Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

    Pat Riley’s search to bring young help to the Heat is officially underway, according to an Associated Press report.

    Riley was in State College, Pa., on Sunday, watching Indiana freshman guard Eric Gordon play against Penn State. Gordon scored 26 points, but the 18th-ranked Hoosiers lost to the Nittany Lions, 68-64 in overtime.

    Riley is expected in Miami on Monday night when the Heat host the Clippers

    http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ar...osiers_gordon/

    Looks like Riley might be looking to add Gordon.

    AUSTRALIA'S NO.1 PACER FAN

  • #2
    Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

    I doubt he's still interested after todays stinker. 8-24. Youch.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

      Yeah, if Gordon wanted to get added to the Heat today did not help his chances. He played good D, but he played arguably his worst game all year offensively.


      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

        Could have been there to see DJ as well.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

          Pat Riley was there, but I don't think he was there to see Gordon.

          Yesterday's game just reaffirmed every belief that I have that I don't want Eric Gordon anywhere near the Pacers. DJ White on the other hand, I would welcome.
          Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team. -- Scottie Pippen

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

            Originally posted by jcouts View Post
            Pat Riley was there, but I don't think he was there to see Gordon.

            Yesterday's game just reaffirmed every belief that I have that I don't want Eric Gordon anywhere near the Pacers. DJ White on the other hand, I would welcome.
            Gordon is a freshman; White is a senior.

            DJ has improved by leaps and bounds since his freshman year.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

              I seriously doubt Miami would be taking EJ no matter what he
              did yesterday considering they've got Wade at SG and will
              be picking at #1 thru #4. And a guy as savvy as Riley isn't
              gonna base his opinion on one game anyway.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

                Originally posted by Shade View Post
                Gordon is a freshman; White is a senior.

                DJ has improved by leaps and bounds since his freshman year.
                All the more reason why Gordon isn't ready for the NBA and needs to stay in college another year or two. In two years, if he makes better basketball decisions, plays defense the entire game, learns to trust his teammates, isn't as soft and plays for a coach who has actually had a guard play in the NBA (Sampson has never coached a guard who has played a minute in the NBA...in fact, only 2 players he's ever coached have played in the NBA - Eduardo Najera and Ryan Humphrey), I might be open to him being on the Pacers.

                I certainly agree that Miami has no need for Gordon, unless they plan on getting rid of Wade. I really really hope Riley isn't that stupid. He just shut down Wade for the rest of the year to make sure he's ready for next year. I see a need for DJ White on the Heat...I do not see a need for Eric Gordon on the Heat. Wade will be playing SG. Gordon has little in the way of court vision, or desire to pass the ball in general.

                Yesterday's game: Gordon, 24 FGAs...entire rest of the team, 34 FGAs.

                The pathetic thing in general was that IU's backcourt shot a combined 12 for 45. Gordon's 30% FG% was hot compared to Bassett and Crawford.

                What's more interesting is that the IU frontcourt was 10-13 in FGAs.
                Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team. -- Scottie Pippen

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

                  Originally posted by jcouts View Post
                  Gordon has little in the way of court vision, or desire to pass the ball in general.

                  Yesterday's game: Gordon, 24 FGAs...entire rest of the team, 34 FGAs.

                  The pathetic thing in general was that IU's backcourt shot a combined 12 for 45. Gordon's 30% FG% was hot compared to Bassett and Crawford.

                  What's more interesting is that the IU frontcourt was 10-13 in FGAs.
                  Darn right. At this point I'm hoping that he does declare for the draft. I want guys on the IU team that understand there are four other players out there with Indiana on their jerseys.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

                    So, are the Heat tanking the season now?




                    MIAMI (AP)—Dwyane Wade’s season with the Miami Heat is over.

                    Heat coach Pat Riley announced Monday that Wade, the All-Star guard and 2006 NBA finals MVP who has battled left knee pain throughout the season, will not play in Miami’s final 21 games this year.

                    The move was expected, although its timing—with so much of the season still to play—was mildly surprising. But Wade missed Miami’s game against the Golden State Warriors on Friday because of knee stiffness, telling Riley at the time that it pained him just to get out of bed.

                    The next day, Wade looked strong playing in Atlanta. But with all hope of the playoffs gone, the Heat—the NBA’s worst team at 11-50—and Wade decided Monday that the time was right to give the franchise’s best player additional time to heal and rest.


                    As recently as last Thursday, Wade said that even though the knee is sore, he wanted to continue playing.

                    “I don’t want to cut my minutes back,” Wade said, when asked why he still wanted to play this season. “If it’s going to happen, it’s going to happen. And whenever that day is, if it comes, I’ll just start preparing for the summer and rehabbing. But the day is not today.”

                    The day came four days later.

                    So now, Wade will turn to therapy in hopes of getting his knee back to top form.

                    Later this week, he’ll undergo OssaTron treatment—a high-tech, high-powered form of shock wave therapy. The non-surgical procedure lasts about 30 minutes, and afterward, Wade will be limited to passive exercise for the first 30 days. After that, he may return to basketball-related activity.

                    “The knee will be hit with shock waves, electrical shock waves,” Riley said. “It’s actually a pretty painful procedure.”

                    OssaTron has been used to treat injuries such as plantar fasciitis and tennis elbow when other more conventional treatments fail to bring as much relief as a patient would like. Heat center Alonzo Mourning has undergone the same procedure in the past to alleviate tendinitis, Riley said.

                    Wade, who had surgery on his left knee and left shoulder last May, will have a long summer.

                    He still intends to be part of USA Basketball’s team that will compete in the Beijing Olympics in August, and the Heat will open training camp about four weeks after the games. So getting him time to rest and further rehabilitate the knee now, in Miami’s eyes, seems paramount.

                    Wade finishes the season averaging 24.6 points, fifth-best in the NBA.

                    He becomes the third Heat player who’s out for the season because of injuries, adding to a litany of roster woes in Miami. Mourning and forward Dorell Wright both suffered knee injuries and will not play the rest of the year, and guard Smush Parker will remain on the team’s inactive list because of a legal matter.

                    A number of other Heat players are also nicked up right now, including forward Udonis Haslem (ankle), guard Marcus Banks (hamstring) and center Earl Barron (knee).

                    Riley has said that he’s considering signing a player or two to a 10-day contract, but that would require a roster move, since the Heat has 15 players already in the fold.


                    http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...e=lgns&print=1
                    Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

                      Originally posted by jcouts View Post
                      All the more reason why Gordon isn't ready for the NBA and needs to stay in college another year or two. In two years, if he makes better basketball decisions, plays defense the entire game, learns to trust his teammates, isn't as soft and plays for a coach who has actually had a guard play in the NBA (Sampson has never coached a guard who has played a minute in the NBA...in fact, only 2 players he's ever coached have played in the NBA - Eduardo Najera and Ryan Humphrey), I might be open to him being on the Pacers.

                      I certainly agree that Miami has no need for Gordon, unless they plan on getting rid of Wade. I really really hope Riley isn't that stupid. He just shut down Wade for the rest of the year to make sure he's ready for next year. I see a need for DJ White on the Heat...I do not see a need for Eric Gordon on the Heat. Wade will be playing SG. Gordon has little in the way of court vision, or desire to pass the ball in general.

                      Yesterday's game: Gordon, 24 FGAs...entire rest of the team, 34 FGAs.

                      The pathetic thing in general was that IU's backcourt shot a combined 12 for 45. Gordon's 30% FG% was hot compared to Bassett and Crawford.

                      What's more interesting is that the IU frontcourt was 10-13 in FGAs.
                      Oh, EJ certainly needs more seasoning, I agree with that.

                      But I still feel he's gonna be a stud in 2-3 years, so I want the Pacers to take him now and develop him.

                      As for the FG attempts, two things:

                      - His FG attempts have been rising since Dakich took over,
                      - There is no consistent third option on the team. DJ and EJ have been carrying IU for most of the season.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

                        And yes, geez, the Heat are tanking. I think they deserve to drop out of the top 3 for that.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

                          Do the Heat really need to sit Wade to tank ? Seems to me that
                          they're bad enough regardless.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Riley Begins Scouting Tour With Trip To See Hoosiers' Gordon

                            Originally posted by jcouts View Post
                            All the more reason why Gordon isn't ready for the NBA and needs to stay in college another year or two. In two years, if he makes better basketball decisions, plays defense the entire game, learns to trust his teammates, isn't as soft and plays for a coach who has actually had a guard play in the NBA (Sampson has never coached a guard who has played a minute in the NBA...in fact, only 2 players he's ever coached have played in the NBA - Eduardo Najera and Ryan Humphrey), I might be open to him being on the Pacers.

                            I certainly agree that Miami has no need for Gordon, unless they plan on getting rid of Wade. I really really hope Riley isn't that stupid. He just shut down Wade for the rest of the year to make sure he's ready for next year. I see a need for DJ White on the Heat...I do not see a need for Eric Gordon on the Heat. Wade will be playing SG. Gordon has little in the way of court vision, or desire to pass the ball in general.

                            Yesterday's game: Gordon, 24 FGAs...entire rest of the team, 34 FGAs.

                            The pathetic thing in general was that IU's backcourt shot a combined 12 for 45. Gordon's 30% FG% was hot compared to Bassett and Crawford.

                            What's more interesting is that the IU frontcourt was 10-13 in FGAs.
                            DJ certainly should have touched the ball more, I can't argue with that. However with Ellis suspended yesterday, they needed Gordon to handle the ball even more. Gordon isn't a PG. Anyways, I think Gordon has been struggling mainly because he hasn't had a consistent coaching situation this year. He hasn't improved in the areas that you would expect a young player to get better in with a good coach.


                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X