Foster, Granger, and JO rise through the basketball floor (which is doubling as a stage) is the right message for the Pacers (especially at this time anyway). The soundtrack is fine but the image is all wrong. I ASSUME this is a canned ad that is the same for all NBA teams on FSN but I don't know (any League Pass people to confirm this one way or the other?). Instead of comparing them with rock stars, let's show them taking charges, making putbacks, rejecting shots, stealing the ball, knocking down a dagger, and mix in some shots of them interacting with the community. We don't need to see the team as pampered rock stars, we need to see them as hard working, blue collar types doing the dirty work on the court and connecting with the community. (IMHO)

    If JO is playing on a knee that still is requiring rehab and limited minutes, why on Earth do you have him jump center to start the game?

    I don't know what it is but Shawne Williams' play on the court this season would make my decision on what to do about his 'play' off the court pretty easy. I thought Shawne's play regressed this year... although I realize he had his moments. Still, he looked lost and lethargic many times. And his decision making OFF the court would lead me to dangle him on the trading block. I realize why some might want to give him more time... But one of the problems of the past of this franchise is offering too many chances and waiting too long.

    I hope the Pacers can find a way under Bird to end the overpaying and limiting of options that have plagued the team these past few years. Other teams find ways to do it... why can't we?

    I'm not much for stockpiling players that you aren't going to use or develop. Maybe you do it when you're a playoff contender (to see what develops), but when you're staring up at the 8th seed you should look to trade some quantity for a position of need... or develop it off the bench. IOW- It does no good (IMHO) to have a Diogu sitting in the doghouse season after season while his trade value and label of 'potential' declines.

    We might not be over the hump just yet... but this offseason doesn't feel as heavy as the last couple of offseasons. There's actually some light at the end of the proverbial tunnel.
    Last edited by Bball; 04-27-2008, 12:55 PM.
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  • #2
    Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

    WELCOME BACK!!!!!!!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

      That was totally well written. Great job!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

        Great post, and nicely written.

        I tend to agree with most of the sentiments you expressed.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

          EDIT- Also on the subject of televison- I don't think the Fox Sports "Rock Concert" ad where Foster, Granger, and JO rise through the basketball floor (which is doubling as a stage) is the right message for the Pacers (especially at this time anyway). The soundtrack is fine but the image is all wrong. I ASSUME this is a canned ad that is the same for all NBA teams on FSN but I don't know (any League Pass people to confirm this one way or the other?). Instead of comparing them with rock stars, let's show them taking charges, making putbacks, rejecting shots, stealing the ball, knocking down a dagger, and mix in some shots of them interacting with the community. We don't need to see the team as pampered rock stars, we need to see them as hard working, blue collar types doing the dirty work on the court and connecting with the community.
          yea that ad was generic for all teams

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

            Originally posted by Bball View Post
            EDIT- Also on the subject of televison- I don't think the Fox Sports "Rock Concert" ad where Foster, Granger, and JO rise through the basketball floor (which is doubling as a stage) is the right message for the Pacers (especially at this time anyway). The soundtrack is fine but the image is all wrong. I ASSUME this is a canned ad that is the same for all NBA teams on FSN but I don't know (any League Pass people to confirm this one way or the other?). Instead of comparing them with rock stars, let's show them taking charges, making putbacks, rejecting shots, stealing the ball, knocking down a dagger, and mix in some shots of them interacting with the community. We don't need to see the team as pampered rock stars, we need to see them as hard working, blue collar types doing the dirty work on the court and connecting with the community. (IMHO)
            While I don't disagree with you they already tried that hard at work crap in the playoffs one year. They all looked rediculous wearing hard hats in opening.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

              Excellent post. One response:

              Originally posted by Bball View Post
              By the same token, the TV deal needs reconsidered. There were too many untelevised games this season (they ALL should be televised in the local market IMHO) and I'm not sure the exclusive Fox Sports cable deal is really in the best longterm interests of the team. At least in regards to connecting with the fanbase. Some over the air offerings still should be considered.
              Unfortunately, as has been discussed there really is no over-the-air channel that is broadly available to the Indy market. The network-affiliated channels aren't going to preempt programming 39 times a year - this is why the deal with WTTV was lost, as CW insisted its affiliates drop sports and focus on consistent network program availability. The existing non-network-affiliated stations are either specialty (religious) or too small of a broadcast area such that someone would have to set up a network to handle it.

              Making the deal with Fox (and my understanding is that the Pacers pay for it, not the other way around) ultimately reaches more homes even though it seems to be a smaller available market.

              The only thing I think I'd check into if I were on the Pacers' Media Relations team would be if there was some way to have all cable and satellite providers include FSIN with basic cable. That might be too much money for what it is worth but would pretty much guarantee the television audience, even though it still stiffs the broadcast-only folks.
              BillS

              A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
              Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

                Very nicely written. I agree 100%

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

                  Bball - I always look forward to your "Season Ending Post Mortem" - always one of the best reads of the year

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

                    Right off the bat I do have a big problem with the Walsh/Bird issue. You take exception to the "drawn out" hand off, but what if the truth is that those in the know were feeling some concern that Bird wasn't quite up to it, but not so much as to dump him outright?

                    Frankly IMO when a great leader shows up in a situation his overall presence tends to push others aside, even if those being pushed haven't been too shabby themselves.

                    Contrast this with a disturbing set of recent truths. They are looking for a new GM, one to do the "day to day" work that is below Bird. Fine, the guy is meant to be the "final say voice".

                    Fine until you also then factor in Herb stepping in and saying he's going to have a major voice on matters. Certainly you would think that this implies his own role as the final voice, leaving Bird as a man without a definite role....again.

                    I smell smoke on this one. It seems to me that we are getting pounded with warning signs that this just isn't the job for Larry. He might want to be involved in the NBA in some manner, but perhaps not really as a GM/president type.

                    And that naturally leads to the views on his previous bid to own a team (partial owner at least).


                    So ironically it's you (Bball) who is far more sunshiner on the current view of the top, that somehow the first step off a cliff could be labeled a "start" simply because it's not more of the same standing around near the cliff's edge.

                    I realize that the final book on Bird is not yet in, but the idea that his record is a blank slate is insulting to all of us. Too many things have been said that imply STRONGLY that Bird made a call, including the comments on Isiah's firing out of Pacers camp/Walsh, the Euro signings after he personally scouted them, and the drafting of Shawne after he personally saw an early season Memphis game and liked him (hey, quality player, just saying it was probably HIS call).

                    In fact let's return to Shawne. Got the ticket, got the court date, Bird came out and said unacceptable and that he would personally go over and bring him to court if it came to it. The implication was a serious and direct involvement in the young man's life. Just a few months later this kid was still mixed up with the same problem person.

                    It struck me that there was a disconnect here between Bird's talk and Bird's walk. You can't watch them all, but at the same time if you had issues in general and then a specific YOUNG player made it clear he needed guidance, and you went on record with an attitude that you'd give him an earful, then it seems like something went wrong.

                    Donnie wasn't the one ripping on Rick for lack of discilpline last summer after all.



                    Now I will give you a huge thumbs up for outwriting me by a long shot. You decide if I mean quality or quantity or both.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

                      There's a lot, it's going to take more than one post on this one.
                      Instead of comparing them with rock stars, let's show them taking charges, making putbacks, rejecting shots, stealing the ball, knocking down a dagger, and mix in some shots of them interacting with the community.
                      Well at least they got the 3 guys best suited for that image in the ad. Dun plays a nice offense, but the rebounding and defensive dirty work was all about those 3 players. A simple swap of the concert with their own highlight reels and this one is solved. You'd only need to go through about 3 games to find enough for the reel. That's certainly one reason I keep going to games.

                      I can't really believe OBrien was any happier with many of those than I was but yet I didn't see the "What the hell was that?" from him you'd expect after a player made a bad decision (or several).
                      I'm actually much more troubled by the offense than the defense. I hate that he seems comfortable with some of the really simplistic 2 man games they rely on. I've been too busy to filter and run the numbers, but my GUESS is that the decent A-FGM ratio involves a lot of hand-backs to a guy shooting the 3 on a basic give and step back, or a perimeter PnR, or worst of all the NCAA pass around the arc till someone shoots.

                      At times they ran plays that actually involved real help from the other 3 guys, screens and picks that setup really easy, high quality inside looks. But it didn't appear to be the staple of the offense.

                      The defense stunk of course, but at least I saw why (talent). However it was the cheap, quick offense following one of their actual good defensive stands that bugged me the most, primarily because defensive stands were so rare.
                      Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 04-28-2008, 02:40 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

                        I can't really comment on much of your post relating to this year, because for the first time in many, many years... I simply didn't watch the Pacers this year. It was good to hear about the bright spots, because not too many of those make the sports page.

                        I agree on Walsh needing to move on. It was time, he is getting a nice start elsewhere... with the bonus of replacing a very unpopular predecessor. I really have appreciated everything he did for the Pacers though.

                        I am not sure how Bird will do in the front office. He certainly hasn't done a bang up job either as an influencer or a main decision maker... whatever his role has been. I agree that he starts off a bit underwater vs. on level ground.

                        Oh well... hopefully we get a good draft pick and we start anew. I would love to trade JO if anybody wants him. I think in the right role he will be a difference maker and the guy could probably use a change of scenery.

                        Nice read.
                        “Seventy percent of me talking on the court is personally for me to get me
                        motivated and going. Thirty percent is to see if I can get into the opponent’s head.”
                        Reggie Miller

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

                          also games in HD please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Bball's Season Ending Post Mortem

                            Great post Bball. Like UB, I think this is one of the best posts of the year.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X