View Poll Results: Well?

Voters
46. You may not vote on this poll
  • Danny

    11 23.91%
  • Mike

    16 34.78%
  • Equally important

    19 41.30%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: Dunleavy or Granger?

  1. #1
    Member LoneGranger33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Age
    28
    Posts
    17,394

    Default Dunleavy or Granger?

    The question is simple - Who's scoring is more important to the team, and why? Take into account what the players offer besides scoring when considering your response.

    Record in games in which they have scored 20 or more points:
    Granger 9-3
    Dunleavy 7-4

    Do we need them both to score 20 consistently, or is it more important that one of them reaches a score of scores more frequently?

  2. #2
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,982

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    I think they are equally important exactly because they offer other stuff besides the scoring.

    Dun Dun brings extra playmaking, intelligence just too mention some of the things, while Danny brings extra defensive wingspin and is about the only effective defensive player on the swingspots.

    They both are equally important.

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  3. #3

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    I'd say equal at this point although I think Danny still needs to score to be have a good game.
    So maybe Danny.

    More importantly, I've noticed every time JO leads the team in scoring neither one of these players do.
    "They could turn out to be only innocent mathematicians, I suppose," muttered Woevre's section officer, de Decker.

    "'Only.'" Woevre was amused. "Someday you'll explain to me how that's possible. Seeing that, on the face of it, all mathematics leads, doesn't it, sooner or later, to some kind of human suffering."

  4. #4
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,982

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by Arcadian View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd say equal at this point although I think Danny still needs to score to be have a good game.
    So maybe Danny.

    More importantly, I've noticed every time JO leads the team in scoring neither one of these players do.
    It's because both of them are then just not moving, not taking shots or are shooting badly, so JO is FORCED to shoot a lot... .
















    yeah, I was beying sarcastic.
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  5. #5
    J.O. To The T.O. Oneal07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,459

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Danny is a better defender!!! Not lockdown, but is better!!! We need Both to play well overall!!!

    If we can get JO, Danny and Mike to play well all the time. We would be winning more games. Remember also Jamaal is out
    R.I.P. Bernic Mac & Isaac Hayes

  6. #6
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,982

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneal07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Danny is a better defender!!! Not lockdown, but is better!!! We need Both to play well overall!!!

    If we can get JO, Danny and Mike to play well all the time. We would be winning more games. Remember also Jamaal is out

    True words spoken. I hope that is possible though, really hope so as it would be truly great for this team.

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  7. #7
    It Might Be a Soft J JayRedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    12,158

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by Arcadian View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    More importantly, I've noticed every time JO leads the team in scoring neither one of these players do.
    Nice.
    Read my Pacers blog:
    8points9seconds.com

    Follow my twitter:

    @8pts9secs


  8. #8
    The light, not the lie. kester99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Disgusta, GA
    Posts
    8,829
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by JayRedd View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Nice.
    Nah. He's right. I went back thru the boxscores. Good catch, Arc.

    On a more serious note, Dunleavy consistently pulls more assists. Danny tops him in blocks, and fouls, unfortunately...118 vs 82 total for the season. Danny has the most fouls of any Pacer....although on a per minute basis, Harrison, Diogu, Williams, Foster, Murph and O'Neal (in that order) foul at a higher clip.

    Just shows where Danny can continue to improve. We need both wings to be deadly.
    Last edited by kester99; 01-06-2008 at 02:19 PM.
    [~]) ... Cheers! Go Pacers!

  9. #9
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    I voted Danny because he disappears more than Mike when his shot isn't falling. He's an X-factor right now. Also, not only do you get the points on the board when his shot's falling, but those are the nights where he attacks the basket more, and you see a hop in his step on defense, which can lead to blocks, steals, deflections.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    We need SOMEBODY to do it every night.

    It doesn't have to be the same guy every night.

    What thrills me the most is seeing a different player excel from night to night. It could be Daniels. It could be Rush, It could be Williams. It could be Murphy.

    It is gonna be Granger or Dunleavy more often than anyone else. But there are five players on the court all the time and it could be any one of them.

    I want a game strategy that gets everything the opponent allows.
    And I won't be here to see the day
    It all dries up and blows away
    I'd hang around just to see
    But they never had much use for me
    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

  11. #11
    Member LoneGranger33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Age
    28
    Posts
    17,394

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    I said Mike because he's more of a defensive liability, but I think we need him more now that Tinsley is out because of his passing.

  12. #12
    Member idioteque's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    washington dc
    Age
    28
    Posts
    9,519

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    I'm starting to become afraid that Granger's ceiling is Dunleavy with a little more defense and athleticism.

  13. #13
    The light, not the lie. kester99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Disgusta, GA
    Posts
    8,829
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by dcpacersfan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm starting to become afraid that Granger's ceiling is Dunleavy with a little more defense and athleticism.
    I don't think that would be a bad thing. And I'm not even sure we've seen Dunleavy's ceiling yet.

    Bottom line (or one of them) here is that if we keep this group mostly together, and not trade 2 or 3 of them, we will start reaping the rewards that come with continuity. Look at Detroit's first five. Greater than the sum of their parts because they've played so much together. We haven't even come close to seeing that kind of effect here yet.

    Which is why I don't talk trade seriously. The flashes of brilliance that Danny, Dun and JT have shown in the up-tempo game could be something we see more and more...I hope I hope I hope.
    [~]) ... Cheers! Go Pacers!

  14. #14
    Member CableKC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA ( 1123, 6536, 5321 )
    Age
    41
    Posts
    24,571

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    To make this more interesting....you should have added JONeal to the poll.

    Who should lead the team in scoring on a regular basis going forward?

    Our #1 scoring option prior to this season ( JONeal )...our Future ( Granger )...or whatever Dunleavy does.
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    This is David West, he is the Honey Badger, West just doesn't give a *****....he's pretty bad *ss cuz he has no regard for any other Player or Team whatsoever.

  15. #15
    NaptownSeth is all feel Naptown_Seth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Downtown baby
    Posts
    12,618

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    I voted Danny because despite his defense (which is overrated right now due to awareness) he struggles to impact games away from scoring, while Dun clearly is productive just by touching the ball every time down.

    Dun is almost always involved in some way, Danny typically is only involved if he is scoring.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mal View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I voted Danny because he disappears more than Mike when his shot isn't falling. He's an X-factor right now. Also, not only do you get the points on the board when his shot's falling, but those are the nights where he attacks the basket more, and you see a hop in his step on defense, which can lead to blocks, steals, deflections.
    Exactly

  16. #16

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I voted Danny because despite his defense (which is overrated right now due to awareness) he struggles to impact games away from scoring, while Dun clearly is productive just by touching the ball every time down.

    Dun is almost always involved in some way, Danny typically is only involved if he is scoring.
    I don't think Danny's D is overrated, and some of us even underrate it!

    Untill now Shawne hasn't convinced me one bit as a future defensive stopper, while Danny has shown flashes of great defense.
    Maceo Baston's #1 fan on Pacers Digest!

  17. #17
    It Might Be a Soft J JayRedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    12,158

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpolloloco View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Danny has shown flashes of great defense.
    I must have blinked.

    He's never impressed me for even a full quarter. Too many missed assignments and rotations, let alone his inability to really stop penetration. He just has too many possessions where he seems disinterested.

    As for the overall topic, I voted Mike. Like the 2nd Quarter against Atlanta or in New York a few weeks back, the team just explodes when he goes on his little scoring runs. I don't have any proof, but it seems like every time he makes a nice look to a cutter for a bucket and then, say, hits a three next time down, we heat up. Next thing you know dudes are getting deflections, MDJ is getting to the rim for a lay-in and then sticking one of those awkward, step-back 15 footers off the dribble that somehow goes in. Then other dudes start hitting threes and Quis or Jamaal start getting into the paint. Him doing well just sparkplugs the whole team.

    Now that I think about it, I say we trade Danny. Mike's quite a bit better than him, they play the same position, and we could get someone pretty good for Danny. Plus we have Quisy for a few more years to back up Mike, and Shawne is okay too.

    It's time.

    Trade the Gift.
    Last edited by JayRedd; 01-06-2008 at 04:40 PM.
    Read my Pacers blog:
    8points9seconds.com

    Follow my twitter:

    @8pts9secs


  18. #18
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,982

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by kester99 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Danny has the most fouls of any Pacer....although on a per minute basis, Harrison, Diogu, Williams, Foster, Murph and O'Neal (in that order) foul at a higher clip.

    Just shows where Danny can continue to improve. We need both wings to be deadly.
    Maybe that's because on most nights Danny has to guard the opponents top SF or SG, so to me it's totally logical that he makes a lot of fouls.

    I aggree that we need both wingplayers to make their respective contributions (more) consistantly if the team wants to reach the play-offs let stand have even a shimmer of a chance of advancing in it.

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  19. #19

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by JayRedd View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I must have blinked. He's never impressed me for even a full quarter. Too many missed assignments and rotations, let alone his inability to really stop penetration. He just has too many possessions where he seems disinterested.

    As for the overall topic, I voted Mike. Like the 2nd Quarter against Atlanta or in New York a few weeks back, the team just explodes when he goes on his little scoring runs. I don't have any proof, but it seems like every time he makes a nice look to a cutter for a bucket and then, say, hits a three next time down, we heat up. Next thing you know dudes are getting deflections, MDJ is getting to the rim for a lay-in and then sticking one of those awkward, step-back 15 footers off the dribble that somehow goes in.

    Now that I think about it, I say we trade Danny. Mike's quite a bit better than him, they play the same position, and we could get someone pretty good for Danny. Plus we have Quisy for a few more years to back him up, and Shawne is okay too.

    It's time. Trade the Gift.
    Nah I'd rather trade Williams. Danny is a class act while Shawne already has a police record.
    Maceo Baston's #1 fan on Pacers Digest!

  20. #20

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    They both need to score for this team to be effective.......

  21. #21
    It Might Be a Soft J JayRedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    12,158

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpolloloco View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Nah I'd rather trade Williams. Danny is a class act while Shawne already has a police record.
    Cool. Trade em both then. Mike's a lot better than either one.
    Read my Pacers blog:
    8points9seconds.com

    Follow my twitter:

    @8pts9secs


  22. #22
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,982

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by JayRedd View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Now that I think about it, I say we trade Danny. Mike's quite a bit better than him, they play the same position, and we could get someone pretty good for Danny. Plus we have Quisy for a few more years to back up Mike, and Shawne is okay too.

    It's time.

    Trade the Gift.
    While Dannie is far from flawless and Mike is not as bad a defender as some make him out to be I still shrug about the thought of Mike having to defend the James, Bryants, Dengs, Ginobili's, Ray Allen's, McGrady's, Richardson, etc of this world.

    So, unless we get a top defender for Granger I really am hesistant of such an idea.

    But, maybe you are beying sarcastic, I'm not sure .

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  23. #23
    It Might Be a Soft J JayRedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    12,158

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mourning View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    While Dannie is far from flawless and Mike is not as bad a defender as some make him out to be I still shrug about the thought of Mike having to defend the James, Bryants, Dengs, Ginobili's, Ray Allen's, McGrady's, Richardson, etc of this world.

    So, unless we get a top defender for Granger I really am hesistant of such an idea.

    But, maybe you are beying sarcastic, I'm not sure .

    Regards,

    Mourning
    Nope. For once I'm not.

    Obviously, Mike isn't gonna be our go to defender on the perimeter. We need to find someone else to do that. But it's not like we have anyone doing it now either. Danny's big and strong, but he's not much of challenge for the elite swing men in this League. (And please don't put ever put Jason Richardson on that list again.)

    I just don't see much reason to extend Danny at, say 4 years/$50 million when we already have Dunleavy signed for less. You can't pay two SFs $10 million-ish per year. It's just dumb.

    If we're so worried about defense all of the sudden, then get a PG that can help out. And maybe sign a SG. That would be novel. Danny for someone with a both-ways skill set of, say, Corey Maggette would be fine.
    Last edited by JayRedd; 01-06-2008 at 05:04 PM.
    Read my Pacers blog:
    8points9seconds.com

    Follow my twitter:

    @8pts9secs


  24. #24
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,982

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    Quote Originally Posted by JayRedd View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Nope. For once I'm not.

    Obviously, Mike isn't gonna be our go to defender on the perimeter. We need to find someone else to do that. But it's not like we have anyone doing it now either. Danny's big and strong, but he's not much of challenge for the elite swing men in this League. (And please don't put ever put Jason Richardson on that list again.)

    I just don't see much reason to extend Danny at, say 4 years/$50 million when we already have Dunleavy signed for less. You can't pay two SFs $10 million-ish per year. It's just dumb.

    If we're so worried about defense all of the sudden, then get a PG that can help out. And maybe sign a SG. That would be novel. Danny for someone with a both-ways skill set of, say, Corey Maggette would be fine.
    Ok. Well not much to really disaggree with. Few points though.

    I will aggree that Danny isn't a premier defender, but I would say he is by far the best what we have at the swingman positions in this role (though Rush seems to be doing pretty well defensively aswell as of late, can't see him playing more then 20 minutes a game unless it's forced because of say things like injuries).

    Sure, he generally doesn't lock down the elite swingmen he faces, but they aren't considered elite for nothing so the group of players who actually CAN lock them down or slow them down considerably is going to be rather small.

    I think Danny is also suffering from the fact that he a lot of times has to not only defend the opposing teams first offensive option, but is also expected to create a sizable offensive output himself (scoring). Then I think he can also become a better defender by a decent margin (but, maybe I am wrong here) to easily put him in the "good defenders" group. Players who don't lock down the opposing elite players totally, but can certainly slow them down or very frequently frustrate them into bad shooting nights.

    Let Mike defend the players Danny is defending and I think those players have career nights against the Pacers more then often. I don't think he is awfull on defense, but nevertheless at best he still is average at that part of the game. I dunno getting back a good SG who could defend would make me consider moving Danny, but that player would have to be better then say a Luther Head or somebody like him.

    Then you mention the contract issues. I aggree that it would generally be stupid to pay two of your players at the same position large amounts of salary. However, a lot of games they don't play the same position (logical because they play a lot of the time together)

    And does this position of yours also mean dropping JO as he has an albatross contract, which is endangering our ability to resign any of our younger players at all, because we also have another player with a huge contract at the same position(s) he plays at in Murphy?

    Offcourse, I would prefer to drop Troy instead of JO, but I doubt anyone in the league could be enticed to take that baite, while I still have some (verrrrry) slim hope for JO in that respect.

    Regards,

    Mourning
    Last edited by Mourning; 01-06-2008 at 05:27 PM.
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  25. #25
    It Might Be a Soft J JayRedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    12,158

    Default Re: Dunleavy or Granger?

    I think we should have traded JO like 12 months ago. But that's sort of beside the point.

    To me, there's only three things that matter here: 1) Mike's better than Danny, 2) I believe Mike will continue to be better than Danny, and 3) we only need one starting SF.

    So unless you think Danny is gonna be some 5-time All Star, it comes down to money and where to best spend your resources. Next year, we'll be paying a combined $16 million for Dun and Quis. Those two guys (plus Shawne, who's still on a rookie deal through 2010) are more than capable of playing 48 minutes at SF on a winning basketball team, IMO. And they can both play a little fill-in SG (while Shawne can maybe play some fill-in PF).

    And since trading either Mike or Marquis is gonna be difficult (contract/soft reputation and injury history, respectively) and trading Danny would give us back a legit asset, why would we not just trade Danny for something we actually need?

    Maybe I'm being a little hasty (I did just come to this conclusion five minutes ago), but it just seems to make sense. I just think Mike is better, and I'm not too too worried about the short-term fall-out of making our horrible perimeter defense slightly more horribler. And, presumably, the person we're trading Danny for would be a SG with at least as much individual defensive acumen as Granger.

    As for stopping the elites, of course no one does that. Not Bruce Bowen, Gerald Wallace or Ron Artest. But a lot of guys make them work for their points. I don't think Danny makes them work much. He's not even close to other SFs like Richard Jefferson or Tayshaun. I'm guessing every elite perimeter player in the league licks their chops when they know Indy is coming up on their schedule. "Whew...I can drop 30 without tiring myself up for this upcoming West Coast road trip." I really wonder how many starting SFs he's actually better than defensively. As long as we pair Dunleavy with someone as good defensively as Jack or Ricky Davis, I don't think we'll see any drop off (and, hopefully, we will get someone significantly better than those two).

    Age is the only reason I'd rather have Danny. But for the next 4-5 years, I expect Mike to stay better. He just has a lot more skills.
    Last edited by JayRedd; 01-06-2008 at 06:07 PM.
    Read my Pacers blog:
    8points9seconds.com

    Follow my twitter:

    @8pts9secs


Similar Threads

  1. Is Mike Dunleavy the new Stephen Jackson?
    By idioteque in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-08-2008, 01:17 PM
  2. Dunleavy, The Pacers, and Top Draft Picks
    By naptownmenace in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 01:32 PM
  3. Granger reminds Magic of the past
    By Will Galen in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-10-2007, 12:56 AM
  4. Dunleavy says that Offense is Better When he is involved
    By andreialta in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 11-30-2007, 12:06 PM
  5. Granger = EC Player of the Week
    By Mr.ThunderMakeR in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 11-06-2007, 12:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •