Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

    It is getting pretty bad when your teams biggest win of the year comes against barely beating the hawks. The most disheartening aspect of this season is just the lack of hope for improvement. I became a fan in the mid 80's when I was a kid and maybe I just wasn't aware of the nuances of running a basketball team, but I dont ever remember thinking that the team would be horrible forever. The Pacers were getting great draft picks we were a high scoring team with young talent (rifleman reg detlef etc.)

    This era barring a major lopsided trade or a ridiculous luck drafting just out of the lottery, we are doomed for years with a roster full of unmovable players and a gm who seems to be looking for the next steve alford.

    Does anyone really feel that there is one player on this team that will positively affect this franchise and possibly propel the Pacers to the next level (this means competing with best teams in league on a consistent basis and going deep in the playoffs?)
    then: adverb - at that time; at the time in question

    than: conjunction & preposition - introducing the second element in a comparison

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

      Originally posted by Dr. Goldfoot View Post
      I didn't watch the 4th. I can't remember the last time I voluntarily did anything of the sort, maybe never. Usually, I'm interested in seeing the guys who seldom get playing time but I didn't care tonight. I watched a couple of Flight of the Conchords episodes, some Family Guy & checked in on primary results. I'll tune in for the Suns game with the confidence they can win, I guess.
      I will admit that this is the 3rd time that I have tuned out a game....where we were doing so badly that I had little confidence that they could pull out a win. That's the problem....before this season, I would sit through the bitter end only because I don't get to watch/listen to that many games. Now that I can actually listen to them.....I find myself not caring. Unfortunately, I'm tuning out because we are such an "up and down" scoring team.

      I consider myself a die-hard Pacer fan.....a fan that is not in Indy ( which means that I can't watch them on TV). If I am effectively tuning out the Pacers cuz I have ZERO confidence in them playing well.......I wonder what the common NBA fan in Indy is doing.

      If we continue to play mediocre ball and continue to draw low attendance records at home....I really wouldn't be surprised if the Pacers Ownership doesn't consider making a major change to the FO in the offeason. Honestly, I think that TPTB tried to put out a better product to win back fans.....and unfortunately, they aren't buying it.
      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

        Originally posted by odeez View Post
        erase...erase...erase

        I wish I could, erase this season and the way it is going for the Pacers. Back and forth, win one lose two. We need to blow this up. That is just my opinion of course, but not sure there is another way. Making the playoffs in the weak Eastern conference is nothing to get excited about, really. No way we can touch Detroit and Boston.

        Well at least I have the Warriors here in Oakland, now that is an exciting team. But my damn heart always pulls for the Pacers, but I ask why more and more.

        Are you going to the Indy game on Sunday? I am so afraid that the Ws are going to humiliate the Pacers that I'm considering not wearing my Pacers jersey.
        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

          As a true and diehard Pacers fan, it's hard to see the team existing in this state where we are as inconsistent as ever and there isn't much to look forward to in terms of the games. I really would not have a problem with all this if it was for a purpose, but apparently we have our mind set in merely making the playoffs (which I really don't care for if it means improving our lotto standing).

          So, in conclusion, please LB and JOB, pull out the tank. Come draft day, you won't regret it.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

            Originally posted by indypacerfan54 View Post

            Does anyone really feel that there is one player on this team that will positively affect this franchise and possibly propel the Pacers to the next level (this means competing with best teams in league on a consistent basis and going deep in the playoffs?)

            No. There's nobody on the Pacers roster who can propel the team to the top of the standings.

            But there are some good players on the team. We can build with them, even if we can't build around them.

            That was a very disappointing loss, though. (This is probably the shortest, least enthusiastic Post Game thread ever.)
            And I won't be here to see the day
            It all dries up and blows away
            I'd hang around just to see
            But they never had much use for me
            In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

              Far be it from me to ever blame the offense for the poor defense. But 26 turnovers will always make your defense look really bad, because the other team is getting fastbreak after fastbreak, and then when you throw in all the missed threes that typicallly result in long rebounds those often lead to fastbreaks also.

              Last night was bad, but I'm not giving up on this team - I still have hope they can start playing like they were about 3 weeks ago.

              But the lack of confidence the team has right now is very evident.

              Roam, I wouldn't bother watching any of the game. The only player I enjoyed a little bit tonight was Foster.

              Edit: Gnome - I take that back you really need to watch the part of the game when Harrison is on the floor, because you have to see it to believe it - our discription of it will not do it justice. I think he played in the second quarter
              Last edited by Unclebuck; 01-09-2008, 10:24 AM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

                Utah is a well-built, talented team. We are not.

                Originally that first sentence was a lot longer, but I shortened it down to not be so reactionary.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

                  Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                  Are you going to the Indy game on Sunday? I am so afraid that the Ws are going to humiliate the Pacers that I'm considering not wearing my Pacers jersey.
                  We aggree on a lot of issues, but come on now, don't be afraid to be a Pacersfan in public.
                  2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                  2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                  2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

                    Originally posted by Mal View Post
                    I find myself questioning if Jackson/Miller/Mullin/Smits were truly as bad defensively as we once thought. Not that I now think they were very good or anything, but damn.
                    Those guys at least knew how to stay close to the guy they were defending and they didn't gamble\foul like this team does.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

                      Originally posted by Roaming Gnome View Post
                      Wasn't home to watch the game, but when I heard they were down 32 when I was in the truck, I just turned off the radio.

                      Is there any reason to watch the recording, or should I just erase it off the DVR?
                      Normally I'm a "watch it all" type, and I did watch all of this. But honestly there just isn't much worth watching. I don't think a single player showed much positive. Even guys with okay nights showed nothing new and did more bad than good.

                      I mean 40 points in a quarter. That's almost 2 baskets per minute. If you let a team just pick up a ball at the other baseline, score it as quickly as possible but made them run back to the other baseline to pick up the next ball I bet they'd have trouble scoring much more than 40.

                      Of course when you turn it over to them at midcourt that makes it a lot shorter distance, so the Jazz had an advantage.


                      Look at the Jazz game here and then this one and explain to me how the team is "getting it". The Jazz came fumbling into this game too.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Pacers vs. Jazz Post-Game Thread: Utah wins in a rout

                        Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                        Roam, I wouldn't bother watching any of the game. The only player I enjoyed a little bit tonight was Foster.

                        Edit: Gnome - I take that back you really need to watch the part of the game when Harrison is on the floor, because you have to see it to believe it - our discription of it will not do it justice. I think he played in the second quarter
                        Ditto. Hulk barely containing the green and a couple of his fouls where he was losing it is worth seeing for the spectacle of it.

                        And as I've said before, FOSTER IS THE BEST DUNKER ON THE TEAM, as in quickest up with it close to the rim, in traffic, on the run. No one does that better than he does. That dunk he hit last night where he came down and nearly broke his freaking back, who makes that play better than Jeff?

                        Jeff taking a pass on the run 2 feet from the rim is a dunk every time it seems. That's his version of the crazy Quis layup in traffic.


                        Of course there was also a classic case of Jeff's "meaningless offensive rebound" where he put it back up horribly, missing the rim entirely and basically just giving it to the Jazz. A play where you say "why bother even getting that rebound if that's what you're doing with it?"


                        Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                        At the 3rd Qtr,we were down by 20 Pts. At that point, I just turned off Nba radio. Is anyone else getting bored of PacerBall?
                        Hopefully none of the people that raved in the preseason threads and early season threads. How about everyone that blasted me for the "Cakewalk preseason" thread? Whoops.

                        Yet ironically I just picked up tickets for several games. I'll watch them into the lottery or on a miracle 5th seed rally. Whatever, it's ball and I'm a Hoosier.
                        Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 01-09-2008, 12:12 PM.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X