Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

    This was said in pot #4 in another thread, http://www.pacersdigest.com/apache2-...ad.php?t=36917

    "Kravitz said a couple weeks ago on his radio gig that he'd asked
    Bird why they don't just rebuild. Bird told him that he was
    concerned that, if they did so and had a couple really crappy
    years, that they might lose the franchise."

    So the question is what would put you in the seats at Pacer games?
    81
    The Pacers were a winning team?
    9.88%
    8
    The Pacers were a contending team?
    11.11%
    9
    The Pacers traded for Vince Carter?
    2.47%
    2
    The Pacers were rebuilding?
    17.28%
    14
    I go to games reguardless.
    28.40%
    23
    Other
    30.86%
    25
    Last edited by Will Galen; 02-12-2008, 03:57 PM.

  • #2
    Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

    I go anyway, but if they were rebuilding I would go more often and probably enjoy it more.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

      it will take me about 45 minutes I figure tonight with the weather.

      And for those who want rebuilding - just pretend that JO and JT have been traded. Enjoy the players who are playing

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

        I voted for contending and other.

        I loved the team that played with such heart after the Brawl!! They left it all on the floor, but I swore I'd never go to another game until TPTB got rid of the players that don't actually want to be here (cough,cough - JT,JO)..

        Even tho he was a knucklehead, I thought Jackson brought it most nights, although he kind of overdid it a few times.

        When TPTB grow some brains (likely that happens), I'll start buying tickets again!!
        Last edited by indyblue47; 02-12-2008, 04:16 PM. Reason: can't spell %$$@

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

          The Pacer brass seemingly believe only winning with players of high character will put you in the seats..

          http://my.nba.com/forum.jspa?forumID=300017878&start=0

          With trade deadline looming, is more change coming?
          Feb 11, 2008
          With the trade deadline a little more than a week away, the debate has resurfaced: should the Pacers blow it up and start all over, or should they stand firm and push toward the playoffs?

          Here's the right answer: neither and both.

          It sounds easy: blow it up. Just get rid of guys because the fans are tired of them, don't believe in them, etc., etc. It's extremely difficult to do that in the NBA because of the combination of the restrictive trade rules within the salary cap, not to mention the global presence of guaranteed contracts but you, the fan, don't want to hear that. You want to hear moves are being made.

          Well, there's this: Of the 15 players on the roster at the beginning of the 2007 calendar year, seven remain. More than half the roster has been turned over in the past 13 months. The head coach and most of the assistants have changed.

          The job is not finished, clearly. Until it is, Jim O'Brien, Larry Bird and Donnie Walsh will not rest. But it is well underway.

          "I think we have some really, really good pieces," said O'Brien. "There’s certainly not all the pieces of what we would eventually like to have in my tenure here. Management is certainly not happy with us being (21-30) at this point in time, nor am I, nor are the players, and there’s not an hour that goes by where everybody upstairs is not thinking about a way to improve the situation."

          Some would advance the notion they would gladly support a mediocre – or worse – team if it was constituted of lovable solid citizens. This is, of course, utter bunk. The Pacers of the late '70s and early '80s were a terrific bunch. Clark Kellogg is one of the finest people I've ever known. Billy Knight, Johnny Davis, Herb Williams and Jerry Sichting are great guys who've enjoyed long, successful post-playing careers. Steve Stipanovich? Wayman Tisdale? It's pretty hard to criticize their character.

          Their teams, however, were not very good and very few people shelled out cash to watch them perform as a result.

          This is not to suggest you'd gladly watch a band of outlaws win 50 games. The point is this: you don't just want players of high character; you want winners of high character.

          O'Brien spent quite a bit of time meeting with fans during the offseason breakfasts, dinners and other such gatherings. He didn't just talk to them, he listened.

          "A number of them have said that it’s very important that we have a team that we can be proud of, and some of them actually said it’s not necessarily about winning as much as it is about the people that you have representing us," he said, "and I said every single time, 'I hear what you’re saying, I don’t buy it.' It’s about winning with character and class and with a certain culture, but it is about winning.

          "I think we have a wonderful brand of basketball. I think we’re seventh in the league in scoring. We push the tempo. We move people. We pass the ball. We’re in the top five, I believe, in assists. We have an exciting brand of basketball. We’re not winning, and I think it’s all about winning, but when you’re looking at any organization in the NBA or any professional organization you want to do it with people that your fan base will rally around and kind of identify with."

          You know how sometimes you look into the bright eyes of your 6-year-old daughter and suddenly realize she's 18, all grown up and where'd the time go? When you're so close to something, sometimes change is easy to miss because it doesn't happen all at once. It's a process, sometimes painful, sometimes wondrous. But that doesn't mean it isn't happening right before your eyes.
          ----------------

          As I've said before, the Pacers are rebuilding, they just aren't doing it like some fans want. They're moving players in and moving them out if they don't work.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

            If I had the time and energy I would love to dig out all the old posts from so many of you, saying how you would just following the team, go to games if the team's offense wasn't so boring - if they would only score more, run more, movie the ball more.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

              A ticket home and I'm there.
              The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

                Considering I don't live in Indy and never plan on doing so...it's harder for me. I would make a bigger effort if the Pacers were Colts-quality so I picked "contending."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

                  I don't go to games. I've been to 1 Pacer game in my 15 years of being a fan. A playoff game vs the Bucks in 2000. I can't recall which game it was, but we were blown out and I believe Rik Smits was ejected early in the 2nd half for a mini fight with someone, maybe Ervin Johnson. I was so high up, 7'4" 260 lb. Rik Smits looked like an albino ant. I live an hour outside of Indy and can't afford good seats, so I'm content to watching on television.

                  What would rejuvenate my interest in the team, and make me more inclined to attend games if it were possible, would be either winning at a reasonably high level (above .500), which isn't happening, or exciting, talented young players that would give me hope for winning in the future. Being mediocre to bad does nothing for me, and with such a large portion of our core being 28 or older and peaked, I'm not that thrilled with our current future. The three biggest joys I get out of watching this years team: watching Danny, watching Shawne, and watching Ike, on the rare occasion he actually plays.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

                    I voted other. That being if I lived in Indy.

                    Or, if they move to Tampa and become the Florida Pacers I will go to games. (grin)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

                      The only reason we have not gone to any Pacer games since pre season is that I don't live in Indiana any more....if not for that we would still have the season tickets..
                      Go Pacers!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

                        If JO and tinsley were not on this team anymore....
                        "GIMMIE DAT!"-DANGER

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

                          Originally posted by OnlyPacersLeft View Post
                          If JO and tinsley were not on this team anymore....
                          patience

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

                            i would go to every game if i lived there. i just have to wait two more years.
                            I think KP is a Captain Planet fan. He believes that the collective will of five decent starters can outweigh the power of top-level talent. Too bad Herb won't cut the check for their Planeteer rings.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: What would it take to get you to go to Pacer games?

                              Only reason I don't go is the distance, from Holland so a bit difficult!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X