Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

    Originally posted by Alpolloloco View Post
    JO played well at the defensive end, so maybe he better concentrated on that end insteas of forcing too many shots on offense.
    JO blocked 4 shots against Memphis also. Whether this team wins or loses isn't really affected by JO anymore. Granted thats a bad thing considering his contract, but to say well we lost cause of JO or we won because of JO it just generally isn't true anymore. The play of Dun, Granger, Rush, Quis, and Tins is far more important in successfully exectuing Obie's gameplan.


    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

      Originally posted by Indy View Post
      JO shot 10 times tonight. He shot 11 times against Memphis, and was just generally all around bad. He shot 26 times against the Bobcats, but also pulled down 13 boards and had 5 assists. He shot 20 times against the Pistons at Conseco, but again 11 boards and 5 assists. Against the Pistons at the Palace he shot 13 times and made 8 scoring 25 points. Against the Hawks (the start of this losing streak) he shot 14 times, but again pulled down 10 boards.

      So its not like JO's shot selection was significantly less than usual except for the Bobcats game and the home game against the Pistons. However pretty much everything else JO did was on par with what he did against Memphis (except his rebounding was better agiainst the Grizz). So unless you're saying we're a better team when JO doesn't rebound or pass the ball effectively, I think all this proved is something we already knew. If Granger and Dun are hot, the Pacers win. All that probably means is our three pointers are falling. This isn't anything new. Its just a shame Dun and Granger never want to step up consistently. That along with Tins has been the key to the successful stretches for this team.
      You make some good points. I would like to know, however, if there is a tendency to defer to JO that hinders the team and particularly ball movement. It just seems that when Dunleavy gets hot, Granger does too....and clearly it was not dependent solely on JT. There is some trigger here because it seems like the perimeter players blow up at the same time. Maybe it's just the competition...

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

        Originally posted by bellisimo View Post
        did we win this - or did the Hawks give one away?
        Originally posted by aero View Post
        was our D good tonight, or did Atlanta really play that bad ? or was it a mixture of both ?
        I think we just hit so many three pointers that we took all the wind out of their sails, and there wasn't that much to begin with.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

          Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
          You make some good points. I would like to know, however, if there is a tendency to defer to JO that hinders the team and particularly ball movement. It just seems that when Dunleavy gets hot, Granger does too....and clearly it was not dependent solely on JT. There is some trigger here because it seems like the perimeter players blow up at the same time. Maybe it's just the competition...
          I just think thats how it is. If one guy gets hot other perimeter players feed off of it. The Seattle Supersonics got a fluke 50 win season out of Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis staying ridiculously hot for 90% of the season. Unfortunately Dun and Granger are not Ray Ray and Shard.
          To me its just one of those things. I don't think this game tells us that much about this team. Just like I don't think that Memphis game tells us a whole lot.
          Granger shot 5/6 from the arc and Dun shot 4/6 from the arc. I don't think that has anything to do with gameplanning. Just hitting their shots for once.


          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

            On a scale from 1 to 10, Ike Diogu was absolutely horrible tonight.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

              Originally posted by LoneGranger33 View Post
              On a scale from 1 to 10, Ike Diogu was absolutely horrible tonight.
              In other news, the sky is blue and the grass is green.

              Ike sucks.


              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                Ok, what was different tonight?

                This is what showed up in the box score:
                1) Far less shooting by JO
                2) Far more shooting and effectiveness by other players, not just Granger and Dun.

                That is all.
                Really, that's all????

                Because a 9 of 12 spot from behind the arc by the wings is par for course.
                Come on man, they did what they've done several times this season, shoot their way into a victory.

                Or was tonight finally the night guys were "open". Not according to JOB it wasn't, by his count they are open all the time and miss shots, as in "we lost tonight because guys missed open shots".

                I predict that the Pacers will win 80% of the games they go 52% from 3 on 20+ attempts at the very least. Call me crazy, but that's how I roll when I'm not busting outta bathrooms with a big Indian at my side.


                In a happier tone, THANK FREAKING GOD! This doesn't save the season or flip it back to "hey, this is how it goes with .500 teams", it's too little too late for that. Now they need to go win some surprise games on the road to get back to that status. But at least they dodged the "we're F'd" stage...for now.

                Oh, and they also decided to totally destroy them just so they could also confuse the heck out of us as we try to figure them out.
                Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 01-04-2008, 10:18 PM.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                  Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                  Ok, what was different tonight?

                  This is what showed up in the box score:
                  1) Far less shooting by JO
                  2) Far more shooting and effectiveness by other players, not just Granger and Dun.

                  That is all.
                  I looked at the shot chart for JONeal...and he took 6 of his shots from the Low-Post ( between 2 to 5 feet from the basket ) where he hit 5 of those shots. Outside of the paint...he only hit 1 of the 5 shots he took.

                  That is what we need from our PF......take only efficient shots that he has a good chance of making. If JONeal only took shots like this...then he would be way more effective in this offense.
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                    Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                    The more JO gets touches, the more DG and DunDun will vanish...and the more likely we struggle to score points efficiently. None of this should be a surprise.

                    This only happens when DG and Dun don't move when JO has the ball....when they move, JO draws the double and gets the ball to them for a good shot!
                    Go Pacers!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                      I'm just glad I didn't get mad and leave before the 4th quarter started this time. Progress? I sure hope so.
                      "Just look at the flowers ........ BANG" - Carol "The Walking Dead"

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                        Originally posted by BobbyMac View Post
                        This only happens when DG and Dun don't move when JO has the ball....when they move, JO draws the double and gets the ball to them for a good shot!
                        And to follow up on that JO was coming off a couple of back to back 5 assist games. I'd say he was being a darn good facilitator. With or without JO I've seen some of these guys go into stand mode, and neither Dun nor Danny can afford to just stand and watch the post or even just the ball from the weakside. And yet you see it creep into their games, Danny especially.

                        JO passes out of the post all the time. His "slog ball" is simply waiting for the double to come, not some intentional slow down attempt. Now maybe JOB doesn't want them to wait for that, but isn't that a prime benefit of a low post threat?

                        Get it to JO, cut the lane or pull a baseline give and go, and even if he doesn't pass it you've pulled a defender off him to protect the passing lane and now he's got space to attack in close.

                        Or stand and watch as he gets doubled from the weakside with good rotation and is pressured into a tough jumper. Some of this is on JO, but not nearly as much as he is blamed for.

                        Since the losses began JO has assists of 6, 3, 1, 4, 5, 5, 1 and the 3 tonight. That's a 3.5 apg average.
                        Now Dunleavy in those same 8 games: 3, 7, 4 ,3, 2, 2, 2, 2 for a 3.1 apg average.


                        And then at the other end just to show his value you have these blocks in the last 8: 2, 6, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 4 = 3.25 blocks per game.

                        Go look at true PF/C players and find how many dish 3.5+ AND get 3.2 blocks for you. That's gotta be a very short list. Just the assists over 3.0 cut out all but Dirk, KG, Josh Smith, Diaw (3.3), Boozer (3.0), Camby (3.1), Duncan (3.0) and B. Miller (3.0). Of those only Josh Smith and Camby are over 3.0 blocks on the year too.

                        And to this we say "boy JO has been the cause of our problems lately".


                        Not only all of that, but the funny thing is JO just came off a strong FG% month by his standards, a respectable 48.5% December.
                        Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 01-04-2008, 10:59 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                          My post-game commentary/game observations:

                          - Great team and individual defense tonight. Sometimes a 3-hr practice and 90 minute film session will do a team good!

                          - Granger and Dunleavy finally got their games going at the same time. OUTSTANDING!

                          - Was good to see JO finally get uncorked out their in the 2nd half. We needed to have atleast one Big have his game going. JO played very smart out there. He started kicking the ball out instead of fighting through the double-team.

                          - I still don't like Quis at the Point. I think he tries to do too much from that position. He doesn't have very good court vision, and his decision making on passes is questionable. I'd rather he stick w/playing from the 2-Guard.

                          - It was smart of Dun to take charge of the offense and...well, just take charge out there! He really sparked the offense and blew this game wide open! But the real benefit to him running the offense was that he allowed Quis to focus more on his game. (I really don't think JOB had anything to do with that because when it happened no time-out was called. Dun just did it!)

                          - Rush finally had a better than average game as well.

                          - It was good to finally see David Harrison back out there. I like his progress far and above over Ike's. This team could use another big body who's willing to rebound, block shots and score w/the short- to mid-range jump shot.

                          Overall, a good win by my boyz! Now, go out and show you can play w/teams out West and surprise some folks and win 4-5. (I can dream can't I? )

                          GO PACERS!

                          Naptown Seth,

                          As usual, good observations. I'm always very surprised at all this folks who continue to devalue JO in JOB's offense. I knew it would be a matter of time before he grasps some things, but overall, I like how he has tried to make the adjustments. I think he's far more important to this team's offense and defense than most fans care to admit. Most just want him gone so they can feel more comfortable and this team moving forward post-brawl. I say, "Get over it already!" Even the media has started to back off that old story. So should the fans.
                          Last edited by NuffSaid; 01-04-2008, 11:07 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                            There is a correlation between Jermaine's shot attempts and the Pacers win/loss record. Big men, particularly star big men (a la O'Neal) are suppose to be your teams most efficient scorers. Jermaine is not even close to ours. 1.11 points-per-shot is bad for a guard, and utterly horrible for a power forward. He and Tinsley are the two reasons we're always amongst the bottom of the league in team field goal percentage.

                            Here's a stat...

                            We're 7-13 when J.O. takes 12 shots or more. That's .350 winning percentage, or 29-53 over an 82 game schedule.

                            We're 9-5 when he takes 11 shots or less (including games he doesn't play). That's .643, or 53-29 over an 82 game schedule.

                            Both Mike and Danny have proven to be far more reliable, effective scorers than Jermaine this year. So why is J.O. still our first option? It doesn't help the team win, both stats and anyone watching the games can tell you that. So what gives?

                            This team would be much better off if Jermaine O'Neal turned into a Marcus Camby clone and focused more on defense and rebounding, only taking high percentage shots, while letting the offense run through Mike and Danny.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                              Originally posted by bellisimo View Post
                              did we win this - or did the Hawks give one away?
                              What??? I can't even believe you're asking that question!! The Pacers took this game from the very beginning. Have you seen the box scores? Two back-to-back 30+ pt quarter (2nd and 3rd) not to mention they won every quarter except the 4th, and they would have won it had JOB not pulled the starters near the 7 minute. They fought back every run the Hawks made and attacked the basket alot more than they had been doing up until these last three games.

                              No, my friend. The Hawks didn't give this game away. The Pacers demanded it, command it and won it on their terms!

                              Now, one can only hope they perform as well on their WCRT.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Hawks/Pacers Post Game 34: Revenge served

                                When I don't watch a game, we win, When I watch the game we lose. . .The Pacers must not like me. . . . But I'm glad to see balance in our attack.

                                I'm also glad to come home and not see another L in our column
                                R.I.P. Bernic Mac & Isaac Hayes

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X