Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

    http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...OCAL/801260461

    '78: The mother of all blizzards
    Countless Hoosiers survied harrowing ordeals as a monster storm killed 11 and paralyzed a state
    By Will Higgins



    Thirty years ago today, Dean Kruse thought he was a goner.

    He and three friends, driving home to Fort Wayne, found themselves mired in a snowbank along I-69. Leaving the car in those horrific conditions would have been suicide. Staying inside seemed equally perilous. The car was quickly buried in snow, trapping Kruse and his friends.

    The engine failed, leaving them without heat.

    The future looked bleak, but the four proved resilient. They ate snow to stay hydrated. To stay warm, they sang.

    Rescue operation: The Indiana National Guard was called to duty to rescue motorists stranded by the blizzard that struck the state in late January 1978. Here, tanks and heavy equipment free trucks and cars. - The Star 1978 file photo

    BLIZZARD OF 1978
    Jan. 25
    Snow began falling early in the day.

    • Accumulation: Snow reached 20.5 inches (15.5 inches during the blizzard, on top of 5 inches of snow from an earlier storm) over parts of Central and Southern Indiana and up to 40 inches in Northern Indiana.

    Snowdrifts reached 10 to 20 feet.

    Jan. 26
    Gov. Otis Bowen and Mayor William H. Hudnut declared snow emergencies.

    • Response: More than 1,000 Indiana National Guard personnel were mobilized to assist stranded travelers, snowbound workers and families whose homes had lost heat and electrical power.

    • Conditions: Wind gusts reached 55 mph, and the wind chill index plummeted to 40 to 50 degrees below zero.

    • Travel: Roads were closed. Airline, bus and rail service ceased.

    Jan. 29
    Main roads in Indianapolis were cleared enough to reopen.

    • Casualties: Eleven deaths were attributed to the blizzard.

    -- Compiled by Star librarian Cathy Knapp

    Sources: Star archives, National Weather Service





    Kruse's is one of the many stories that emerged from what became known as "The Great Blizzard of '78."

    It sounds archaic, The Great Blizzard of '78, but probably everything you've heard about it was true.

    It was a three-day affair, the first snow coming at 5 p.m. Jan. 25, a Wednesday. Fifteen inches would fall, on top of 5 already on the ground.

    The storm was more than just snowfall. It was wind: 55 mph gusts out of the northwest. Snowdrifts were 10 feet deep. The wind chill index reached minus 51.

    In Indiana, 11 people died.

    "Indianapolis closed yesterday," said a story in The Indianapolis Star.

    There was some looting, but the city pulled together. At hotels, managers served food, and guests made their own beds. Car dealerships lent four-wheel drive vehicles to emergency workers. The roughly 300 people stranded at Indianapolis International Airport were "one big happy family," a police officer said.

    And Dean Kruse survived to tell his story.
    Desperate days and nights
    Editor's note: The Fort Wayne News Sentinel asked readers to send in their memories of the Blizzard of 1978. This harrowing account was submitted by Dean Kruse of Kruse International in Auburn, which draws nationwide interest for its car auctions. Kruse writes for the first time about being stranded during the blizzard and his rescue by the National Guard.
    The evening of the '78 blizzard, I had left the Fort Wayne airport and landed in Indianapolis to connect to a flight to Dallas. We boarded our Dallas flight, the pilot pulled out on the runway and announced the snow was too deep to take off; and with more snow coming, he had to turn back to the terminal. Thinking I would catch any flight out of Indy south, I quickly checked the departure board and every flight was canceled and the airport was closed. The weather report was bad.
    I bumped into a friend of mine, Sheryl Swartz from Decatur, who was headed for Florida. I said, "Sheryl, if it is getting bad, why don't we rent a car and go home and sit out the storm." All cars had been rented but one, a four-door sedan from National. We took it.
    As we headed to the rental car, we bumped into Jim Stovell and his wife. When they found out we were headed for the Fort Wayne airport, where all our cars were parked, they said they wanted to go along.
    After we were on I-465 North about five minutes, we realized we were doing the wrong thing. The snow was deep and getting deeper. The temperature (the radio said) was 46 below zero with the chill factor, and the wind was blowing so strong we had to fight the car from blowing sideways.
    We decided to get off at the first exit. To our surprise, we could not get off. Each exit was jammed full of cars and trucks that were jackknifed and stranded. We could not get off 465. We kept going slower and slower, thinking we had to stay in the car and get off the interstate. We made it to I-69, thinking it might be plowed. It was not.
    Finally, after passing the Fishers exit, so much snow was packed under our car, the fan belt broke. We lost our heater. Shortly thereafter, the snow was so deep we could not move at all. Jim said he would try to push open the car door and get his suitcase out of the trunk for some warm clothes. It took him a while to push back the snow to get the door open. He ran in nearly waist-deep snow to the trunk and back to the car. In that short time, he got frostbite. It was bad for his toes and fingertips, we found out later.
    Shortly, we noticed our car was going to be covered up with snow. He had gotten his wife's suitcase. We took a pair of her red slacks and put the top waistband in the window with the legs flapping in the wind like a flag. Our car was starting to be almost entirely covered with snow.
    From time to time, we checked the radio to get reports. The radio said it was the worst storm in Indiana history. We started talking about freezing to death. We decided we were desperate. So we got a tin soap holder from the suitcase and tried to burn a fire in it. We cut up pieces of seat belts, pieces of seat covers, pieces of headliner; nothing would burn. We had one book of matches.
    I crossed my legs and sat on my feet so they would not freeze. We sang "99 bottles of beer on the wall" because it brought up the temperature. Finally, Sheryl found a bottle of hairdressing. After some thought, we cut up our shoelaces and dipped them into the hair oil. To our surprise, it burned like a candle and brought up the temperature in the car. We took a magazine, tore it up and lined the windows with the pages for insulation to preserve the heat. Jim and his wife took turns in the back seat lying on top of each other to keep warm.
    The strong winds were drifting the snow onto the top of the car. It was very cold, but our shoestrings were still working.
    The next day about noon, we heard pounding on the roof of our car. They yelled if anyone was in the car. We yelled back; they kept pounding. It was obvious they did not hear us, so we pounded back. It sounded like they said they would get help. By 10 p.m. that night, our second night, we were about to give up.
    We started to hear noises like cars or trucks were traveling on the highway. Of course, we found out later it was just sounds of the wind fooling us. Little did we know the snow had drifted to 10 and 20 feet high in sections of the highway.
    We were getting in bad shape. We had rolled one window a few inches and ate snow for water. Sheryl said she had heard in the "Battle of the Bulge" U.S. soldiers had frozen to death just by going to sleep; we decided not to go to sleep. I auctioneered for about an hour to help bring up the temperature.
    As I recall, it was between midnight and 2 a.m. We saw a huge piece of steel alongside of our car. No one said anything because we thought we were dreaming or hallucinating. There was a pound on the window. It was help!
    I can't remember how the rest of us got out of the car, but I remember them dragging me out of the window. From sitting on my feet, my knees had swelled up so much my legs would not straighten out. The National Guard had a 6x6 Army truck with cots and Army blankets for us in the back of a canvas-covered bed. There was heat coming in a pipe, probably from the engine.
    We found out they had a CAT 988 loader with a huge coal mine bucket on the front. They had to literally dig out every foot they progressed to get to us. I was told all but one man wanted to turn back. He said some snowmobile was out illegally and saw our red slacks flapping in the wind. They were sure some people were in the car. So this man, whom I don't know, pushes everyone to have the equipment dig, to go one more mile, which took them a long time. Today, I don't even know his name. But we all four owe him our lives.
    When the 988 loader started back, they had to again dig every foot out because the path had quickly blown shut. The loader was so large, it just would pick up an entire car and move it out of the pathway. It was a monster machine.
    They took us to the Fishers Fire Department, where they had a temporary hospital. They ran our feet and hands through sand boxes to determine frostbite. That's when we found out Jim had frostbite that he obtained in less than two minutes. They gave us some hot drinks, including hot cider. They divided us up and took us to nearby houses to get some sleep.
    My body started shaking so bad that I could not stop it. The doctor on duty, who lived nearby, told me my body was going into shock. I can't remember how he got it to stop, but he did. The people who took me in were very nice. I think I slept on a couch until noon or so. The State Police called my wife and asked her where I was, and she said somewhere in Texas and that I had not called in. The police told her I was sleeping in a volunteer firefighter's home in Fishers.
    After a couple of days, when they took me home in a motor coach, I could not believe what I was seeing. An entire train stopped dead on the railroad. So many cars everywhere; some were on their sides. I suppose the big equipment trucks had to clear the highway for one lane. It looked like a war zone.
    The Indianapolis Star ran a story: "Last known survivors of the '78 Blizzard found in a snow-covered car along I-69."
    I can easily say it was the worst storm in our history, and I hope there is never another one. There had to be billions of dollars in damage and losses.
    For a few years after the '78 blizzard, I carried three candles in my suitcase and several boxes of matches. Back then, I had never even heard of a cell phone. What a difference that would have made for us. This is the first time I have written about this experience, and I am doing so now because of your invitation.
    ---------------------

    A really, really, bad storm! My own memory of that storm was a good one, only in as much as I didn't have to go out in it.

    I was working 3rd trick at the time, so when I didn't go to work I still stayed up all night. I opened the kitchen curtains so I could watch the storm, then sat at the kitchen table putting a radio together, while listening to another radio. By the time morning arrived all I could see of the house across the street was it's roof.

  • #2
    Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

    I was at Ball State, and was working for the campus radio station, WBST. All the other radio stations closed down, and we were asked to stay on the air out of public necessity until the emergency was over. So we stayed on the air for about 72 continuous hours instead of the usual 12 hours of programming they did at that time. The station manager allowed us to play anything during the wee hours of the morning. To this day, everytime I hear Stephen Stills sing, "Love the One You're With" I think of that blizzard.

    One more thing. One of the neat stories I remember was a mother delivering twin baby girls during the blizzard, and having to be taken to the hospital by emergency crews. I reported that on the radio and forgot about it. Eighteen years later, we started attending a new church and that that family was attending there, so we got to know them. I surprised them by recalling the details of their birth.

    Anyway, the blizzard of '78 was fun.
    And I won't be here to see the day
    It all dries up and blows away
    I'd hang around just to see
    But they never had much use for me
    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

      Makes me glad about global warming.
      This space for rent.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

        I am a direct product of the blizzard of '78. Born exactly 9 months to the day after that storm.

        So, um, yay blizzard?

        I'm sure others would disagree...

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

          I have very fond memories of the blizzard. Remember my dad being home for several days straight. Remember getting stuck in the snow, remember having to hold our dog up above the snow so she could go to the bathroom. I remember the huge drifts.

          It was one of the best times of my life. Of coruse when you are 9 years old, you are just happy everyone in the family is there and having fun

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

            I lived in a rural area in southern Indiana with gravel roads. The road graders were too inadequate to deal with such huge snow drifts, so bulldozers, backhoes, and big front loaders were used to clear one country road at a time over several weeks.

            I was in high school and we missed 3 whole weeks of classes.

            The wind was so bad that the snow blew everywhere. It was piled up like sand dunes, but there was nearly bare ground in between the big dunes (10-15 feet) of snow.

            We had two farms a mile apart and my dad and I had to walk it for the first few days to take care of farm animals, then we blazed a trail across frozen corn fields between the snow dunes on the only tractor we could get to start in the bitter cold.

            I remember digging DOWN with a shovel to find our mailbox completely entombed in a 10 foot snow drift.

            Once it warmed up, the sledding was fun for many days, but three weeks out of school eventully got boring. It really took that long to make the country roads safe, since there are actually some decent-sized hills in much of southern Indiana.
            The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

              My step brother was born during that storm. They had to take his mother to the hospital on a snow mobile to give birth.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

                I worked for a newspaper and spent the night in a YWCA because they declared martial law in Evansville and wouldn't let us on the highway -- not that I could have gotten my 280Z started anyway. I hate winter weather!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

                  Weeks off of school. We had to tunnel our way out of our apartment, literally, thanks to massive drifts.

                  The most kick-*** snow forts you could imagine though, and they lasted for days.

                  And in 78 big strip malls and 24 open anythings just weren't around. I remember we had real concerns about getting more bread and milk for the first few days. And we weren't rural by any stretch.

                  At some point my buddies and I played some football, or tried. The snow came up to our waist nearly so the game was pretty slow going.
                  Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 02-09-2008, 11:37 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

                    Those are some interesting memories that people have shared about the blizzard.
                    And I won't be here to see the day
                    It all dries up and blows away
                    I'd hang around just to see
                    But they never had much use for me
                    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

                      My Dad was in Winchester during the storm. He said the neighborhood he lived in pretty much banded together and tried to make sure everyone had enough food to get through. I guess they pretty much had to tunnel through the streets.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Thirty years ago today, the Blizzard of 78.'

                        I remember this blizzard. Crazy fun for a kid.

                        Cars burried in the street in front of our house. I remember climbing to the top of the plowed snow along the road when they did get it plowed and looking down on the road.

                        I remember going out in the storm to play and not being able to see the house from the yard.

                        That was a good one.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X