Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

    Originally posted by Since86 View Post
    Budinger won't be picked, not because of his ability or lack of ability if you think so, but because it would be the umpteenth SF on the team. It would almost comical if it wasn't the team I love.
    I'm not going to give TPTB the benefit of the doubt when it comes to drafting another SF for the team. We need a few more to run our All-SF lineup.
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

      Originally posted by themayhem87 View Post
      No to budinger, and hell no to hibbert. the man can't get down the court. I watched him against memphis...who plays an NBA style of pace and dude played like 10 minutes the whole game because he is so slow. At the number 9 pick someone is going to fall and it might be DJ augustin...theres who we need. A quick pass-first point guard who has a great outside shot. He's small so people might not like him, but I've watched enough of Texas this year to know hes a player. I live in Knoxville, and watched him single-handedly destroy my beloved #2 ranked Volunteers.
      augustin is not good enough to go top 10, so yes, he will be there. by why draft him in the 1st when you have the exact same player in sean singletary waiting in round 2, and a slightly lesser version of both in dominic james in round 2 as well...?

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

        Originally posted by croz24 View Post
        augustin is not good enough to go top 10, so yes, he will be there. by why draft him in the 1st when you have the exact same player in sean singletary waiting in round 2, and a slightly lesser version of both in dominic james in round 2 as well...?
        Singletary and James aren't point guards....augustin is. I've watched both Singletary and James this year and haven't been impressed with either. James is a ballhog, no way I want him. I'm telling you Augustin is going to be a great player....and no team needs a point guard more right now than the pacers. Just my opinion. And nbadraft.net has us drafting Hasheem Thabeet, over Mayo

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

          how exactly are singletary and james not pgs? the fact that you made that statement makes me think you really haven't watched much of james or singletary at all over the past 3 years...sure the pacers need a pg, but you should never draft on need, especially a position like pg where it's so difficult to find a franchise player at that position...

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

            CableKC-

            Thabeet is certainly a few years way from being a finished product
            (especially offensively), but his upside is potentially huge. Given
            where this team is now, I'm not sure that doesn't fit pretty well
            with about when they'll be back to a contending level.

            If that's incorrect (which means J.O. is sticking around), then Thabeet
            would still be a great frontline compliment as his size and defensive
            skills would allow J.O. to play more at the PF spot.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

              I will probably explode if we have the opportunity to draft Mayo and don't.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                Originally posted by esabyrn333 View Post
                We wouldn't take Budinger in the first place and most of these things just rank the players and fill in the teams where they fall.

                Roy Hibbert will be a back up at best in the nba. He is to slow and does not have the athelitic ability to translate to the nba game
                I'm sure that's it too (hope at least) and agree on Hibbert too. No plays run for him? Hardly. Unlike Thabeet they put Hibbert in the post constantly. He either scores or passes. He does this well by NCAA standards but unlike Thabeet he's rather slow and looks topped out on his major talent growth.

                Good kid, but you can't take him that high. Double that for Budinger IMO.

                BTW, I want to again repeat that the best place to get a good sense of where the Pacers will draft you need to look at Hollinger's Playoff Predictor which is based on simulating the REMAINING SCHEDULE, not projecting out the current W-L.

                By that count you need to look at the 14-15 range talent still.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                  Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                  The important question is if Thabeet is NBA ready....we need to get a guy that is ready to go. I don't doubt that I would much rather have him over Hibbert....but the impression that I get is that this guy has the potential to develop into a solid NBA center.....the problem is how long it will take.
                  I'd say Thabeet has probably another good 4 years.

                  He is still very raw in terms of basketball skills. It will take some time yet for him to get better there.

                  Plus he needs to get stronger. Great quickness but he isn't strong enough to endure an NBA season right now.

                  No matter what though if I had to choose i'd take him over Hibbert. I think Hibbert = a bust in the NBA where at least Thabeet has the potential to be productive.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                    As for the Pacers picking I think that there are only 3 guards that you should take a look at and they are Gordon, Bayless, and maybe Mayo if his background checks out ok.

                    I really like Batum but he is a wing player and very similar to Danny and Shawne IMO.

                    If i'm the Pacers I have my sights set on taking a point guard or a big man. Normally it's who is going to be the best player no matter what position but we can not take another wing player.

                    There are 2 point guards in this draft in D.J. Augistin, Darren Collison, that the Pacers should consider.

                    If you can you take Augistin hands down. Collison comes as the second choice but you only take him if you can trade down into the late teens. I think Collison can start in the NBA but not as one of your best players. I think that Augistin can be a big part of your team, think of Tony Parker or Jameer Nelson. They may not be their teams best players like some point guards (Nash, Paul, etc) but they are their teams second or third best player.

                    The only big man I consider if i'm the Pacers is Hasheem Thabeet. Brook Lopez will be gone by the time Indiana picks.

                    So, assuming the Pacers pick in say the 10-15 range I take Augistin or Thabeet. If neither is avaliable I move the pick.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                      Originally posted by croz24 View Post
                      how exactly are singletary and james not pgs? the fact that you made that statement makes me think you really haven't watched much of james or singletary at all over the past 3 years...sure the pacers need a pg, but you should never draft on need, especially a position like pg where it's so difficult to find a franchise player at that position...
                      Ummmm....I've watched James and thought he was overrated. Maybe I've seen him on 5 or 6 off days. Anyways, obviously if we get a higher pick and get the opportunity to draft Derrick Rose or Bayless I'd be estatic. But if we stay at the 9 pick both of those players will be gone and from what I've seen of Augustine I think he'll be a great player

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                        Okay, he might be overrated but how does that not make him a PG?

                        He's a pg and only a pg, there's no other position he can play.
                        Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                          Originally posted by themayhem87 View Post
                          Ummmm....I've watched James and thought he was overrated. Maybe I've seen him on 5 or 6 off days. Anyways, obviously if we get a higher pick and get the opportunity to draft Derrick Rose or Bayless I'd be estatic. But if we stay at the 9 pick both of those players will be gone and from what I've seen of Augustine I think he'll be a great player
                          yes, he is a little overrated and should have come out after his freshman season. but i did say a 'slightly lesser version' of the two. james' a/t is actually better than augustin's this year though, so he's clearly a pg. i only mentioned james though because he and augustin are very similar types of players with close to equal talent. i'm just not sure why the pacers should draft augustin when they have players of equal/slightly lesser talent available in the 2nd they could draft. but let's compare singletary and augustin for a minute based on this year's stats...

                          dj augustin - 5'11 180lbs 19.2ppg 6.1apg 2.9rpg 2.26a/t 1.2spg 43.1fg% 79.4ft% 35.9%3pt 1.36pps

                          sean singletary - 5'11 185lbs 18.8ppg 5.9apg 3.9rpg 1.42a/t 1.7spg 42.1fg% 84.1ft% 38.1%3pt 1.35pps

                          i don't know about you but those stats seem VERY similar...sean singletary has to carry the load much more for his uva team with their horrid supporting cast and the acc is year in year out arguably the toughest basketball conference in the nation...the point is why waste a top 15 pick on a pg not named rose, bayless, mayo when you can find the exact same player in the 2nd...

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                            I don't know, the big 12 has Texas, A&M, OK, Kansas and Kansas St. Frankly the ACC is down this year compared to the power of some of these other conferences. And the Pac-10 is just as nuts (UCLA, Stanford, Wash St, AZ, USC). And both conferences feature lots of high caliber NBA picks, not just good teams (whereas Duke and UNC do not).

                            Oh, and TX went out of conference for UCLA, St. Mary and Tennessee. I mean Tenn and UCLA are top 4-5 caliber teams to go with the top 4-5 caliber KS team they play twice.

                            UVA doesn't even get UNC twice. So Duke twice, UNC, AZ...4 top 25 caliber teams. And even still they are a horrible 2-9 in conference.


                            Augustin isn't Bayless, but he's pretty tough and he's the man on a high ranking team that just lost the player of the year last year. I just don't see him as only slightly better than Singletary.

                            Now I would reach on Collison because he's underwhelmed, especially considering his size, but Augustin at 12 or so makes a ton of sense.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                              Originally posted by croz24 View Post
                              . . . the point is why waste a top 15 pick on a pg not named rose, bayless, mayo when you can find the exact same player in the 2nd...

                              The case you've presented convinced me, however it seems to me you're putting the cart before the horse. If Singletary is as good as point guards thought to be worthy of being picked in the first round, what makes you believe he will be available in the 2nd round. If he goes in the first round, your point is no longer true.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Draft Express 2008 Mock Draft

                                Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                                I don't know, the big 12 has Texas, A&M, OK, Kansas and Kansas St. Frankly the ACC is down this year compared to the power of some of these other conferences. And the Pac-10 is just as nuts (UCLA, Stanford, Wash St, AZ, USC). And both conferences feature lots of high caliber NBA picks, not just good teams (whereas Duke and UNC do not).

                                Oh, and TX went out of conference for UCLA, St. Mary and Tennessee. I mean Tenn and UCLA are top 4-5 caliber teams to go with the top 4-5 caliber KS team they play twice.

                                UVA doesn't even get UNC twice. So Duke twice, UNC, AZ...4 top 25 caliber teams. And even still they are a horrible 2-9 in conference.


                                Augustin isn't Bayless, but he's pretty tough and he's the man on a high ranking team that just lost the player of the year last year. I just don't see him as only slightly better than Singletary.

                                Now I would reach on Collison because he's underwhelmed, especially considering his size, but Augustin at 12 or so makes a ton of sense.
                                I co-sign this post. I really, really like Augustin for this team. Not only does he have a lot of talent, but I think he could become the leader at PG that a lot of Pacers fans crave.


                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X