Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

  1. #1
    Offical Thread Killer TheSauceMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,889
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    Why are some ready to sell there souls for Tmac ?

    We don't need a Tmac we need a Solid SG , yes Tmac would be nice but there are other good options for SG this summer and if it means we give up Ron Artest...NO way in HELL!!!

    Ron Artest and Jermaine O'Neal are the type of Players you build a Championship around and Tinsley is a Keeper Also.

  2. #2
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,741

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    I wouldn't give up Ron, but I would give Harrington and Bender. Orlando would have to offer more than TMac before I'd include Tinsley or Jones.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  3. #3
    Steveman
    Guest

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    I like Ron's game, I really do, but I don't think Ron is a good fit on this team. He doesn't get along well with the coaching staff and his teammates don't understand him. He isn't smart offensively and tries to take over the game when JO is supposed to be "the man". So, if we can get a prolific outside scorer for him ... so be it.

    T-Mac fits because:
    1) He is a prolific scorer.
    2) He will open up the inside for JO so he can be "the man" and raise hell in there.
    3) He and JO are good friends (chemistry).

  4. #4
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    Why? Because I truly believe JO + T-Mac = Rings.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lifelong Indy-area resident
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,660

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    He doesn't get along well with the coaching staff...
    Not true. Bird and Carlisle have said nothing but positive things about Artest all season long. I also know individuals with close ties to the Pacers and the locker room who disagree.

    He isn't smart offensively and tries to take over the game when JO is supposed to be "the man".
    I wouldn't agree with that. Although I will say that Artest, JO and Al have all been somewhat selfish at times this season. But at times, Ron has not only tried to take over a game, he has exceeded. He has dominated on the defensive end, that's for certain. Offensively, there have been times that he has actually taken over and overpowered his defender, "willing" his team to win.

    The Pacers would be nuts not to investigate what it might take to get McGrady. But they will NOT sacrifice Artest or O'Neal to get it done. Not many teams would be willing to sacrifice their offensive and defensive cornerstones.... those are the folks that you build a team around..... not sacrifice to obtain another player.

  6. #6
    sweabs
    Guest

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    We don't need a Tmac we need a Solid SG , yes Tmac would be nice but there are other good options for SG this summer and if it means we give up Ron Artest...NO way in HELL!!!
    Well said - we can't give up Artest in the offseason...that is a must. If we are able to bring in a good SG who can create - and they don't have to be the Tracy McGrady's or the Kobe Bryants...just a good shooting guard then we are fine. But Artest and JO are who you keep.

  7. #7
    Member Dukins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brownsburg
    Posts
    911
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    I am a big big fan of getting T-Mac here. I dont think giving up the team is the answer though. If we could get some athletic player or someone who could create there own shot. I we had to trade Artest, Fred wouldnt be a bad defensive stopper. IMO JO, Tinsley and Reg is the only ones safe. Ill keep saying it until im blue in the face. We cant cringe everytime some adversity comes to the team and have to worry about if Artest is going to fly off the deepend. Especially in such a critical part of a game or series. Too many mysteries.


    2006 WORLD CHAMPION INDIANAPOLIS COLTS

  8. #8
    LAPacer
    Guest

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    If it happens, the Pacers would have the poor mans version of Shaq and Kobe. TMac would be a great fit. I think if TMac were a Laker he would be the one being compared to MJ.

  9. #9
    Boom Baby'er ABADays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Coliseum
    Posts
    6,248

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    If only he cared to play defense like MJ.
    The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

  10. #10
    Zesty
    Guest

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    I think he's got the size and strength to be a good defensive player, and I think under Carlisle he'd improve greatly in that regard.

  11. #11
    LAPacer
    Guest

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    TMac was a defensive specialist when he played underneath Vince's shadow in Toronto. He did a good job of it too.

  12. #12
    75Ranger
    Guest

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    Going into this series against the piston everybody knew we lacked shooters and creative scorers, and by the way we played against the pistons is obvious there is going to have to be some changes to the roster to balance it out.

    Honestly I think Ray Allen would be the perfect fit for this team. I know many would like Fred Jones to start out at guard.Im sure we would win 50 games but is keeping the roster intact going to give us a shot to win a championship. I don't think so.

    I think we need to have a better second option on the offensive end then Artest to win a championship. This is in no way diss towards Artest, he had a great year and may be the most important player on the team but at this point in his career hes not an elite offensive player and you need a player like that to win a title. So if T-mac, or Allen become available we have to make an effort to aquire them.

  13. #13
    Offical Thread Killer TheSauceMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,889
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    Tmac wont score 28 ppg if he comes to Indy, won't be the only offense we have , but he would help take the load off tinsley and tinsley could focus more on running the team rather than scoring .

    I will stand by my statement in trading ron would be a bad bad mistake.

  14. #14
    Member Doug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,631

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    In the "It Will Never Happen, but I Can Dream, Can't I" category:

    Indiana trades:
    PG Fred Jones (4.9 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 2.1 apg in 18.6 minutes)
    PF Al Harrington (13.3 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 1.7 apg in 30.9 minutes)
    PF Austin Croshere (5.0 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.7 apg in 13.7 minutes)

    Indiana receives:
    C Steven Hunter (3.2 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 0.2 apg in 13.4 minutes)
    SG Tracy McGrady (28.0 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 5.5 apg in 39.9 minutes)

    Change in team outlook: +8.0 ppg, -2.3 rpg, and +1.2 apg.

    Orlando trades:
    C Steven Hunter (3.2 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 0.2 apg in 13.4 minutes)
    SG Tracy McGrady (28.0 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 5.5 apg in 39.9 minutes)

    Orlando receives:
    PG Fred Jones (4.9 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 2.1 apg in 81 games)
    PF Al Harrington (13.3 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 1.7 apg in 79 games)
    PF Austin Croshere (5.0 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.7 apg in 77 games)

    Change in team outlook: -8.0 ppg, +2.3 rpg, and -1.2 apg.

    TRADE ACCEPTED
    You're caught up in the Internet / you think it's such a great asset / but you're wrong, wrong, wrong
    All that fiber optic gear / still cannot take away the fear / like an island song

    - Jimmy Buffett

  15. #15

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    We don't need a Tmac we need a Solid SG , yes Tmac would be nice but there are other good options for SG this summer and if it means we give up Ron Artest...NO way in HELL!!!
    Well said - we can't give up Artest in the offseason...that is a must. If we are able to bring in a good SG who can create - and they don't have to be the Tracy McGrady's or the Kobe Bryants...just a good shooting guard then we are fine. But Artest and JO are who you keep.
    Yet, if by chance Detroit were able to obtain McGrady, a lot people here (you know who you are) would concede next season to the Pistons, not to mention the press.

  16. #16
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    I think he's got the size and strength to be a good defensive player, and I think under Carlisle he'd improve greatly in that regard.
    So do I. I think at worst he'd be an average defender, at best a pretty good one. Carlisle and staff got TINSLEY to start playing D, I'm sure they can get a 6'8" SG with length and quickness to figure it out (assuming he doesn't already know).

  17. #17
    Member Snickers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    True
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,614

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    This is a team, that minus a couple key injuries and a few bad breaks, is in the finals. 61 wins, swept the first round, won 4-2 in the second round, and lost in 6 to an excellent and determined Detroit team.

    This is a damned good team. And Ron is a huge part of it.

    That said, I would have to think about Tmac-Artest for a while.

    The Good:
    -Not many teams can claim to have two legitimate MVP-caliber players.
    -We'd instantly be the favourites in the East, as we were for none of this season, when we had the best record in the league for pretty much the entire time.
    -We'd have the best inside-outside offensive combo this side of LA.
    -We'd have a guard who could create his own shot, as much as we needed him to.
    -In this series, Ron was frustrated and frustrating. These 6 games were the most important so far in his career.

    The Bad:
    -Tmac hasn't proven to be a great crunch-time player. [has he?]
    -Tmac is a household name, and there's always a risk of those causing chemistry problems when they go to a team where they get fewer touches.
    -This team, the way it is now, will be back in ECF next year. And probably for several years to come. While Tmac could be the piece that would get us over the hump, that's a big risk to take.
    -Tmac's lazy eye scares me.

    I wouldn't jump on it immediately, but I think it's definitely something to think about.
    Official Member of the Anti-Alliteration Association

  18. #18
    Offical Thread Killer TheSauceMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,889
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    Yeah but is Tmac offically on the Market ? Nope he is undecided and if the Magic can bring some players in the Tmac Stays ..so we can speculate Tmac all day but the Reality he leaves is slim at best right now and I think he said his first choice was houston , and a few others Indiana and Detriot are like 4-5 options

  19. #19
    Member Snickers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    True
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,614

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    Yeah but is Tmac offically on the Market ? Nope he is undecided and if the Magic can bring some players in the Tmac Stays ..so we can speculate Tmac all day but the Reality he leaves is slim at best right now and I think he said his first choice was houston , and a few others Indiana and Detriot are like 4-5 options
    Yeah, I'd be sincerely surprised if we have a legitimate shot at him. Besides, I'm not sure Orlando thinks as highly of Ronnie as we Pacer fans do.
    Official Member of the Anti-Alliteration Association

  20. #20
    Offical Thread Killer TheSauceMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,889
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    Well I don't think if Houston has the Chance they would Pass up Tmac ,I think him coming to the Pacers is probably low on the List ...that's just being Honest.

  21. #21
    Zesty
    Guest

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    My biggest reservation with trading ANYONE for McGrady is whether or not he'd stick around after the season was over. If I'm not mistaken, he has a player option on his contract for the two seasons after this upcoming season, which is why Orlando is rumored to be trading him in the first place (rather than risk losing him next summer with no compensation at all). I might shoot myself if we were to trade any of Al/JB/Artest/Jones for McGrady and then he walked at the end of the season.

    I also think if he came in here and we got to the Finals, he'd feel like sticking around (much like the 'Sheed situation in Detroit).

  22. #22
    Offical Thread Killer TheSauceMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,889
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    2005/06 he has a player option

    and those are alot of Big If's there zesty

  23. #23
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    32,843

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    I would trade Jones, Bender and Al for T-Mac.

    If I were the Magic I would do that deal, they aren't going to get anything better. it is a gamble for the pacers, T-Mac has had back trouble, and if he were toi get injured, Pacers would be selling their future.

    But the idea of having Tinsley, McGrady, Artest, J.O and Foster in the starting lineup would be way to good to pass up.

  24. #24
    Offical Thread Killer TheSauceMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,889
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    We know Ron is tough as Nails , how many people come back after 5 games with the surgery Ron had ? he was shooting on the Practice court 72 hours after surgery , if that's not a guy who is tough as nails , I dunno what is .

  25. #25
    Member Dukins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brownsburg
    Posts
    911
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Tmac, Tmac, Tmac

    T-Mac is only 25 yrs old with given the right time could be the 1-2 punch needed to get over the hump at the SG position. No one is questioning Ron's heart, its his mental lapses at crucial times. WE have no clue what Ron is going to do in any given night. The same cant be said for TMAC we know what we are getting everynight. Also what better exposure on TV and nationwide than having a human highlight film in TMAC. I dont know but i like the idea of seeing them nationwide more often.


    2006 WORLD CHAMPION INDIANAPOLIS COLTS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •