Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 32

Thread: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

  1. #1
    The light, not the lie. kester99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Disgusta, GA
    Posts
    8,829
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    This article discusses local and league concerns about the Pacers who have slipped to dead last in attendance.

    http://cms.ibj.com/ASPXPages/6iframe...0342&NoFrame=1
    [~]) ... Cheers! Go Pacers!

  2. #2
    J.O. To The T.O. Oneal07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,459

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    It's things like this that should make our players play hard every night. Every single player on the team have a chip on their shoulder. I just don't understand why this doesn't motivate our players
    R.I.P. Bernic Mac & Isaac Hayes

  3. #3
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    20,104

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    1. Inept management.

    1A. Ownership that is overly loyal to management and/or too unmotivated to do what needs to be done.

    That's now the problem.

    Really, you can't blame players or management because ownership has really missed the boat on stepping in to put a stop to the bleeding and seeing to it that those issues were handled.

    So either this team is being ran (into the ground) exactly like they think it should be ran.... or they don't care.

    Like I said, I've all but made up my mind the Simons bought the team for the wrong reason(s). Yes, they kept the team in Indy, but they didn't get into it to bring a basketball championship to the Indy. And unfortunately, it's looking more to me like a part of it could've been that they just wanted a pro sports team so they could be like other billionaires and join that club.

    If I was the city I'd offer to cut the yearly lease price in half, but that is as far as I would go (sarcasm: the lease is 1.00 per year). IOW: This mess needs righted internally. Until the Pacers straighten up their own mess and start running this franchise like it should be with some vision and energy, the city should NOT waste taxpayer dollars on propping them up and be even more of an enabler.

    As another poster said, the fact that there is even a valid argument as to who is and has been calling the shots just points to more of the problem.

    This team is getting exactly what it deserves for allowing Walsh to hang on too long... and nobody externally has any idea whether Bird can sink, swim, or fly on his own because we have no idea what he's actually responsible for or where he's had his hands tied (or wings clipped). Internally, that should be known though.

    Adam said it and I agree- The Simons loyalty (to a fault (my words)) to Walsh is the ruination of this franchise.



    -Bball
    Nuntius was right. I was wrong. Frank Vogel has retained his job.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  4. #4
    Member Speed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Brownsburg
    Posts
    8,528

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    I agree with almost everything you said, but I don't think it matters if the Simons bought it for the wrong reasons as long as they'll spend the money, which they are willing to do to be good and have done.

    Their lack of judgement or accountability when it comes to decision makers is a good point. Its the wrong thing to do for all the right reasons, that doesn't cut it in the business world.

    Another point is that maybe they wouldn't be hemmoraging money if they didn't pay Walsh and Bird to do the same job now for 4 years.

  5. #5
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    20,104

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Quote Originally Posted by Speed View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    Another point is that maybe they wouldn't be hemmoraging money if they didn't pay Walsh and Bird to do the same job now for 4 years.


    ...And pay them well too! I've said this so much I'm sure people know it by heart, but I just don't understand what Walsh is still doing here if Bird is really the one in charge.

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right. I was wrong. Frank Vogel has retained his job.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  6. #6
    Here we go Steelers.. jmoney2584's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    708

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Maybe slipping to dead last in attendance will fire up the trade machine as people call for a change.
    Roy Hibbert.... It's the POWER!!!

  7. #7
    Boom Baby'er ABADays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Coliseum
    Posts
    6,248

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    I don't buy for one second the Simons bought the Pacers for the wrong reason. Unless hometown civic interest is the wrong reson.
    The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Kester, thanks for posting this. It is a good article, except for this bit:

    Quote Originally Posted by IBJ
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The Pacers have to hope the off-the-court incidents that have marred the team’s reputation in recent years don’t have a lasting effect that supersedes whatever success the team can find in the win-loss column, sports marketers said.

    No. The Pacers have to leave nothing to hope. They have to admit that the off-court incidents are having a lasting effect and that fans aren't going to come back to a team whose reputation is marred.

    I believe O'Neal, Tinsley and Harrison will have to go before the brawl is truly behind us. Three years have gone by, but this team is still the brawl team.
    And I won't be here to see the day
    It all dries up and blows away
    I'd hang around just to see
    But they never had much use for me
    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

  9. #9
    The Last Great Pacer BlueNGold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    15,248

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Quote Originally Posted by Putnam View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I believe O'Neal, Tinsley and Harrison will have to go before the brawl is truly behind us. Three years have gone by, but this team is still the brawl team.
    There is some wisdom. Whatever one might think about those players, even if JO and Tins are two of our most talented players, the public is not fond of them and that is a bad thing on several levels.

    First, the public will not follow the team and spend big bucks to come see a team going nowhere. Second, the business/networking "fans" are not going to buy blocks of tickets to bring their customers to games. It's simply not good business as long as the biggest news going on with the Pacers happens on W 38th street.

    So, we are really in a situation where we should continually seek to move them for some amount of value. If that cannot be done, we should be seeking to find their replacements anyway. We should start with drafting a PG or PF/C in the draft this spring. Puhleeze no more SF's. We don't even need a SG as bad with Rush and Quis on the team. More than anything, we need a real center in the middle.

  10. #10
    NaptownSeth is all feel Naptown_Seth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Downtown baby
    Posts
    12,618

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Quote Originally Posted by ABADays View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I don't buy for one second the Simons bought the Pacers for the wrong reason. Unless hometown civic interest is the wrong reson.
    I agree. It's not a fault to be patient and loyal and it's sad that we allow it to be categorized as such. Had Bird, Ron, JO, Tinsley, Rick, etc turned it around they'd look brilliant. That does happen, it's not like it was obviously going to fail. There are a LOT of missteps to this point, but the first few weren't clearly the beginning of the end.

    Frankly they were hanging in there even last year prior to the trade. Rio hurt a lot, but had they stayed just over .500 and NOT had 8 Seconds, Tins/JO hurt all the time, Cloud 9 and a rash trade decision they might be getting this thing under control a bit.

    Maybe they should have known Tins had a nose for trouble, and if that's the case then they were ridiculously loyal to him. Otherwise none of us could have avoided that situation. It seems tough to believe that Bird of all people was willing to be overly loyal to Tins prior to 8 Seconds, especially if pal Rick wasn't a big fan of Tins' game.


    Look, the LAST major move for this roster was the GS deal. No other move has had this kind of impact. When I complained last year people said give it time. When the season ended in disaster I was told it was Rick's fault. When they won their first 3 I was told "told you so". When they started to skid it changed to that's what .500 teams do.

    Isn't it time to own up on this, they made one bad trade and it's just getting to be one year coming up. The problem isn't a long spiral, it's that the team was on thin ice and the last thing they could afford was that one disaster trade. They did it and now they haven't had enough time to fix it.


    I'm really sick of people dismissing 61 freaking wins as no big deal. It was 1-0 in the ECF too, not some huge flop. They lost to the champs, a team that virtually swept the Lakers after battling with Indy. It's not like they haven't put a damn good product out even in recent years.

    Someone decided that teetering on .500 with injuries to JO/Tins and Jack with a bad rep was intolerable. It wasn't. As far as low points go it was pretty good in fact. Only making the playoffs as your down year, then going to the ECF or Finals in your good years is the stuff of elite teams.

    Perhaps Bird isn't GM material but didn't the owners have to find out for themselves? Walsh wasn't sticking around forever. So they are finding out now. Let's see what happens this summer before assuming ownership isn't noticing. Half a season wasn't enough to be a trend. Of course I said the same thing regarding Rick, but Bird was happy to pull the trigger on that. I guess he'll understand if the Simons do the same this June.

  11. #11
    NaptownSeth is all feel Naptown_Seth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Downtown baby
    Posts
    12,618

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    It's not the brawl, it's the losing.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    IMHO: Walsh has been great Bird came in just before the brawl when we were expected to be very good. The brawl could not be blamed on management neither could Artest's trade demand. The trade that brought Al back was a decision that most on here supported. Yes, it is about wins and losses. Blaming management is wrong at this point. JO with his injury situation, Tinsley with all his problems makes both at this time difficult to unload. No matter what, the Simons have a right not to absorb a huge financial loss. I am sure Bird is on the phone trying to make this team better. Its a difficult position to be in.
    "He wanted to get to that money time. Time when the hardware was on the table. That's when Roger was going to show up. So all we needed to do was stay close"
    Darnell Hillman (Speaking of former teammate Roger Brown)

  13. #13
    woman without a team
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,055

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    It's the brawl and the losing. When people aren't going to games because "The Pacers are nothing but a bunch of thugs" it's about the aftermath of the brawl and all the off the court stuff that's been going on since.

    David Stern looking into this cracks me up. When he looks at us and thinks "I did all this" does he do it with a smile on his face?

    As for the city giving the Pacers financial help do you honestly think anyone but die hard Pacers fans are going to be in favor of it? I don't. I'm not even sure I'm in favor of it.

  14. #14
    The Last Great Pacer BlueNGold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    15,248

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Quote Originally Posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's not the brawl, it's the losing.
    Need to look up the chain of causation to find the root cause for the losses. IMO, character issues and poor management are the cause of the losses.

    Specifically, the losses are caused by bad trades and chemistry problems even on talented teams. The trades and chemistry problems were caused by trade demands (ie. Ron Artest is the man!), bad relationships (JO/Artest, Tins/RC, JO/Bird, etc.) and character issues (ie selfishness and immaturity).

    I guess some people will always believe in hanging onto players regardless. IMO the Pacers went with that philosophy for a very long time...literally years...until the pain and embarrassment and suspensions and particularly the chemistry issues just got too bad. Actually, when Reggie retired it really started to fall apart....hmmm, I think he knew where this ship was headed.

    ...but not all of this is on the players themselves. Poor management decisions led to the assembly of this embarrassing mess. Or maybe the problem goes to the very top. Actually, I am pretty certain at this point that the problem goes all the way up. The owners should have made different decisions hiring their management.

    No, the police reports from players like Artest, Jackson, JO, Harrison, Marshall, Tinsley, Quis, Williams,...am I missing any? Probably several. .....are not the root cause either. But neither is losing. Both are symptoms...

  15. #15
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    20,104

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Quote Originally Posted by ABADays View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I don't buy for one second the Simons bought the Pacers for the wrong reason. Unless hometown civic interest is the wrong reson.

    Where's their civic pride while this mess is compounding?

    I'm tired of people getting passes for what they did 20+ years ago. Their the owners, if their management can't fix it then they need to do something themselves and fix their management.

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right. I was wrong. Frank Vogel has retained his job.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  16. #16

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    This article makes me wonder, if Eric Gordon is who the Pacers need?

    I am not as high on him as some are. I think he should turn out alright but I like Derrick Rose a lot better. But should the Pacers maybe look to move up in the draft to get him if they don't land a high enough pick? Especially if IU has a nice NCAA tournament run Gordon could be the guy to take to turn things around in the stands. Not sure about on the court though.

  17. #17
    The light, not the lie. kester99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Disgusta, GA
    Posts
    8,829
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Quote Originally Posted by rommie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This article makes me wonder, if Eric Gordon is who the Pacers need?

    I am not as high on him as some are. I think he should turn out alright but I like Derrick Rose a lot better. But should the Pacers maybe look to move up in the draft to get him if they don't land a high enough pick? Especially if IU has a nice NCAA tournament run Gordon could be the guy to take to turn things around in the stands. Not sure about on the court though.

    When the Pacers drafted Damon Bailey, I remember a lot of interest being generated throughout my area of the state. People started following the Pacers who hadn't really done so before. Obviously Damon never worked out on the court. But if the Pacers could get a few (even one or two) good well-known players of local origin, I do think it would help.
    [~]) ... Cheers! Go Pacers!

  18. #18

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Quote Originally Posted by kester99 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    When the Pacers drafted Damon Bailey, I remember a lot of interest being generated throughout my area of the state. People started following the Pacers who hadn't really done so before. Obviously Damon never worked out on the court. But if the Pacers could get a few (even one or two) good well-known players of local origin, I do think it would help.
    Yeah I was thinking about Damon Bailey.

    I think that Gordon is a much better pro prospect and should turn into a better one than Damon was.

    Things have gotten really bad and I am begining to think that Eric Gordon could solve these problems quickly.

  19. #19
    Member jeffg-body's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Anderson, IN
    Posts
    3,446
    Mood

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    I have to agree that EJ is a better talent than Damon Bailey, but he is still pretty raw as a player as shown by Uconn's veteran guards and IMO he should stay in school another year and polish his game. On the selfish side I would like to see the Pacers get him somehow.

  20. #20
    Running with the Big Boys BillS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Danberry
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,603

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    I think the comment reactions are more telling than the article itself. Few specifics as to who the "thugs" still are, just general disdain for the Pacers as a team "full" of them.

    I'm at a loss to figure out what to do short of free tickets for kids.
    BillS

    "Every time I pitched it was like throwing gasoline on a fire. Pkkw! Pkkw! Pkkw! Pkkw!"
    - Ebby Calvin "Nuke" LaLoosh

  21. #21
    Member Speed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Brownsburg
    Posts
    8,528

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Quote Originally Posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's not the brawl, it's the losing.

    Exactly, unlikeable players is just the icing. Sucking is the cake.

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,089

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    Rebuild.

  23. #23
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    32,767

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    it is really simple. Walsh to us own admission, "fell in love with talent" management put all their eggs in the JO and Artest basket. That was the mistake, and it tales awhile to dig out from that big of a mistake - it is three years and running to dig out, maybe another 8 months or so then the digging out will be over and they can then start building something again.

    I appauded their decision to build the team around JO and Ronnie (and as we have seen, both were needed together) so I cannot and will not after the fact act like I knew it was a bad choice.

  24. #24

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    If the team was winning people would come to the games. Maybe Indy isn't a two team town either.

    Really I think people should do what Grace did--follow another team for a couple years and find out for yourselves that most teams have bad years, too or as Bball puts it teams run into the ground.
    "They could turn out to be only innocent mathematicians, I suppose," muttered Woevre's section officer, de Decker.

    "'Only.'" Woevre was amused. "Someday you'll explain to me how that's possible. Seeing that, on the face of it, all mathematics leads, doesn't it, sooner or later, to some kind of human suffering."

  25. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    149

    Default Re: Indianapolis Business Journal Article on future of Pacers

    The Simons bought the Pacers for the wrong reasons? Don't you buy any professional sports team to make money? They are an investment. Even losing money some years usually can be offset by the potential profit of a sale.

    Separate the fan from the argument, business is business. Even Cuban, an owner that people talk is passionate about winning and a huge fan, still maintains that it is a business and that he maximizes profits. He has talked at length about putting together a winner-but as part of the overall entertainment experience. He makes more money from tickets and merch sales if he has a winner.

    I think that applies to the Pacers-you can argue all day that character is an issue (and the IBJ article hints at the morality involved) but the bottom line is that winning is the best thing that could happen to improve the Pacers fortunes.

    Which, to me, means you have to take the pill and rebuild. If you could trade tinsley for expiring and a pick, go for it. Harrison? So sorry you can't stay. Owens and Graham-not rotation, let's roll the dice with some NBDL players. JO can opt out or get the trade. I say go the route of the blazers or hornets-draft the best you can (and hope to get lucky) and focus on guys that want to play hard.

Similar Threads

  1. Early Review of Pacers Season, Outlook on future
    By imawhat in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 12:59 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 11:13 AM
  3. A Schedule Comparison: Pacers -vs- ???
    By NuffSaid in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-28-2007, 02:05 PM
  4. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12-11-2007, 06:06 PM
  5. Article: Change of Pacers upstairs (from Boston Globe)
    By BostonConnection in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-19-2007, 12:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •