Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

    Hmmm... some interesting comments from Donnie here and there in this article. Don't think it has been posted yet, but if it has feel free to lock this thread Admins .

    "Which way is up?
    Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle


    For much of the NBA, the trade deadline has a straightforward focus. Those teams cruising to a playoff berth are looking to deal for the final piece to the Finals puzzle, while those in the express lane to the draft lottery are trying to peddle their veterans for young players or draft picks.

    Stuck in the middle, though, are those teams whose destination is unclear, who are seemingly as close to the playoffs as they are to rebuilding. And for teams such as the Indiana Pacers and Milwaukee Bucks -- clubs not in realistic title contention nor out of the playoff chase -- the decision about whether to trade yourself into or out of the postseason may be one of the most difficult in the NBA.

    "It's wonderful to say everybody's goal is to win the world championship; that's a good sound bite," said Bob Ferry, general manager of the Washington Bullets from 1973-90. "But realistically, if you don't have the nucleus of players to build around to do that, then you're much more likely to take your lumps and take a chance in the lottery. But it's a huge gamble, and you're going to have to understand it can take years to build that way."

    Before rolling the dice on that sort of fresh start, teams tend to consider the odds on a handful of key concerns. These issues say as much about a team's present as they do in determining its future.

    Star power
    Being invited to a party that includes more than half of the league may not qualify as exclusive, but the playoffs still offer a lot more pluses than minuses: revenue, exposure and an accomplishment to sell to fans. Still, the difference between attending as a low seed and getting a seat behind the velvet rope as a title contender is a function of having the type of talent that isn't common in the NBA.

    "If your goal is to win the championship, you've got to have basically the best player in the NBA," said Ferry, who presided over a Bullets team that won the 1978 title and reached the postseason 14 times in his tenure as GM. "It doesn't make any difference what position."

    While the occasional outliers -- the 2004 Pistons, the Sonics and Bullets of the late 1970s -- offer some evidence to the contrary, for the most part, the history of the NBA Finals is littered with the game's iconic figures, from Russell to Abdul-Jabbar to Magic to Bird to Jordan to Shaq and Kobe to Duncan.

    Acquiring that rare talent has thus become the driving philosophy for many a team, an impetus that prompts some clubs to welcome a nosedive in the standings in hopes of winning the draft lottery. That is, when they are not continually searching for the right mix of complementary pieces to surround their MVP candidate.

    "It's like a poker hand. Your best player is your wild card," Ferry said. "If you've got a couple of wild cards, then it's best to keep going, trying to pick the right players or make the right trades to add to what you have. If you don't, then you've got to decide how to get that player."

    Tying your fortunes to the likes of a Jason Kidd, though, also ties a team to the whims of the player. That means a team could be compelled to make moves whether it wants to or not.

    "Guys who make a lot of money often tell teams which way they want them to go," new Sixers GM Ed Stefanski said. "Players' attitudes and chemistry in the locker room and on the court will dictate whether you blow it up or not. If they decide that they don't want to be around and they make a ton of money, that forces a team to make a decision."

    The goals of that choice differ, though, for a team running out the clock on a playoff run versus a club at the beginning of one.

    "There is a decision to be made if getting in the playoffs is going to put you in a better position next year to go higher in the playoffs," said Pacers CEO Donnie Walsh, whose club missed the postseason for the first time in 10 years last season. "When you have a young team you should always want to make the playoffs because the more times your team is in, the better they are going to be once they grow up and get to a certain point where you can add the necessary players around them to make them an elite team.

    "There's [also] a time you might look and say, 'We've had elements of this team that have been together for a long time; it's not working. What is our best value out there? Are we in a position where we can add players, or are there trades that will make us better, or should we just break up the whole thing?' "

    That decision, according to Walsh -- who acknowledged that the Pacers need additions to become a better team -- will guide Indiana's moves and those of most teams this week and this summer.

    To market, to market
    No matter how many hours a front office spends scouting potential trade targets, a team's options are limited by the very opponents it hopes to beat.

    "What you want to do isn't the question," Walsh said. "The question is, What are those teams I'm dealing with willing to do? If you make the right trades, it can go either way. It may allow you to break up the team, get draft choices, young players and start all over. On the other hand, if you're not able to do that, you may have to go in another direction."

    Walsh cites the recent Shaquille O'Neal trade as an example of how quickly a team's plans can change. With Shaq signed for another two seasons at $20 million annually, the Diesel was thought to be all but untradable, a notion that likely would have had the Heat looking to quickly build a productive, if not title-worthy, supporting cast around O'Neal and Dwyane Wade. When the Suns came calling, though, the opportunity to rebuild for the long term was too enticing to ignore.

    But those types of offers from contenders can just as easily keep a team focused on making the best of its current situation. In Philadelphia, Stefanski took over in December promising to assess the organization from top to bottom, which, for a team that lost 47 games last season, seemed a prelude to a housecleaning, especially with the salary-cap savings veteran point guard Andre Miller could offer in a trade. But impressed with Miller's leadership of a young roster, Stefanski may just keep his $9 million asset.

    "I have not called any teams and asked them what they would give me for Andre Miller," Stefanski told SI.com. "I've fielded calls about Andre, but there have been no offers that would make us trade him. He's our leader and the glue guy on our team. If we decided to trade him, you'd have to go with youth and a piece for the future; we've already got experience, so you'd have to stay in a total rebuilding mode."

    Of course, the willingness to pick up the phone in the first place depends on another variable out of a team's control: the draft.

    "Certain years it makes a hell of a lot more sense to lose and scratch it out than other years, depending on who is projected to go in the lottery," Ferry said.

    For every year that offers a LeBron or a Carmelo, however, there are far more that include players such as Adam Morrison and recently traded Shelden Williams among the top five. That reality may give a general manager pause before taking the sledgehammer to his team. And that's to say nothing of the team that swings for a lottery prize and misses.

    "Teams have gotten really burned going for the worst record," Walsh said. "Instead of getting a Greg Oden, they pick 4 or 5 or 6, and that sets you back a long way. You'll get a normal, good player, but you've given up your whole team and you can't really replace it, so you've probably put yourself way behind."

    Buzz factor
    Despite the bluster of how important rings and banners are, the NBA is, like any sport, a business enterprise, and that business is entertainment. Filled seats and luxury boxes more than make up for the hundreds of millions spent on salaries, luxury taxes and palatial training courts. And though logic holds that fans will support a winner, they won't come to see a winner tread water.

    "There comes a point where making the playoffs isn't received as well by the franchise or the fans," Walsh said. "Nobody's excited anymore that you make the playoffs because you always make the playoffs. It doesn't mean as much to you or your fan base."

    That fact doesn't manifest itself, initially, in wide swaths of empty seats, but in an undefined "feel," according to Walsh, a sense that sends some teams scrambling for the checkbook to acquire that elusive player who will get them "over the top" before the title window slams shut. But a new toy only goes so far with fans.

    "When I was in Washington, our big decision centered on whether or not to keep paying Moses Malone," Ferry said of the star center, whom the Bullets had acquired in June 1986. "[In 1988] we lost to Detroit in the final game of our [first-round] playoff series [the Bullets' fourth consecutive first-round exit]. After that happened, I think it was more exciting to [owner] Abe Pollin to think about the lottery and what might happen than it was just making the playoffs.

    "It was explained to [Pollin] by our marketing people that if we rebuilt they could market the team just as well as if we made another playoffs and lost in the first round. When Abe was reassured he wouldn't lose any more money going through this process, he went for it."

    Malone signed with the Rockets in the summer of 1988, and the Bullets' five-year streak of playoff appearances ended the next season.

    A painful process
    A fresh start rarely sounds like a bad alternative. It even engenders catchy slogans such as "Doin' It," or "The Hustling Bullets." But once the marketing campaign has been deployed and a team in the throes of reconstruction has to draw on its own play, the atmosphere in and around a club can turn sour quickly.

    "When those decisions are made, sometimes people don't realize the pain of losing and how devastating it is on people," Ferry said. "The summer may be great, but then you lose eight or 10 in a row, the bottom falls out and all of a sudden you remember, 'Oh my god, we're doing this on purpose.'

    "I would imagine some owners or organizations can handle it, but I didn't think our market or our chemistry could survive a rebuilding job. I showed [upper management] how long it took the average team at the time to build through the drafts and all the lotteries and ups and downs, and it was up to eight years. I said, 'I just don't think anybody in this room can handle losing for that long.' This wasn't going to be easy and relationships were going to be strained, and I knew it wasn't going to work for me."

    Ferry left the organization in 1990, when Washington was in the second year of an eight-year playoff drought. Free agency now can hasten a rebuilding project, but the process still can take years.

    "If you have draft choices and your salary is down, you could go out, draft good players, sign free agents and maybe get the talent in two years," Walsh said. "Then it's going to take time for you to grow into a very good team. Players have to learn one another and they have to go through all the trials and tribulations of ascending up the league. ... [But] if you're talking about completely rebuilding -- what Chicago did after Jordan's group -- you have to get ready for it because it can be real ugly in the beginning."

    How ugly? The Bulls averaged 21 victories in the first five 82-game seasons after Jordan's last hurrah in 1997-98. Seattle started this season 0-8 and also has had a 14-game losing streak. The Hawks haven't won more than 35 games in a season in 10 years.

    So why do it? Why tear down if tension and pink slips and hundreds of losses are the price of reaching for the next Hall of Famer? Why not play it safe, build a solid core and aim to become the next Pistons of 2004?

    Simply? It's easier to win with one than without one. The nature of the game allows one player to change a team's fortunes. With so many other hard, uncertain choices to weigh in determining a team's future, the comforts of stardom offer an asset that takes little analysis to appreciate."

    Source: CNNSI.com
    Link: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ing/index.html

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  • #2
    Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

    Did anyone else hear Slick suggest that making the playoffs this season probably isn't the best thing for this Pacers team. He said this during last night's pre-game radio show

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

      I have a feeling when I get time to read this thoroughly and in whole, I'm not going to like it/agree am I?

      -Bball
      Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

      ------

      "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

      -John Wooden

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

        Originally posted by Bball View Post
        I have a feeling when I get time to read this thoroughly and in whole, I'm not going to like it/agree am I?

        -Bball
        Haha, knowing you just a little bit I think that's a fair conclusion .

        Regards,

        Mourning
        2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

        2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

        2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

          Slick is a realist and he doesn't mince words. Bird probably agrees
          with him, but can't say it.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

            Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
            Did anyone else hear Slick suggest that making the playoffs this season probably isn't the best thing for this Pacers team. He said this during last night's pre-game radio show
            Marc Stein reports that he's heard the advice to strongly believe that JO will play out the year WITH the Pacers.

            Or would that be for him to not play the season out FOR the Pacers?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

              Originally posted by Mourning View Post
              The goals of that choice differ, though, for a team running out the clock on a playoff run versus a club at the beginning of one.

              "There is a decision to be made if getting in the playoffs is going to put you in a better position next year to go higher in the playoffs," said Pacers CEO Donnie Walsh, whose club missed the postseason for the first time in 10 years last season. "When you have a young team you should always want to make the playoffs because the more times your team is in, the better they are going to be once they grow up and get to a certain point where you can add the necessary players around them to make them an elite team.

              "There's [also] a time you might look and say, 'We've had elements of this team that have been together for a long time; it's not working. What is our best value out there? Are we in a position where we can add players, or are there trades that will make us better, or should we just break up the whole thing?' "

              That decision, according to Walsh -- who acknowledged that the Pacers need additions to become a better team -- will guide Indiana's moves and those of most teams this week and this summer.

              To market, to market
              No matter how many hours a front office spends scouting potential trade targets, a team's options are limited by the very opponents it hopes to beat.

              "What you want to do isn't the question," Walsh said. "The question is, What are those teams I'm dealing with willing to do? If you make the right trades, it can go either way. It may allow you to break up the team, get draft choices, young players and start all over. On the other hand, if you're not able to do that, you may have to go in another direction."
              I think that this is very telling of what TPTB have been trying to do this season. The goal at the beginning of the season was to make the Playoffs...like normal.....while trying to see what they can do to move JONeal for Expiring Contracts/Picks/prospects. Since they couldn't do it...we are not back on track with our push for the Playoffs...again.
              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

                These points need to be repeated ad nauseum to all "tankers" and "blow it up" types.
                "When those decisions are made, sometimes people don't realize the pain of losing and how devastating it is on people," Ferry said. "The summer may be great, but then you lose eight or 10 in a row, the bottom falls out and all of a sudden you remember, 'Oh my god, we're doing this on purpose.'
                [But] if you're talking about completely rebuilding -- what Chicago did after Jordan's group -- you have to get ready for it because it can be real ugly in the beginning."

                How ugly? The Bulls averaged 21 victories in the first five 82-game seasons after Jordan's last hurrah in 1997-98. Seattle started this season 0-8 and also has had a 14-game losing streak. The Hawks haven't won more than 35 games in a season in 10 years
                And Indy has been there before too. We know how horrible it can be, at least if you are over 35 or so. 5 straight years of 21 wins? Can you imagine what Conseco would look like...that's if the team wasn't moved in that time?

                Curtains for the upper level and ends of the club level. Legends is closed down. In short a LOT worse than it is even this season. They haven't got that average down to 7-8K yet.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

                  Thanks for posting this article Mourning. A nice read, even if it is a realistic look at where we are. I love the Pacers, but we're not a very good team. I hope we can find a way to turn it around.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

                    Originally posted by Bball View Post
                    I have a feeling when I get time to read this thoroughly and in whole, I'm not going to like it/agree am I?

                    -Bball
                    I thought it dead on.

                    You won't like it because you just flat out don't like management and won't like reading what their problems are. But look at your bright side, this gives you an excuse to write your 10,300 diatribe against management.
                    Last edited by Will Galen; 02-21-2008, 04:49 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

                      Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post

                      Curtains for the upper level and ends of the club level. Legends is closed down. In short a LOT worse than it is even this season. They haven't got that average down to 7-8K yet.
                      It's coming. The Pacers method of attempting to avoid it is actually going to make it worse. Why? Because even .500 ball isn't going to excite anyone and right now we're staring UP at .500 ball. We've had a 61 win team this decade and the next best was 44 IIRC (Well, I guess it depends on where you count 2000). Overall, we've been pretty BLAH more times than not this decade and are heading the wrong way. So the honeymoon period on rebuilding was wasted and the team is throwing spaghetti at the wall to avoid the inevitable.

                      We're having 'rebuilding' type records NOW and we're not rebuilding. We're just extending the pain until we truly start the process. Rising up to be .500 isn't going to fix this mess.

                      If something doesn't change yesterday, you can wave bye to the Pacers because the fact that the Simons and Walsh-Bird are maintaining the course means they must think this is the right path. And that means in the end they'll blame the city/state/fans for not being interested in NBA basketball anymore. ...And then they will move.

                      -Bball
                      Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                      ------

                      "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                      -John Wooden

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

                        Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                        I thought it dead on.

                        You won't like it because you just flat out don't like management and won't like reading what their problems are.
                        I'm just reading replies right now. I figure you're probably right. I want to take my time reading the article.

                        -Bball
                        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                        ------

                        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                        -John Wooden

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

                          Originally posted by Bball View Post
                          We're having 'rebuilding' type records NOW and we're not rebuilding.

                          -Bball
                          But we are rebuilding, just not the way you and others want. The Pacer brass just chose not to do a complete overhaul.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

                            Originally posted by Bball View Post
                            We're having 'rebuilding' type records NOW and we're not rebuilding. We're just extending the pain until we truly start the process. Rising up to be .500 isn't going to fix this mess.
                            But I'm in the "they are already rebuilding" camp, so I don't agree.

                            Here's my rough plan for the team considering the contracts they've worked into.

                            You have DG and Shawne to develop. Okay, both need to cook about another 2 years. Danny is just starting to tip into team star (not all-star) status. Shawne is about 1.5 years behind him I think.

                            In the meantime you've just got zero room to work, especially considering the resign cost on Granger.

                            So instead of trying to fix everything now, you try to hover around and then make a sudden leap in about 3 years. In the meantime while you sit in this dead-end waiting room the East is poor enough that even as configured you can get into the playoffs.

                            The team peeks into the playoffs once or twice which gives DG and Shawne that taste as more critical components in those situation. And at the same time something much more important is happening - JO, Tins, Dun and Troy all have their contracts getting better and better.

                            So just as Danny and Shawne are ready to be THE guys and are needing some help to push past first round fodder status, off the books comes JO, and Tins/Dun/Troy suddenly have become killer trade bait instead of dead weight.

                            Along the way you might have picked up another Foster or Woody or Tony type in the mid-first, a guy that isn't the star but helps round out the youth movement.


                            In other words, pretend that JO/Tins/Dun/Troy aren't even a part of what you are becoming. Yes they are here, but in a rebuilding spirit where the target is to get good in 3-4 years they aren't because clearly they will be coming off the books or traded by then.

                            If you buy into Danny, and why not, and perhaps Shawne too, then what the F is the hurry to fix anything? As if EJ gets drafted and JO is traded for Vince and suddenly the Pacers are champs. That wouldn't be the case. Even if they can get a Rose, EJ or Bayless, those guys are going to need a couple of years just like Danny did.

                            In the meantime someone check the list of possible FAs the year that JO comes off the books. That's the real rebuild target date, not today at 3pm. That's how a team that is as stuck as any team in the NBA gets out of that spot. And along the way you get some minor playoff distraction instead of total crap.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: CNNSI article: Path to success unclear for teams stuck in the middle (Walsh input)

                              With all the ENTERTAINING BBALL happening alot of places OTHER than INDY this year (and probably alot more years, with the present regime) all I can hope for is that WALSH and BIRD hang on to the draft pick. Who knows, an ASTUTE judge of talent like BIRD might just get something good this time. BTW, shouldn't he be in EUROPE trying to mine yet another gem?

                              Of course, they might just feel the need to give it up for Baby AL AGAIN.

                              Why are these guys still running the team?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X