Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Q and A with JO (Star)

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Q and A with JO (Star)

    Worst' season really bothers O'Neal

    By Mike Wells
    mike.wells@indystar.com



    Indiana Pacers forward Jermaine O'Neal, who has dealt with constant injuries the past three-plus seasons, told The Star that he may sit out the rest of the season to let his ailing left knee completely heal.

    O'Neal is having his worst season since 2000-01, his first with the Pacers. O'Neal, who can opt out of the final two years of his contract at the end of the season, sat down with The Star after practice Sunday to discuss his frustrating season.

    Q: How do you feel about your latest setback?

    A: Over the last two years I've dealt with the knee situation. I tore the meniscus and last year I played, obviously, more than I should have. That took an effect.
    Knowing I was going to have surgery over the summer made me feel better about the situation. The fact of the matter of it is, since the surgery I haven't recovered. I shouldn't have started camp when I started, which was the first day.
    It was more that we have a new coach, a new style, (and) I wanted to be out there. Saying this, me coming back early, was nobody else's fault but mine. When you go through some of the tougher years that we've been through, you want to be out there and giving something.
    My teammates feel like it's important for me to take the time necessary to see if I can get back to 100 percent.

    Q: What would happen if you tried to continue to play on your knee?

    A: If I continue to play, it can not only be detrimental to me getting back to the level I'm used to playing or beyond that. The four, five, six years I have left in my career, (it) could really affect that. . . . (Playing at) 60 percent may be causing me to shorten my career and beyond that.
    It could have a major effect on my health. From all the painkillers, the injections, being able to walk. I walk with a limp now at 29 years old because the knee is so irritated in so many different areas.
    It's something that we feel like, if I totally rehab, it can get better. Playing is something I obviously want to do, but it's not in the cards right now. It's frustrating.


    Q: What have you done to help the problems with your knee?

    A: I've come to the conclusion that I don't want any more injections. I don't want to take any more pain relievers every day anymore. Even if I wanted to play right now, I couldn't play because I wouldn't be cleared to play.
    This has become more of an issue to me than just basketball and I understand it's such a tough predicament. I want to apologize to my teammates, coaching staff and the fans because I know it's important for me to be out there. In order for me to have a shot on getting back to a respectable level that I'm use to playing at, I have to take time off.


    Q: How do you think this setback will affect your future with the team? Your name has been brought up in trade rumors in the past and will likely continue to be brought up.

    A: This is a very difficult time, not only for myself, but for the team and organization because when you look at the future of a team. If they want to make a move to move me or make a move on bringing more pieces on the team with me.
    Whatever it is as far as the future it affects everybody because if you don't know where I'm at health-wise, you can't go out and send me anywhere because nobody is going to take me.
    I want the fans to understand, if I play again this year, (it would be ) absolutely great, but anything right now is based on my future.


    Q: You can opt out the final two years of your contract at the end of your season. Have you thought about what you want to do?

    A: I haven't thought about it. Conversations with doctors now is about what I need to do to have a really good finish to my career.
    At 29, that's really hard to accept, talking about what you need to do to finish your career at a high level. It's not like I'm three, four years out of being an All-Star. This was just last year. To come in and have a very average, subpar year based off my ability to move and jump has been tough.


    Q: How tough has it been on you that you're only a shade of your former self?

    A: This is the most unenjoyable year that I've had ever in my life of playing basketball. When you know you can't move and cut and jump and do the things you normally do because you're in pain, that affects emotionally how you play in a game.
    Taking the nine pain relievers a day has affected me in such a major way, to the point that I had to take a test to see how my liver is holding up. The pain I played with has been extraordinary.
    Either way this organization decides to go in the future, what I'm doing now is necessary for my career, for my livelihood after basketball and for this team. I want to be able to play sports with my kids.


    Q: What have your peers around the league told you?

    A: Everybody is saying the same thing: Step away and do the things necessary to get better. I don't want to get to a situation where I have to stop playing early in my career because my knee is so banged up.
    The doctors feel that I can get back. I just can't run and play because it's wearing the knee down.
    People that know me know I want to play and play at a certain level.
    I promise you, everybody I talked to said they watched me play this year and I just don't look the same. It's been emotionally, mentally, physically . . . a dog year.


    Q: Has there been any talk about having surgery again?

    A: That's the blessing of everything that has happened; I don't need any more surgery. The knee is just not strong enough to play.
    Everything is about resting the knee and getting all the swelling out of the knee and then strengthening it to where it was before I actually tore the meniscus.


    http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...TS04/801200444
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

    -John Wooden
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

    Anybody care to go find the articles where he talked about how he was finally completely healthy and his knee was 100%?

    I had to take a test to see how my liver is holding up.
    Considering there are tons of drugs that you have to have blood screenings for side effects, I'm not that sympathetic.

    nobody is going to take me.
    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

      It is sad, what has happened to his career - but I fear it is basically over
      Last edited by Unclebuck; 01-21-2008, 05:47 AM.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

        Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
        It is sad, what has happened to hios career - but I fear it is basically over

        I'm the biggest pessimist that ever walked the face of the earth. Even I don't think his career is over...but then again I kept thinking Bender would recover.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

          Originally posted by Kegboy View Post
          Anybody care to go find the articles where he talked about how he was finally completely healthy and his knee was 100%?

          On that theme... From Conrad Brunner of Pacers.com prior to the season:

          Originally posted by JO
          A. This is me talking just about my physical standpoint, but I feel really excited about my chances this year to get back to being dominant, to really being considered in that top five again. That's where I want to be. I've trained really hard this summer. It started off slow because obviously when you have surgery you have to go through that rough time but, man, I've hired a skills coach, Jerry Powell, who has an academy in New York and has worked with Al Harrington on his ballhandling and one-on-one skills, and he's tough.

          I really have trained this year to dominate. I really have. I'm swimming, and I've never swum in my professional career. I'm boxing, which is something I've tried but didn't sit well, but I've really taken it to hear to accomplish that particular skill. We're shooting a lot of jumpers. We're doing a lot of ballhandling stuff. You'll be surprised. I've always tinkered with shooting threes but if you were to go out and watch me shoot threes right now, you'd be like, 'wow.' We make up to 100 threes a day, and we shoot them every day. We shoot a lot of mid-range and we do a lot of stuff off the dribble.

          For the first time in my career, I'm taking vitamins. I'm on a strict diet with no fried foods. I'm here every single day. I'm making sure every small thing that gets sore is getting treated.

          I'm excited. I think the coaches are excited. I had a long conversation with Coach O'Brien and he's a change of speed for us. I like his demeanor, I like his attitude, I like his persona, I like everything about him. Obviously, he hasn't coached me yet but the consensus of the guys that have been here is that we like him. He demands that the team be a certain way and he won't accept less. Not to say anything bad about Rick (Carlisle) because I thought Rick was a pretty good coach but sometimes a change of speed is good for a team. Obviously, Rick was put in a difficult situation with so many off-the-court issues but it's almost like a new life around here, as players and coaches. I think everybody looks at this year as doing a new year and we're going to do our best to win as many games as possible.

          And on a semi-related theme (from the same piece):
          Q. You've said for the past few years, when the discussion has turned to running more, that there's a perception that style would not fit you well. But haven't you always welcomed the idea because it would allow you to better exploit your athleticism?

          A. The biggest misconception about me running is that we have played in a very structured system over the last four years. When we take the ball out, the first thing we do is look over to the sideline for the play. You cannot run and there's no need to run if they're calling every play. And I was always designated to take the ball out. So when I get downcourt, everybody's already there. Those are two significant things.

          If we run more, the defense can't set up on me. If we walk the ball down and run set plays, it's easier to guard me, it's easier to beat up on me, to double- and triple-team me. I don't want to be in that position. I want to be in the position where we can get easy transition points. Our fast-break points were so low last year it was unbelievable. If we can get 18 to 20 points a game off transition, that'd be great. That'd be big for us.
          Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

          ------

          "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

          -John Wooden

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

            For everything I have ever said about Jermaine O'Neal, and I have said a lot, I have never once doubted his desire to be on the floor and to play at a top level.

            On a purely emotional level, I feel very sorry for Jermaine as he is now facing down the truth that he is past the midway point of his career.

            My belief is that if he thought for even one min. he could play, even at a decreased capacity, he would.

            I hope for his sake he understands that his future is on the line here and actually takes the time to heal.

            If we can get it together with a good pick and a few new players who knows, maybe he can come back next year and be a big part of our team.


            Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

              A thought just crossed my mind. (we all know there is no way he will opt out of his contract) I wonder if he would accept a buyout (assuming the pacers would be willing to do that) that way the Pacers get rid of him and that would allow JO to sign with another team for a reasonable contract and a team where he could be a part-time player. I'm talking about this summer

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

                If we can't trade JO for anything worthwile than a buyout could be a solution. But what would you give the dude?
                With all the games he has missed the past years (and also counting the games he played when more than half-injured) I wouldn't give him more than 10m total for the remaining 2 years.
                Maceo Baston's #1 fan on Pacers Digest!

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

                  It is interesting timing that this article comes out right on the heels of the trade rumor articles out of NJ and NY.

                  I'm not saying it was intentional on the part of the team or JO. I'm just saying that the timing of this article very quickly shoots a big hole in the speculation created by the other two pieces.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

                    Originally posted by Alpolloloco View Post
                    If we can't trade JO for anything worthwile than a buyout could be a solution. But what would you give the dude?
                    With all the games he has missed the past years (and also counting the games he played when more than half-injured) I wouldn't give him more than 10m total for the remaining 2 years.
                    Seeing as how we owe him more than $44 million for those two years, I'm guessing his agent will laugh at someone offering less than a quarter of that.
                    Read my Pacers blog:
                    8points9seconds.com

                    Follow my twitter:
                    @8pts9secs

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

                      This sucks.. . We all know Jermaine, and what he's capable of. If he takes the rest of the year off. I hope he comes back strong, with or without the Pacers.

                      This is just giving reporters more reason to BASH Jermaine. It's fun to bash him while he's down, I guess.

                      Atleast his "last game" of the season was a memorable one against Golden State where he played his heart out. If anyone has that game digitally recorded can you talk to me, I'd like to get that game on DVD or something concrete thanks!!!
                      R.I.P. Bernic Mac & Isaac Hayes

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

                        JO takes a year off, we completely blow the rest of the season, we actually get the number 1 draft pick, who joins with a fully healed JO next year and we become the next Spurs.

                        Then I wake up.
                        BillS

                        A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                        Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

                          I don't understand how we would suck? We still got Foster. It's not like we need J.O's scoring, our team just has to play better defense and hustle a lot more. The way Diener is playing, and Graham looking promising, our team could still suprise a lot of people
                          R.I.P. Bernic Mac & Isaac Hayes

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

                            This doesn't bother me at all. I agree with those saying this is the best thing for everyone.

                            One, there are always rumors concerning JO around this time of year.

                            Two, NJ wasn't going to do a JO trade the way we read the deal in the media. Most or you overlooked the fact that that deal would have had NJ paying the luxury tax. Thus that deal would have cost them nearly three million dollars, beyond just the trade. So it wasn't going to happen.

                            Three, does anyone remember JO in his last game? He played 9:02 and had 4 turnovers. He couldn't even catch the ball. The man is really hurting. This is best for him if he really does it. I think the only way he comes back this year is if we hang on and get a playoff spot. Who knows if that will happen or not.

                            Four, this means JO isn't going to opt out of the final 2 years of his contract. Those who were hoping he would, and those who thought there was a chance he would, need to get some more cards for their deck. This is good news not bad, now the Pacers will either have a healthy O'Neal, or they will be able to get something for him.

                            Five, if we sink in the standings, so what? Do you really think we were going someplace this year? Remember how the Spurs got Duncan after David Robinson had to set out a year? There's no way I think we will be that lucky in the draft, but contrary to popular belief, lightning does strike twice. Hopefully we can get struck once . . .
                            Last edited by Will Galen; 01-21-2008, 12:31 PM.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Re: Q and A with JO (Star)

                              I hope that Jermaine can recover and get close to what he was. I really would love to see him be able to finish his career strong. The way Reggie was able to finish his career was pretty cool. He wasn't the go to guy, the leading scorer but he was a starter and had plenty left in the tank to help a contending team. I'd love to see Jermaine be able to go out like that.

                              But I just think he will never be able to recover. Taking the rest of the year off is probably the best thing he can do but I just think he will probably never being close to what he was.

                              Comment

                              Previous template Next
                              Working...
                              X