Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: a lot of posters here....

  1. #1
    diego
    Guest

    Default a lot of posters here....

    A lot of posters here keep knocking trade ideas of SGs and stating because they play no defense. What i wanted to do is got some real thoughts on what people here think is realistic. IMO we dont need a SG that is a great defender. We dont have one now. BUt I would like one quick enough to stay with other SGs which Reggie cannot.

    I have seen people diss Rose, Vince Carter, Tmac, etc...becasue they play no defense supposedly. But IMO, with Artest having the ability to guard all star SG and SFs, we dont necessarily need our next SG to be great. Not to mention we still ahve Freddie as well.

    We need scoring from the guard spot. PERIOD. It is not likely you are going to find a player like Artest who can guard anyone and score as well. That is the main reason we need to keep him and ship Al. If we bring in a SG with less defensive skills we need Ron to be able to play those high scorers.

    Also many here say this player and that player wont fit Ricks system defensively, but his system is built upon team defense. Tinsley and Reggie suck defensively, but it is team defense that allowed us to be such a good defensive team. So in essence why cant this work with a younger scoring SG. You cannot tell me that Vince, or Tmac, or whoever plays worse defense than Reggie. Reggie may try hard, dont get me wrong, but there is a big difference in trying hard and actually stopping someone.

    All in all, I am not saying that Vince, or whoever is the answer, but im tired of hearing about defense out of that spot liek we already have it. WE NEED SCORING in the backcourt. And i am inclined to believe that someone can improve their defense a lot easier than a defender can improve their scoring. As long as we have Foster, JO, Artest, then i feel comfortable about our defense no matter who we bring in. BUT we must get some scoring ouot of our guards if we want to contend next year.

  2. #2
    LAPacer
    Guest

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    The backcourt needs some D. Tinsley's D is only average. If we get a shooting guard with no D, it will offset their impact on offense.

    But I agree that people are really going overboard with dissing Rose, VC, and TMac. Its not like they are Ricky Davis or Lee Nailon who play absolutely no defense. Rose, VC, and TMac were once all very good defenders. Very very good (maybe i'm getting carried away in Rose's case). I think in the right environment, they would D it up. Ron's D is contagious and Rick won't put up with token D.

  3. #3
    Running with the Big Boys BillS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Danberry
    Age
    54
    Posts
    11,468

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    In my case, I'm only dissing SG D if Artest is part of the trade (in fact, I'm going to diss just about anything feasible if Ronnie is part of the trade because I think Ronnie has waaaay too much upside to give away for anything but an impossible exchange).
    BillS

    "Every time I pitched it was like throwing gasoline on a fire. Pkkw! Pkkw! Pkkw! Pkkw!"
    - Ebby Calvin "Nuke" LaLoosh

  4. #4
    diego
    Guest

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    The backcourt needs some D. Tinsley's D is only average. If we get a shooting guard with no D, it will offset their impact on offense.

    But I agree that people are really going overboard with dissing Rose, VC, and TMac. Its not like they are Ricky Davis or Lee Nailon who play absolutely no defense. Rose, VC, and TMac were once all very good defenders. Very very good (maybe i'm getting carried away in Rose's case). I think in the right environment, they would D it up. Ron's D is contagious and Rick won't put up with token D.


    Now see i can agree with this. We do need some defense out of our backcourt. But nobody can tell me whoever we get wont be an upgrade over reggie. I love Reggie and in his prime was a very solid defender, but now he gets beat routinely, cant close out on shooters quick enough, and is a liability in the post.

  5. #5
    Wasting Light Hicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583
    Mood

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    A lot of posters here keep knocking trade ideas of SGs and stating because they play no defense. What i wanted to do is got some real thoughts on what people here think is realistic. IMO we dont need a SG that is a great defender. We dont have one now. BUt I would like one quick enough to stay with other SGs which Reggie cannot.

    I have seen people diss Rose, Vince Carter, Tmac, etc...becasue they play no defense supposedly. But IMO, with Artest having the ability to guard all star SG and SFs, we dont necessarily need our next SG to be great. Not to mention we still ahve Freddie as well.

    We need scoring from the guard spot. PERIOD. It is not likely you are going to find a player like Artest who can guard anyone and score as well. That is the main reason we need to keep him and ship Al. If we bring in a SG with less defensive skills we need Ron to be able to play those high scorers.

    Also many here say this player and that player wont fit Ricks system defensively, but his system is built upon team defense. Tinsley and Reggie suck defensively, but it is team defense that allowed us to be such a good defensive team. So in essence why cant this work with a younger scoring SG. You cannot tell me that Vince, or Tmac, or whoever plays worse defense than Reggie. Reggie may try hard, dont get me wrong, but there is a big difference in trying hard and actually stopping someone.

    All in all, I am not saying that Vince, or whoever is the answer, but im tired of hearing about defense out of that spot liek we already have it. WE NEED SCORING in the backcourt. And i am inclined to believe that someone can improve their defense a lot easier than a defender can improve their scoring. As long as we have Foster, JO, Artest, then i feel comfortable about our defense no matter who we bring in. BUT we must get some scoring ouot of our guards if we want to contend next year.
    Agreed. People are making the wrong emphasis on these potential SGs. Defense comes second in this case.

  6. #6

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    Simple really.

    If we trade Al to get a SG, he better be an upgrade on defense and scoring to Reggie, and of course be much younger (not asking for the moon here).

    If we trade Ron to get a SG, play Al at SF, the new SG had better play really good defense because he will have to guard all the stud 2-guards that Ron used to guard and that Al can't guard.
    The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!)

  7. #7
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    32,711

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    diego, I always think defense first, that is just the way I am.

    Bills made a good point, if Ron is traded, then defense is very important, and yet diego I see your point, I'll sacrifice some defense for offense, Some

  8. #8
    Member Ultimate Frisbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,374

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    How many SGs are there that are both good on offense and defense? 1. Kobe.
    Here, everyone have a : on me

  9. #9

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    I think we already have a SG on our squad who's a good defender...Fred Jones. His offensive game is just limited.

    Anyway, I would sacrifice some D for a legitimate offensive player. Unless, of course, Ron is included in a trade.

  10. #10
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,965

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    Same here. The question is offcourse the expectation of what quality of player would come here. It seems like soo many people are expecting T-Mac, Ray Allen or Pierce to come over here. I just dont see that happening and if it does its going to cost us a lot, Artest to start with I would think.

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  11. #11

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    I think we already have a SG on our squad who's a good defender...Fred Jones. His offensive game is just limited.

    Anyway, I would sacrifice some D for a legitimate offensive player. Unless, of course, Ron is included in a trade.
    I wouldn't say limited. It is still developing. And it's going pretty well in my opinion.
    Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

  12. #12
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,965

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    Aggreed, Suave, its going well, better than I expected at the beginning of this season with Jones not so super summercamp and pre season. Still I think he's a back up for at the very least one more year, and I still doubt he would be consistent outside threat game in, game out. Great back up, no doubt, not yet close to a starter I think. Just my .

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  13. #13
    Boom Baby'er ABADays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Coliseum
    Posts
    6,248

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    Could you change the name of the thread please? I had my credit card ready to buy some.
    The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

  14. #14
    Administrator Roaming Gnome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Indy's Wild Wild West Side: 8 sec-check...Club Rio-check...Cloud 9-check
    Age
    40
    Posts
    5,933

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: a lot of posters here....

    Why do we all think that bringing in a shooting guard that can fill it up but has only average defense at best is "sacraficing"? Reggie's D is marginal at best...how is that a sacrafice?
    ...Still "flying casual"
    @roaminggnome74

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •