I know I'm in the minority, but by how much?
Besides me, does anyone around here want Scot Pollard to stick around another year?

YEAR..TEAM..G..FG%..RPG..PPG
97-98..DET..33..50..2.20..2.7
98-99..SAC..16..54..5.10..5.1
98-99..--..16..54..5.10..5.1
99-00..SAC..76..53..5.30..5.4
00-01..SAC..77..47..6.00..6.5
01-02..SAC..80..55..7.10..6.4
02-03..SAC..23..46..4.60..4.5
03-04..IND..61..41..2.70..1.7
Career.......366..50..5.10..4.9
Playoff........44..51..3.80..3.6

I think with another year in our system, he could really contribute. I also think he really wasn't in good playing shape this season, kind of like Austin Croshere a year or two ago. I think he will improve next year, whether it be with the Pacers or not. I have read a lot of things on here, mostly people talking about his "stone hands" and calling him "Scott Pollard ()." I think it was the first year jitters and he should be good to go next year. Most people love him for his antics, but I think, if given the chance here, he could be more than just a "Zan Tabak" type of player and more like a "Sam Perkins" in terms of the amount of time he sees on the court. I think most people around here have given up on him because of his play this season and because his "big" contract is displeasing, but I don't see it that way. Your thoughts?