Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Sampson to be fired today?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sampson to be fired today?

    http://thebiglead.com/?p=4613

    Source: Indiana’s Kelvin Sampson to Be Fired Friday

    College Basketball TheBigLead February 13th. 2008, 8:35pm

    According to a media source, the buzz in college basketball circles is that Indiana coach Kelvin Sampson will be fired Friday for violating telephone restrictions and then lying to both the school and the NCAA. Our source says that the school is looking to act quickly with Sampson because if he were to guide the 13th-ranked Hoosiers to the Final Four - it’s entirely possible with talent like DJ White, Eric Gordon, and a cadre of role players - it would be much more difficult (nearly impossible) to fire him. If the school doesn’t cut the cord with Sampson Friday, it is possible that he could gain traction among fans via victories (the Hoosiers host Michigan State Saturday, and Purdue Tuesday) despite his misconduct.

    Greg Couch of the Chicago Sun-Times already has a column out hinting at some of what we’ve said, with this great line: “every day Sampson is at IU is another day without credibility.” Jeff Goodman of Fox Sports “guesses” Sampson won’t last through the season. We suspect more details about Friday’s firing will surface once tonight’s game against Wisconsin is complete. [It’s gone final: Wisconsin 68, Indiana 66 on a late Brian Butch three-pointer.]
    The article's a little over a day old, so who knows.

  • #2
    Re: Sampson to be fired today?

    Here's an updated article:

    http://thebiglead.com/?p=4629#more-4629

    Indiana’s Kelvin Sampson … Still Employed

    College Basketball, Media Gossip/Musings TheBigLead February 14th. 2008, 5:59pm

    As of this moment - 5:58 pm, Indiana’s basketball coach is still Kelvin Sampson. We had a source tell us late Wednesday night that Sampson would be fired on Friday, and we received our fair share of negative emails.

    Such is life. Here’s the latest from around the net:

    * Jeff Goodman of Fox Sports reports that Sampson may or may not coach Saturday’s game against Michigan State. As for the firing, Goodman referenced Jim O’Brien’s situation at Ohio State a few years ago - O’Brien sued OSU when he was fired before the NCAA had ruled on his case and eventually won a lawsuit ($2.2 million plus interest) against the school.

    * Andy Katz reports that Sampson very nearly didn’t coach Wednesday’s brutal 68-66 home loss to Wisconsin. Katz also floats the idea that a buyout of Sampson’s contract is a possibility. Katz also mentions the Jim O’Brien story, which could mean that Pat Forde’s call for a suspension is the answer.

    * Hooiser Scoop reports “high-level decision-makers” met today and that president Michael McRobbie “wants a swift resolution to the situation.” In addition, Hooiser Scoop says that as of lunchtime Thursday, Sampson had not been contacted by the administration.
    A suspension seems like a plausible short-term solution. They don't want to open themselves up to another O'Brien/OSU fiasco.

    Unless you're Bob Kravitz, of course. Then you go in both guns blazing and leave your brain at the door.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Sampson to be fired today?

      Originally posted by Shade View Post
      Here's an updated article:

      http://thebiglead.com/?p=4629#more-4629



      A suspension seems like a plausible short-term solution. They don't want to open themselves up to another O'Brien/OSU fiasco.

      Unless you're Bob Kravitz, of course. Then you go in both guns blazing and leave your brain at the door.

      I think the 2.2 mil fine sounds like a cheap price to pay to save the schools honor and dignity. Quick action is needed to help stay the NCAA's hand when they eventually look at IU's culpability in this.
      Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Sampson to be fired today?

        Originally posted by indygeezer View Post
        I think the 2.2 mil fine sounds like a cheap price to pay to save the schools honor and dignity. Quick action is needed to help stay the NCAA's hand when they eventually look at IU's culpability in this.
        I would not want to give Sampson ANY more money. Not a freakin' cent. In fact, I'd try to sue him for damaging the reputation of the school and the program. And any loss of revenue resulting from sanctions.
        You're caught up in the Internet / you think it's such a great asset / but you're wrong, wrong, wrong
        All that fiber optic gear / still cannot take away the fear / like an island song

        - Jimmy Buffett

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Sampson to be fired today?

          Originally posted by Doug View Post
          I would not want to give Sampson ANY more money. Not a freakin' cent. In fact, I'd try to sue him for damaging the reputation of the school and the program. And any loss of revenue resulting from sanctions.
          What I want to know is what terms were written into Sampson's contract in the event of a situation like this?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Sampson to be fired today?

            Originally posted by Shade View Post
            Here's an updated article:

            http://thebiglead.com/?p=4629#more-4629



            A suspension seems like a plausible short-term solution. They don't want to open themselves up to another O'Brien/OSU fiasco.
            Short of firing him which seems unlikely at this moment a suspension is exactly what I would do. He doesn't need to be anywhere near this team right now.
            The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Sampson to be fired today?

              Originally posted by Doug View Post
              I would not want to give Sampson ANY more money. Not a freakin' cent. In fact, I'd try to sue him for damaging the reputation of the school and the program. And any loss of revenue resulting from sanctions.
              FTW !!!


              Oh I totally agree with this. My comment was meant that if that was what is was going to take to get rid of this guy then so be it.
              Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Sampson to be fired today?

                Contract sets terms for termination
                IU does not have to wait for NCAA ruling to make decision on Sampson’s future at Indiana
                by Doug Wilson dwilson@heraldt.com
                February 15, 2008


                BLOOMINGTON — The new investigation that president Michael McRobbie will announce today could help Indiana build a case to fire Kelvin Sampson.

                If IU officials decide to fire Sampson, they don’t have to wait for an NCAA ruling this summer. At least that’s what Sampson’s contract seems to say.

                That contract pays Sampson an annual base salary of $500,000. With five years left on the deal, the cost of paying off the contract could reach at least $2.5 million.

                But IU can fire Sampson “for just cause” without paying his contract beyond what he’s owed for the rest of the month in which he’s fired if IU can demonstrate he committed violations that do not comply with the terms of the contract.

                “It (the contract) talks about significant, intentional or repetitive violations, so the question becomes, when does it become a violation?,” said Indianapolis attorney Stephen Backer, a former IU trustee who works in contractual law. “That’s the issue. I’m sure that’s what (IU officials) are meeting about (Thursday).”

                The “just cause” section of Sampson’s contract offers examples of situations in which IU has the right to fire Sampson, among them any one of the following:

                • “A significant, intentional or repetitive violations of any law, rule, regulation, constitutional provision, bylaw or intrepretation of the university, Big Ten Conference or the NCAA, which violation may, in the sole judgment of the university, reflect adversely upon the university or its athletic program, including, but not limited to any significant, intentional or repetitive violation which may result in the university being placed on probation by the Big Ten Conference or the NCAA .”

                • “A significant, intentional or repetitive violation of any law, rule or regulation, constitutional provision, bylaw or interpretation of the University, the Big Ten Conference or the NCAA by a member of the intercollegiate men’s basketball coaching staff or any other person under the employee’s supervision and direction, including student athletes in the program, which violation the employee knew or should have known of and which violation may, in the sole judgment of the university, reflect adversely upon the university and its athletic program, including but not limited to any significant, intentional or repetitive violation which may result in the university being placed on probation by the Big Ten Conference or the NCAA.”

                • “Conduct of the employee seriously prejudicial to the best interests of the University’s stated mission.”

                • “Knowingly misleading the university about any matters related to the men’s basketball program .”

                The procedures for firing Sampson for just cause are also spelled out in his contract. Athletic director Rick Greenspan has the authority to suspend Sampson from his duties without pay while giving Sampson “reasonable time” to respond to a written notice of suspension.

                Upon such notice, Sampson would have the right to a request a review of the situation by university president Michael McRobbie, who could consider that request himself or appoint a delegate to do so. If after doing so, McRobbie or his delegate agreed with Greenspan’s recommendation, Sampson would be notified in writing of his termination.

                The contract for the Hoosier basketball coach appears to better define the reasons that are adequate to terminate his employment than that of former Ohio State coach Jim O’Brien, who won $2.2 million plus interest in court after he was fired for loaning $6,000 to a player he was trying to recruit. Ohio State has appealed the court decision that said it did not follow the provisions of O’Brien’s contract to the Ohio Supreme Court, which has yet to decide if it will hear the case.

                O’Brien’s contract permitted termination for cause for only three things: (1) a breach of contract, (2) criminal conduct or (3) NCAA or Big Ten actions against Ohio State in a major infractions case for rules violations.

                The list of NCAA or Big Ten actions that could trigger O’Brien being fired for cause included sanctions reducing Ohio State’s number of scholarships, limiting the school’s recruiting, placing it on probation or banning it from post-season play or some of its television coverage.

                This focus on NCAA or Big Ten action became a problem for Ohio State when it decided to fire O’Brien before the NCAA took any action against the school. Once O’Brien sued the school, it put Ohio State in the position, according to an appeals court judge, to prove that O’Brien had breached his contract.

                Ohio Court of Claims Judge Joseph T. Clark, according to numerous media accounts, ruled that O’Brien had not breached his contract and although he had violated NCAA rules, the violations weren’t serious enough to warrant his firing.

                The Associated Press contributed to this report.

                http://www.tmnews.com/stories/2008/0....nw-085465.tms
                Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                ------

                "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                -John Wooden

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Sampson to be fired today?

                  The pres is on right now. Sound slike a 7 day investigation by IU ath dr and then recommendations will be made to the pres. So I guess Samp is the coach for the next week.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Sampson to be fired today?

                    Just fire the cretin already.
                    I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                    -Emiliano Zapata

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Sampson to be fired today?

                      If we were going to hang a rule breaking coach, why didn't we just keep Bob Knight? Knight may have, threw a chair, choked a kid, shot a friend but by no means did he EVER jeporadize the University's image with all of these sanctions. I.U is a top tier basketball school and shouldn't put up with this.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Sampson to be fired today?

                        Originally posted by BoomBaby31 View Post
                        If we were going to hang a rule breaking coach, why didn't we just keep Bob Knight? Knight may have, threw a chair, choked a kid, shot a friend but by no means did he EVER jeporadize the University's image with all of these sanctions. I.U is a top tier basketball school and shouldn't put up with this.
                        It's kinda hard to get a recruiting violation when you're sitting in a fishing boat instead of recruiting...

                        -Bball
                        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                        ------

                        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                        -John Wooden

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Sampson to be fired today?

                          My hope is that they go after a guy like Mark Few or Tom Crean. Or maybe try to grab one of North Carolina's assistants since that school actually knows how to recruit in Indiana...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Sampson to be fired today?

                            From the Indy Star

                            Inquiry leader a joke

                            By Bob Kravitz
                            bob.kravitz@indystar.com


                            This is nothing more than a little dance they have to do, a procedural two-step orchestrated by the school’s legal beagles before Indiana University does what it needs to do and will do in less than a week’s time — fire Kelvin Sampson.

                            This is about appearances, window dressing, about looking like IU gave Sampson a chance to address the charges in the NCAA’s letter of allegations. This is about ensuring that the university doesn’t get slammed down the road the way Ohio State did, when it lost a wrongful termination suit filed by former coach Jim O’Brien.
                            Nothing more. Nothing less.

                            What’s another internal investigation of the NCAA charges supposed to do?

                            Exonerate Sampson? He has already acknowledged he violated the terms of his probation stemming from the Oklahoma mess. Now he is being charged with five additional “major’’ violations, including lying to IU and NCAA investigators.

                            Suddenly he’s going to become a beacon of truthfulness? IU is going to believe him when he says, “Honest, I’m not lying this time”?

                            The truth is, he should be suspended for Saturday’s game, should be suspended until the resolution of this latest matter.

                            He has already gotten enough second chances.

                            He got a second chance when the clowns in IU’s academic and athletic administration hired him — instead of Vanderbilt’s Kevin Stallings (Purdue guy) or then-West Virginia coach John Beilein ($4 million buyout).

                            Sampson got a second second chance when an internal investigation uncovered several violations of the terms of his probation. More impermissible calls. More shortcuts. More sloppiness.

                            Now Sampson is getting his third second chance.

                            He shouldn’t coach the Hoosiers Saturday or any night until a decision has been reached. How is that going to look, IU on national TV with their dead-duck coach prowling the sideline?

                            And what’s ridiculous about this one is, Rick Greenspan is again being asked to lead the investigation and then make a recommendation to school president Michael McRobbie.

                            Wait a minute. Greenspan hired this guy. His future is inextricably tied to Sampson’s future. Anybody else smell a conflict of interest? I don’t care if Greenspan wanted Beilein, Sampson or Pete Newell; he should not be reviewing anything. McRobbie, who sounded like he was staging a defense of Greenspan during Friday’s news conference, is making a mistake here.

                            Of course, none of this would be necessary if Sampson went right ahead and resigned, thus sparing the school from further embarrassment. It’s fair to assume his legal and financial advisers are telling him to make the school fire him, but there is ample language in the coach’s contract that gives IU the right to fire him at the first whiff of impropriety.

                            The school would only be obligated to pay him through the rest of the month, and nothing more.

                            The longer this goes on, the more it’s going to be a distraction for the players. The longer this goes on, the harsher the penalties will be if and when the NCAA addresses the allegations. The longer this goes on, the more it’s going to cost the university, which already paid Ice Miller to investigate Sampson, and will have to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars more to defend Sampson if this madness continues.

                            Meanwhile, the vultures are circling and the rest of basketball is chiming in. Former coach Bob Knight told espn.com he has no reaction “publicly,” although, be assured, he’s paying close attention. Mike Davis told the Web site “it’s unbelievable,” although Davis told me the summer after his firing that Sampson would have IU in hot water within three years.

                            So now, we wait. We wait for this joke of an investigation. We wait for Greenspan to recommend Sampson’s firing, which should happen within a week’s time.

                            In the meantime, can we please ask former IU president Adam Herbert to stand up and answer questions about this hire? Clearly, he still cares about the program he helped bring down; he was in attendance at Wednesday’s game against Wisconsin. How about a statement? How about some accountability? Not just from Herbert but from all the trustees who thought that hiring Sampson was a really good idea.

                            These folks are front and center during the good times. Now they’re harder to find than Osama bin Laden.

                            As all this silliness commences, I want fans at Saturday’s IU-Michigan State game to do something: Wear a T-shirt with a hand-written message. It can be any message. Josh Tucker, the Louisville, Ky., man who was nearly tossed from Assembly Hall on Wednesday for wearing a “Bring Back Bobby” shirt, will distribute shirts before the game.

                            Or you can make your own. You can write “Fire Kelvin.” You can write “Free Kelvin.” Say whatever you want to say, and say it by wearing a T-shirt that expresses your sentiments.

                            And forget this insipid “stripe-out.’’

                            Let’s see Assembly Hall security throw out 17,000 people for wearing “offensive” T-shirts. Wouldn’t that be a sight for a national audience watching on ESPN?

                            Crazy, because the one guy they ought to be tossing out is the one with the trademark blue shirt and red tie.

                            http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...STS01/80215055
                            Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                            ------

                            "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                            -John Wooden

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Sampson to be fired today?

                              I listened to Kravit's radio program yesterday and he had me feeling bad for Greenspan, but as he says, ultimately this was his hire even if it was forced on him.

                              Question, he alludes to it here and I heard him mention it yesterday, what is this "stripe-out" he mentions?

                              ESPN said yesterday that Katz column has a list of potential suitors for the IU job...anybody seen it?
                              Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X